Статистика
Translator
Скачать
Вниманию авторов
Индексирование журнала
Содержание журнала
Historical experienceSamigullin V.K.To be an advocate is fashionable and honourable! The thoughts cast by memories of activity of the Bashkir Republican Bar during the preperestroika period
Purpose: Consideration of separate legal and organizational aspects of activity of the Russian legal profession in the late eighties - the beginning of the 90th years of the XX century.Methodology: Historical and legal and formal-legal methods and method of the included supervision were applied.Results: In work separate aspects of the organization and activity of legal profession and also professional activity of lawyers in the Republic of Bashkortostan and the Russian Federation in the late eighties - the beginning of the 90th years of the XX century are considered.Novelty/originality/value: Article is of a certain scientific and practical value as in it with use of a method of the included supervision the author’s assessment of activity of certain lawyers and bodies of lawyer self-government is given in the Republic of Bashkortostan and the Russian Federation in the late eighties - the beginning of the 90th years of the XX century.Keywords: legal profession, lawyer, legal profession history, legal profession of the Republic of Bashkortostan, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. Advokatura v SSSR. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1971.2. Barshhevskij M.Ju. Organizacija i dejatel’nost’ advokatury v Rossii. – M.: Jurist#, 1997.3. Vlasov A.A. Advokatura v konstitucionno-pravovom pole // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2014. – № 4 (71). – S. 123–124.4. Gol’diner V.D. Zashhititel’naja rech’. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1970.5. Kazakov V.N., Dobrieva M.D. Kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ (inostrannyj i mezhdunarodno-pravovoj opyt) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 4 (31). – S. 22–28.6. Linejceva K.S. K voprosu o pravovoj kul’ture i razvitii institutov grazhdanskogo obshhestva // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 9.7. Oreshnikov V.I. Stanovlenie i formirovanie instituta advokatury v carskoj Rossii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 210–227.8. Potashnik I.M. Problemy realizacii pravozashhitnoj funkcii advokatury po okazaniju kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi naseleniju v uslovijah reformirovanija sudebnoj sistemy Rossijskoj Federacii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 11 (51). – S. 54–71.9. Rol’ i zadachi sovetskoj advokatury / Рod red. A.Ja. Suhareva. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1972.10. Smirnov V.N., Usmanov R.R. Istorija advokatury Srednego Urala. – Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyj universitet, 1999.11. Chernyshov V.V. K voprosu o meste i roli pravo-ohranitel’noj dejatel’nosti // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 4.12. Chilingarjan K.P. Sovety advokatam: rech’ i kak donesti ee v sude // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 3.
Historical experienceMelnichenko R.G.The disciplinary offenses connected with reporting discipline of the barrister before the principal and deduction of money and documents
Purpose: Research of the separate disciplinary offenses existing in the Russian jury legal profession.Methodology: Formal-legal and historical-legal methods were used.Results: In article such structures of disciplinary offenses of barristers as violation of reporting discipline of the lawyer before the principal and deduction by the lawyer of money and documents of the client are analyzed. The historical and legal analysis of similar offenses in the period of jury and modern legal profession is carried out.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses the high scientific value as is one of the first attempts to provide the historical and legal characteristic of disciplinary offenses of barristers.Keywords: juror, lawyer, disciplinary responsibility, reporting discipline, deduction of money and documents.References (transliterated)1. Arsen’ev K.K. Zametki o russkoj advokature. Obzor dejatel’nosti S.-Peterburgskogo soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh za 1886–74 g. – S.-Peterburg#, 1875.2. Vtoroj otchet Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh okruga Odesskoj sudebnoj palaty za 1906–1907 g. – Odessa: Tipografija Juzhno-Russkogo Obshhestva Pechatnogo d#la, 1907.3. Markov A.N. Pravila advokatskoj professii v Rossii. – M.: Tipografija O.L. Somovoj, 1913.4. Otchet o dejatel’nosti Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh okruga Har’kovskoj sudebnoj palaty za 1905–1906 g. (s 15 fevralja 1905 goda po 15 fevralja 1906 goda). – Har’kov: Tipografija Advol’fa Darre, 1906.5. Otchet Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh okruga Odesskoj sudebnoj palaty za 1905–1906 g. – Odessa: Tipografija Juzhno-Russkogo Obshhestva Pechatnogo d#la., 1906.6. Reshenie Moskovskogo Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh ot 1904 g. // Cit. po: Markov A.N. Pravila advokatskoj professii v Rossii. – M.: Tipografija O.L. Somovoj, 1913. – S. 306.7. Reshenie Moskovskogo Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh ot 1910 g. // Cit. po: Markov A.N. Pravila advokatskoj professii v Rossii. – M., 1913.8. Slavin I.Ja. Vospominanija // Volga. – № 11–12. – 1998.9. Stepanova A.V. Problemy jetiki i morali v dejatel’nosti advokata (na primere dejatel’nosti prisjazhnogo poverennogo A.I. Urusova) // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 6 (7). – S. 51–56.10. Tretij otchet Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh okruga Odesskoj sudebnoj palaty za 1907 g. – Odessa: Tipografija gazety «Odesskij Novosti», 1908.
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONINGRyabtseva E.V.Forms of a free legal aid in international law and practice of foreign countries
Purpose: The analysis of forms of a free legal aid in international law and practice of foreign countries.Methodology: Comparative and legal and formal-legal methods were applied.Results: In work international legal acts and practice of foreign countries concerning rendering a free legal aid, including «pro bono» are analyzed. Definition of the free help in the sphere of legal services is given, classification of its forms is carried out. Allocation of the main of a form of a free legal aid on a branch sign allows to gain a complex impression about this type of legal activity, positive and negative tendencies of foreign countries.Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific and practical value as in it the analysis of forms of a free legal aid is provided in international law and foreign countries that allows to make use of foreign experience in domestic legislative and law-enforcement practice.Keywords: «Pro bono», free legal aid, pure judicare, duty lawyer.References (transliterated)1. Moorhead R. and others. Quality and Cost: Final Report of the Contracting of Civil Non-Family Advice and Assistance Pilot. – London: The Stationery Office, 2001.2. Rhudy R. Description and Analysis of Legal Aid Models / Legal Aid Models for Latin America [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display/document/legacyid/452.3. Barzilova Ju.V. K voprosu ob okazanii besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Saratovskom regione // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 3 (4). – S. 39–41.4. Bugarenko A.I. Besplatnaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ v nekotoryh zarubezhnyh stranah // Arbitrazhnaja praktika, 2010.5. Galoganov A.P. Gosudarstvennye juridicheskie bjuro i advokatskaja dejatel’nost’: obshhee i osobennoe // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 14.6. Lapidus A.E., Suchkova M.A. Social’naja otvetstvennost’ jurista // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta. – 2008. – № 8. – № 9.7. Rezoljucija № 45/121 ot 14.12.1990: Neofic. perev. / Cit. po: Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo: Sbornik dokumentov / Рod red. K.A. Bekjasheva, A.G. Hodakova. – M.: BEK, 1996. – S. 126–129.8. SZ RF. – 2001. – № 2. – St. 163.9. Udalova N.M. Okazanie besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossii i inostrannyh gosudarstvah // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 11 (51). – S. 189–198.10. Juridicheskij slovar’[Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://enc-dic.com/word/p/Pro-bono-128686.html.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICERagulin A.V.Some contradictions between the legislation on advocacy profession and the legislation regulating production on civil cases, and their overcomingPurpose: Identification of collisions between the legislation on advocacy profession and the legislation regulating production on civil cases in Russia, and development of offers on their overcoming.Methodology: The formal - legal method and method of theoretical modeling were used.Results: The author formulated offers on permission of collisions between the Russian legislation on advocacy profession and the legislation regulating production on civil cases, concerning the content of the rights of the advocate representative, an identification of the lawyer representative, registration of its powers, and also the rights connected with realization for the branch statement to the judge considering a civil case, and the rights for compensation within production on a civil case of expenses on payment of a legal aid.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first attempts to consider a question of overcoming of collisions between the legislation on advocacy profession and the legislation regulating production on civil cases.Keywords: advocacy profession, production on civil cases, the legislation, collisions, overcoming of collisions, professional privileges of the advocate.References (transliterated)1. Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i advokatura: Sbornik normativnyh aktov i dokumentov / Pod obshh. red. E.V. Semenjako, Ju.S. Pilipenko. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2010. – S. 358–365.2. Anisimov V.F. Otstaivanie advokatskih polnomochij na mestah // Federal’noe zakonodatel’stvo ob advokature: praktika primenenija i problemy sovershenstvovanija: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauch.-prakt. konferencii. Ekaterinburg, 13 ijulja 2004 g. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2004. – S. 26–27.3. Baev M.O., Baeva N.A. Taktiko-jeticheskie nachala dejatel’nosti advokata-zashhitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2009. – S. 251.4. Dikusar V.M. Kommentarij k stat’e 8 // Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii» / Pod obshh. red. I.L. Trunova. – M.: Jeksmo, 2005. – S. 49.5. Ivakin V.N. Polnomochija advokata – predstavitelja v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve: voprosy oformlenija // Advokatura. Gosudarstvo. Obshhestvo: Sb. materialov IV Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii / Otv. red.: S.I. Volodina, Ju.S. Pilipenko. – M.: Novyj ucheb., 2007. – S. 83–84.6. Lapach V.A. Vozmeshhenie rashodov na oplatu us-lug advokata-predstavitelja // Federal’noe zakonodatel’stvo ob advokature: praktika primenenija i problemy sovershenstvovanija: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj. nauch.-prakt. konferencii. Ekaterinburg, 13 ijulja 2004 g. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2004. – S. 199–201.7. Mal’ko A.V. Teorija gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurist’, 2001. – S. 230.8. Neznamova Z.A. Kollizii v ugolovnom prave: Av-toref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 1995. – S. 8.9. Pilipenko Ju.S. Advokatskaja tajna: Zakonodatel’nyj, jeticheskij, pravoprimenitel’nyj aspekty. – M.: Inform–Pravo, 2009. – S. 243–245.10. Prihod’ko I. Primenenie pravil o predstavitel’stve i nekotorye processual’nye prezumpcii // Hozjajstvo i pravo. – 2003. – № 2. – S. 88.11. Ragulin A.V. «Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika»: formulirovanie opredelenija ponjatija // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 21–25.12. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu ob opredelenii ponjatija «professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika» // Pravovaja iniciativa. –2011. – № 2. – S. 16.13. Ragulin A.V. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel’stva v napravlenii ohrany professional’nyh prav advokatov // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj Akademii advokatury i notari-ata. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 14–19.14. Tihomirov M.Ju. Kollizionnoe pravo. – M., 2000.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Zorin R.G., Krivel V.V.Prospects for the development and improvement of appeals appeal and protest judgments in criminal procedure of Belarus and the Russian Federation
Purpose: Analysis of the legal framework governing appellate review and challenge court decisions in criminal proceedings.Methodology: Used a comparative legal and method of analysis.Results: On the basis of analysis of the current criminal procedural legislation of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation and the prospects for development of improved elements of appeal and protest. It is the gradual introduction of appeal and protest court decisions in criminal proceedings the Republic of Belarus will contribute to establishing additional guarantees the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, the efficiency of the judicial authorities. For effective implementation of appeal and protest necessary in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Belarus to define the subject and scope of appeal of the criminal case, and the procedure for appealing decisions of appeal have not entered into force, procedural form and content of the document, which should be vested with the decision of Court of Appeal , the persons who have the right of appeal and protest. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation must enter changes aimed at broadening the appeal board in the criminal proceedings, also define a circle having the right of appeal and protest, to ensure mandatory participation acquitted, convicted or the person against whom a criminal case dismissed on appeal .Novelty/originality/value: The paper has high practical importance, since it contains the analysis of the historical implementation and operation of the appellate proceedings, its theoretical and legal characteristics, scientific views of scientists study author generalizations and conclusions that can be applied in practice. Scientific novelty predetermined by the fact that the appellate appeal and protest in Belarus has not yet received its legal regulation in the field of criminal justice. The ways of reforming the current in the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation on appeal and protest have not entered into force of the verdict.Keywords: criminal trial, appeal and appeal proceedings, the prospects for development and improvement, the procedure for appealing, the persons having the right of appeal, the subject and scope of appeal of the criminal proceedings, the procedural form and content of the court’s decision.References (transliterated)1. Zajceva L.L. Nuzhna li apelljacionnaja instancija // Sudebnyj vestnik. – 1993. – № 4. – S. 47–50.2. Zajceva L.L. Apelljacija v ugolovnom processe: istoricheskij, zarubezhnyj i nacional’nyj opyt // Sudebnyj vestnik. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 52–56.3. Kalinkovich V. O vvedenii apelljacionnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam // Sudebnyj vestnik. – 2004. – № 4. – S. 14–16.4. Kolokolov N.A. I radost’, i dosada // Juridicheskij vestnik. – 2002. – № 22. – C. 3–10.5. Kukresh L.L. Problemy zakonodatel’nogo reglamentirovanija kassacionnogo proizvodstva v ugolovnom processe // Sudebnyj vestnik. – 2003. – № 1. – S. 52–54.6. Lazareva V. Plohoj horoshij zakon // Juridicheskaja gazeta. – 2011. – № 10. – S. 6–7.7. Latypova Z.U. Apelljacija v ugolovnom processe: voprosy i vozmozhnye otvety // Perspektivy razvitija i sovershenstvovanija apelljacionnogo obzhalovanija sudebnyh reshenij v rossijskom ugolovnom processe: Nauch.-prak. konf. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://vs.bkr.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=press_dep&op=3&did=18.8. Orehov A.Ju. Jelementy apelljacii v ugolovnom processe // Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konferencii studentov, magistrantov i aspirantov. – Minsk, 2012. – S. 220–221.9. Sukalo V.O. Sudebnaja reforma v Respublike Belarus’ // Sudebnye reformy v stranah SNG: Sb. nauch. st. / Nauch. red. L.L. Zajceva. – Minsk, 2005. – S. 7–14.10. Razinkina A.N. Apelljacija v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M., 2003.11. Ryzhakov A.P. Kommentarij k Ugolovno-processual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii. – M.: Jurist#, 2003.12. Smirnova N.N. Ugolovnyj process. – SPb.: Prior, 2002.13. Smirnov A.V. Reforma porjadka peresmotra sudebnyh reshenij po ugolovnym delam: apelljacija (po sostojaniju na 30 nojabrja 2011 g.) // Konsul’tant Pljus: Versija Prof. Tehnologija 3000 / OOO «JurSpektr». – M., 2014.14. Junushev S.V. Obespechivaet li novyj porjadok peresmotra prigovorov zashhitu interesov poterpevshego? // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 8–9.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEPozdnyakova E.A.Legal regulation section of debts jointly acquired by spouses
Purpose: Analysis of current legislation regulating section of debts, jointly acquired by spouses and its application in the context of the clarifications of the Supreme court of the Russian Federation.Methodology: the Main methods used in the work were: logical, comparative legal method and analysis.Results: the study identified a number of factors that hinder the application of p. 3 tbsp. 39 of the Family code of the Russian Federation regulating section jointly acquired spouses debt. Formulated a new version of this article, promoting elimination of the gap in the law and uniform application.Novelty/originality/value: the Novelty of this paper is the generalization of judicial practice on matters relating to the division of jointly acquired spouses debts with regard to clarification of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, data in 2014. on application of provisions of the Family code of the Russian Federation in conjunction with the provisions of the Civil and Civil procedure codes of the Russian Federation.Keywords: jointly acquired property, the obligations section of debts, enforcement measures.References (transliterated)1. Bogdanov D.E. Spravedlivost’ kak nachalo i princip grazhdanskogo prava // Zakonodatel’stvo i jekonomika. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 14–32.2. Grazhdanskoe delo № 2-1558/12 po isku g-na V.I.A. k g-ke V.N.A. o razdele sovmestno nazhitogo imushhestva i raspredelenii dolgov // Arhiv Chertanovskogo rajonnogo suda g. Moskvy za 2012 god.3. Zor’kin V.D. Cennostnyj podhod v konstitucionnom regulirovanii prav i svobod // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. – 2008. – № 12.4. Zor’kin V.D. Jekonomika i pravo: novyj kontekst // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2014. – 22 maja. – № 113 (6385). – S. 13.5. Kozlova N. Muzh platit v odinochku // RG. – 2014. – № 6422 (8 ijulja).6. Opredelenie Verhovnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 23 ijulja 2013 goda po delu № 34-KG13-5.7. Pozdnjakova E.A. Poluchenie informacii advokatom i drugimi licami po sporam o brachno-semejnyh i svjazannyh s nimi otnoshenijah // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teorija i praktika. – 2013. – № 4 (100). – S. 48–49.
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND DISCIPLINARY RESPONSIBILITY OF ADVO CATeZaborovskу V.V.The reason for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against lawyers for law of Ukraine
Purpose: Аnalyzis the legal nature of the reasons for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer. The main objectives of the author set for themselves: to reveal the essence of the issue and order the initiation of disciplinary proceedings a lawyer; analyze the norms of the Ukrainian legislation governing this issue; and on the basis of the analysis to identify gaps and deficiencies of legal regulation concerning the reasons for the initiation of disciplinary proceedingsMethodology: The authors used legalistic method based on the consistency and comprehensiveness of its holding.Results: The article concludes that the provisions of Art. 36 of the Law of Ukraine «On the legal profession and advocacy» (initiate the issue of attorney disciplinary proceedings) are not properly implementing the principle of the independence of the legal profession. And available in this article guarantees of activity of attorney is not providing adequate efficiency of the institute disciplinary proceedings. Is input on the need for changes in the Ukrainian legislator provisions of the Law «On the legal profession and advocacy», which govern the question of the grounds for the institution of disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer, taking into account, for example, the experience of the legislator of the Russian Federation.Novelty/originality/value: The paper has a certain scientific value and important practical significance, since it contains a comprehensive study of the legal nature of the drives for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer for the legislation of Ukraine.Keywords: lawyer disciplinary liability, the drive for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings, the statement of complaint.References (transliterated)1. Ob advokature i advokatskoj dejatel’nosti: Zakon Ukrainy ot 5 ijulja 2012 goda № 5076-VI // Oficial’nyj vestnik Ukrainy. – 2012. – № 62. – St. 17.2. Ob obrashhenijah grazhdan: Zakon Ukrainy ot 2 oktjabrja 1996 goda № 393/96-VR // Vedomosti Verhovnoj Rady Ukrainy. – 1996. – № 47. – St. 256.3. Kodeks professional’noj jetiki advokata, prinjat Pervym Vserossijskim s#ezdom advokatov 31 janvarja 2003 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.fparf.ru/norms/codex.htm.4. Reformirovanie sistemy dostupa k advokatskoj professii i disciplinarnoj otvetstvennosti advokatov: Raz#jasnenie Ministerstva justicii Ukrainy ot 28 fevralja 2013 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0006323-13.5. Postanovlenie okruzhnogo administrativnogo suda g. Kieva ot 25 sentjabrja 2013 goda (po delu № 826/10762/2013) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/33864404.6. Reshenie Vysshej kvalifikacionno-disciplinarnoj komissii advokatury № II-033/2014 ot 24 janvarja 2014 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://vkdka.org/rishennya-i-0332014.7. Reshenie Vysshej kvalifikacionno-disciplinarnoj komissii advokatury № II-025/2014 ot 24 janvarja 2014 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://vkdka.org/rishennya-i-0252014.8. Reshenie Vysshej kvalifikacionno-disciplinarnoj komissii advokatury № II-019/2014 ot 24 janvarja 2014 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://vkdka.org/rishennya-i-0192014.9. Busurina E.O. Povody dlja vozbuzhdenija disciplinarnogo proizvodstva v otnoshenii advokata // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 60–64.10. Kovalenko T. S. Disciplinarnaja otvetstvennost’ advokata: Dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. – K., 2010.11. Mostovenko S. Advokat – ne posrednik mezhdu chinovnikom i klientom! // Zerkalo nedeli. – 2012. – № 26. – S. 6.12. Ragulin A.V. Pravovye i organizacionnye sredstva obespechenija realizacii professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika v Rossii i puti ih sovershenstvovanija // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 4 (5). – St. 62–67.13. Fiolevs’kij D.P. Advokatura: Uchebnik. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. – K.: Alerta, 2014.
PROTECTION OF THE PRO FESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVO CATeTrunov I.L.Legislative and law-enforcement problems of fight against murders of advocates in Russia
Purpose: Development and the offer of changes in the existing Russian legislation for improvement of legal protection of the identity of the advocate.Methodology: Formal-legal method, a comparative - legal method and a method of theoretical modeling were used.Results: The author formulated a complex of suggestions for improvement of provisions of the existing Russian legislation providing protection of the identity of advocate against encroachments from representatives of government bodies and criminal elements.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first attempts to offer a package of measures, aimed at providing personal security of advocate.Keywords: legal profession, advocacy, advocate, lawyer, safety of advocate, murder of advocates, professional rights of advocate.References (transliterated)1. www.usmarshals.gov.2. Borodkina T. Problemy i perspektivy razvitija instituta gosudarstvennoj zashhity poterpevshih, svidetelej i inyh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Mirovoj sud’ja. – 2010. – № 4.3. Digesty Justiniana. Izbr. Fragmenty / Per. i prim. I.S. Pereterskogo. – M.: Nauka, 1984. 4. Potashnik I.M.Kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ v Rossii // Jekonomika i pravo. XXI vek. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 142–149.5. Potashnik I.M.Perspektivy razvitija zakonodatel’stva ob advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 25.6. Pjatin E.I. Dostupnost’ dlja naselenija Rossii kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi, okazyvaemoj advokatami // Jekonomika i pravo. XXI vek. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 91–99.7. Ragulin A.V. Osnovnye organizacionno-pravovye sredstva obespechenija realizacii i zashhity professional’-nyh prav advokata // Uchenye trudy rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2011. – № 4 (23). – S. 12–17.8. Ragulin A.V. Pravo advokata-zashhitnika trebovat’ zapreta na vmeshatel’stvo v advokatskuju dejatel’nost’ libo prepjatstvovanie ej kakim by to ni bylo obrazom: problemy zakonodatel’noj reglamentacii i prakticheskoj realizacii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 4 (47). – S. 136–143.9. Ragulin A.V. Pravovye i organizacionnye sredstva obespechenija realizacii professional’nyh prav advokatov // Social’naja politika i sociologija. – 2010. – № 8 (62). – S. 356–358.10. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija i realizacija profes-sional’nogo prava advokata-zashhitnika na sobljudenie osobogo porjadka ugolovnogo presledovanija // Evrazij-skij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 1 (56). – S. 139–142.11. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija prav advokata-zashhitnika na opros lic s ih soglasija i predstavlenie predmetov i dokumentov // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 1 (2). – S. 50–52.12. Ragulin A.V. Jetapy stanovlenija instituta professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika v Rossii i ih obshhaja harakteristika // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 1 (8). – S. 19–28.13. Ugolovnyj kodeks Francii (Code Penal) ot 22 ijulja 1992 g. (s izm. ot 6 fevralja 2012 g.) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: www.legifrance.gouv.fr.
PROTECTION OF THE PRO FESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVO CATeIvanov A.V.Guarantees of independence of advocate and way of their improvement
Purpose: Consideration of the main guarantees of independence of advocate by the legislation of the Russian Federation and development of the measures directed on their improvement and realization in practical activities.Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal method, a comparative method and a method of theoretical modeling.Results: The author comes to a conclusion that despite fixing of guarantees of independence of advocate in the Russian legislation, the real mechanism of their realization and protection against inappropriate intervention from the state in activity of the lawyer actually is absent. In article it is shown that guarantees of independence of lawyers are fixed in the law, however they aren’t always observed in practice owing to what these guarantees have declarative character. This order doesn’t provide real independence of advocate that doesn’t allow to carry out lawyer activity fully effectively. The legislative and organizational and legal offers directed on elimination of the revealed problems are brought.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses a certain scientific value and the high practical importance as contains the author’s generalizations possessing novelty, conclusions and offers which can be applied in advocate practice and legislative activity.Keywords: legal profession, lawyer, guarantees of independence of the lawyer, professional rights of the lawyer, advocate, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. http://www.fparf.ru/zazhita_prav/prof_prava.htm.2. https://genproc.gov.ru/genprokuror/interview/document-65710.3. Brovchenko S.V. Garantii nezavisimosti advokata. Problemy obespechenija ugolovno-pravovyh garantij nezavisimosti advokatu, vystupajushhemu v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve v kachestve zashhitnika // Voprosy advokatury. – 2004. – № 32.4. Burger B.M. Garantii nezavisimosti advokata pri okazanii kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi: monografija / Pod nauch. red. A.A. Hmyrova. – M., 2011. – S. 120.5. Gorbunov O.A. Protivodejstvie zakonnoj dejatel’nosti advokata-zashhitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (harakteristika, sredstva preduprezhdenija i nejtralizacii): Avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. – Voronezh, 2006. – S. 9.6. Dokument Kopengagenskogo soveshhanija Konferencii po chelovecheskomu izmereniju SBSE (podpisan v g. Kopengagene 29.06.1990) // Mezhdunarodnye izbiratel’nye standarty: Sbornik dokumentov / Otv. red. A.A. Veshnjakov. – M., 2004. – S. 335.7. Kolokolov N.A. Poslednie novelly UPK RF: balans obvinitel’noj vlasti stabiliziruetsja // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2009. – № 2.8. Konvencija o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod: zakljuchena v g. Rime 04.11.1950 // SZ RF. – 2001. – № 2. – St. 163.9. Korotkova P.E. K voprosu o nezavisimosti advokatskoj dejatel’nosti // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 8.10. Mezhdunarodnyj pakt o grazhdanskih i politicheskih pravah ot 16.12.1966 // BVS RF. – 1994. – № 12.11. Mery po zashhite professional’nyh prav advokata: odobreny Sovetom Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii ot 22.04.2004 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.fparf.ru/zazhita_prav/prof_prava.htm.12. Milashina E. «Chemodanchik Bastrykina» i «rostov-skie amazonki» // Novaja gazeta. – 2014. – 15 avgusta. – № 90.13. Obshhij kodeks pravil dlja advokatov stran Evropejskogo Soobshhestva [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.law.edu.ru/doc/document.asp?docID=1131942.14. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 06.03.2003 № 108-O «Po zhalobe grazhdanina Cickishvili Givi Vazhevicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav punktom 2 chasti tret’ej stat’i 56 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // SZ RF. – 2003. – № 21. – St. 2060.15. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 06.03.2008 № 428-O-P «Po zhalobe grazhdanki Kirjuhinoj Iriny Petrovny na narushenie ee konstitucionnyh prav chast’ju shestoj stat’i 82 Ugolovno-ispolnitel’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii i punktom 6 stat’i 14 Zakona Rossijskoj Federacii «Ob uchrezhdenijah i organah, ispolnjajushhih ugolovnye nakazanija v vide lishenija svobody» // Vestnik Konstitucionnogo Suda RF. – 2008. – № 5.16. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 06.07.2000 № 128-O «Po zhalobe grazhdanina Parshutkina Viktora Vasil’evicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav i svobod punktom 1 chasti vtoroj stat’i 72 UPK RSFSR i stat’jami 15 i 16 Polozhenija ob advokature RSFSR» // SZ RF. – 2000. – № 33. – St. 3433.17. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 08.11.2005 № 439-O «Po zhalobe grazhdan S.V. Borodina, V.N. Burobina, A.V. Bykovskogo i drugih na narushenie ih konstitucionnyh prav stat’jami 7, 29, 182 i 183 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // SZ RF. – 2006. – № 5. – St. 633.18. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 17.07.2012 № 1472-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Lukasha Vladimira Ivanovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav stat’jami 86, 166, chast’ju vtoroj stat’i 176, stat’jami 180 i 186 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii, punktom 3 stat’i 8 Federal’nogo zakona «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii» i polozhenijami Federal’nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoj dejatel’nosti»» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.19. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 22.03.2012 № 629-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Abdulhamidova Ahmedshapi Gamzatovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav polozhenijami statej 8 i 9 Federal’nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoj dejatel’nosti», a takzhe statej 7, 29 i 450 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.20. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 22.04.2014 № 732-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Krjukova Viktora Fedorovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav polozhenijami statej 7, 176, 177, 256 i 307 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.21. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 29.05.2007 № 516-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhalob grazhdan Gol’dmana Aleksandra Leonidovicha i Sokolova Sergeja Anatol’evicha na narushenie ih konstitucionnyh prav stat’ej 29, punktom 3 chasti vtoroj stat’i 38, punktami 2 i 3 chasti tret’ej stat’i 56 i punktom 1 chasti pervoj stat’i 72 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.22. Osnovnye polozhenija o roli advokatov, prinjaty VIII Kongressom OON po preduprezhdeniju prestuplenij avgust 1990 // Sovetskaja justicija. – 1991. – № 20. – S. 19.23. Osnovnye principy, kasajushhiesja roli juristov: prinjaty v g. Gavane 27.08.1990–07.09.1990 vos’mym Kongressom OON po preduprezhdeniju prestupnosti i obrashheniju s pravonarushiteljami // Doklad vos’mogo kongressa Organizacii Ob#edinennyh Nacij po preduprezhdeniju prestupnosti i obrashheniju s pravonarushiteljami. – Gavana, 1990. – S. 131–136.24. Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 29.05.2012 «Delo «Suslov (Suslov) protiv Rossijskoj Federacii» (zhaloba № 2366/07) // Bjulleten’ Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. – 2013. – № 11.25. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 25.10.2001 № 14-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij, soderzhashhihsja v stat’jah 47 i 51 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa RSFSR i punkte 15 chasti vtoroj stat’i 16 Federal’nogo zakona «O soderzhanii pod strazhej podozrevaemyh i obvinjaemyh v sovershenii prestuplenij», v svjazi s zhalobami grazhdan A.P. Golomidova, V.G. Kislicina i I.V. Moskvicheva» // SZ RF. – 2001. – № 48. – St. 4551.26. Ragulin A.V. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel’stva v napravlenii ohrany professional’nyh prav advokatov // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj Akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2009. – № 4 (15). – S. 15.27. Ragulin A.V. Pravovye i organizacionnye sredstva obespechenija realizacii professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika v Rossii i puti ih sovershenstvovanija // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 62.28. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika, obespechenie ih realizacii i ohrany po zakonodatel’stvu gosudarstv Vostochnoj Evropy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 66.29. Rezoljucija Konferencii Advokatskoj palaty Irkutskoj oblasti «O nedopustimosti narushenija professional’nyh prav advokatov Irkutskoj oblasti» ot 28.03.2014 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.advpalata-irk.ru/?module=news&act=read&id=244.30. Reshenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 17.07.2012 «Ob utverzhdenii obzora praktiki Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii za pervyj kvartal 2012 goda» // Jekonomika i zhizn’. – 2012. – № 32.31. Son’kin N.B. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye standarty advokatskoj dejatel’nosti. Pravovye osnovy advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokatury // Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i advokatura v Rossii. Vvedenie v special’nost’: Uchebnik. – Ch. 1 / Pod red. I.L. Trunova. – M., 2006. – S. 148.32. Stecovskij Ju.I. Zashhita advokata ot ugolovnogo presledovanija // Advokat. – 2007. – № 9. – S. 36.33. Ugolovnyj kodeks Ispanii / Pod red. i s predisl.: N.F. Kuznecovoj, F.M. Reshetnikovа; Per.: V.P. Zyrjanova, L.G. Shnajder. – M., 1998.34. Ugolovnyj kodeks Kazahstana [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1008032.35. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ // SZ RF. – 1996. – № 25. – St. 2954.36. Ugolovnyj kodeks Francii / Per. s franc. I.E. Krylovoj; nauch. red. L.V. Golovko. – SPb., 2002.37. Hechan A.N. Zabastovka advokatov v Armenii // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 4 (5). – S. 68–69.
ACTUAL PRO BLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICEEvko V.Y.The conception of actual marital relations in the family law of Ukraine
Purpose: to disclose the conception of actual marital relations and to find out their judicial significant features which will allow courts to protect material womens’ and mens’ interests effectively who live together without official registration of their relations.Methodology: such methods were used as historical-judicial, systemic-judicial and comparative-judicial.Results: in this article on the basis of existing legislation in Ukraine highlighted the main aspects and features of the actual marital relations, and given their doctrinal definition. It is found that the actual marriage must meet the conditions of the two groups: the first – the conditions, compliance with which is mandatory for the marriage, the second – the conditions that allow simultaneous concubinage closer to marriage, but also to distinguish it from him. The first group includes conditions that are laid down in Articles 22, 24–26 UK Ukraine. The second group are the following: 1) living together; 2) common life; 3) sufficient length of actual marital relations; 4) identification of these relations to third parties. Compliance with the conditions of the first and the second group to be set by the court in dealing with any property dispute involving people who lived or live in concubinage.Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific value, since it is one of the first attempts to analyze the actual marriage relationships that develop between men and women and provide them legally significant features.Keywords: marriage, family, the actual marriage, spouses, concubinage.References (transliterated)1. Antokol’skaja M.V. Semejnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurist, 1999.2. Arivanjuk T. Pro dejakі problemnі pitannja novogo sіmejnogo zakonodavstva. Faktichne podruzhzhja // Mala enciklopedіja notarіusa. – 2004. − № 1 (13). – S. 39– 2.3. Beljakova A.M., Vorozhejkin E.M. Sovetskoe se-mejnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1974.4. Vorozhejkin E.M. Pravovye osnovy braka i sem’i. – M., 1969.5. Ermakov V.D. O konceptual’nyh podhodah k so-vershenstvovaniju pravovogo regulirovanija semejnyh otnoshenij v RF // Zakon i pravo. – 2004. − № 4. – S. 37–39.6. Ershova N.M. Sem’ja i pravo // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. − 1982. − № 2. – S. 38–45.7. Zhilinkova I.V. Pravovoj rezhim imushhestva chlenov sem’i. – Har’kov: Ksilon, 2000.8. Zagorovskij A.I. Kurs semejnogo prava. – Odessa, 1902.9. Zlotnik І. Juridichnі osoblivostі faktichnih shljubnih vіdnosin // Juridichnij zhurnal. – 2004. − № 7(25). –S. 31–35.10. Ivanov-Kuligin A.S. Pravovoj rezhim imushhestva lic, sostojashhih v fakticheskih brachnyh otnoshenijah // Pravovedenie. – 1977. − № 2. – S. 46–50.11. Korotkova L.P., Vihrov A.P. Sem’ja – tol’ko v ramkah zakona // Pravovedenie. – 1994. – № 5–6. – S. 159–163.12. Korotkova L.P. Neobhodimoe universal’noe ponjatie sem’I // Pravovedenie. – 1980. − № 1. – S. 63–65.13. Lukashevich M.P., Tulenko M.V. Specіal’nі ta galuzevі socіal’nі teorії: Navch. posіbnik. – K.: MAUP, 1999.14. Manankova R.P. Pravovoj status chlenov sem’i po sovetskomu zakonodatel’stvu. – Tomsk, 1985.15. Matveev G.K. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1978.16. Mahinchuk V., Zvezda S. Konkubinat v Semejnom kodekse // Juridicheskaja praktika. – 2004. − № 4 (318). – S. 20–21.17. Mironova G. Moral’nі zasadi Sіmejnogo kodeksu Ukraїni // Pravo Ukraїni. – 2004. − № 4. – S. 99–102.18. Nechaeva A.M. Semejnoe pravo. Kurs lekcij. – M.: Jurist, 1999.19. Nechaeva A.M. Sem’ja i zakon. – M., 1980.20. Novohats’ka Ja. Shhodo pravovoї prirodi shljubu // Pravo Ukraїni. − 2002. − № 4. – S. 131–135.21. Pchelinceva L.M. Kommentarij k Semejnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii. – M.: NORMA − INFRA M, 1999.22. Reutov S.I. K voprosu o fakticheskih brachnyh otnoshenijah // Uchenye zapiski Permskogo un-ta. – 1973. – № 290. – S. 83–95.23. Romovs’ka Z.V. Sіmejnij kodeks Ukraїni: Naukovo-praktichnij komentar. – K.: Іn Jure, 2003.24. Romovs’ka Z.V. Sіmejnij kodeks Ukraїni: pogljad u majbutnє // Pravo Ukraїni. – 2001. – № 2. – S. 63–65.25. Ruzakova O.A. Semejnoe pravo Rossii. Kurs lekcij: Ucheb. posob. – M.: Jelit, 2004.26. Sіmejne pravo Ukraїni / Za red. V.S. Gopanchuka. – Kiїv: Іstina, 2002.27. Sіmejne pravo Ukraїni: Pіdruchnik / L.M. Baranova, V.І. Borisova, І.V. Zhilіnkova ta іn.; Za zag. red. V.І. Borisovoї ta І.V. Zhilіnkovoї. – K.: Jurinkom Іnter, 2004.28. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo / Pod red. V.A. Rjasen-ceva. – M.: Jur. lit., 1982. − S. 4329. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo / Pod red. V.F. Maslova, A.A. Pushkina. – K., 1982.30. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo: Ucheb. posob. / K.M. Borzova, V.N. Godunov, V.V. Levyj i dr.; pod red. V.F. Chigira. – Mn.: Universitetskoe, 1989.31. Solovej T. Vіd zaruchin – do majnovoї vіdpovіdal’nostі // Nova polіtika. – 2001. − № 3. – S. 14–16.32. SU. – 1926. – № 82. – St. 612.33. Shershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazh-danskogo prava. – M., 1997.
ACTUAL PRO BLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICEStudentsov A.V.VALUE pros and cons of pre-trial settlement of disputes
Objective: identification of shortcomings and optimization of pre-trial settlement of disputes.Methodology: Analytical opposition to common mental and normative doctrines.Results: a dialectical study of pre-trial settlement of disputes.Novelty/originality/value: author’s manner of legal journalism, the combination of methodological and polemical approaches, scientific and practical importance.Keywords: pre-trial settlement, pre-trial claim wiggery.References (transliterated)1. Mednikova M. Ustanovlenie fakta nesobljudenija dosudebnogo regulirovanija sporov arbitrazhnym sudom: problemy primenenija processual’nyh norm //Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. – 2006. – № 11. – S. 20–25.2. Filosofija prava. – M.: Mysl’, 1990. – S. 529.
ACTUAL PRO BLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Khsanov F.Z.Infection victim hiv through rape and violent acts of sexsual character
Purpose: Analysis of qualifications charging HIV through rape and other sexual assault.Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal, comparative legal method.Results: The article presents an interpretation of intentional contamination and negligently injured person with HIV in the commission of rape and other sexual assault.Novelty/originality/value: The author proposes to classify such acts associated with Knowingly placing the victim (victim) in the risk of HIV infection or intentional HIV infection for multiple offenses provided for Article 131 or 132 of the Criminal Code and Art. 122 of the Criminal Code.Keywords: infection with HIV, rape, sexual assault, qualification, disposition, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.References1. Andreeva M.A. Warning sexual crime measures cri-minal law // Russian investigator. – 2010. – № 7. – S. 20–22.2. Galakhova A.V. Qualification of crimes in criminal law and judicial practice (on the basis of subjective side) // Russian investigator. – 2010. – № 18. – S. 13–18.3. Development of the AIDS epidemic. World Health Organization [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.data.unaids.org/pub/EpiReport/2006/2006_EpiUpdate_Ru.pdf.4. Fargiyev I. Criminal legal assessment of venereal diseases // Criminal Law. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 42–44.5. Omigov V.I. Rape: qualifying and particularly qualifying elements // Russian investigator. – 2011. – № 8. – S. 11–15.6. About 720 thousand people living with HIV in the Russian Federation revealed in all the years of observation. RIA news [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://www.ria.ru/society/20130325/928852641.html.
Purpose: Consideration of separate legal and organizational aspects of activity of the Russian legal profession in the late eighties - the beginning of the 90th years of the XX century.Methodology: Historical and legal and formal-legal methods and method of the included supervision were applied.Results: In work separate aspects of the organization and activity of legal profession and also professional activity of lawyers in the Republic of Bashkortostan and the Russian Federation in the late eighties - the beginning of the 90th years of the XX century are considered.Novelty/originality/value: Article is of a certain scientific and practical value as in it with use of a method of the included supervision the author’s assessment of activity of certain lawyers and bodies of lawyer self-government is given in the Republic of Bashkortostan and the Russian Federation in the late eighties - the beginning of the 90th years of the XX century.Keywords: legal profession, lawyer, legal profession history, legal profession of the Republic of Bashkortostan, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. Advokatura v SSSR. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1971.2. Barshhevskij M.Ju. Organizacija i dejatel’nost’ advokatury v Rossii. – M.: Jurist#, 1997.3. Vlasov A.A. Advokatura v konstitucionno-pravovom pole // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2014. – № 4 (71). – S. 123–124.4. Gol’diner V.D. Zashhititel’naja rech’. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1970.5. Kazakov V.N., Dobrieva M.D. Kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ (inostrannyj i mezhdunarodno-pravovoj opyt) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 4 (31). – S. 22–28.6. Linejceva K.S. K voprosu o pravovoj kul’ture i razvitii institutov grazhdanskogo obshhestva // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 9.7. Oreshnikov V.I. Stanovlenie i formirovanie instituta advokatury v carskoj Rossii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 210–227.8. Potashnik I.M. Problemy realizacii pravozashhitnoj funkcii advokatury po okazaniju kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi naseleniju v uslovijah reformirovanija sudebnoj sistemy Rossijskoj Federacii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 11 (51). – S. 54–71.9. Rol’ i zadachi sovetskoj advokatury / Рod red. A.Ja. Suhareva. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1972.10. Smirnov V.N., Usmanov R.R. Istorija advokatury Srednego Urala. – Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyj universitet, 1999.11. Chernyshov V.V. K voprosu o meste i roli pravo-ohranitel’noj dejatel’nosti // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 4.12. Chilingarjan K.P. Sovety advokatam: rech’ i kak donesti ee v sude // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 3.
Historical experienceMelnichenko R.G.The disciplinary offenses connected with reporting discipline of the barrister before the principal and deduction of money and documents
Purpose: Research of the separate disciplinary offenses existing in the Russian jury legal profession.Methodology: Formal-legal and historical-legal methods were used.Results: In article such structures of disciplinary offenses of barristers as violation of reporting discipline of the lawyer before the principal and deduction by the lawyer of money and documents of the client are analyzed. The historical and legal analysis of similar offenses in the period of jury and modern legal profession is carried out.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses the high scientific value as is one of the first attempts to provide the historical and legal characteristic of disciplinary offenses of barristers.Keywords: juror, lawyer, disciplinary responsibility, reporting discipline, deduction of money and documents.References (transliterated)1. Arsen’ev K.K. Zametki o russkoj advokature. Obzor dejatel’nosti S.-Peterburgskogo soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh za 1886–74 g. – S.-Peterburg#, 1875.2. Vtoroj otchet Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh okruga Odesskoj sudebnoj palaty za 1906–1907 g. – Odessa: Tipografija Juzhno-Russkogo Obshhestva Pechatnogo d#la, 1907.3. Markov A.N. Pravila advokatskoj professii v Rossii. – M.: Tipografija O.L. Somovoj, 1913.4. Otchet o dejatel’nosti Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh okruga Har’kovskoj sudebnoj palaty za 1905–1906 g. (s 15 fevralja 1905 goda po 15 fevralja 1906 goda). – Har’kov: Tipografija Advol’fa Darre, 1906.5. Otchet Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh okruga Odesskoj sudebnoj palaty za 1905–1906 g. – Odessa: Tipografija Juzhno-Russkogo Obshhestva Pechatnogo d#la., 1906.6. Reshenie Moskovskogo Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh ot 1904 g. // Cit. po: Markov A.N. Pravila advokatskoj professii v Rossii. – M.: Tipografija O.L. Somovoj, 1913. – S. 306.7. Reshenie Moskovskogo Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh ot 1910 g. // Cit. po: Markov A.N. Pravila advokatskoj professii v Rossii. – M., 1913.8. Slavin I.Ja. Vospominanija // Volga. – № 11–12. – 1998.9. Stepanova A.V. Problemy jetiki i morali v dejatel’nosti advokata (na primere dejatel’nosti prisjazhnogo poverennogo A.I. Urusova) // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 6 (7). – S. 51–56.10. Tretij otchet Soveta prisjazhnyh poverennyh okruga Odesskoj sudebnoj palaty za 1907 g. – Odessa: Tipografija gazety «Odesskij Novosti», 1908.
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONINGRyabtseva E.V.Forms of a free legal aid in international law and practice of foreign countries
Purpose: The analysis of forms of a free legal aid in international law and practice of foreign countries.Methodology: Comparative and legal and formal-legal methods were applied.Results: In work international legal acts and practice of foreign countries concerning rendering a free legal aid, including «pro bono» are analyzed. Definition of the free help in the sphere of legal services is given, classification of its forms is carried out. Allocation of the main of a form of a free legal aid on a branch sign allows to gain a complex impression about this type of legal activity, positive and negative tendencies of foreign countries.Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific and practical value as in it the analysis of forms of a free legal aid is provided in international law and foreign countries that allows to make use of foreign experience in domestic legislative and law-enforcement practice.Keywords: «Pro bono», free legal aid, pure judicare, duty lawyer.References (transliterated)1. Moorhead R. and others. Quality and Cost: Final Report of the Contracting of Civil Non-Family Advice and Assistance Pilot. – London: The Stationery Office, 2001.2. Rhudy R. Description and Analysis of Legal Aid Models / Legal Aid Models for Latin America [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display/document/legacyid/452.3. Barzilova Ju.V. K voprosu ob okazanii besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Saratovskom regione // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 3 (4). – S. 39–41.4. Bugarenko A.I. Besplatnaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ v nekotoryh zarubezhnyh stranah // Arbitrazhnaja praktika, 2010.5. Galoganov A.P. Gosudarstvennye juridicheskie bjuro i advokatskaja dejatel’nost’: obshhee i osobennoe // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 14.6. Lapidus A.E., Suchkova M.A. Social’naja otvetstvennost’ jurista // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta. – 2008. – № 8. – № 9.7. Rezoljucija № 45/121 ot 14.12.1990: Neofic. perev. / Cit. po: Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo: Sbornik dokumentov / Рod red. K.A. Bekjasheva, A.G. Hodakova. – M.: BEK, 1996. – S. 126–129.8. SZ RF. – 2001. – № 2. – St. 163.9. Udalova N.M. Okazanie besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossii i inostrannyh gosudarstvah // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 11 (51). – S. 189–198.10. Juridicheskij slovar’[Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://enc-dic.com/word/p/Pro-bono-128686.html.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICERagulin A.V.Some contradictions between the legislation on advocacy profession and the legislation regulating production on civil cases, and their overcomingPurpose: Identification of collisions between the legislation on advocacy profession and the legislation regulating production on civil cases in Russia, and development of offers on their overcoming.Methodology: The formal - legal method and method of theoretical modeling were used.Results: The author formulated offers on permission of collisions between the Russian legislation on advocacy profession and the legislation regulating production on civil cases, concerning the content of the rights of the advocate representative, an identification of the lawyer representative, registration of its powers, and also the rights connected with realization for the branch statement to the judge considering a civil case, and the rights for compensation within production on a civil case of expenses on payment of a legal aid.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first attempts to consider a question of overcoming of collisions between the legislation on advocacy profession and the legislation regulating production on civil cases.Keywords: advocacy profession, production on civil cases, the legislation, collisions, overcoming of collisions, professional privileges of the advocate.References (transliterated)1. Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i advokatura: Sbornik normativnyh aktov i dokumentov / Pod obshh. red. E.V. Semenjako, Ju.S. Pilipenko. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2010. – S. 358–365.2. Anisimov V.F. Otstaivanie advokatskih polnomochij na mestah // Federal’noe zakonodatel’stvo ob advokature: praktika primenenija i problemy sovershenstvovanija: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauch.-prakt. konferencii. Ekaterinburg, 13 ijulja 2004 g. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2004. – S. 26–27.3. Baev M.O., Baeva N.A. Taktiko-jeticheskie nachala dejatel’nosti advokata-zashhitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2009. – S. 251.4. Dikusar V.M. Kommentarij k stat’e 8 // Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii» / Pod obshh. red. I.L. Trunova. – M.: Jeksmo, 2005. – S. 49.5. Ivakin V.N. Polnomochija advokata – predstavitelja v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve: voprosy oformlenija // Advokatura. Gosudarstvo. Obshhestvo: Sb. materialov IV Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii / Otv. red.: S.I. Volodina, Ju.S. Pilipenko. – M.: Novyj ucheb., 2007. – S. 83–84.6. Lapach V.A. Vozmeshhenie rashodov na oplatu us-lug advokata-predstavitelja // Federal’noe zakonodatel’stvo ob advokature: praktika primenenija i problemy sovershenstvovanija: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj. nauch.-prakt. konferencii. Ekaterinburg, 13 ijulja 2004 g. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2004. – S. 199–201.7. Mal’ko A.V. Teorija gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurist’, 2001. – S. 230.8. Neznamova Z.A. Kollizii v ugolovnom prave: Av-toref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 1995. – S. 8.9. Pilipenko Ju.S. Advokatskaja tajna: Zakonodatel’nyj, jeticheskij, pravoprimenitel’nyj aspekty. – M.: Inform–Pravo, 2009. – S. 243–245.10. Prihod’ko I. Primenenie pravil o predstavitel’stve i nekotorye processual’nye prezumpcii // Hozjajstvo i pravo. – 2003. – № 2. – S. 88.11. Ragulin A.V. «Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika»: formulirovanie opredelenija ponjatija // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 21–25.12. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu ob opredelenii ponjatija «professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika» // Pravovaja iniciativa. –2011. – № 2. – S. 16.13. Ragulin A.V. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel’stva v napravlenii ohrany professional’nyh prav advokatov // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj Akademii advokatury i notari-ata. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 14–19.14. Tihomirov M.Ju. Kollizionnoe pravo. – M., 2000.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Zorin R.G., Krivel V.V.Prospects for the development and improvement of appeals appeal and protest judgments in criminal procedure of Belarus and the Russian Federation
Purpose: Analysis of the legal framework governing appellate review and challenge court decisions in criminal proceedings.Methodology: Used a comparative legal and method of analysis.Results: On the basis of analysis of the current criminal procedural legislation of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation and the prospects for development of improved elements of appeal and protest. It is the gradual introduction of appeal and protest court decisions in criminal proceedings the Republic of Belarus will contribute to establishing additional guarantees the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, the efficiency of the judicial authorities. For effective implementation of appeal and protest necessary in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Belarus to define the subject and scope of appeal of the criminal case, and the procedure for appealing decisions of appeal have not entered into force, procedural form and content of the document, which should be vested with the decision of Court of Appeal , the persons who have the right of appeal and protest. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation must enter changes aimed at broadening the appeal board in the criminal proceedings, also define a circle having the right of appeal and protest, to ensure mandatory participation acquitted, convicted or the person against whom a criminal case dismissed on appeal .Novelty/originality/value: The paper has high practical importance, since it contains the analysis of the historical implementation and operation of the appellate proceedings, its theoretical and legal characteristics, scientific views of scientists study author generalizations and conclusions that can be applied in practice. Scientific novelty predetermined by the fact that the appellate appeal and protest in Belarus has not yet received its legal regulation in the field of criminal justice. The ways of reforming the current in the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation on appeal and protest have not entered into force of the verdict.Keywords: criminal trial, appeal and appeal proceedings, the prospects for development and improvement, the procedure for appealing, the persons having the right of appeal, the subject and scope of appeal of the criminal proceedings, the procedural form and content of the court’s decision.References (transliterated)1. Zajceva L.L. Nuzhna li apelljacionnaja instancija // Sudebnyj vestnik. – 1993. – № 4. – S. 47–50.2. Zajceva L.L. Apelljacija v ugolovnom processe: istoricheskij, zarubezhnyj i nacional’nyj opyt // Sudebnyj vestnik. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 52–56.3. Kalinkovich V. O vvedenii apelljacionnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam // Sudebnyj vestnik. – 2004. – № 4. – S. 14–16.4. Kolokolov N.A. I radost’, i dosada // Juridicheskij vestnik. – 2002. – № 22. – C. 3–10.5. Kukresh L.L. Problemy zakonodatel’nogo reglamentirovanija kassacionnogo proizvodstva v ugolovnom processe // Sudebnyj vestnik. – 2003. – № 1. – S. 52–54.6. Lazareva V. Plohoj horoshij zakon // Juridicheskaja gazeta. – 2011. – № 10. – S. 6–7.7. Latypova Z.U. Apelljacija v ugolovnom processe: voprosy i vozmozhnye otvety // Perspektivy razvitija i sovershenstvovanija apelljacionnogo obzhalovanija sudebnyh reshenij v rossijskom ugolovnom processe: Nauch.-prak. konf. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://vs.bkr.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=press_dep&op=3&did=18.8. Orehov A.Ju. Jelementy apelljacii v ugolovnom processe // Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konferencii studentov, magistrantov i aspirantov. – Minsk, 2012. – S. 220–221.9. Sukalo V.O. Sudebnaja reforma v Respublike Belarus’ // Sudebnye reformy v stranah SNG: Sb. nauch. st. / Nauch. red. L.L. Zajceva. – Minsk, 2005. – S. 7–14.10. Razinkina A.N. Apelljacija v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M., 2003.11. Ryzhakov A.P. Kommentarij k Ugolovno-processual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii. – M.: Jurist#, 2003.12. Smirnova N.N. Ugolovnyj process. – SPb.: Prior, 2002.13. Smirnov A.V. Reforma porjadka peresmotra sudebnyh reshenij po ugolovnym delam: apelljacija (po sostojaniju na 30 nojabrja 2011 g.) // Konsul’tant Pljus: Versija Prof. Tehnologija 3000 / OOO «JurSpektr». – M., 2014.14. Junushev S.V. Obespechivaet li novyj porjadok peresmotra prigovorov zashhitu interesov poterpevshego? // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 8–9.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEPozdnyakova E.A.Legal regulation section of debts jointly acquired by spouses
Purpose: Analysis of current legislation regulating section of debts, jointly acquired by spouses and its application in the context of the clarifications of the Supreme court of the Russian Federation.Methodology: the Main methods used in the work were: logical, comparative legal method and analysis.Results: the study identified a number of factors that hinder the application of p. 3 tbsp. 39 of the Family code of the Russian Federation regulating section jointly acquired spouses debt. Formulated a new version of this article, promoting elimination of the gap in the law and uniform application.Novelty/originality/value: the Novelty of this paper is the generalization of judicial practice on matters relating to the division of jointly acquired spouses debts with regard to clarification of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, data in 2014. on application of provisions of the Family code of the Russian Federation in conjunction with the provisions of the Civil and Civil procedure codes of the Russian Federation.Keywords: jointly acquired property, the obligations section of debts, enforcement measures.References (transliterated)1. Bogdanov D.E. Spravedlivost’ kak nachalo i princip grazhdanskogo prava // Zakonodatel’stvo i jekonomika. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 14–32.2. Grazhdanskoe delo № 2-1558/12 po isku g-na V.I.A. k g-ke V.N.A. o razdele sovmestno nazhitogo imushhestva i raspredelenii dolgov // Arhiv Chertanovskogo rajonnogo suda g. Moskvy za 2012 god.3. Zor’kin V.D. Cennostnyj podhod v konstitucionnom regulirovanii prav i svobod // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. – 2008. – № 12.4. Zor’kin V.D. Jekonomika i pravo: novyj kontekst // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2014. – 22 maja. – № 113 (6385). – S. 13.5. Kozlova N. Muzh platit v odinochku // RG. – 2014. – № 6422 (8 ijulja).6. Opredelenie Verhovnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 23 ijulja 2013 goda po delu № 34-KG13-5.7. Pozdnjakova E.A. Poluchenie informacii advokatom i drugimi licami po sporam o brachno-semejnyh i svjazannyh s nimi otnoshenijah // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teorija i praktika. – 2013. – № 4 (100). – S. 48–49.
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND DISCIPLINARY RESPONSIBILITY OF ADVO CATeZaborovskу V.V.The reason for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against lawyers for law of Ukraine
Purpose: Аnalyzis the legal nature of the reasons for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer. The main objectives of the author set for themselves: to reveal the essence of the issue and order the initiation of disciplinary proceedings a lawyer; analyze the norms of the Ukrainian legislation governing this issue; and on the basis of the analysis to identify gaps and deficiencies of legal regulation concerning the reasons for the initiation of disciplinary proceedingsMethodology: The authors used legalistic method based on the consistency and comprehensiveness of its holding.Results: The article concludes that the provisions of Art. 36 of the Law of Ukraine «On the legal profession and advocacy» (initiate the issue of attorney disciplinary proceedings) are not properly implementing the principle of the independence of the legal profession. And available in this article guarantees of activity of attorney is not providing adequate efficiency of the institute disciplinary proceedings. Is input on the need for changes in the Ukrainian legislator provisions of the Law «On the legal profession and advocacy», which govern the question of the grounds for the institution of disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer, taking into account, for example, the experience of the legislator of the Russian Federation.Novelty/originality/value: The paper has a certain scientific value and important practical significance, since it contains a comprehensive study of the legal nature of the drives for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer for the legislation of Ukraine.Keywords: lawyer disciplinary liability, the drive for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings, the statement of complaint.References (transliterated)1. Ob advokature i advokatskoj dejatel’nosti: Zakon Ukrainy ot 5 ijulja 2012 goda № 5076-VI // Oficial’nyj vestnik Ukrainy. – 2012. – № 62. – St. 17.2. Ob obrashhenijah grazhdan: Zakon Ukrainy ot 2 oktjabrja 1996 goda № 393/96-VR // Vedomosti Verhovnoj Rady Ukrainy. – 1996. – № 47. – St. 256.3. Kodeks professional’noj jetiki advokata, prinjat Pervym Vserossijskim s#ezdom advokatov 31 janvarja 2003 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.fparf.ru/norms/codex.htm.4. Reformirovanie sistemy dostupa k advokatskoj professii i disciplinarnoj otvetstvennosti advokatov: Raz#jasnenie Ministerstva justicii Ukrainy ot 28 fevralja 2013 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0006323-13.5. Postanovlenie okruzhnogo administrativnogo suda g. Kieva ot 25 sentjabrja 2013 goda (po delu № 826/10762/2013) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/33864404.6. Reshenie Vysshej kvalifikacionno-disciplinarnoj komissii advokatury № II-033/2014 ot 24 janvarja 2014 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://vkdka.org/rishennya-i-0332014.7. Reshenie Vysshej kvalifikacionno-disciplinarnoj komissii advokatury № II-025/2014 ot 24 janvarja 2014 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://vkdka.org/rishennya-i-0252014.8. Reshenie Vysshej kvalifikacionno-disciplinarnoj komissii advokatury № II-019/2014 ot 24 janvarja 2014 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://vkdka.org/rishennya-i-0192014.9. Busurina E.O. Povody dlja vozbuzhdenija disciplinarnogo proizvodstva v otnoshenii advokata // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 60–64.10. Kovalenko T. S. Disciplinarnaja otvetstvennost’ advokata: Dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. – K., 2010.11. Mostovenko S. Advokat – ne posrednik mezhdu chinovnikom i klientom! // Zerkalo nedeli. – 2012. – № 26. – S. 6.12. Ragulin A.V. Pravovye i organizacionnye sredstva obespechenija realizacii professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika v Rossii i puti ih sovershenstvovanija // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 4 (5). – St. 62–67.13. Fiolevs’kij D.P. Advokatura: Uchebnik. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. – K.: Alerta, 2014.
PROTECTION OF THE PRO FESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVO CATeTrunov I.L.Legislative and law-enforcement problems of fight against murders of advocates in Russia
Purpose: Development and the offer of changes in the existing Russian legislation for improvement of legal protection of the identity of the advocate.Methodology: Formal-legal method, a comparative - legal method and a method of theoretical modeling were used.Results: The author formulated a complex of suggestions for improvement of provisions of the existing Russian legislation providing protection of the identity of advocate against encroachments from representatives of government bodies and criminal elements.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first attempts to offer a package of measures, aimed at providing personal security of advocate.Keywords: legal profession, advocacy, advocate, lawyer, safety of advocate, murder of advocates, professional rights of advocate.References (transliterated)1. www.usmarshals.gov.2. Borodkina T. Problemy i perspektivy razvitija instituta gosudarstvennoj zashhity poterpevshih, svidetelej i inyh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Mirovoj sud’ja. – 2010. – № 4.3. Digesty Justiniana. Izbr. Fragmenty / Per. i prim. I.S. Pereterskogo. – M.: Nauka, 1984. 4. Potashnik I.M.Kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ v Rossii // Jekonomika i pravo. XXI vek. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 142–149.5. Potashnik I.M.Perspektivy razvitija zakonodatel’stva ob advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 25.6. Pjatin E.I. Dostupnost’ dlja naselenija Rossii kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi, okazyvaemoj advokatami // Jekonomika i pravo. XXI vek. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 91–99.7. Ragulin A.V. Osnovnye organizacionno-pravovye sredstva obespechenija realizacii i zashhity professional’-nyh prav advokata // Uchenye trudy rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2011. – № 4 (23). – S. 12–17.8. Ragulin A.V. Pravo advokata-zashhitnika trebovat’ zapreta na vmeshatel’stvo v advokatskuju dejatel’nost’ libo prepjatstvovanie ej kakim by to ni bylo obrazom: problemy zakonodatel’noj reglamentacii i prakticheskoj realizacii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 4 (47). – S. 136–143.9. Ragulin A.V. Pravovye i organizacionnye sredstva obespechenija realizacii professional’nyh prav advokatov // Social’naja politika i sociologija. – 2010. – № 8 (62). – S. 356–358.10. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija i realizacija profes-sional’nogo prava advokata-zashhitnika na sobljudenie osobogo porjadka ugolovnogo presledovanija // Evrazij-skij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 1 (56). – S. 139–142.11. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija prav advokata-zashhitnika na opros lic s ih soglasija i predstavlenie predmetov i dokumentov // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 1 (2). – S. 50–52.12. Ragulin A.V. Jetapy stanovlenija instituta professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika v Rossii i ih obshhaja harakteristika // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 1 (8). – S. 19–28.13. Ugolovnyj kodeks Francii (Code Penal) ot 22 ijulja 1992 g. (s izm. ot 6 fevralja 2012 g.) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: www.legifrance.gouv.fr.
PROTECTION OF THE PRO FESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVO CATeIvanov A.V.Guarantees of independence of advocate and way of their improvement
Purpose: Consideration of the main guarantees of independence of advocate by the legislation of the Russian Federation and development of the measures directed on their improvement and realization in practical activities.Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal method, a comparative method and a method of theoretical modeling.Results: The author comes to a conclusion that despite fixing of guarantees of independence of advocate in the Russian legislation, the real mechanism of their realization and protection against inappropriate intervention from the state in activity of the lawyer actually is absent. In article it is shown that guarantees of independence of lawyers are fixed in the law, however they aren’t always observed in practice owing to what these guarantees have declarative character. This order doesn’t provide real independence of advocate that doesn’t allow to carry out lawyer activity fully effectively. The legislative and organizational and legal offers directed on elimination of the revealed problems are brought.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses a certain scientific value and the high practical importance as contains the author’s generalizations possessing novelty, conclusions and offers which can be applied in advocate practice and legislative activity.Keywords: legal profession, lawyer, guarantees of independence of the lawyer, professional rights of the lawyer, advocate, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. http://www.fparf.ru/zazhita_prav/prof_prava.htm.2. https://genproc.gov.ru/genprokuror/interview/document-65710.3. Brovchenko S.V. Garantii nezavisimosti advokata. Problemy obespechenija ugolovno-pravovyh garantij nezavisimosti advokatu, vystupajushhemu v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve v kachestve zashhitnika // Voprosy advokatury. – 2004. – № 32.4. Burger B.M. Garantii nezavisimosti advokata pri okazanii kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi: monografija / Pod nauch. red. A.A. Hmyrova. – M., 2011. – S. 120.5. Gorbunov O.A. Protivodejstvie zakonnoj dejatel’nosti advokata-zashhitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (harakteristika, sredstva preduprezhdenija i nejtralizacii): Avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. – Voronezh, 2006. – S. 9.6. Dokument Kopengagenskogo soveshhanija Konferencii po chelovecheskomu izmereniju SBSE (podpisan v g. Kopengagene 29.06.1990) // Mezhdunarodnye izbiratel’nye standarty: Sbornik dokumentov / Otv. red. A.A. Veshnjakov. – M., 2004. – S. 335.7. Kolokolov N.A. Poslednie novelly UPK RF: balans obvinitel’noj vlasti stabiliziruetsja // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2009. – № 2.8. Konvencija o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod: zakljuchena v g. Rime 04.11.1950 // SZ RF. – 2001. – № 2. – St. 163.9. Korotkova P.E. K voprosu o nezavisimosti advokatskoj dejatel’nosti // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 8.10. Mezhdunarodnyj pakt o grazhdanskih i politicheskih pravah ot 16.12.1966 // BVS RF. – 1994. – № 12.11. Mery po zashhite professional’nyh prav advokata: odobreny Sovetom Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii ot 22.04.2004 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.fparf.ru/zazhita_prav/prof_prava.htm.12. Milashina E. «Chemodanchik Bastrykina» i «rostov-skie amazonki» // Novaja gazeta. – 2014. – 15 avgusta. – № 90.13. Obshhij kodeks pravil dlja advokatov stran Evropejskogo Soobshhestva [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.law.edu.ru/doc/document.asp?docID=1131942.14. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 06.03.2003 № 108-O «Po zhalobe grazhdanina Cickishvili Givi Vazhevicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav punktom 2 chasti tret’ej stat’i 56 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // SZ RF. – 2003. – № 21. – St. 2060.15. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 06.03.2008 № 428-O-P «Po zhalobe grazhdanki Kirjuhinoj Iriny Petrovny na narushenie ee konstitucionnyh prav chast’ju shestoj stat’i 82 Ugolovno-ispolnitel’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii i punktom 6 stat’i 14 Zakona Rossijskoj Federacii «Ob uchrezhdenijah i organah, ispolnjajushhih ugolovnye nakazanija v vide lishenija svobody» // Vestnik Konstitucionnogo Suda RF. – 2008. – № 5.16. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 06.07.2000 № 128-O «Po zhalobe grazhdanina Parshutkina Viktora Vasil’evicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav i svobod punktom 1 chasti vtoroj stat’i 72 UPK RSFSR i stat’jami 15 i 16 Polozhenija ob advokature RSFSR» // SZ RF. – 2000. – № 33. – St. 3433.17. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 08.11.2005 № 439-O «Po zhalobe grazhdan S.V. Borodina, V.N. Burobina, A.V. Bykovskogo i drugih na narushenie ih konstitucionnyh prav stat’jami 7, 29, 182 i 183 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // SZ RF. – 2006. – № 5. – St. 633.18. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 17.07.2012 № 1472-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Lukasha Vladimira Ivanovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav stat’jami 86, 166, chast’ju vtoroj stat’i 176, stat’jami 180 i 186 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii, punktom 3 stat’i 8 Federal’nogo zakona «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii» i polozhenijami Federal’nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoj dejatel’nosti»» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.19. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 22.03.2012 № 629-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Abdulhamidova Ahmedshapi Gamzatovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav polozhenijami statej 8 i 9 Federal’nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoj dejatel’nosti», a takzhe statej 7, 29 i 450 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.20. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 22.04.2014 № 732-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Krjukova Viktora Fedorovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav polozhenijami statej 7, 176, 177, 256 i 307 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.21. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 29.05.2007 № 516-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhalob grazhdan Gol’dmana Aleksandra Leonidovicha i Sokolova Sergeja Anatol’evicha na narushenie ih konstitucionnyh prav stat’ej 29, punktom 3 chasti vtoroj stat’i 38, punktami 2 i 3 chasti tret’ej stat’i 56 i punktom 1 chasti pervoj stat’i 72 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.22. Osnovnye polozhenija o roli advokatov, prinjaty VIII Kongressom OON po preduprezhdeniju prestuplenij avgust 1990 // Sovetskaja justicija. – 1991. – № 20. – S. 19.23. Osnovnye principy, kasajushhiesja roli juristov: prinjaty v g. Gavane 27.08.1990–07.09.1990 vos’mym Kongressom OON po preduprezhdeniju prestupnosti i obrashheniju s pravonarushiteljami // Doklad vos’mogo kongressa Organizacii Ob#edinennyh Nacij po preduprezhdeniju prestupnosti i obrashheniju s pravonarushiteljami. – Gavana, 1990. – S. 131–136.24. Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 29.05.2012 «Delo «Suslov (Suslov) protiv Rossijskoj Federacii» (zhaloba № 2366/07) // Bjulleten’ Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. – 2013. – № 11.25. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 25.10.2001 № 14-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij, soderzhashhihsja v stat’jah 47 i 51 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa RSFSR i punkte 15 chasti vtoroj stat’i 16 Federal’nogo zakona «O soderzhanii pod strazhej podozrevaemyh i obvinjaemyh v sovershenii prestuplenij», v svjazi s zhalobami grazhdan A.P. Golomidova, V.G. Kislicina i I.V. Moskvicheva» // SZ RF. – 2001. – № 48. – St. 4551.26. Ragulin A.V. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel’stva v napravlenii ohrany professional’nyh prav advokatov // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj Akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2009. – № 4 (15). – S. 15.27. Ragulin A.V. Pravovye i organizacionnye sredstva obespechenija realizacii professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika v Rossii i puti ih sovershenstvovanija // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 62.28. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika, obespechenie ih realizacii i ohrany po zakonodatel’stvu gosudarstv Vostochnoj Evropy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 66.29. Rezoljucija Konferencii Advokatskoj palaty Irkutskoj oblasti «O nedopustimosti narushenija professional’nyh prav advokatov Irkutskoj oblasti» ot 28.03.2014 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.advpalata-irk.ru/?module=news&act=read&id=244.30. Reshenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 17.07.2012 «Ob utverzhdenii obzora praktiki Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii za pervyj kvartal 2012 goda» // Jekonomika i zhizn’. – 2012. – № 32.31. Son’kin N.B. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye standarty advokatskoj dejatel’nosti. Pravovye osnovy advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokatury // Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i advokatura v Rossii. Vvedenie v special’nost’: Uchebnik. – Ch. 1 / Pod red. I.L. Trunova. – M., 2006. – S. 148.32. Stecovskij Ju.I. Zashhita advokata ot ugolovnogo presledovanija // Advokat. – 2007. – № 9. – S. 36.33. Ugolovnyj kodeks Ispanii / Pod red. i s predisl.: N.F. Kuznecovoj, F.M. Reshetnikovа; Per.: V.P. Zyrjanova, L.G. Shnajder. – M., 1998.34. Ugolovnyj kodeks Kazahstana [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1008032.35. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ // SZ RF. – 1996. – № 25. – St. 2954.36. Ugolovnyj kodeks Francii / Per. s franc. I.E. Krylovoj; nauch. red. L.V. Golovko. – SPb., 2002.37. Hechan A.N. Zabastovka advokatov v Armenii // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 4 (5). – S. 68–69.
ACTUAL PRO BLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICEEvko V.Y.The conception of actual marital relations in the family law of Ukraine
Purpose: to disclose the conception of actual marital relations and to find out their judicial significant features which will allow courts to protect material womens’ and mens’ interests effectively who live together without official registration of their relations.Methodology: such methods were used as historical-judicial, systemic-judicial and comparative-judicial.Results: in this article on the basis of existing legislation in Ukraine highlighted the main aspects and features of the actual marital relations, and given their doctrinal definition. It is found that the actual marriage must meet the conditions of the two groups: the first – the conditions, compliance with which is mandatory for the marriage, the second – the conditions that allow simultaneous concubinage closer to marriage, but also to distinguish it from him. The first group includes conditions that are laid down in Articles 22, 24–26 UK Ukraine. The second group are the following: 1) living together; 2) common life; 3) sufficient length of actual marital relations; 4) identification of these relations to third parties. Compliance with the conditions of the first and the second group to be set by the court in dealing with any property dispute involving people who lived or live in concubinage.Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific value, since it is one of the first attempts to analyze the actual marriage relationships that develop between men and women and provide them legally significant features.Keywords: marriage, family, the actual marriage, spouses, concubinage.References (transliterated)1. Antokol’skaja M.V. Semejnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurist, 1999.2. Arivanjuk T. Pro dejakі problemnі pitannja novogo sіmejnogo zakonodavstva. Faktichne podruzhzhja // Mala enciklopedіja notarіusa. – 2004. − № 1 (13). – S. 39– 2.3. Beljakova A.M., Vorozhejkin E.M. Sovetskoe se-mejnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1974.4. Vorozhejkin E.M. Pravovye osnovy braka i sem’i. – M., 1969.5. Ermakov V.D. O konceptual’nyh podhodah k so-vershenstvovaniju pravovogo regulirovanija semejnyh otnoshenij v RF // Zakon i pravo. – 2004. − № 4. – S. 37–39.6. Ershova N.M. Sem’ja i pravo // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. − 1982. − № 2. – S. 38–45.7. Zhilinkova I.V. Pravovoj rezhim imushhestva chlenov sem’i. – Har’kov: Ksilon, 2000.8. Zagorovskij A.I. Kurs semejnogo prava. – Odessa, 1902.9. Zlotnik І. Juridichnі osoblivostі faktichnih shljubnih vіdnosin // Juridichnij zhurnal. – 2004. − № 7(25). –S. 31–35.10. Ivanov-Kuligin A.S. Pravovoj rezhim imushhestva lic, sostojashhih v fakticheskih brachnyh otnoshenijah // Pravovedenie. – 1977. − № 2. – S. 46–50.11. Korotkova L.P., Vihrov A.P. Sem’ja – tol’ko v ramkah zakona // Pravovedenie. – 1994. – № 5–6. – S. 159–163.12. Korotkova L.P. Neobhodimoe universal’noe ponjatie sem’I // Pravovedenie. – 1980. − № 1. – S. 63–65.13. Lukashevich M.P., Tulenko M.V. Specіal’nі ta galuzevі socіal’nі teorії: Navch. posіbnik. – K.: MAUP, 1999.14. Manankova R.P. Pravovoj status chlenov sem’i po sovetskomu zakonodatel’stvu. – Tomsk, 1985.15. Matveev G.K. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1978.16. Mahinchuk V., Zvezda S. Konkubinat v Semejnom kodekse // Juridicheskaja praktika. – 2004. − № 4 (318). – S. 20–21.17. Mironova G. Moral’nі zasadi Sіmejnogo kodeksu Ukraїni // Pravo Ukraїni. – 2004. − № 4. – S. 99–102.18. Nechaeva A.M. Semejnoe pravo. Kurs lekcij. – M.: Jurist, 1999.19. Nechaeva A.M. Sem’ja i zakon. – M., 1980.20. Novohats’ka Ja. Shhodo pravovoї prirodi shljubu // Pravo Ukraїni. − 2002. − № 4. – S. 131–135.21. Pchelinceva L.M. Kommentarij k Semejnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii. – M.: NORMA − INFRA M, 1999.22. Reutov S.I. K voprosu o fakticheskih brachnyh otnoshenijah // Uchenye zapiski Permskogo un-ta. – 1973. – № 290. – S. 83–95.23. Romovs’ka Z.V. Sіmejnij kodeks Ukraїni: Naukovo-praktichnij komentar. – K.: Іn Jure, 2003.24. Romovs’ka Z.V. Sіmejnij kodeks Ukraїni: pogljad u majbutnє // Pravo Ukraїni. – 2001. – № 2. – S. 63–65.25. Ruzakova O.A. Semejnoe pravo Rossii. Kurs lekcij: Ucheb. posob. – M.: Jelit, 2004.26. Sіmejne pravo Ukraїni / Za red. V.S. Gopanchuka. – Kiїv: Іstina, 2002.27. Sіmejne pravo Ukraїni: Pіdruchnik / L.M. Baranova, V.І. Borisova, І.V. Zhilіnkova ta іn.; Za zag. red. V.І. Borisovoї ta І.V. Zhilіnkovoї. – K.: Jurinkom Іnter, 2004.28. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo / Pod red. V.A. Rjasen-ceva. – M.: Jur. lit., 1982. − S. 4329. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo / Pod red. V.F. Maslova, A.A. Pushkina. – K., 1982.30. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo: Ucheb. posob. / K.M. Borzova, V.N. Godunov, V.V. Levyj i dr.; pod red. V.F. Chigira. – Mn.: Universitetskoe, 1989.31. Solovej T. Vіd zaruchin – do majnovoї vіdpovіdal’nostі // Nova polіtika. – 2001. − № 3. – S. 14–16.32. SU. – 1926. – № 82. – St. 612.33. Shershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazh-danskogo prava. – M., 1997.
ACTUAL PRO BLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICEStudentsov A.V.VALUE pros and cons of pre-trial settlement of disputes
Objective: identification of shortcomings and optimization of pre-trial settlement of disputes.Methodology: Analytical opposition to common mental and normative doctrines.Results: a dialectical study of pre-trial settlement of disputes.Novelty/originality/value: author’s manner of legal journalism, the combination of methodological and polemical approaches, scientific and practical importance.Keywords: pre-trial settlement, pre-trial claim wiggery.References (transliterated)1. Mednikova M. Ustanovlenie fakta nesobljudenija dosudebnogo regulirovanija sporov arbitrazhnym sudom: problemy primenenija processual’nyh norm //Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. – 2006. – № 11. – S. 20–25.2. Filosofija prava. – M.: Mysl’, 1990. – S. 529.
ACTUAL PRO BLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Khsanov F.Z.Infection victim hiv through rape and violent acts of sexsual character
Purpose: Analysis of qualifications charging HIV through rape and other sexual assault.Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal, comparative legal method.Results: The article presents an interpretation of intentional contamination and negligently injured person with HIV in the commission of rape and other sexual assault.Novelty/originality/value: The author proposes to classify such acts associated with Knowingly placing the victim (victim) in the risk of HIV infection or intentional HIV infection for multiple offenses provided for Article 131 or 132 of the Criminal Code and Art. 122 of the Criminal Code.Keywords: infection with HIV, rape, sexual assault, qualification, disposition, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.References1. Andreeva M.A. Warning sexual crime measures cri-minal law // Russian investigator. – 2010. – № 7. – S. 20–22.2. Galakhova A.V. Qualification of crimes in criminal law and judicial practice (on the basis of subjective side) // Russian investigator. – 2010. – № 18. – S. 13–18.3. Development of the AIDS epidemic. World Health Organization [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.data.unaids.org/pub/EpiReport/2006/2006_EpiUpdate_Ru.pdf.4. Fargiyev I. Criminal legal assessment of venereal diseases // Criminal Law. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 42–44.5. Omigov V.I. Rape: qualifying and particularly qualifying elements // Russian investigator. – 2011. – № 8. – S. 11–15.6. About 720 thousand people living with HIV in the Russian Federation revealed in all the years of observation. RIA news [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://www.ria.ru/society/20130325/928852641.html.
НОВОСТИ
- "Назад к ничтожеству: контрреформа закона об адвокатуре" стрим Андрея Рагулина и Романа Мельниченко
- Заявление Специального докладчика ООН по вопросу о положении в области прав человека в Российской Федерации
- Первый Всероссийский съезд адвокатов: рождение «монстра» стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Новый закон об адвокатуре: в ожидании золотого века: стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Международная научно-практическая конференция «Российская адвокатура: независимость, самоуправляемость, защищенность» (9 декабря 2023 г., 10-00 Мск.).
- Беседа с Адвокатом Андреем Рагулиным
- Принятие антиадвокатских поправок в закон об адвокатуре
- Independent expert assessment on the Draft Law to amend the Federal Law “On legal practice and legal profession in the Russian Federation”, no. 301952-8
- Антиадвокатская сущность адвокатских палат: стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Обращение Правления Межрегиональной общественной организации "Инициатива 2018" в органы Организации Объединенных Наций, к международным ассоциациям адвокатов и правозащитным организациям
- Круглый стол «Российская адвокатура: защита для защитников» (28 октября 2023 г., 10-00 Мск).
- Круглый стол «Законодательство об адвокатуре в России: прогрессивное развитие или деградация?» (25 ноября 2023 г., 10-00 Мск).
- Научно-практическая Конференция Союза "Негосударственный Экспертный Научно-Исследовательский Центр Судебных Экспертов и Специалистов"
- Мнение Комиссии по продвижению законодательных инициатив в сфере социальных и профессиональных прав адвокатов Адвокатской палаты Санкт-Петербурга / о проекте Федерального закона №301952-8 /
- Защитим российскую адвокатуру - 2023!
- Обращение Совета АП Новосибирской области о содержании Законопроекта о внесении изменений в законодательство об адвокатуре
- Независимое экспертное заключение на проект Федерального Закона «О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон «Об адвокатской деятельности и адвокатуре в Российской Федерации» № 301952-8
- Обращение в защиту российских адвокатов, подвергающихся преследованию
- 9-й форум по криптовалютам и майнингу Blockchain Life 2022
- 14-15 сентября в Москве состоится 9-й международный форум по криптовалютам и майнингу Blockchain Life 2022.
