Translator
Скачать
Вниманию авторов
Индексирование журнала
Содержание журнала
Historical experience
Basarab O.T.The Peculiarities of Kievan Rus Border Guarding – Historical and Legal AspectsPurpose: Research of normative regulation of Kievan Rus border guarding through the studying of ancient sources of law.Methodology: Historical-legal and formal legal method was used.Results: In the scientific publication the legal peculiarities of Kiev Rus border guarding are investigated. Texts of ancient sources of law are analyzed. The lack of special legal acts that regulated social relations connected with the guarding and protection of the Kiev Rus border is determined. The main reasons of this fact were customs that governed a wide range of relations in those days. Thus as a result of the study of «Russian Truth», princely statutes, charters, treaties concluded between Kiev Rus and Byzantium and other ancient sources of law we distinguished norms that regulated social relations connected with the guarding and protection of the Kiev Rus border. Those norms particularly regulated territorial borders of the country (in the feudal period limited fiefdoms), the legal status of foreigners in the Kiev Rus and the position of Russian diplomats and merchants in foreign countries, process of construction of border fortifications, etc.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses the scientific value as one of the first attempts to consider the evolution of Kiev Rus Border guarding through the prism of the oldest sources of law.Keywords: border guarding, border protection, sources of law, norms, social relations.
References (transliterated)1. Grushevskij M.S. Istorija Ukrainy – Rusi. – T. 2. – K.: Libіd’, 1992.2. Duhovnye i dogovornye gramoty velikih i udel’nyh knjazej XIV–XVI vv. – M.: L.: AN SSSR, 1950.3. Istorija gosudarstva i prava Ukrainy. – Ch. 1: Uchebnik – M.: In Jure, 1996.4. Istorija granic i Pogranichnyh vojsk Ukrainy: Monografija. – Hmel’nickij: Izd-vo Hmel’nickoj gorodskoj tipografii, 2000.5. Karamzin N.M. Istorija gosudarstva russkogo [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.kulichki.com/inkwell/text/special/history/karamzin/karahist.htm.6. Povest’ vremennyh let (po Lavrent’evskoj i Ipat’evskoj letopisjam) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://stepanov01.narod.ru/library.7. Rossijskoe zakonodatel’stvo H–HH vekov: V 9 t. – T. 1. Zakonodatel’stvo Drevnej Rusi. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1984.8. Rybakov B.A. Rozhdenie Rusi. – M.: AiF Print, 2004.9. Tvorchestvo XII–XIII vv. Slovo o polku Igoreve [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL http://izbornyk.org.ua/hrushukr/hrush205.htm.10. Tolochko P.P. Drevnjaja Rus’. Ocherki social’no-politicheskoj istorii. – K.: Naukova dumka, 1987.
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Makushkina E.E.Some problems of vocational training of advocates and delivery of a qualification examination in the light of reform of the market of legal servicesPurpose: Analysis of problems of preparation of advocates, receiving status of the advocate, development of recommendations about their overcoming.Methodology: The author applied formal logical, comparative legal and sociological methods.Results: In the light of the forthcoming reform of the market of legal services the conclusion is drawn on need of increase of the state quality assurances of the legal help given by advocates. As the main direction change of existing system of vocational training of advocates and delivery of a qualification examination is called. On the basis of the analysis of the legislation, scientific researches, practice (by studying of statistical data and materials of bar associations), foreign and national experience separate suggestions for improvement of the legislation on advocates activity and legal profession in Russia are made.Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific value and the practical importance for improvement of procedural aspects of passing of qualification examinations for receiving the status of advocate and increase of vocational training of advocatesKeywords: legal profession, lawyer monopoly, reform of the market of legal services, vocational training of the lawyer, qualification examination, advocate, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. Averina A.Ju. Nekotorye perspektivy sozdanija instituta advokatskoj monopolii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 200–205.2. Bondar’ O.N. Kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ – konstitucionnaja garantija sudebnoj zashhity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossijskoj Federacii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Rostov n/D, 2008.3. Borovik I.E. Garantii predostavlenija juridicheskoj pomoshhi maloimushhim (analiz zakonodatel’stva Japonii i Rossii) // Advokat. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 81–85.4. Botnev V.K. Prekrashhenie statusa advokata // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 67–69.5. Bugarenko A.I. Obespechenie kachestva predostavljaemoj besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossii // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 45–48.6. Busurina E.O. Disciplinarnaja otvetstvennost’ sudej i advokatov: sravnitel’nyj analiz // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 40–48.7. Vlasov A.A. Konstitucionnoe pravosudie i pravo advokata na zapros (organizacionnyj i processual’nyj aspekty) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 1 (28). – S. 10–12.8. Volosnikova L.M. Ob uchastii sudov v prakticheskoj podgotovke juristov: opyt FRG // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. – 2005. – № 5. – S. 42.9. Galushkin A.A., Timoshenko D.Ju. Aktual’nye voprosy dejatel’nosti advokatskih obrazovanij v Rossijskoj Federacii na sovremennom jetape // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 3.10. Dehanov S.A. Tipologija instituta advokatury. Advokatura v Evrope i SShA // Advokat. – 2005. – № 9. – S. 67–71.11. Zakomoldin A.V. O proekte Federal’nogo zakona «Ob okazanii kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossijskoj Federacii» // Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. – 2009. – Vyp. 2. – S. 99–101. – (Pravo).12. Interv’ju s zamestitelem ministra jekonomicheskogo razvitija Rossijskoj Federacii, predsedatelem pravlenija Associacii juristov Rossii Manylovym Igorem Evgen’evichem // Juridicheskij mir. – 2011. – № 10. – S. 4–5.13. Kazakov V.N., Dobrieva M.D. Kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ (inostrannyj i mezhdunarodno-pravovoj opyt) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 4 (31). – S. 22–28.14. Karcev V.A. Nravstvennye osnovanija professional’-noj dejatel’nosti jurista // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 1 (28). – S. 29–32.15. Kashkovskij V.S. Juridicheskaja pomoshh’ kak pravovaja kategorija i social’no-pravovoe javlenie: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Tambov, 2009.16. Kleandrov M.I. Institut juridicheskoj sluzhby v predprinimatel’stve: Monografija. – M.: Norma – INFRA-M, 2013.17. Kolobashkina S.S. Publichnoe regulirovanie rynka juridicheskih uslug (po materialam zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva) // Administrativnoe pravo i process. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 61–66.18. Korobov O.A. O nekotoryh voprosah okazanija kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Rossijskaja justicija. – 2011. – № 7. – S. 56–58.19. Kosarev M.A. Pravovoj status advokata v inostrannyh gosudarstvah // Pravo i politika. – 2006. – № 11. – S. 136–151.20. Latyev A.N. Ogranichennaja advokatskaja monopolija ili otnositel’naja svoboda sudebnogo predstavitel’stva // Zakon. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 94–104.21. Mel’nichenko R.G. Kvalifikacionnyj jekzamen na poluchenie statusa rossijskogo advokata // Pravo i obrazovanie. – № 11. – 2010. – S. 28.22. Mel’nichenko R.G. Pravo na juridicheskuju pomoshh’: konstitucionnye aspekty: Monografija. – Volgograd: Izd-vo VAGS, 2003.23. Mel’nichenko R.G. Institut professional’noj otvetstvennosti advokata // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 24. – S. 114–116.24. Mel’nichenko R.G. O finansovyh ogranichenijah dostupa k advokatskoj professii v Rossii // Advokat. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 5–9.25. Minjust nameren sohranit’ pravo okazanija juridicheskih konsul’tacij tol’ko za advokatami [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.garant.ru/news/464965.26. Mirzoev G.B., Jashina O.N. Puti sovershenstvovanija organizacii gosudarstvennoj besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 3 (30). – S. 5–11.27. Morozov N.V. Osnovy pravovogo polozhenija advokata po zakonodatel’stvu Francii // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2006. – № 6. – S. 33.28. Muranov A.I. Principial’naja dopustimost’ tak nazyvaemoj advokatskoj monopolii v svete aktov Konstitucionnogo suda RF i Konstitucii RF. Velikij mif o Postanovlenii KS RF ot 16.07.2004 № 15-P // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 91–121.29. Ne nuzhno zagonjat’ v advokaturu siloj: Interv’ju s S. Pepeljaevym // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.advgazeta.ru/rubrics/13/566.30. Nevskaja O.V. Chto takoe kvalificirovannaja juridi-cheskaja pomoshh’ // Advokat. – 2004. – № 11. – S. 37–39.31. Otchet o dejatel’nosti Soveta Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii za period s aprelja 2011 goda po aprel’ 2013 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.fparf.ru/sezdi/otchet_fpa_vi_s/fsfgd.htm.32. Otchet o dejatel’nosti Soveta Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii za period s aprelja 2009 goda po aprel’ 2011 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.fparf.ru/sezdi/otchet5/otchet5_1.htm.33. Panchenko V.Ju. Kvalificirovannost’ kak priznak juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 18–20.34. Panchenko V.Ju. O «svobodnoj» i «monopol’noj» modeljah juridicheskoj pomoshhi v kontekste informacionnoj otkrytosti professional’noj dejatel’nosti juristov // Juridicheskij mir. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 60–63.35. Pilipenko Ju.S. Vstupitel’naja stat’ja // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2010. – № 5. – S. 2–3.36. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 16.07.2004 № 15-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti chasti 5 stat’i 59 Arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii v svjazi s zaprosami Gosudarstvennogo Sobranija – Kurultaja Respubliki Bashkortostan, gubernatora Jaroslavskoj oblasti, Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnojarskogo kraja, zhalobami rjada organizacij i grazhdan» // SPS «Konsul’tantPljus».37. Potashnik I.M. K voprosu o statuse advokata i statuse zashhitnika v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 7.38. Prikaz Ministerstva finansov RF ot 19.03.2013 № 32n (red. ot 20.08.2013) // SPS «Konsul’tantPljus».39. Pjatin E.I. Pravovoe regulirovanie otnoshenij po okazaniju juridicheskoj pomoshhi (uslug) v Rossii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 3 (43). – S. 66–74.40. Ragulin A.V. Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika: formulirovanie opredelenija ponjatija // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 21–25.41. Ragulin A.V. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel’stva v napravlenii ohrany professional’nyh prav advokatov // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2009. – № 4 (15). – S. 14–19.42. Ragulin A.V. Osnovnye organizacionno-pravovye sredstva obespechenija realizacii i zashhity professio-nal’nyh prav advokata // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 12–17.43. Ragulin A.V. Pravo advokata-zashhitnika trebovat’ zapreta na vmeshatel’stvo v advokatskuju dejatel’nost’ libo prepjatstvovanie ej kakim by to ni bylo obrazom: problemy zakonodatel’noj reglamentacii i prakticheskoj realizacii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 47. – S. 136–143.44. Ragulin A.V. Pravovaja reglamentacija vzaimodejstvija advokata-zashhitnika i chastnogo detektiva nuzhdaetsja v sovershenstvovanii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 25. – S. 126–128.45. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija i realizacija professio-nal’nogo prava advokata-zashhitnika na sobljudenie osobogo porjadka ugolovnogo presledovanija // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 1 (56). – S. 139–142.46. Rasporjazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 02.07.2014 № 1197-r «Ob utverzhdenii plana realizacii gosudarstvennoj programmy «Justicija» na 2014 god i planovyj period 2015 i 2016 godov».47. Reznik G.M. K voprosu o konstitucionnom soderzhanii ponjatija «kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’» // Advokat. – 2007. – № 4. – S. 10.48. Reshenie konferencii chlenov Advokatskoj palaty Rostovskoj oblasti ot 08.02.2014 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.advpalataro.ru/about/committees.php?ID=7581.49. Reshenie Soveta Advokatskoj palaty Moskovskoj oblasti ot 16.08.2006 № 08 «Ob uporjadochenii priema dokumentov i dopuska k kvalifikacionnomu jekzamenu na prisvoenie statusa advokata» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.bestpravo.ru/moskovskaya/zk-postanovlenija/w9r.htm.50. Reshenie Soveta Advokatskoj palaty Moskovskoj oblasti ot 23.05.2012 «Reglament, ustanavlivajushhij porjadok i dopolnjajushhij pravila, soderzhashhiesja v st. 9–13 glavy 3 FZ «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii», kasajushhiesja priobretenija statusa advokata» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://apmo.ru/?show=chamber_solutions#solution23may2012.51. Reshenija XIII ocherednoj konferencii chlenov Advokatskoj palaty Moskovskoj oblasti ot 24 janvarja 2014 g. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.apmo.ru/?show=conferencing_solutions&PHPSESSID=15ek2in69t0t6vge0r45jl6ku4#XIII_conference.52. Reshenija odinnadcatoj i dvenadcatoj otchetnoj konferencii advokatov Nizhegorodskoj oblasti (2013, 2014 g.) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://apno.ru/content/category/3/9/10.53. Savost’janova O.N. Predposylki vozniknovenija instituta advokatury v Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 2 (29). – S. 20–28.54. Savost’janova O.N. Ustanovlenie advokatskoj monopolii kak odno iz uslovij uspeshnoj realizacii konstitucionnogo prava na poluchenie kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi (istoriko-pravovoj aspekt) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 4 (31). – S. 41–46.55. Spisok pretendentov [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://apmo.ru/?show=applicants_waiting_list.56. Chudinovskaja N.A. Nekotorye aspekty uchastija advokata v arbitrazhnom processe // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 16–21.57. Shagiev B.V. Notariat i advokatura kak pravozashhitnye organy Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 34–38.58. Shamratova Je. Grjadushhie izmenenija v sfere juridicheskih uslug i standarty advokatskoj professii [Interv’ju s E.V. Semenjako] // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 137–147.59. Sharov G.K. K sporu o «kommercializacii» advokatury // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 169–176.60. Shestakov E. Samoregulirovanie juristov protiv advokatskoj monopolii // Rossijskoe agentstvo pravovoj i sudebnoj informacii [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://rapsinews.ru/legislation_publication/20100925/250766038.html. ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Valshina I.R.Some problem aspects of a pre-trial agreement about collaboration and the ways of their solvingPurpose: The research on the base of foreign analogues and approaches for the solving of the most disputable matters existing in the foreign legislation by conclusion of the pre-trial agreement about collaboration.Methodology: A corparative-legal analysis, analysis and synthesis methods were used.Results: An efficient solving of the problems connected with the ensuring of the victim’s and accused (suspected) person by conclusion of the pre-trial agreement about the collaboration is rendered in this article on the base of a legal regulation of the victim’s, suspected (accused) person’s rights in the international law and normative regulation of their rights by consideration of the criminal case in a simplified way.Novelty/originality/value: The practical value of a science-based analysis of foreign transaction institution functioning with justice (according to the Russian legislation – agreement about collaboration) consists in its allowing of better studying and understanding of the home agreement about collaboration and in its offering of appeared problems solving version approved by foreign experience.Keywords: victim, accused (suspected), ensuring of the rights, transaction with justice, pre-trial agreement about collaboration.References (transliterated)1. Frommann M. Regulating Plea-Bargaining in Germany: Can the Italian Approach Serve as a Model to Guarantee the Independence of German Judges? // Hanse law review(HanseLR). – 2009. – № 1. – P. 211.2. Baev M.O. O roli advokata-zashhitnika v zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve s podozrevaemym / obvinjaemym // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 376. – (Pravo).3. Val’shina I.R. O vozmozhnosti zakljuchenija dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve pri rassledovanii ugolovnogo dela v forme doznanija // Aktual’nye problemy sudebnoj vlasti, prokurorskogo rassledovanija i pravozashhitnoj dejatel’nosti: Sb. nauch. statej / Pod obshh. red. O.V. Gladyshevoj, V.A. Semencova. – Krasnodar, 2013. – S. 47–55.4. Val’shina I.R. O roli poterpevshego pri zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve s pozicii mezhdunarodnogo prava // Obshhestvo i Pravo. – 2013. – № 3 (45). – S. 194–199.5. Val’shina I.R. O roli suda pri zakljuchenii «sdelok s pravosudiem» // Aktual’nye problemy sudebnoj vlasti, prokurorskogo rassledovanija i pravozashhitnoj dejatel’nosti: Sb. nauch. statej / Pod obshh. red. O.V. Gladyshevoj, V.A. Semencova. – Krasnodar, 2014. – S. 41–50.6. Grankin K.B., Mil’tova E.V. Problemy primenenija norm UPK RF, regulirujushhih dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 76–79.7. Kuvaldina Ju.V. Predposylki i perspektivy razvitija kompromissnyh sposobov razreshenija ugolovno-pravovyh konfliktov v Rossii: Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Samara: SamGu, 2011 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.kalinovsky-k.narod.ru/b/kuvaldina_2011/2-2.html.8. Kuvaldina Ju.V. Obzhalovanie prigovorov, postanovlennyh v osobom porjadke: nastojashhee i budushhee // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 14−15.9. Semencov V.A., Val’shina I.R. Obespechenie prav poterpevshego pri zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve s pozicii mezhdunarodnogo prava, zarubezhnogo i otechestvennogo zakonodatel’stva // Biblioteka kriminalista. – 2013. – № 6(11). – S. 233–247.10. Smirnov A.V. Osobyj porjadok prinjatija sudebnogo reshenija pri zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnyj process. – 2009. – № 10 (58). – S. 8.11. Sofijchuk N.V. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossijskoj Federacii: nekotorye problemy pravoprimenenija // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie. – 2012. – № 19. – S. 48–52.12. Stovpovoj A., Tjunin V. Ugolovno-pravovye i ugolovno-processual’nye aspekty dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve na predvaritel’nom sledstvii // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 118–123.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Martynenko I.E. Features of the appeal of judicial acts in economic (arbitration) legal proceedings of Republic of Belarus Purpose: Research of features of system of the appeal of judicial resolutions for development of measures on improvement of the procedural legislation.Methodology: Methodological basis scientific works in the field of civil and arbitration processes made, judicial systems. Work is prepared on the basis of the analysis of literary and standard sources. Methods of the analysis and synthesis, comparative jurisprudence, historical and legal and formally legal methods were used.Results: In article features of functioning in Republic of Belarus systems of the appeal (audit) of judicial resolutions on economic disputes are considered. Subjects of excitement are defined; the content of appeal, cassation and supervising verification of acts of justice on economic disputes is opened. The analysis of the existing legislation in a context of the changes made at the end of 2013 – the beginning of 2014 in judicial system of this country is made.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses a certain scientific value as is one of the first attempts to consider changes in judicial and legal system of Belarus connected with improvement organization of judicial authority on economic disputes.Keywords: court, judicial system, justice, appeal, cassation, judicial supervision.References (transliterated)1. Borisova E.A. Teoreticheskie problemy proverki sudebnyh aktov v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom processah: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. – M., 2005.2. Borisova E.A. O proizvodstve v arbitrazhnom apelljacionnom sude // Hozjajstvo i pravo. − 2004. − № 5. − S. 80−85.3. Borisova E.A. Apelljacija v grazhdanskom (arbitrazhnom) processe. − 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. − M.: Gorodec, 2008.4. Efimov A.E. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom processe: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. − M., 2007.5. Zhukova O.V. Obespechenie dostupnosti pravosudija v stadii kassacionnogo proizvodstva: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. SPb., 2005.6. Kamenkov V. Apelljacija ili kassacija v hozjajstvennom processual’nom kodekse? // Vestnik Vysshego hozjajstvennogo suda Respubliki Belarus’. − 2003. − № 6. − S. 87−98.7. Kleandrov M.I. Arbitrazhnyj apelljacionnyj sud i problema obzhalovanija «promezhutochnyh opredelenij» // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. − 2004. − № 2. − S. 128−139.8. Koljadko I.N. Apelljacionnyj peresmotr sudebnyh reshenij v Respublike Belarus’ // Pravo Belarusi. − 2004. − № 19. − S. 65–68.9. Martynenko I.Je. Sudoustrojstvo i sudoproizvodstvo po hozjajstvennym sporam: Ucheb. posob. – Grodno: GrGU, 2009.10. Nagornaja Je.N. Proizvodstvo v kassacionnoj instancii arbitrazhnogo suda: sravnitel’nyj kommentarij Arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Justicinform, 2003.11. Podval’nyj I.O. Apelljacija i kassacija v arbitrazhnom processe Rossijskoj Federacii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. − SPb., 2001.12. Smetannikov A.E. Problema stanovlenija form apelljacii v rossijskom arbitrazhnom processe // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. − 2006. – № 7. – S. 34–36.13. Smagina E.S. Teoreticheskie aspekty apelljacionnogo proizvodstva po obzhalovaniju reshenij i opredelenij mirovyh sudej v rossijskom grazhdanskom processe: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. − Saratov, 2005.14. Timoshenko A.S. Problemy apelljacionnogo proizvodstva v arbitrazhnom processe // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. – 2007. – № 7. – S. 51–57.15. Tjan D.V. Sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija arbitrazhnogo suda kassacionnoj instancii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2007.16. Sherstjuk V.M. Arbitrazhnyj process (v voprosah i otvetah): Kommentarij, rekomendacii, predlozhenija po primeneniju Arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii. –3-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Gorodec, 2004.17. Jakovleva G.V. Proizvodstvo v hozjajstvennom sude apelljacionnoj instancii: Posobie dlja studentov. – Minsk: BGU, 2008.18. Jakovleva G.V. Vozbuzhdenie dela v hozjajstvennom sude apelljacionnoj instancii // Vestnik Vysshego Hozjajstvennogo Suda Respubliki Belarus’. – 2006. – № 6. – S. 115–117.
PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Ragulin A.V.The Federal Law draft «About modification of separate acts of the Russian Federation regarding ensuring the right of the advocate on collecting the data necessary for rendering a legal aid»: author’s comment and suggestions for improvementPurpose: The Federal Law draft analysis «About modification of separate acts of the Russian Federation regarding ensuring the right of the advocate on collecting the data necessary for rendering a legal aid» for determination of its compliance to the legislation on lawyer activity and legal profession and possibility of achievement of the tasks set for it.Methodology: The formal-legal method, comparative - legal method, statistical method and method of theoretical modeling were used.Results: In work the positive assessment is given to the presented bill, and the importance of realization is proved by the advocate’s of the right for inquiry. Besides, scientific and reasonable offers on need of adjustment used in a number of offers of the bill of formulations are stated the right of the advocate for inquiry was expanded. It is also offered to exclude from the bill norm about administrative responsibility of the advocate for violation of an order of the address with information received by advocate’s inquiry as the advocate can be made responsible for similar act in a disciplinary order. In article it is also offered to realize a judicial order of permission of obtaining data at the request of the advocate when information which it requests belongs to secret especially protected by the law.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is the first attempt to consider the questions concerning the Federal Law draft about advocate’s inquiry.Keywords: legal profession, advocate, rights of advocate, advocate’s inquiry, inquiry, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79.2. https://rospravosudie.com.3. Agutin A.V. Mirovozzrencheskie idei v ugolovno-processual’nom dokazyva-nii: Avtoref. dis. … dokt. jurid. nauk. – N. Novgorod, 2005. – S. 25–26.4. Agutin A.V. Obespechenie zakonnyh interesov poterpevshego i obvinjaemogo v dosudebnom proizvodstve. – N. Novgorod, 2005. – S. 21.5. Bardin L.N. Zakon popravili, no nedostatochno // Advokatskie vesti. – 2005. – № 2. – S. 17.6. Bubon K.V. O tajnah, sekretah i pravah advokata // Advokat. – 2005. – № 6.7. Burobin V. Tajna sledstvija i interesy doveritelja // Novaja advokatskaja gaze-ta. – 2007. – № 1 (004).8. Vajpan V.A. Nastol’naja kniga advokata. – M.: Justicinform. 2006. – S. 38.9. Varfolomeev V.V. Problema sbora advokatom dokazatel’stv // Juridicheskij mir. – 2006. – № 4. – S. 65.10. Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2007. – № 3 (17). – S. 88.11. Vlasov A.A. Konstitucionnoe pravosudie i pravo advokata na zapros (organi-zacionnyj i processual’nyj aspekty) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advo-katury i notariata. – 2013. – № 1 (28). – S. 10–12.12. Galoganov A.P. Advokatskaja tajna. Soderzhanie. Konfidencial’nye i nekon-fidencial’nye svedenija, poluchennye pri osushhestvlenii professional’noj deja-tel’nosti // Advokatura. Gosudarstvo. Obshhestvo: Sb. materialov 6 ezhegodnoj na-uch.-praktich. konferencii, 2009 g. / Federal’naja Palata advokatov Ros. Federa-cii. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2009. – C. 38.13. Grudcyna L. V zakon ob advokature neobhodimy produmannye popravki // Ad-vokat. – 2004. – № 7. –S. 33–37.14. Guljaev A. P., Rivkin K. E., Sarajkina O.V., Judushkin S.M. Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii». – M.: Jekzamen, 2004. – S. 51.15. Dadonov S.V. Realizacija principa sostjazatel’nosti na dosudebnyh stadijah ugolovnogo processa Rossii: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. – M., 2003. – S. 22.16. Zakomoldin A.V. Problemy okazanija kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomo-shhi v ugolovnom processe Rossii. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2009. – S. 114.17. Karahanjan S.G. Juridicheskie znanija v sisteme professional’nyh znanij ad-vokata // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – № 7. – S. 1725 –1726.18. Korobicyn M.G. Neispolnenie advokatskogo zaprosa // Advokat. – 2008. – № 3. – S. 112–115.19. Kronov E.V. Advokatskij zapros v ugolovnom processe // Rossijskaja justi-cija. – 2008. – № 2. – S. 45.20. Makarova Z.V. Professional’naja zashhita podozrevaemyh, obvinjaemyh. – SPb.: Izdatel’stvo R. Aslanova «Juridicheskij centr Press», 2008. – S. 227–228.21. Makushkina E.Je. K voprosu o srokah predostavlenija advokatu zaproshennyh im dokazatel’stv // Jurist. – 2007. – № 1. – S. 59–61.22. Mahnik O.P. Konstitucionnoe pravo na lichnuju i semejnuju tajnu. Vrachebnaja tajna // Konstitucionnoe i municipal’noe pravo. – 2006. – № 8.23. «Neopredelennost’ju zakona kto-to objazatel’no vospol’zuetsja, chtoby izvra-tit’ ego dejstvitel’nyj smysl». Interv’ju s G.M. Reznikom, prezidentom Advokat-skoj palaty g. Moskvy // Advokat. – 2004. – № 11. – S. 4–8.24. Ragulin A.V. «Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika»: formulirovanie opredelenija ponjatija // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 21–25.25. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu o neobhodimosti usilenija garantij nezavisimosti ad-vokata i sohranenija advokatskoj tajny // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii ad-vokatury. – 2008. – № 3 (8). – S. 10–15.26. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu o soderzhanii prava advokata-zashhitnika sovershat’ dejstvija, ne protivorechashhie zakonodatel’stvu Rossijskoj Federacii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 113–115.27. Ragulin A.V. O prave advokata-zashhitnika otkazyvat’ v predostavlenii svede-nij, svjazannyh s okazaniem juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 15–17.28. Ragulin A.V. Ponjatie i sistema instituta professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 81–85.29. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija prav advokata-zashhitnika na opros lic s ih sogla-sija i predstavlenie predmetov i dokumentov // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 1 (2) – S. 50–52.30. Tarasov A. A. Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i sledstvennoj tajne // Sootnoshe-nie dosudebnogo i sudebnogo proizvodstva: voprosy prava, processa i kriminali-stiki: Materialy mezhvuzovskoj nauch.-praktich. konferencii (16 fevralja 2006 g.). – Omsk: Izd-vo Omsk. jurid. in-ta, 2006. – S. 17.31. Jakubovich N.A. Uchastie zashhitnika v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam // So-cialisticheskaja zakonnost’. – 1963. – № 11. – S. 43.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Minyazeva T.F.Limits of alternativeness of criminal and legal sanctionsPurpose: Consideration of questions of limits of alternativeness of the sanctions containing in the Criminal code of the Russian Federation.Methodology: Historical legal and formally legal methods were used.Results: In article recommendations about establishment of reasonable limits of criminal and legal sanctions and their alternativeness are formulated. The author notes that articles about bribery contain the wide range of limits of application of the sanctions, promoting corruption manifestation and not promoting the solution of problems of crime control. The author offered to establish a penalty only as additional punishment and also it is offered to return property confiscation to system of punishments. It is offered in sanctions of articles with the maximum limit of imprisonment in ten years, to set the minimum limit in five years of imprisonment; for nonviolent plunders with aggravating circumstances to establish the maximum term of imprisonment in seven years and, respectively, the minimum – three years. Within imprisonment in sanctions other crimes it is expedient to establish a gap no more than in four – six years.Novelty/originality/value: Article has high scientific value as in it topical issues of improvement of the criminal legislation of Russia in modern conditions are considered.Keywords: penal law, punishment, sanctions, penalty, property confiscation, imprisonment for a certain term, alternativeness of sanctions.References (transliterated)1. Abdullaev Je. Osobennosti regulirovanija prav nesovershennoletnih i ispolnenie nakazanij v ispravitel’nyh uchrezhdenijah Azerbajdzhana // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 46. – S. 40–42.2. Volkov B.S. Obshhepredupreditel’noe znachenie nakazanija i problema povyshenija ego jeffektivnosti // Problemy nakazanija po zakonodatel’stvu Rossii i zarubezhnyh stran: Materialy mezhvuzovskoj nauchnoj konferencii. – M.: RUDN, 1999. – S. 7.3. Vstrecha s Mihailom Fedotovym, Vladimirom Lukinym i Borisom Titovym, 10 ijulja 2012 g. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7lDhAutmV84. Ivanov D.I. Interesy gosudarstva v sfere ispolnenija ugolovnyh nakazanij kak ob#ekt ugolovno-pravovoj ohrany // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 8.5. Karpec I.I. Nakazanie. Social’nye, pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy. – M., 1973. – S. 134.6. Konovalova I.A. Opredelenie individual’nyh mer preduprezhdenija korystnyh prestuplenij nesovershennoletnih // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 14.7. Kruter M.S. Razvitie institutov ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za narushenie pravil obrashhenija opasnyh othodov (dorevoljucionnyj period) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2010. – № 1 (16). – S. 66–70.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Baturina N.A.Problems of realization of a principle of collective leadership at revision of civil cases in a cassation and supervising orderPurpose: The analysis of efficiency of realization of a principle of collective leadership at revision of civil cases in a cassation and supervising order.Methodology: The author used a formal-legal and а comparative legal methodsResults: Considering the principle of joint consideration of civil cases through a psychology prism, the author of article draws a conclusion that the option of joint hearing of cases fixed in civil procedural legislation Russian Federation in vessels of cassation and supervising instances not fully promotes increase of efficiency of civil legal proceedings.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value as is one of the first attempts to consider a question realization of a principle of collective leadership at revision of civil cases in a cassation and supervising order through a prism of psychology.Keywords: civil process, principle of collective leadership, revision of civil cases, cassation instance, supervising instance.References (transliterated)1. Borisova E.A. Proverka sudebnyh aktov po grazhdanskim delam. – M.: Gorodec, 2005. – S. 93.2. Bykov V.M. Proizvodstvo v sude kassacionnoj instancii po novomu Zakonu: Nauchnyj kommentarij // Nalogi. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 17–22.3. Verblovskij G. Voprosy russkogo grazhdanskogo prava i processa. Edinolichnyj sud po grazhdanskim delam. – M.: Tovarishhestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, 1896. – S. 412.4. Majers D. Psihologija / Per. s angl.: I.A. Karpikov, V.A. Starovojtova. – 2-e izd. – Mn.: Popurrm, 2006. – S. 748–757.5. Neshataeva T.N. Sud i zashhita prav i svobod grazhdan Rossijskoj Federacii // Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy grazhdanskogo, arbitrazhnogo processa i ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva: Sbornik nauchnyh statej. – Krasnodar: SPb.: Juridicheskij centr Press, 2005. – S. 34–43.6. Svencickij A.L. Social’naja psihologija: Uchebnik. – M.: TK Velbi: Prospekt, 2004. – S. 214–217.7. Stoljarenko L.D. Psihologija: Uchebnik dlja vuzov. – SPb.: Piter, 2008. – S. 464.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Fomenko E.V.Problem issues of corpus delicti legislative consolidation «mediation in bribery» in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Purpose: Analysing the standards consolidated in Article 291¹ of the Russian Federation’s Criminal Code and developing some proposals related to its improvement.Methodology: Historico-legal, formal legal and systemic methods of scientific cognition, description, comparison, analysis and synthesis have been used.Outcome: The article characterises the legal nature of the notion of mediation in bribery, outlines the problems related to qualifying the mediation in bribery and proposes the ways to tackle these problems by altering some individual standards of the Russian Federation’s Criminal Code.Novelty/Originality/Value: is in the fact that the author has analysed the legislator’s innovation consolidated in the standards of Article 291¹ of the Russian Federation’s Criminal Code, as well as provided some recommendations to be followed within the process of improving the Russian criminal legislation and law-enforcement practices in the area of regulating the standards, norms and legal relationships looked into in the work.Keywords: mediation, bribery and mediation in a commercial graft.References (transliterated)1. Anikin A.A. Otvetstvennost’ za vzjatochnichestvo po novomu UK // Zakonnost’. – 1997. – № 6. – S. 33.2. Bjulleten’ Verhovnogo Suda SSSR. – 1962. – № 5. – S. 8.3. Bjulleten’ Verhovnogo Suda SSSR. – 1990. – № 3. – S. 11.4. Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestuplenija. – M.: Jurist, 2000. – S. 248.5. Zdravomyslov B.V. Dolzhnostnye prestuplenija. Ponjatie i kvalifikacija. – M., 1975. – S. 152.6. Ivanov Je.A. Vlijanie antikorrupcionnogo zakono-datel’stva Velikobritanii na dejatel’nost’ rossijskih kompanij // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 6(61). – С. 144–147.7. Kachmazov O.H. Otvetstvennost’ za vzjatochnichestvo po rossijskomu ugolovnomu pravu. – Vladikavkaz: Iriston, 2000. – S. 152.8. Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu RSFSR (po sostojaniju na 15 dekabrja 1993 g.) / Otv. red. V.I. Radchen-ko. – M.: Verdikt, 1994. – S. 333.9. Korzhanskij N.I. Kvalifikacija sledovatelem dolzhnostnyh prestuplenij: Ucheb. posob. – Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1986. – S. 58.10. Krasnopeeva E.V. Vzjatochnichestvo: ugolovno-pravovoj i kriminologicheskij aspekty: Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – M., 2002. – S. 96–98.11. Fomenko E.V. Aktual’nye voprosy sovershenstvovanija dejstvujushhego zakonodatel’stva po bor’be s korrupciej i vzjatochnichestvom // Rossijskij sledovatel’. – 2013. – № 24. – S. 40–43.12. Fomenko E.V. Uzhestochat’ nel’zja milovat’? // Jezh-Jurist. – 2008. – № 46 (nojabr’). – S. 15.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Isayev P.A.To a problem of merging of management personnel with organized crime in Russian FederationPurpose: Consideration of actual problems of formation of the negative social phenomenon of criminal bureaucracy for the purpose of development of the offers directed on fight against it.Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal method and a method of theoretical modeling.Results: In article the main scientific approaches to a problem of an evolution of bureaucracy in more dangerous to society and the form state are analyzed, the main stages of an evolution of bureaucracy in criminal bureaucracy are characterized.Novelty/originality/value: Article contains representing scientific and practical importance author’s generalizations and the conclusions directed on improvement of scientific ideas of criminal bureaucracy as to a negative form of deviant behavior of civil officers.Keywords: bureaucracy, organized crime, management.References (transliterated)1. Arutjunov L.S., Kas’janenko M.A. Vlijanie kriminal’-noj bjurokratii na jetnicheskuju prestupnost’ v RF: Monografija. – Kislovodsk: Izd-vo KGTI, 2007. –S. 30.2. Atamanchuk G.V. Teorija gosudarstvennogo upravlenija. – M., 2004. – S. 12.3. Besedina A.S. Faktory, determinirujushhie voznik-novenie prestuplenij, svjazannyh s nezakonnoj registraciej sdelok s zemlej, moshennichestvom i korrupciej v jetoj sfere // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2012. – № 6. – S. 3.4. Volkov A.M., Karimov H.M. Agentstvo pri Prezidente Respubliki Tadzhikistan po finansovomu kontrolju i bor’be s korrupciej Respubliki Tadzhikistan kak publichnyj sub#ekt pravovogo regulirovanija otvetstvennosti dolzhnostnyh lic // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 8.5. Kallagov T.Je. Zadachi i funkcii municipal’noj sluzhby v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 6.6. Kardashova I.B., Konysheva E.G. Ob uregulirovanii konflikta interesov na municipal’noj sluzhbe // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 6.7. Kas’janenko M.A. O nekotoryh kriminal’nyh aspektah diversifikacii pravovogo immuniteta v «protivopravnyj» // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 52. – S. 123–124.8. Ketov Ju.M., Kas’janenko M.A. O nekotoryh kriminologicheskih osobennostjah vzaimosvjazi kriminal’nogo bjurokratizma i organizovannoj prestupnosti v sovremennoj Rossii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2011. – № 36. – S. 117–120.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Karpov E.S.On current trends in tax legislation in the Russian FederationPurpose: The research of contemporary issues of reform and codification of the tax legislation of the Russian Federation.Methodology: Historical-legal and formally-legal method were used.Results: The author analyzes the current trends of the tax laws, the legal nature of the customs duties, insurance contributions for compulsory social insurance. According to the author, there is now a gradual replacement of the tax payments on the non-tax, that leads to a formal reduction of the tax burden at its actual increases. These negative trends criticized in the work.Novelty/originality/value: Article has high scientific value and has practical significance, because it is one of the first attempts to consider current trends codify the tax laws. The author not only identifies the problems in this area, but also offers solutions.Keywords: tax Code of the Russian Federation, the reform of the tax system, the codification of the tax laws, customs, insurance contributions for compulsory social insurance.References (transliterated)1. Alpatov P.Ju. Rynochnaja jekonomika i chastnaja sobstvennost’ v Rossijskoj Federacii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2010. – № 5. – S. 112–126.2. Bakaeva O.Ju. Tamozhennye fiskal’nye dohody: pravovoe regulirovanie. – M.: Statut, 2005. – S. 99–100.3. Borzunova O.A. Nalogovyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii: genezis, istorija prinjatija i tendencii sovershenstvovanija. – M.: Justicinform, 2010. – S. 6.4. Brjummerhoff D. Teorija gosudarstvennyh finansov. – Vladikavkaz, 2001. – S. 186.5. Bjudzhetnoe poslanie Prezidenta RF Federal’nomu Sobraniju ot 13 ijunja 2013 g. «O bjudzhetnoj politike v 2014–2016 godah» // Pensija. – 2013. – № 6.6. Vasjanina E.L. Fiskal’noe pravo Rossii: Monografija / Pod red. S.V. Zapol’skogo. – M.: KONTRAKT, 2013. – S. 77.7. Vlasenko A.V. Organizacionno-pravovye osnovy optimizacii nalogooblozhenija: teo-rija voprosa // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 108–111.8. Gutarina O.V. Finansovo-pravovaja priroda objaza-tel’nyh social’nyh vznosov // Finansovoe pravo. – 2013. – № 8. – S. 7.9. Ivanov V.V. O nekotoryh osobennostjah uplaty aptechnymi uchrezhdenijami strahovyh vznosov v gosudarstvennye social’nye vnebjudzhetnye fondy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 4 (5). – S. 58–61.10. Kozyrin A.N. Tamozhennaja poshlina. – M., 1998. – S. 5.11. Kuksin I.N. Nalog kak neot#emlemyj priznak gosudarstva: istoriko-teoreticheskij analiz // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 48. – S. 57–60.12. Kucherov I.I. Teorija nalogov i sborov (pravovye aspekty): Monografija. – M.: JurInfoR, 2009. – S. 205.13. Majburov I.A., Sokolovskaja A.M. Teorija nalogooblozhenija. Prodvinutyj kurs: Uchebnik. – M.: JuNITI-DANA, 2011.14. Nalogi i nalogovoe pravo: Ucheb. posob. / Pod red. A.V. Bryzgalina. – M., 1997. – S. 87–89.15. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 10 dekabrja 2002 g. № 284-O «Po zaprosu Pravitel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii o proverke konstitucionnosti Postanovlenija Pravitel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii «Ob utverzhdenii Porjadka opredelenija platy i ee predel’nyh razmerov za zagrjaznenie okruzhajushhej prirodnoj sredy, razmeshhenie othodov, drugie vidy vrednogo vozdejstvija» i stat’i 7 Federal’nogo zakona «O vvedenii v dejstvie chasti pervoj Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // Ros. gazeta. – 2002. – 25 dekab-rja.16. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 22 janvarja 2004 g. № 8-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby otkrytogo akcionernogo obshhestva «Nojzidler Syktyvkar» na narushenie konstitucionnyh prav i svobod stat’ej 3 Federal’nogo zakona «O strahovyh tarifah na objazatel’noe social’noe strahovanie ot neschastnyh sluchaev na proizvodstve i professional’nyh zabolevanij na 2000 god». Dokument opublikovan ne byl.17. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 17 ijunja 2013 g. № 13-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti chasti 2 stat’i 2 Federal’nogo zakona ot 23 dekabrja 2010 g. № 360-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal’nyj zakon «O dopolnitel’nom social’nom obespechenii chlenov letnyh jekipazhej vozdushnyh sudov grazhdanskoj aviacii» v svjazi s zaprosami Arbitrazhnogo suda Sahalinskoj oblasti i Arbitrazhnogo suda Primorskogo kraja» // Ros. gazeta. – 2013. – 26 ijunja.18. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 24 fevralja 1998 g. № 7-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel’nyh polozhenij statej 1 i 5 Federal’nogo zakona ot 5 fevralja 1997 g. «O tarifah strahovyh vznosov v Pensionnyj fond Rossijskoj Federacii, Fond social’nogo strahovanija Rossijskoj Federacii, Gosudarstvennyj fond zanjatosti naselenija Rossijskoj Federacii i v Fondy objazatel’nogo medicinskogo strahovanija na 1997 god» v svjazi s zhalobami rjada grazhdan i zaprosami sudov» // Ros. gaze-ta. – 1998. – 10 marta.19. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 28 fevralja 2006 g. № 2-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel’nyh polozhenij Federal’nogo zakona «O svjazi» v svjazi s zaprosom Dumy Korjakskogo avtonomnogo okruga» // Ros. gazeta. – 2006. – 14 marta.20. Reshenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 28 marta 2002 g. № GKPI2002-178 «O priznanii nezakonnym (nedejstvitel’nym) Postanovlenija Pravitel’stva RF ot 28 avgusta 1992 g. № 632 «Ob utverzhdenii Porjadka opredelenija platy i ee predel’nyh razmerov za zagrjaznenie okruzhajushhej prirodnoj sredy, razmeshhenie othodov, drugie vidy vrednogo vozdejstvija» v redakcii ot 14 ijunja 2001 g.» // Nalogovyj vestnik. – 2002. – № 12.21. Ros. gazeta. – 2003. – 10 ijulja.22. Troshkina T.N., Shahmamet’ev A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie tamozhennyh platezhej. – M., 2003. – S. 108.23. Finansovoe pravo: Uchebnik / Otv. red. N.I. Himicheva. – 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Norma, 2008. – S. 368.24. Harisov I.F. Pravovaja priroda nalogovyh i tamozhennyh platezhej // Nalogi. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 12.25. Cindeliani I.A. Tamozhennaja poshlina v sisteme fiskal’nyh platezhej v Rossii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2004. – № 6. – S. 54.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Fedorova L.F. Problems of realization of the right of the child to Express his(her) opinionPurpose: To research the content of the right of the child to Express his (her) opinion in the Russian legislation, the identification of problems that arise in law-enforcement practiceMethodology: Legal, historical, logical and formal legal methods.Results: The legislative affirmation of the right of the child to Express his opinion in the historical aspect is considered in the paper. It is established that prior to 1995, this right was enshrined in the laws and regulations in a very truncated form. However, even after a substantial increase in the content of the right of the child to Express his opinion in the Family code of 1995, both in theory and in practice there are many uncertain and problematic issues associated with the implementation of this law.Novelty/originality/value: In the article for the first time taking into account the achievements of modern psychology, the necessity of reducing the age at which compulsory account of the views of the child and expansion of the list of actions for execution of which requires mandatory consent of the child. .Keywords: child, the age, the right to express an opinion, consent.References (transliterated)1. URL: http://www.gks.ru.2. URL: http://www.rosmintrud.ru/docs/mintrud/protection/69.3. Abramov V.I. Prava rebenka i ih zashhita v Rossii: obshheteoreticheskij analiz: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2007. – S. 28.4. Antokol’skaja M.V. Semejnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Norma – Infra-M, 2010. – S. 189.5. Besedkina N.I. K voprosu o priemnoj sem’e // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 11.6. Besedkina N.I. Pravo rebenka zhit’ i vospityvat’sja v sem’e // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2011. – № 5. – S. 121–127.7. Bolotova A.V., Molchanova O.P. Psihologija razvitija i vozrastnaja psihologija. – M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki, 2012.8. Vavil’chenkova S.E. Obshheteoreticheskie problemy pravovogo regulirovanija v sfere materinstva, detstva i sem’i // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 76–80.9. Ventcel’ K.N. Osvobozhdenie rebenka. – 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Zemlja i fabrika, 1923.10. Ziganshina D.F. Imushhestvennye prava nesovershennoletnih // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2008. – № 5. – S. 90–99.11. Il’ina O.Ju. Interesy rebenka v semejnom prave Rossijskoj Federacii. – M.: Gorodec, 2006.12. Kommentarij k Semejnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii / Otv. red. O.N. Nizamieva. – M.: Prospekt, 2011. – S. 216–217.13. Kommentarij k Semejnomu kodeksu RF / Otv. red. A.M. Nechaeva. – M.: Jurajt-Izdat, 2008. – S. 195.14. Korbut L.V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye voprosy klassifikacii prav detej // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 49. – S. 19–23.15. Korbut L.V. Obzor zasedanija komissii po pravovomu polozheniju sem’i Mezhdunarodnogo sojuza juristov // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2014. – № 2 (69). – S. 181–185.16. Korol’ I.G. Lichnye neimushhestvennye prava rebenka po semejnomu pravu Rossijskoj Federacii: Nauch.-praktich. posob. – M.: Prospekt, 2010.17. Kravchuk N.V. Konvencija o mezhdunarodnom pohishhenii detej: zakonodatel’nye problemy i perspektivy realizacii // Semejnoe i zhilishhnoe pravo. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 12–17.18. Maksimovich L.B. O prave rebenka vyrazhat’ svoe mnenie // Problemy grazhdanskogo, semejnogo i zhilishhnogo zakonodatel’stva: Sbornik statej / Otv. red. V.N. Litovkin. – M.: Gorodec, 2005. – S. 58–70.19. Nechaeva A.M. Rossija i ee deti (rebenok, zakon, gosudarstvo). – M.: Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN, 2000. – S. 71–95.20. Neshtaeva T.N. Sud i obshhepriznannye principy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava // Vestnik VAS RF. – 2004. – № 3.21. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka / Pod red. prof. L.I. Skvorcova. – M.: Oniks, 2010. – S. 541.22. Psihologija: Uchebnik / Otv. red. A.A. Krylov. – M.: Prospekt, 2009. – S. 323.23. Rajkunova A.G. Pravosub#ektnost’ nesovershennoletnih v oblasti semejnyh lichnyh neimushhestvennyh otnoshenij // Semejnoe i zhilishhnoe pravo. – 2005. – № 1. – S. 7.24. Skakun O.S. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty realizacii prava rebenka «ne razluchat’sja s roditeljami» pri raspade sem’i // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 9 (64). – S. 65–71.25. Tatarinceva E.A. Pravovye posledstvija usynovlenija dlja usynovitelej, ih rodstvennikov v Rossijskoj Federacii i stranah obshhego prava // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 47. – S. 126–131.26. Tveritinova O.G. Imushhestvennye prava rebjonka: problemy realizacii // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 1.27. Jerdelevskij A.M. Pravo rebenka na vyrazhenie mnenija // SPS Konsul’tantPljus, 2001.
Politics and Economics of Eurasia
Shulipa A.V. The International Civil Service: the Traditional ConceptPurpose: The study of formation of the traditional concept of the international civil service.Methodology: Historical-legal method and formal-legal methodResults: The authors identifies four basic principles on which the concept of the international civil service is built. The first principle is that employees of international organizations should to a certain extent abandon its national loyalty and take into account when carrying out their duties only the interests of the international organization, which they serve. The second principle is impartiality. The third principle – independence. The fourth principle suggests that the staff of an international organization should be selected primarily on the basis of personal qualities and merits of the candidates. There was identified the influence of the British concept of the public service on the formation of the traditional concept of the international civil service. It was found that the ideal international civil service shall consist of permanent career officials recruited on the basis of their personal qualities and achievements that will put the interests of the organization above any other interests. It was also found that with increasing number of member states of the UN, the acceptability of the traditional concept has been questioned.Novelty/originality/value: The article presents a comprehensive historical and legal analysis of the formation of the International Civil Service concept.Keywords: the international civil service, the secretariat of an international organization, the League of Nations, the United Nations.References (transliterated)1. Evans A.A. Characteristics of an International Organization // Public Administration. – 1945. – Vol. 5. – P. 34.2. Gordenker L. The UN Secretary General and the Maintenance of Peace. – New York: Columbia University Press, 1967.3. Howard-Ellis C. The Origin, Structure and Working of the League of Nations. – Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1929. (Reprint 2003 by The Lawbook Exchange).4. Jenks W. Some Problems of International Civil Service // Public Administration Review. – 1943. – Vol. 3. – P. 94.5. Winchmore C. The Secretariat: Retrospect and Prospect // International Organizations. – 1965. – Vol. 3. – P. 629.6. Velichko D.S. Konstitucionno-pravovye osnovy dejatel’nosti diplomaticheskoj sluzhby // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 1 (8). – S. 85–89.7. Djomina O.V. Ponjatie i znachenie mezhdunarodnoj grazhdanskoj sluzhby // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 26. – S. 27–29.8. Samedov R.T. Covet po pravam cheloveka OON i ego predshestvennik – Komissija po pravam cheloveka: dejatel’nost’ po ustanovleniju standartov i monitoringam // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 1 (8). – S. 64–70.
EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCE
Voronov A.A.Why according to the Supreme Court of Russia and a number of subordinate courts consideration of criminal case in the absence of the advocate-defender is lawful? Purpose: Consideration of the problem questions connected with consideration of criminal cases in the absence of the advocate-defender.Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal method, a method of studying of documents and a method of the included supervision.Results: In article on the basis of the analysis of the interconnected criminal cases it is shown how the right for judicial protection against an arbitrariness of officials and the right for the appeal guaranteed by the Constitution of Russia in court of actions (or inaction) and decisions of authorities and public officials is ignored by judges of the first, appeal, cassation and supervising instances. Legal justification of illegality of consideration of criminal case is also given in article in the absence of the advocate-defender in relation to concrete criminal case.Novelty/originality/value: Article has the important practical value as contains author’s generalizations possessing scientific novelty, conclusions and practical offers which can be used in advocate’s activity.Keywords: judicial protection, the lawyer, the right to the qualified legal aid, right of defense, order of criminal trial, competitiveness, justice, advocate, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. Belozercev S.V., Akimov O.O. Zlokljuchenija sudebnoj reformy i processual’nyh norm v Rossii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 27. – S. 103–109.2. Voronov A.A. Rol’ advokatury v realizacii konstitucionnogo prava na kvalificirovannuju juridicheskuju pomoshh’: Monografija. – Voronezh: Central’no-Chernozemnoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 2009. – S. 259.3. Kozyrev B.C. Principy organizacii sudebnoj vlasti // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2010. – № 11. – S. 206–222.4. Kondratenko N.A. Pravovaja priroda i mesto sudebnoj vlasti v sisteme razdelenija vlastej // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2010. – № 7. – S. 173 –189.5. Kucherena A.G. To, chto tvoritsja v Mosgorsude, – jeto mrakobesie [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://rusverdict.livejournal.com/172566.html.6. Mirzoev G.B. Institut ob#ektivnoj istiny v ugolovnom processe – garantija spravedlivogo pravosudija // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2014. – № 1 (32). – S. 5–8.7. Mihajlova R.Ju. K voprosu ob obespechenii zakonnosti i pravoporjadka v Rossijskoj Federacii v kontekste teorii I. Kanta soglasovannosti gosudarstvennogo ustrojstva s pravovymi principami i koncepciej pravovogo gosudarstva // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 9.8. Osin V.V. Kto zashhitit, esli obvinjaemyj i podozrevaemyj lisheny prava na zashhitu izbrannym imi advokatom? // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 6 (7). – S. 93–104.9. Pronin K.V. Processual’nye aspekty formirovanija i realizacii diskrecionnyh polnomochij suda // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2009. – № 19. – S. 69–73.
Basarab O.T.The Peculiarities of Kievan Rus Border Guarding – Historical and Legal AspectsPurpose: Research of normative regulation of Kievan Rus border guarding through the studying of ancient sources of law.Methodology: Historical-legal and formal legal method was used.Results: In the scientific publication the legal peculiarities of Kiev Rus border guarding are investigated. Texts of ancient sources of law are analyzed. The lack of special legal acts that regulated social relations connected with the guarding and protection of the Kiev Rus border is determined. The main reasons of this fact were customs that governed a wide range of relations in those days. Thus as a result of the study of «Russian Truth», princely statutes, charters, treaties concluded between Kiev Rus and Byzantium and other ancient sources of law we distinguished norms that regulated social relations connected with the guarding and protection of the Kiev Rus border. Those norms particularly regulated territorial borders of the country (in the feudal period limited fiefdoms), the legal status of foreigners in the Kiev Rus and the position of Russian diplomats and merchants in foreign countries, process of construction of border fortifications, etc.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses the scientific value as one of the first attempts to consider the evolution of Kiev Rus Border guarding through the prism of the oldest sources of law.Keywords: border guarding, border protection, sources of law, norms, social relations.
References (transliterated)1. Grushevskij M.S. Istorija Ukrainy – Rusi. – T. 2. – K.: Libіd’, 1992.2. Duhovnye i dogovornye gramoty velikih i udel’nyh knjazej XIV–XVI vv. – M.: L.: AN SSSR, 1950.3. Istorija gosudarstva i prava Ukrainy. – Ch. 1: Uchebnik – M.: In Jure, 1996.4. Istorija granic i Pogranichnyh vojsk Ukrainy: Monografija. – Hmel’nickij: Izd-vo Hmel’nickoj gorodskoj tipografii, 2000.5. Karamzin N.M. Istorija gosudarstva russkogo [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.kulichki.com/inkwell/text/special/history/karamzin/karahist.htm.6. Povest’ vremennyh let (po Lavrent’evskoj i Ipat’evskoj letopisjam) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://stepanov01.narod.ru/library.7. Rossijskoe zakonodatel’stvo H–HH vekov: V 9 t. – T. 1. Zakonodatel’stvo Drevnej Rusi. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1984.8. Rybakov B.A. Rozhdenie Rusi. – M.: AiF Print, 2004.9. Tvorchestvo XII–XIII vv. Slovo o polku Igoreve [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL http://izbornyk.org.ua/hrushukr/hrush205.htm.10. Tolochko P.P. Drevnjaja Rus’. Ocherki social’no-politicheskoj istorii. – K.: Naukova dumka, 1987.
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Makushkina E.E.Some problems of vocational training of advocates and delivery of a qualification examination in the light of reform of the market of legal servicesPurpose: Analysis of problems of preparation of advocates, receiving status of the advocate, development of recommendations about their overcoming.Methodology: The author applied formal logical, comparative legal and sociological methods.Results: In the light of the forthcoming reform of the market of legal services the conclusion is drawn on need of increase of the state quality assurances of the legal help given by advocates. As the main direction change of existing system of vocational training of advocates and delivery of a qualification examination is called. On the basis of the analysis of the legislation, scientific researches, practice (by studying of statistical data and materials of bar associations), foreign and national experience separate suggestions for improvement of the legislation on advocates activity and legal profession in Russia are made.Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific value and the practical importance for improvement of procedural aspects of passing of qualification examinations for receiving the status of advocate and increase of vocational training of advocatesKeywords: legal profession, lawyer monopoly, reform of the market of legal services, vocational training of the lawyer, qualification examination, advocate, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. Averina A.Ju. Nekotorye perspektivy sozdanija instituta advokatskoj monopolii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 200–205.2. Bondar’ O.N. Kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ – konstitucionnaja garantija sudebnoj zashhity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossijskoj Federacii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Rostov n/D, 2008.3. Borovik I.E. Garantii predostavlenija juridicheskoj pomoshhi maloimushhim (analiz zakonodatel’stva Japonii i Rossii) // Advokat. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 81–85.4. Botnev V.K. Prekrashhenie statusa advokata // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 67–69.5. Bugarenko A.I. Obespechenie kachestva predostavljaemoj besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossii // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 45–48.6. Busurina E.O. Disciplinarnaja otvetstvennost’ sudej i advokatov: sravnitel’nyj analiz // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 40–48.7. Vlasov A.A. Konstitucionnoe pravosudie i pravo advokata na zapros (organizacionnyj i processual’nyj aspekty) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 1 (28). – S. 10–12.8. Volosnikova L.M. Ob uchastii sudov v prakticheskoj podgotovke juristov: opyt FRG // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. – 2005. – № 5. – S. 42.9. Galushkin A.A., Timoshenko D.Ju. Aktual’nye voprosy dejatel’nosti advokatskih obrazovanij v Rossijskoj Federacii na sovremennom jetape // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 3.10. Dehanov S.A. Tipologija instituta advokatury. Advokatura v Evrope i SShA // Advokat. – 2005. – № 9. – S. 67–71.11. Zakomoldin A.V. O proekte Federal’nogo zakona «Ob okazanii kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossijskoj Federacii» // Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. – 2009. – Vyp. 2. – S. 99–101. – (Pravo).12. Interv’ju s zamestitelem ministra jekonomicheskogo razvitija Rossijskoj Federacii, predsedatelem pravlenija Associacii juristov Rossii Manylovym Igorem Evgen’evichem // Juridicheskij mir. – 2011. – № 10. – S. 4–5.13. Kazakov V.N., Dobrieva M.D. Kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ (inostrannyj i mezhdunarodno-pravovoj opyt) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 4 (31). – S. 22–28.14. Karcev V.A. Nravstvennye osnovanija professional’-noj dejatel’nosti jurista // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 1 (28). – S. 29–32.15. Kashkovskij V.S. Juridicheskaja pomoshh’ kak pravovaja kategorija i social’no-pravovoe javlenie: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Tambov, 2009.16. Kleandrov M.I. Institut juridicheskoj sluzhby v predprinimatel’stve: Monografija. – M.: Norma – INFRA-M, 2013.17. Kolobashkina S.S. Publichnoe regulirovanie rynka juridicheskih uslug (po materialam zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva) // Administrativnoe pravo i process. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 61–66.18. Korobov O.A. O nekotoryh voprosah okazanija kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Rossijskaja justicija. – 2011. – № 7. – S. 56–58.19. Kosarev M.A. Pravovoj status advokata v inostrannyh gosudarstvah // Pravo i politika. – 2006. – № 11. – S. 136–151.20. Latyev A.N. Ogranichennaja advokatskaja monopolija ili otnositel’naja svoboda sudebnogo predstavitel’stva // Zakon. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 94–104.21. Mel’nichenko R.G. Kvalifikacionnyj jekzamen na poluchenie statusa rossijskogo advokata // Pravo i obrazovanie. – № 11. – 2010. – S. 28.22. Mel’nichenko R.G. Pravo na juridicheskuju pomoshh’: konstitucionnye aspekty: Monografija. – Volgograd: Izd-vo VAGS, 2003.23. Mel’nichenko R.G. Institut professional’noj otvetstvennosti advokata // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 24. – S. 114–116.24. Mel’nichenko R.G. O finansovyh ogranichenijah dostupa k advokatskoj professii v Rossii // Advokat. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 5–9.25. Minjust nameren sohranit’ pravo okazanija juridicheskih konsul’tacij tol’ko za advokatami [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.garant.ru/news/464965.26. Mirzoev G.B., Jashina O.N. Puti sovershenstvovanija organizacii gosudarstvennoj besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 3 (30). – S. 5–11.27. Morozov N.V. Osnovy pravovogo polozhenija advokata po zakonodatel’stvu Francii // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2006. – № 6. – S. 33.28. Muranov A.I. Principial’naja dopustimost’ tak nazyvaemoj advokatskoj monopolii v svete aktov Konstitucionnogo suda RF i Konstitucii RF. Velikij mif o Postanovlenii KS RF ot 16.07.2004 № 15-P // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 91–121.29. Ne nuzhno zagonjat’ v advokaturu siloj: Interv’ju s S. Pepeljaevym // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.advgazeta.ru/rubrics/13/566.30. Nevskaja O.V. Chto takoe kvalificirovannaja juridi-cheskaja pomoshh’ // Advokat. – 2004. – № 11. – S. 37–39.31. Otchet o dejatel’nosti Soveta Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii za period s aprelja 2011 goda po aprel’ 2013 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.fparf.ru/sezdi/otchet_fpa_vi_s/fsfgd.htm.32. Otchet o dejatel’nosti Soveta Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii za period s aprelja 2009 goda po aprel’ 2011 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.fparf.ru/sezdi/otchet5/otchet5_1.htm.33. Panchenko V.Ju. Kvalificirovannost’ kak priznak juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 18–20.34. Panchenko V.Ju. O «svobodnoj» i «monopol’noj» modeljah juridicheskoj pomoshhi v kontekste informacionnoj otkrytosti professional’noj dejatel’nosti juristov // Juridicheskij mir. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 60–63.35. Pilipenko Ju.S. Vstupitel’naja stat’ja // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2010. – № 5. – S. 2–3.36. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 16.07.2004 № 15-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti chasti 5 stat’i 59 Arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii v svjazi s zaprosami Gosudarstvennogo Sobranija – Kurultaja Respubliki Bashkortostan, gubernatora Jaroslavskoj oblasti, Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnojarskogo kraja, zhalobami rjada organizacij i grazhdan» // SPS «Konsul’tantPljus».37. Potashnik I.M. K voprosu o statuse advokata i statuse zashhitnika v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 7.38. Prikaz Ministerstva finansov RF ot 19.03.2013 № 32n (red. ot 20.08.2013) // SPS «Konsul’tantPljus».39. Pjatin E.I. Pravovoe regulirovanie otnoshenij po okazaniju juridicheskoj pomoshhi (uslug) v Rossii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 3 (43). – S. 66–74.40. Ragulin A.V. Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika: formulirovanie opredelenija ponjatija // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 21–25.41. Ragulin A.V. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel’stva v napravlenii ohrany professional’nyh prav advokatov // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2009. – № 4 (15). – S. 14–19.42. Ragulin A.V. Osnovnye organizacionno-pravovye sredstva obespechenija realizacii i zashhity professio-nal’nyh prav advokata // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 12–17.43. Ragulin A.V. Pravo advokata-zashhitnika trebovat’ zapreta na vmeshatel’stvo v advokatskuju dejatel’nost’ libo prepjatstvovanie ej kakim by to ni bylo obrazom: problemy zakonodatel’noj reglamentacii i prakticheskoj realizacii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 47. – S. 136–143.44. Ragulin A.V. Pravovaja reglamentacija vzaimodejstvija advokata-zashhitnika i chastnogo detektiva nuzhdaetsja v sovershenstvovanii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 25. – S. 126–128.45. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija i realizacija professio-nal’nogo prava advokata-zashhitnika na sobljudenie osobogo porjadka ugolovnogo presledovanija // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 1 (56). – S. 139–142.46. Rasporjazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 02.07.2014 № 1197-r «Ob utverzhdenii plana realizacii gosudarstvennoj programmy «Justicija» na 2014 god i planovyj period 2015 i 2016 godov».47. Reznik G.M. K voprosu o konstitucionnom soderzhanii ponjatija «kvalificirovannaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’» // Advokat. – 2007. – № 4. – S. 10.48. Reshenie konferencii chlenov Advokatskoj palaty Rostovskoj oblasti ot 08.02.2014 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.advpalataro.ru/about/committees.php?ID=7581.49. Reshenie Soveta Advokatskoj palaty Moskovskoj oblasti ot 16.08.2006 № 08 «Ob uporjadochenii priema dokumentov i dopuska k kvalifikacionnomu jekzamenu na prisvoenie statusa advokata» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.bestpravo.ru/moskovskaya/zk-postanovlenija/w9r.htm.50. Reshenie Soveta Advokatskoj palaty Moskovskoj oblasti ot 23.05.2012 «Reglament, ustanavlivajushhij porjadok i dopolnjajushhij pravila, soderzhashhiesja v st. 9–13 glavy 3 FZ «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii», kasajushhiesja priobretenija statusa advokata» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://apmo.ru/?show=chamber_solutions#solution23may2012.51. Reshenija XIII ocherednoj konferencii chlenov Advokatskoj palaty Moskovskoj oblasti ot 24 janvarja 2014 g. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.apmo.ru/?show=conferencing_solutions&PHPSESSID=15ek2in69t0t6vge0r45jl6ku4#XIII_conference.52. Reshenija odinnadcatoj i dvenadcatoj otchetnoj konferencii advokatov Nizhegorodskoj oblasti (2013, 2014 g.) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://apno.ru/content/category/3/9/10.53. Savost’janova O.N. Predposylki vozniknovenija instituta advokatury v Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 2 (29). – S. 20–28.54. Savost’janova O.N. Ustanovlenie advokatskoj monopolii kak odno iz uslovij uspeshnoj realizacii konstitucionnogo prava na poluchenie kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi (istoriko-pravovoj aspekt) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2013. – № 4 (31). – S. 41–46.55. Spisok pretendentov [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://apmo.ru/?show=applicants_waiting_list.56. Chudinovskaja N.A. Nekotorye aspekty uchastija advokata v arbitrazhnom processe // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 16–21.57. Shagiev B.V. Notariat i advokatura kak pravozashhitnye organy Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 34–38.58. Shamratova Je. Grjadushhie izmenenija v sfere juridicheskih uslug i standarty advokatskoj professii [Interv’ju s E.V. Semenjako] // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 137–147.59. Sharov G.K. K sporu o «kommercializacii» advokatury // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 169–176.60. Shestakov E. Samoregulirovanie juristov protiv advokatskoj monopolii // Rossijskoe agentstvo pravovoj i sudebnoj informacii [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://rapsinews.ru/legislation_publication/20100925/250766038.html. ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Valshina I.R.Some problem aspects of a pre-trial agreement about collaboration and the ways of their solvingPurpose: The research on the base of foreign analogues and approaches for the solving of the most disputable matters existing in the foreign legislation by conclusion of the pre-trial agreement about collaboration.Methodology: A corparative-legal analysis, analysis and synthesis methods were used.Results: An efficient solving of the problems connected with the ensuring of the victim’s and accused (suspected) person by conclusion of the pre-trial agreement about the collaboration is rendered in this article on the base of a legal regulation of the victim’s, suspected (accused) person’s rights in the international law and normative regulation of their rights by consideration of the criminal case in a simplified way.Novelty/originality/value: The practical value of a science-based analysis of foreign transaction institution functioning with justice (according to the Russian legislation – agreement about collaboration) consists in its allowing of better studying and understanding of the home agreement about collaboration and in its offering of appeared problems solving version approved by foreign experience.Keywords: victim, accused (suspected), ensuring of the rights, transaction with justice, pre-trial agreement about collaboration.References (transliterated)1. Frommann M. Regulating Plea-Bargaining in Germany: Can the Italian Approach Serve as a Model to Guarantee the Independence of German Judges? // Hanse law review(HanseLR). – 2009. – № 1. – P. 211.2. Baev M.O. O roli advokata-zashhitnika v zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve s podozrevaemym / obvinjaemym // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 376. – (Pravo).3. Val’shina I.R. O vozmozhnosti zakljuchenija dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve pri rassledovanii ugolovnogo dela v forme doznanija // Aktual’nye problemy sudebnoj vlasti, prokurorskogo rassledovanija i pravozashhitnoj dejatel’nosti: Sb. nauch. statej / Pod obshh. red. O.V. Gladyshevoj, V.A. Semencova. – Krasnodar, 2013. – S. 47–55.4. Val’shina I.R. O roli poterpevshego pri zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve s pozicii mezhdunarodnogo prava // Obshhestvo i Pravo. – 2013. – № 3 (45). – S. 194–199.5. Val’shina I.R. O roli suda pri zakljuchenii «sdelok s pravosudiem» // Aktual’nye problemy sudebnoj vlasti, prokurorskogo rassledovanija i pravozashhitnoj dejatel’nosti: Sb. nauch. statej / Pod obshh. red. O.V. Gladyshevoj, V.A. Semencova. – Krasnodar, 2014. – S. 41–50.6. Grankin K.B., Mil’tova E.V. Problemy primenenija norm UPK RF, regulirujushhih dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 76–79.7. Kuvaldina Ju.V. Predposylki i perspektivy razvitija kompromissnyh sposobov razreshenija ugolovno-pravovyh konfliktov v Rossii: Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Samara: SamGu, 2011 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.kalinovsky-k.narod.ru/b/kuvaldina_2011/2-2.html.8. Kuvaldina Ju.V. Obzhalovanie prigovorov, postanovlennyh v osobom porjadke: nastojashhee i budushhee // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 14−15.9. Semencov V.A., Val’shina I.R. Obespechenie prav poterpevshego pri zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve s pozicii mezhdunarodnogo prava, zarubezhnogo i otechestvennogo zakonodatel’stva // Biblioteka kriminalista. – 2013. – № 6(11). – S. 233–247.10. Smirnov A.V. Osobyj porjadok prinjatija sudebnogo reshenija pri zakljuchenii dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve // Ugolovnyj process. – 2009. – № 10 (58). – S. 8.11. Sofijchuk N.V. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossijskoj Federacii: nekotorye problemy pravoprimenenija // Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie. – 2012. – № 19. – S. 48–52.12. Stovpovoj A., Tjunin V. Ugolovno-pravovye i ugolovno-processual’nye aspekty dosudebnogo soglashenija o sotrudnichestve na predvaritel’nom sledstvii // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 118–123.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Martynenko I.E. Features of the appeal of judicial acts in economic (arbitration) legal proceedings of Republic of Belarus Purpose: Research of features of system of the appeal of judicial resolutions for development of measures on improvement of the procedural legislation.Methodology: Methodological basis scientific works in the field of civil and arbitration processes made, judicial systems. Work is prepared on the basis of the analysis of literary and standard sources. Methods of the analysis and synthesis, comparative jurisprudence, historical and legal and formally legal methods were used.Results: In article features of functioning in Republic of Belarus systems of the appeal (audit) of judicial resolutions on economic disputes are considered. Subjects of excitement are defined; the content of appeal, cassation and supervising verification of acts of justice on economic disputes is opened. The analysis of the existing legislation in a context of the changes made at the end of 2013 – the beginning of 2014 in judicial system of this country is made.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses a certain scientific value as is one of the first attempts to consider changes in judicial and legal system of Belarus connected with improvement organization of judicial authority on economic disputes.Keywords: court, judicial system, justice, appeal, cassation, judicial supervision.References (transliterated)1. Borisova E.A. Teoreticheskie problemy proverki sudebnyh aktov v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom processah: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. – M., 2005.2. Borisova E.A. O proizvodstve v arbitrazhnom apelljacionnom sude // Hozjajstvo i pravo. − 2004. − № 5. − S. 80−85.3. Borisova E.A. Apelljacija v grazhdanskom (arbitrazhnom) processe. − 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. − M.: Gorodec, 2008.4. Efimov A.E. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom processe: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. − M., 2007.5. Zhukova O.V. Obespechenie dostupnosti pravosudija v stadii kassacionnogo proizvodstva: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. SPb., 2005.6. Kamenkov V. Apelljacija ili kassacija v hozjajstvennom processual’nom kodekse? // Vestnik Vysshego hozjajstvennogo suda Respubliki Belarus’. − 2003. − № 6. − S. 87−98.7. Kleandrov M.I. Arbitrazhnyj apelljacionnyj sud i problema obzhalovanija «promezhutochnyh opredelenij» // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. − 2004. − № 2. − S. 128−139.8. Koljadko I.N. Apelljacionnyj peresmotr sudebnyh reshenij v Respublike Belarus’ // Pravo Belarusi. − 2004. − № 19. − S. 65–68.9. Martynenko I.Je. Sudoustrojstvo i sudoproizvodstvo po hozjajstvennym sporam: Ucheb. posob. – Grodno: GrGU, 2009.10. Nagornaja Je.N. Proizvodstvo v kassacionnoj instancii arbitrazhnogo suda: sravnitel’nyj kommentarij Arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Justicinform, 2003.11. Podval’nyj I.O. Apelljacija i kassacija v arbitrazhnom processe Rossijskoj Federacii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. − SPb., 2001.12. Smetannikov A.E. Problema stanovlenija form apelljacii v rossijskom arbitrazhnom processe // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. − 2006. – № 7. – S. 34–36.13. Smagina E.S. Teoreticheskie aspekty apelljacionnogo proizvodstva po obzhalovaniju reshenij i opredelenij mirovyh sudej v rossijskom grazhdanskom processe: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. − Saratov, 2005.14. Timoshenko A.S. Problemy apelljacionnogo proizvodstva v arbitrazhnom processe // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. – 2007. – № 7. – S. 51–57.15. Tjan D.V. Sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija arbitrazhnogo suda kassacionnoj instancii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2007.16. Sherstjuk V.M. Arbitrazhnyj process (v voprosah i otvetah): Kommentarij, rekomendacii, predlozhenija po primeneniju Arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii. –3-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Gorodec, 2004.17. Jakovleva G.V. Proizvodstvo v hozjajstvennom sude apelljacionnoj instancii: Posobie dlja studentov. – Minsk: BGU, 2008.18. Jakovleva G.V. Vozbuzhdenie dela v hozjajstvennom sude apelljacionnoj instancii // Vestnik Vysshego Hozjajstvennogo Suda Respubliki Belarus’. – 2006. – № 6. – S. 115–117.
PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Ragulin A.V.The Federal Law draft «About modification of separate acts of the Russian Federation regarding ensuring the right of the advocate on collecting the data necessary for rendering a legal aid»: author’s comment and suggestions for improvementPurpose: The Federal Law draft analysis «About modification of separate acts of the Russian Federation regarding ensuring the right of the advocate on collecting the data necessary for rendering a legal aid» for determination of its compliance to the legislation on lawyer activity and legal profession and possibility of achievement of the tasks set for it.Methodology: The formal-legal method, comparative - legal method, statistical method and method of theoretical modeling were used.Results: In work the positive assessment is given to the presented bill, and the importance of realization is proved by the advocate’s of the right for inquiry. Besides, scientific and reasonable offers on need of adjustment used in a number of offers of the bill of formulations are stated the right of the advocate for inquiry was expanded. It is also offered to exclude from the bill norm about administrative responsibility of the advocate for violation of an order of the address with information received by advocate’s inquiry as the advocate can be made responsible for similar act in a disciplinary order. In article it is also offered to realize a judicial order of permission of obtaining data at the request of the advocate when information which it requests belongs to secret especially protected by the law.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is the first attempt to consider the questions concerning the Federal Law draft about advocate’s inquiry.Keywords: legal profession, advocate, rights of advocate, advocate’s inquiry, inquiry, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79.2. https://rospravosudie.com.3. Agutin A.V. Mirovozzrencheskie idei v ugolovno-processual’nom dokazyva-nii: Avtoref. dis. … dokt. jurid. nauk. – N. Novgorod, 2005. – S. 25–26.4. Agutin A.V. Obespechenie zakonnyh interesov poterpevshego i obvinjaemogo v dosudebnom proizvodstve. – N. Novgorod, 2005. – S. 21.5. Bardin L.N. Zakon popravili, no nedostatochno // Advokatskie vesti. – 2005. – № 2. – S. 17.6. Bubon K.V. O tajnah, sekretah i pravah advokata // Advokat. – 2005. – № 6.7. Burobin V. Tajna sledstvija i interesy doveritelja // Novaja advokatskaja gaze-ta. – 2007. – № 1 (004).8. Vajpan V.A. Nastol’naja kniga advokata. – M.: Justicinform. 2006. – S. 38.9. Varfolomeev V.V. Problema sbora advokatom dokazatel’stv // Juridicheskij mir. – 2006. – № 4. – S. 65.10. Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2007. – № 3 (17). – S. 88.11. Vlasov A.A. Konstitucionnoe pravosudie i pravo advokata na zapros (organi-zacionnyj i processual’nyj aspekty) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advo-katury i notariata. – 2013. – № 1 (28). – S. 10–12.12. Galoganov A.P. Advokatskaja tajna. Soderzhanie. Konfidencial’nye i nekon-fidencial’nye svedenija, poluchennye pri osushhestvlenii professional’noj deja-tel’nosti // Advokatura. Gosudarstvo. Obshhestvo: Sb. materialov 6 ezhegodnoj na-uch.-praktich. konferencii, 2009 g. / Federal’naja Palata advokatov Ros. Federa-cii. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2009. – C. 38.13. Grudcyna L. V zakon ob advokature neobhodimy produmannye popravki // Ad-vokat. – 2004. – № 7. –S. 33–37.14. Guljaev A. P., Rivkin K. E., Sarajkina O.V., Judushkin S.M. Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii». – M.: Jekzamen, 2004. – S. 51.15. Dadonov S.V. Realizacija principa sostjazatel’nosti na dosudebnyh stadijah ugolovnogo processa Rossii: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. – M., 2003. – S. 22.16. Zakomoldin A.V. Problemy okazanija kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomo-shhi v ugolovnom processe Rossii. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2009. – S. 114.17. Karahanjan S.G. Juridicheskie znanija v sisteme professional’nyh znanij ad-vokata // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – № 7. – S. 1725 –1726.18. Korobicyn M.G. Neispolnenie advokatskogo zaprosa // Advokat. – 2008. – № 3. – S. 112–115.19. Kronov E.V. Advokatskij zapros v ugolovnom processe // Rossijskaja justi-cija. – 2008. – № 2. – S. 45.20. Makarova Z.V. Professional’naja zashhita podozrevaemyh, obvinjaemyh. – SPb.: Izdatel’stvo R. Aslanova «Juridicheskij centr Press», 2008. – S. 227–228.21. Makushkina E.Je. K voprosu o srokah predostavlenija advokatu zaproshennyh im dokazatel’stv // Jurist. – 2007. – № 1. – S. 59–61.22. Mahnik O.P. Konstitucionnoe pravo na lichnuju i semejnuju tajnu. Vrachebnaja tajna // Konstitucionnoe i municipal’noe pravo. – 2006. – № 8.23. «Neopredelennost’ju zakona kto-to objazatel’no vospol’zuetsja, chtoby izvra-tit’ ego dejstvitel’nyj smysl». Interv’ju s G.M. Reznikom, prezidentom Advokat-skoj palaty g. Moskvy // Advokat. – 2004. – № 11. – S. 4–8.24. Ragulin A.V. «Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika»: formulirovanie opredelenija ponjatija // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 21–25.25. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu o neobhodimosti usilenija garantij nezavisimosti ad-vokata i sohranenija advokatskoj tajny // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii ad-vokatury. – 2008. – № 3 (8). – S. 10–15.26. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu o soderzhanii prava advokata-zashhitnika sovershat’ dejstvija, ne protivorechashhie zakonodatel’stvu Rossijskoj Federacii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 113–115.27. Ragulin A.V. O prave advokata-zashhitnika otkazyvat’ v predostavlenii svede-nij, svjazannyh s okazaniem juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 15–17.28. Ragulin A.V. Ponjatie i sistema instituta professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 81–85.29. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija prav advokata-zashhitnika na opros lic s ih sogla-sija i predstavlenie predmetov i dokumentov // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 1 (2) – S. 50–52.30. Tarasov A. A. Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i sledstvennoj tajne // Sootnoshe-nie dosudebnogo i sudebnogo proizvodstva: voprosy prava, processa i kriminali-stiki: Materialy mezhvuzovskoj nauch.-praktich. konferencii (16 fevralja 2006 g.). – Omsk: Izd-vo Omsk. jurid. in-ta, 2006. – S. 17.31. Jakubovich N.A. Uchastie zashhitnika v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam // So-cialisticheskaja zakonnost’. – 1963. – № 11. – S. 43.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Minyazeva T.F.Limits of alternativeness of criminal and legal sanctionsPurpose: Consideration of questions of limits of alternativeness of the sanctions containing in the Criminal code of the Russian Federation.Methodology: Historical legal and formally legal methods were used.Results: In article recommendations about establishment of reasonable limits of criminal and legal sanctions and their alternativeness are formulated. The author notes that articles about bribery contain the wide range of limits of application of the sanctions, promoting corruption manifestation and not promoting the solution of problems of crime control. The author offered to establish a penalty only as additional punishment and also it is offered to return property confiscation to system of punishments. It is offered in sanctions of articles with the maximum limit of imprisonment in ten years, to set the minimum limit in five years of imprisonment; for nonviolent plunders with aggravating circumstances to establish the maximum term of imprisonment in seven years and, respectively, the minimum – three years. Within imprisonment in sanctions other crimes it is expedient to establish a gap no more than in four – six years.Novelty/originality/value: Article has high scientific value as in it topical issues of improvement of the criminal legislation of Russia in modern conditions are considered.Keywords: penal law, punishment, sanctions, penalty, property confiscation, imprisonment for a certain term, alternativeness of sanctions.References (transliterated)1. Abdullaev Je. Osobennosti regulirovanija prav nesovershennoletnih i ispolnenie nakazanij v ispravitel’nyh uchrezhdenijah Azerbajdzhana // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 46. – S. 40–42.2. Volkov B.S. Obshhepredupreditel’noe znachenie nakazanija i problema povyshenija ego jeffektivnosti // Problemy nakazanija po zakonodatel’stvu Rossii i zarubezhnyh stran: Materialy mezhvuzovskoj nauchnoj konferencii. – M.: RUDN, 1999. – S. 7.3. Vstrecha s Mihailom Fedotovym, Vladimirom Lukinym i Borisom Titovym, 10 ijulja 2012 g. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7lDhAutmV84. Ivanov D.I. Interesy gosudarstva v sfere ispolnenija ugolovnyh nakazanij kak ob#ekt ugolovno-pravovoj ohrany // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 8.5. Karpec I.I. Nakazanie. Social’nye, pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy. – M., 1973. – S. 134.6. Konovalova I.A. Opredelenie individual’nyh mer preduprezhdenija korystnyh prestuplenij nesovershennoletnih // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 14.7. Kruter M.S. Razvitie institutov ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za narushenie pravil obrashhenija opasnyh othodov (dorevoljucionnyj period) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2010. – № 1 (16). – S. 66–70.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Baturina N.A.Problems of realization of a principle of collective leadership at revision of civil cases in a cassation and supervising orderPurpose: The analysis of efficiency of realization of a principle of collective leadership at revision of civil cases in a cassation and supervising order.Methodology: The author used a formal-legal and а comparative legal methodsResults: Considering the principle of joint consideration of civil cases through a psychology prism, the author of article draws a conclusion that the option of joint hearing of cases fixed in civil procedural legislation Russian Federation in vessels of cassation and supervising instances not fully promotes increase of efficiency of civil legal proceedings.Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value as is one of the first attempts to consider a question realization of a principle of collective leadership at revision of civil cases in a cassation and supervising order through a prism of psychology.Keywords: civil process, principle of collective leadership, revision of civil cases, cassation instance, supervising instance.References (transliterated)1. Borisova E.A. Proverka sudebnyh aktov po grazhdanskim delam. – M.: Gorodec, 2005. – S. 93.2. Bykov V.M. Proizvodstvo v sude kassacionnoj instancii po novomu Zakonu: Nauchnyj kommentarij // Nalogi. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 17–22.3. Verblovskij G. Voprosy russkogo grazhdanskogo prava i processa. Edinolichnyj sud po grazhdanskim delam. – M.: Tovarishhestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, 1896. – S. 412.4. Majers D. Psihologija / Per. s angl.: I.A. Karpikov, V.A. Starovojtova. – 2-e izd. – Mn.: Popurrm, 2006. – S. 748–757.5. Neshataeva T.N. Sud i zashhita prav i svobod grazhdan Rossijskoj Federacii // Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy grazhdanskogo, arbitrazhnogo processa i ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva: Sbornik nauchnyh statej. – Krasnodar: SPb.: Juridicheskij centr Press, 2005. – S. 34–43.6. Svencickij A.L. Social’naja psihologija: Uchebnik. – M.: TK Velbi: Prospekt, 2004. – S. 214–217.7. Stoljarenko L.D. Psihologija: Uchebnik dlja vuzov. – SPb.: Piter, 2008. – S. 464.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Fomenko E.V.Problem issues of corpus delicti legislative consolidation «mediation in bribery» in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Purpose: Analysing the standards consolidated in Article 291¹ of the Russian Federation’s Criminal Code and developing some proposals related to its improvement.Methodology: Historico-legal, formal legal and systemic methods of scientific cognition, description, comparison, analysis and synthesis have been used.Outcome: The article characterises the legal nature of the notion of mediation in bribery, outlines the problems related to qualifying the mediation in bribery and proposes the ways to tackle these problems by altering some individual standards of the Russian Federation’s Criminal Code.Novelty/Originality/Value: is in the fact that the author has analysed the legislator’s innovation consolidated in the standards of Article 291¹ of the Russian Federation’s Criminal Code, as well as provided some recommendations to be followed within the process of improving the Russian criminal legislation and law-enforcement practices in the area of regulating the standards, norms and legal relationships looked into in the work.Keywords: mediation, bribery and mediation in a commercial graft.References (transliterated)1. Anikin A.A. Otvetstvennost’ za vzjatochnichestvo po novomu UK // Zakonnost’. – 1997. – № 6. – S. 33.2. Bjulleten’ Verhovnogo Suda SSSR. – 1962. – № 5. – S. 8.3. Bjulleten’ Verhovnogo Suda SSSR. – 1990. – № 3. – S. 11.4. Volzhenkin B.V. Sluzhebnye prestuplenija. – M.: Jurist, 2000. – S. 248.5. Zdravomyslov B.V. Dolzhnostnye prestuplenija. Ponjatie i kvalifikacija. – M., 1975. – S. 152.6. Ivanov Je.A. Vlijanie antikorrupcionnogo zakono-datel’stva Velikobritanii na dejatel’nost’ rossijskih kompanij // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 6(61). – С. 144–147.7. Kachmazov O.H. Otvetstvennost’ za vzjatochnichestvo po rossijskomu ugolovnomu pravu. – Vladikavkaz: Iriston, 2000. – S. 152.8. Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu RSFSR (po sostojaniju na 15 dekabrja 1993 g.) / Otv. red. V.I. Radchen-ko. – M.: Verdikt, 1994. – S. 333.9. Korzhanskij N.I. Kvalifikacija sledovatelem dolzhnostnyh prestuplenij: Ucheb. posob. – Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1986. – S. 58.10. Krasnopeeva E.V. Vzjatochnichestvo: ugolovno-pravovoj i kriminologicheskij aspekty: Dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – M., 2002. – S. 96–98.11. Fomenko E.V. Aktual’nye voprosy sovershenstvovanija dejstvujushhego zakonodatel’stva po bor’be s korrupciej i vzjatochnichestvom // Rossijskij sledovatel’. – 2013. – № 24. – S. 40–43.12. Fomenko E.V. Uzhestochat’ nel’zja milovat’? // Jezh-Jurist. – 2008. – № 46 (nojabr’). – S. 15.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Isayev P.A.To a problem of merging of management personnel with organized crime in Russian FederationPurpose: Consideration of actual problems of formation of the negative social phenomenon of criminal bureaucracy for the purpose of development of the offers directed on fight against it.Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal method and a method of theoretical modeling.Results: In article the main scientific approaches to a problem of an evolution of bureaucracy in more dangerous to society and the form state are analyzed, the main stages of an evolution of bureaucracy in criminal bureaucracy are characterized.Novelty/originality/value: Article contains representing scientific and practical importance author’s generalizations and the conclusions directed on improvement of scientific ideas of criminal bureaucracy as to a negative form of deviant behavior of civil officers.Keywords: bureaucracy, organized crime, management.References (transliterated)1. Arutjunov L.S., Kas’janenko M.A. Vlijanie kriminal’-noj bjurokratii na jetnicheskuju prestupnost’ v RF: Monografija. – Kislovodsk: Izd-vo KGTI, 2007. –S. 30.2. Atamanchuk G.V. Teorija gosudarstvennogo upravlenija. – M., 2004. – S. 12.3. Besedina A.S. Faktory, determinirujushhie voznik-novenie prestuplenij, svjazannyh s nezakonnoj registraciej sdelok s zemlej, moshennichestvom i korrupciej v jetoj sfere // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2012. – № 6. – S. 3.4. Volkov A.M., Karimov H.M. Agentstvo pri Prezidente Respubliki Tadzhikistan po finansovomu kontrolju i bor’be s korrupciej Respubliki Tadzhikistan kak publichnyj sub#ekt pravovogo regulirovanija otvetstvennosti dolzhnostnyh lic // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 8.5. Kallagov T.Je. Zadachi i funkcii municipal’noj sluzhby v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 6.6. Kardashova I.B., Konysheva E.G. Ob uregulirovanii konflikta interesov na municipal’noj sluzhbe // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 6.7. Kas’janenko M.A. O nekotoryh kriminal’nyh aspektah diversifikacii pravovogo immuniteta v «protivopravnyj» // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 52. – S. 123–124.8. Ketov Ju.M., Kas’janenko M.A. O nekotoryh kriminologicheskih osobennostjah vzaimosvjazi kriminal’nogo bjurokratizma i organizovannoj prestupnosti v sovremennoj Rossii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2011. – № 36. – S. 117–120.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Karpov E.S.On current trends in tax legislation in the Russian FederationPurpose: The research of contemporary issues of reform and codification of the tax legislation of the Russian Federation.Methodology: Historical-legal and formally-legal method were used.Results: The author analyzes the current trends of the tax laws, the legal nature of the customs duties, insurance contributions for compulsory social insurance. According to the author, there is now a gradual replacement of the tax payments on the non-tax, that leads to a formal reduction of the tax burden at its actual increases. These negative trends criticized in the work.Novelty/originality/value: Article has high scientific value and has practical significance, because it is one of the first attempts to consider current trends codify the tax laws. The author not only identifies the problems in this area, but also offers solutions.Keywords: tax Code of the Russian Federation, the reform of the tax system, the codification of the tax laws, customs, insurance contributions for compulsory social insurance.References (transliterated)1. Alpatov P.Ju. Rynochnaja jekonomika i chastnaja sobstvennost’ v Rossijskoj Federacii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2010. – № 5. – S. 112–126.2. Bakaeva O.Ju. Tamozhennye fiskal’nye dohody: pravovoe regulirovanie. – M.: Statut, 2005. – S. 99–100.3. Borzunova O.A. Nalogovyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii: genezis, istorija prinjatija i tendencii sovershenstvovanija. – M.: Justicinform, 2010. – S. 6.4. Brjummerhoff D. Teorija gosudarstvennyh finansov. – Vladikavkaz, 2001. – S. 186.5. Bjudzhetnoe poslanie Prezidenta RF Federal’nomu Sobraniju ot 13 ijunja 2013 g. «O bjudzhetnoj politike v 2014–2016 godah» // Pensija. – 2013. – № 6.6. Vasjanina E.L. Fiskal’noe pravo Rossii: Monografija / Pod red. S.V. Zapol’skogo. – M.: KONTRAKT, 2013. – S. 77.7. Vlasenko A.V. Organizacionno-pravovye osnovy optimizacii nalogooblozhenija: teo-rija voprosa // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 108–111.8. Gutarina O.V. Finansovo-pravovaja priroda objaza-tel’nyh social’nyh vznosov // Finansovoe pravo. – 2013. – № 8. – S. 7.9. Ivanov V.V. O nekotoryh osobennostjah uplaty aptechnymi uchrezhdenijami strahovyh vznosov v gosudarstvennye social’nye vnebjudzhetnye fondy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 4 (5). – S. 58–61.10. Kozyrin A.N. Tamozhennaja poshlina. – M., 1998. – S. 5.11. Kuksin I.N. Nalog kak neot#emlemyj priznak gosudarstva: istoriko-teoreticheskij analiz // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 48. – S. 57–60.12. Kucherov I.I. Teorija nalogov i sborov (pravovye aspekty): Monografija. – M.: JurInfoR, 2009. – S. 205.13. Majburov I.A., Sokolovskaja A.M. Teorija nalogooblozhenija. Prodvinutyj kurs: Uchebnik. – M.: JuNITI-DANA, 2011.14. Nalogi i nalogovoe pravo: Ucheb. posob. / Pod red. A.V. Bryzgalina. – M., 1997. – S. 87–89.15. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 10 dekabrja 2002 g. № 284-O «Po zaprosu Pravitel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii o proverke konstitucionnosti Postanovlenija Pravitel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii «Ob utverzhdenii Porjadka opredelenija platy i ee predel’nyh razmerov za zagrjaznenie okruzhajushhej prirodnoj sredy, razmeshhenie othodov, drugie vidy vrednogo vozdejstvija» i stat’i 7 Federal’nogo zakona «O vvedenii v dejstvie chasti pervoj Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // Ros. gazeta. – 2002. – 25 dekab-rja.16. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 22 janvarja 2004 g. № 8-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby otkrytogo akcionernogo obshhestva «Nojzidler Syktyvkar» na narushenie konstitucionnyh prav i svobod stat’ej 3 Federal’nogo zakona «O strahovyh tarifah na objazatel’noe social’noe strahovanie ot neschastnyh sluchaev na proizvodstve i professional’nyh zabolevanij na 2000 god». Dokument opublikovan ne byl.17. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 17 ijunja 2013 g. № 13-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti chasti 2 stat’i 2 Federal’nogo zakona ot 23 dekabrja 2010 g. № 360-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal’nyj zakon «O dopolnitel’nom social’nom obespechenii chlenov letnyh jekipazhej vozdushnyh sudov grazhdanskoj aviacii» v svjazi s zaprosami Arbitrazhnogo suda Sahalinskoj oblasti i Arbitrazhnogo suda Primorskogo kraja» // Ros. gazeta. – 2013. – 26 ijunja.18. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 24 fevralja 1998 g. № 7-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel’nyh polozhenij statej 1 i 5 Federal’nogo zakona ot 5 fevralja 1997 g. «O tarifah strahovyh vznosov v Pensionnyj fond Rossijskoj Federacii, Fond social’nogo strahovanija Rossijskoj Federacii, Gosudarstvennyj fond zanjatosti naselenija Rossijskoj Federacii i v Fondy objazatel’nogo medicinskogo strahovanija na 1997 god» v svjazi s zhalobami rjada grazhdan i zaprosami sudov» // Ros. gaze-ta. – 1998. – 10 marta.19. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 28 fevralja 2006 g. № 2-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel’nyh polozhenij Federal’nogo zakona «O svjazi» v svjazi s zaprosom Dumy Korjakskogo avtonomnogo okruga» // Ros. gazeta. – 2006. – 14 marta.20. Reshenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 28 marta 2002 g. № GKPI2002-178 «O priznanii nezakonnym (nedejstvitel’nym) Postanovlenija Pravitel’stva RF ot 28 avgusta 1992 g. № 632 «Ob utverzhdenii Porjadka opredelenija platy i ee predel’nyh razmerov za zagrjaznenie okruzhajushhej prirodnoj sredy, razmeshhenie othodov, drugie vidy vrednogo vozdejstvija» v redakcii ot 14 ijunja 2001 g.» // Nalogovyj vestnik. – 2002. – № 12.21. Ros. gazeta. – 2003. – 10 ijulja.22. Troshkina T.N., Shahmamet’ev A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie tamozhennyh platezhej. – M., 2003. – S. 108.23. Finansovoe pravo: Uchebnik / Otv. red. N.I. Himicheva. – 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Norma, 2008. – S. 368.24. Harisov I.F. Pravovaja priroda nalogovyh i tamozhennyh platezhej // Nalogi. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 12.25. Cindeliani I.A. Tamozhennaja poshlina v sisteme fiskal’nyh platezhej v Rossii // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2004. – № 6. – S. 54.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Fedorova L.F. Problems of realization of the right of the child to Express his(her) opinionPurpose: To research the content of the right of the child to Express his (her) opinion in the Russian legislation, the identification of problems that arise in law-enforcement practiceMethodology: Legal, historical, logical and formal legal methods.Results: The legislative affirmation of the right of the child to Express his opinion in the historical aspect is considered in the paper. It is established that prior to 1995, this right was enshrined in the laws and regulations in a very truncated form. However, even after a substantial increase in the content of the right of the child to Express his opinion in the Family code of 1995, both in theory and in practice there are many uncertain and problematic issues associated with the implementation of this law.Novelty/originality/value: In the article for the first time taking into account the achievements of modern psychology, the necessity of reducing the age at which compulsory account of the views of the child and expansion of the list of actions for execution of which requires mandatory consent of the child. .Keywords: child, the age, the right to express an opinion, consent.References (transliterated)1. URL: http://www.gks.ru.2. URL: http://www.rosmintrud.ru/docs/mintrud/protection/69.3. Abramov V.I. Prava rebenka i ih zashhita v Rossii: obshheteoreticheskij analiz: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2007. – S. 28.4. Antokol’skaja M.V. Semejnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Norma – Infra-M, 2010. – S. 189.5. Besedkina N.I. K voprosu o priemnoj sem’e // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 11.6. Besedkina N.I. Pravo rebenka zhit’ i vospityvat’sja v sem’e // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2011. – № 5. – S. 121–127.7. Bolotova A.V., Molchanova O.P. Psihologija razvitija i vozrastnaja psihologija. – M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki, 2012.8. Vavil’chenkova S.E. Obshheteoreticheskie problemy pravovogo regulirovanija v sfere materinstva, detstva i sem’i // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 76–80.9. Ventcel’ K.N. Osvobozhdenie rebenka. – 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Zemlja i fabrika, 1923.10. Ziganshina D.F. Imushhestvennye prava nesovershennoletnih // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2008. – № 5. – S. 90–99.11. Il’ina O.Ju. Interesy rebenka v semejnom prave Rossijskoj Federacii. – M.: Gorodec, 2006.12. Kommentarij k Semejnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii / Otv. red. O.N. Nizamieva. – M.: Prospekt, 2011. – S. 216–217.13. Kommentarij k Semejnomu kodeksu RF / Otv. red. A.M. Nechaeva. – M.: Jurajt-Izdat, 2008. – S. 195.14. Korbut L.V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye voprosy klassifikacii prav detej // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 49. – S. 19–23.15. Korbut L.V. Obzor zasedanija komissii po pravovomu polozheniju sem’i Mezhdunarodnogo sojuza juristov // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2014. – № 2 (69). – S. 181–185.16. Korol’ I.G. Lichnye neimushhestvennye prava rebenka po semejnomu pravu Rossijskoj Federacii: Nauch.-praktich. posob. – M.: Prospekt, 2010.17. Kravchuk N.V. Konvencija o mezhdunarodnom pohishhenii detej: zakonodatel’nye problemy i perspektivy realizacii // Semejnoe i zhilishhnoe pravo. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 12–17.18. Maksimovich L.B. O prave rebenka vyrazhat’ svoe mnenie // Problemy grazhdanskogo, semejnogo i zhilishhnogo zakonodatel’stva: Sbornik statej / Otv. red. V.N. Litovkin. – M.: Gorodec, 2005. – S. 58–70.19. Nechaeva A.M. Rossija i ee deti (rebenok, zakon, gosudarstvo). – M.: Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN, 2000. – S. 71–95.20. Neshtaeva T.N. Sud i obshhepriznannye principy i normy mezhdunarodnogo prava // Vestnik VAS RF. – 2004. – № 3.21. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka / Pod red. prof. L.I. Skvorcova. – M.: Oniks, 2010. – S. 541.22. Psihologija: Uchebnik / Otv. red. A.A. Krylov. – M.: Prospekt, 2009. – S. 323.23. Rajkunova A.G. Pravosub#ektnost’ nesovershennoletnih v oblasti semejnyh lichnyh neimushhestvennyh otnoshenij // Semejnoe i zhilishhnoe pravo. – 2005. – № 1. – S. 7.24. Skakun O.S. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty realizacii prava rebenka «ne razluchat’sja s roditeljami» pri raspade sem’i // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 9 (64). – S. 65–71.25. Tatarinceva E.A. Pravovye posledstvija usynovlenija dlja usynovitelej, ih rodstvennikov v Rossijskoj Federacii i stranah obshhego prava // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 47. – S. 126–131.26. Tveritinova O.G. Imushhestvennye prava rebjonka: problemy realizacii // Pravozashhitnik. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 1.27. Jerdelevskij A.M. Pravo rebenka na vyrazhenie mnenija // SPS Konsul’tantPljus, 2001.
Politics and Economics of Eurasia
Shulipa A.V. The International Civil Service: the Traditional ConceptPurpose: The study of formation of the traditional concept of the international civil service.Methodology: Historical-legal method and formal-legal methodResults: The authors identifies four basic principles on which the concept of the international civil service is built. The first principle is that employees of international organizations should to a certain extent abandon its national loyalty and take into account when carrying out their duties only the interests of the international organization, which they serve. The second principle is impartiality. The third principle – independence. The fourth principle suggests that the staff of an international organization should be selected primarily on the basis of personal qualities and merits of the candidates. There was identified the influence of the British concept of the public service on the formation of the traditional concept of the international civil service. It was found that the ideal international civil service shall consist of permanent career officials recruited on the basis of their personal qualities and achievements that will put the interests of the organization above any other interests. It was also found that with increasing number of member states of the UN, the acceptability of the traditional concept has been questioned.Novelty/originality/value: The article presents a comprehensive historical and legal analysis of the formation of the International Civil Service concept.Keywords: the international civil service, the secretariat of an international organization, the League of Nations, the United Nations.References (transliterated)1. Evans A.A. Characteristics of an International Organization // Public Administration. – 1945. – Vol. 5. – P. 34.2. Gordenker L. The UN Secretary General and the Maintenance of Peace. – New York: Columbia University Press, 1967.3. Howard-Ellis C. The Origin, Structure and Working of the League of Nations. – Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1929. (Reprint 2003 by The Lawbook Exchange).4. Jenks W. Some Problems of International Civil Service // Public Administration Review. – 1943. – Vol. 3. – P. 94.5. Winchmore C. The Secretariat: Retrospect and Prospect // International Organizations. – 1965. – Vol. 3. – P. 629.6. Velichko D.S. Konstitucionno-pravovye osnovy dejatel’nosti diplomaticheskoj sluzhby // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 1 (8). – S. 85–89.7. Djomina O.V. Ponjatie i znachenie mezhdunarodnoj grazhdanskoj sluzhby // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 26. – S. 27–29.8. Samedov R.T. Covet po pravam cheloveka OON i ego predshestvennik – Komissija po pravam cheloveka: dejatel’nost’ po ustanovleniju standartov i monitoringam // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 1 (8). – S. 64–70.
EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCE
Voronov A.A.Why according to the Supreme Court of Russia and a number of subordinate courts consideration of criminal case in the absence of the advocate-defender is lawful? Purpose: Consideration of the problem questions connected with consideration of criminal cases in the absence of the advocate-defender.Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal method, a method of studying of documents and a method of the included supervision.Results: In article on the basis of the analysis of the interconnected criminal cases it is shown how the right for judicial protection against an arbitrariness of officials and the right for the appeal guaranteed by the Constitution of Russia in court of actions (or inaction) and decisions of authorities and public officials is ignored by judges of the first, appeal, cassation and supervising instances. Legal justification of illegality of consideration of criminal case is also given in article in the absence of the advocate-defender in relation to concrete criminal case.Novelty/originality/value: Article has the important practical value as contains author’s generalizations possessing scientific novelty, conclusions and practical offers which can be used in advocate’s activity.Keywords: judicial protection, the lawyer, the right to the qualified legal aid, right of defense, order of criminal trial, competitiveness, justice, advocate, advocacy.References (transliterated)1. Belozercev S.V., Akimov O.O. Zlokljuchenija sudebnoj reformy i processual’nyh norm v Rossii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 27. – S. 103–109.2. Voronov A.A. Rol’ advokatury v realizacii konstitucionnogo prava na kvalificirovannuju juridicheskuju pomoshh’: Monografija. – Voronezh: Central’no-Chernozemnoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 2009. – S. 259.3. Kozyrev B.C. Principy organizacii sudebnoj vlasti // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2010. – № 11. – S. 206–222.4. Kondratenko N.A. Pravovaja priroda i mesto sudebnoj vlasti v sisteme razdelenija vlastej // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2010. – № 7. – S. 173 –189.5. Kucherena A.G. To, chto tvoritsja v Mosgorsude, – jeto mrakobesie [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://rusverdict.livejournal.com/172566.html.6. Mirzoev G.B. Institut ob#ektivnoj istiny v ugolovnom processe – garantija spravedlivogo pravosudija // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2014. – № 1 (32). – S. 5–8.7. Mihajlova R.Ju. K voprosu ob obespechenii zakonnosti i pravoporjadka v Rossijskoj Federacii v kontekste teorii I. Kanta soglasovannosti gosudarstvennogo ustrojstva s pravovymi principami i koncepciej pravovogo gosudarstva // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 9.8. Osin V.V. Kto zashhitit, esli obvinjaemyj i podozrevaemyj lisheny prava na zashhitu izbrannym imi advokatom? // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 6 (7). – S. 93–104.9. Pronin K.V. Processual’nye aspekty formirovanija i realizacii diskrecionnyh polnomochij suda // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2009. – № 19. – S. 69–73.
НОВОСТИ
- "Назад к ничтожеству: контрреформа закона об адвокатуре" стрим Андрея Рагулина и Романа Мельниченко
- Заявление Специального докладчика ООН по вопросу о положении в области прав человека в Российской Федерации
- Первый Всероссийский съезд адвокатов: рождение «монстра» стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Новый закон об адвокатуре: в ожидании золотого века: стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Международная научно-практическая конференция «Российская адвокатура: независимость, самоуправляемость, защищенность» (9 декабря 2023 г., 10-00 Мск.).
- Беседа с Адвокатом Андреем Рагулиным
- Принятие антиадвокатских поправок в закон об адвокатуре
- Independent expert assessment on the Draft Law to amend the Federal Law “On legal practice and legal profession in the Russian Federation”, no. 301952-8
- Антиадвокатская сущность адвокатских палат: стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Обращение Правления Межрегиональной общественной организации "Инициатива 2018" в органы Организации Объединенных Наций, к международным ассоциациям адвокатов и правозащитным организациям
- Круглый стол «Российская адвокатура: защита для защитников» (28 октября 2023 г., 10-00 Мск).
- Круглый стол «Законодательство об адвокатуре в России: прогрессивное развитие или деградация?» (25 ноября 2023 г., 10-00 Мск).
- Научно-практическая Конференция Союза "Негосударственный Экспертный Научно-Исследовательский Центр Судебных Экспертов и Специалистов"
- Мнение Комиссии по продвижению законодательных инициатив в сфере социальных и профессиональных прав адвокатов Адвокатской палаты Санкт-Петербурга / о проекте Федерального закона №301952-8 /
- Защитим российскую адвокатуру - 2023!
- Обращение Совета АП Новосибирской области о содержании Законопроекта о внесении изменений в законодательство об адвокатуре
- Независимое экспертное заключение на проект Федерального Закона «О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон «Об адвокатской деятельности и адвокатуре в Российской Федерации» № 301952-8
- Обращение в защиту российских адвокатов, подвергающихся преследованию
- 9-й форум по криптовалютам и майнингу Blockchain Life 2022
- 14-15 сентября в Москве состоится 9-й международный форум по криптовалютам и майнингу Blockchain Life 2022.
