RUS ENG

Translator

AzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (S)Chinese (T)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish

Читайте в следующем номере

Импакт-фактор российских научных журналов

Группа ВКонтакте

Группа в FB

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Gromov I.A., Dobrynin P.M., Kosarev I.A., Ragulin A.V.
To a question of assessment of validity of arguments against introduction «advocate monopoly» in the Russian Federation
Purpose: On the basis of the current legislation of the Russian Federation and statistical data to analyze arguments against introduction of «advocate monopoly» in the Russian Federation.
Methodology: Dialectic, logical, system, formal-legal and also statistical methods were used.
Results: Authors have drawn a conclusion that the shortage existing now in the Russian Federation of the necessary number of advocates can be overcome as a result of active actions for increase in number of advocates up to necessary level. High level of the taxes raised from advocates, collecting and contributions to bodies of advocates self-government and advocate educations, in considerable degree can be compensated by the size of the fee of the advocate for rendering the qualified legal aid. Increase in level of expenses on rendering the qualified legal aid at introduction of «advocate monopoly» won’t be excessive and can be substantially compensated by quality assurances of rendering this help and also the existing and effectively operating mechanisms of protection of interests of the principal from the state and bodies of advocate self-government. The thesis about lack of influence of presence at the person of the status of the lawyer on quality of the legal aid rendered to them, is unreasonable, and some number of cases of rendering by the persons having the status of the advocate of the low-quality legal help can’t be recognized as a powerful argument against introduction of «advocate monopoly» in view of presence at advocate profession of the effective mechanism of self-cleaning as which initiator of action any interested persons can act. The rights of the businessmen having legal business and their employees and also the right of some consumers, are less valuable benefit in comparison with the interests of the state and society in creation acting by uniform rules and under necessary state and corporate control of legal profession of the sphere of rendering the qualified legal aid.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific value and the practical importance as in a context in it, with application of a wide range of methods the significant problem is considered.
Keywords: legal profession, advocate monopoly, legal aid, legal services, legal business.
References (transliterated)
1. http://fparf.ru/.
2. http://fparf.ru/corporation/community/advocacy/.
3. http://fparf.ru/documents/council_documents/council_reports/37679/.
4. http://fparf.ru/education/applicants/.
5. http://fparf.ru/FPA_RF/house/.
6. http://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/Statistics/EN_STAT_2015_Number_of_lawyers_in_European_countries.pdf.
7. https://newsland.com/community/politic/content/est-kto-zhivoi-naskolko-upala-za-god-chislennost-rossiiskogo-biznesa/5733352.
8. https://pravorub.ru/articles/48695.html.
9. https://yandex.ru/search/?text=goskomstat%20RF&lr=213&clid=1955453&win=151.
10. https://yuridicheskaya-konsultaciya.ru/prozhitochnyj-minimum.html#prozhitochnyj-minimum-rf.
11. Bajramova A.M. Pravovoj analiz advokatskoj deja-tel’nosti kak biznesa ili uslug, okazyvaemyh za opredelennyj gonorar // Sovremennoe pravo. 2014. № 9. S. 87–90.
12. Bojkov A.D. Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’: garantii kachestva i voprosy specializacii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. 2010. № 1 (16).
13. Burobin V. Advokatskaja monopolija: Za i protiv // Advokatskaja gazeta. 2010. № 20 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://apno.ru. http://www.advgazeta.ru/rubrics/13/557.
14. Val’ter M.O. Advokatskaja monopolija kak garantija uspeshnoj realizacii konstitucionnogo prava na poluchenie kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Advokatura segodnja: tradicii i novacii: sbornik statej konkursa, posvjashhennogo 150-letiju rossijskoj advokatury. M.: Federal’naja palata advokatov RF, 2015.
15. Vojdut v polozhenie. Predlagaetsja dat’ advokatam iskljuchitel’noe pravo na zashhitu grazhdan v sudah // Rossijskaja gazeta. Federal’nyj vypusk. 2015. № 6620 (49).
16. Zlobin V.A., Shubin D.A. Nalogi, uplachivaemye pri osushhestvlenii advokatskoj dejatel’nosti // Biznes-advokat. 2002. № 19.
17. Mel’nichenko R.G. Neobhodima li advokatskaja monopolija na rynke juridicheskih uslug? // Zakon. 2008. Aprel’.
18. Mihail Barshhevskij: Ja pytajus’ vozdejstvovat’ na jemocii sudej // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta. 2016. 30 dekabrja.
19. Moiseeva E., Skugarevskij D. Rynok juridicheskih uslug v Rossii: chto govorit statistika. SPb.: IPP EUSPb, 2016. (Analiticheskie obzory po problemam pravoprimenenija).
20. Natarius S.O., Churakova E.N., Kokin A.V. «Advokatskaja monopolija», ili vekovaja konkurencija juristov // Voprosy jekonomiki i prava. 2016. № 102. S. 7–13.
21. Perspektivy vvedenija advokatskoj monopolii v Rossii: Interv’ju s advokatom kollegii advokatov g. Moskvy «Barshhevskij i Partnjory» Pavlom Vital’evichem Hljustovym // Evrazijskaja advokatura. 2015. № 6 (19).
22. Ragulin A.V., Suchkov A.V., Gavrilov S.N., Talantov D.N., Kljuvgant V.V., Mel’nichenko R.G. Predlozhenija po rezul’tatam raboty kruglogo stola «Aktual’nye problemy razvitija advokatury kak instituta, prednaznachennogo dlja okazanija kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi», provedennogo v ramkah Obshherossijskogo grazhdanskogo foruma–2016 (g. Moskva, 19 nojabrja 2016 g.) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://apno.ru. http://www.eurasian-advocacy.ru/vse-novosti/1913-predlozheniya-po-rezultatam-raboty-kruglogo-stola-aktualnye-problemy-razvitiya-advokatury-kak-instituta-prednaznachennogo-dlya-okazaniya-kvalifitsirovannoj-yuridicheskoj-pomoshchi-obshcherossijskij-grazhdanskij-forum-moskva-19-noyabrya-2016-g.
23. Ragulina I.T. Pravovoj status stazhera advokata i pomoshhnika advokata v Rossijskoj Federacii (analiz zakonodatel’stva i praktiki ego primenenija): avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2017.
24. Savost’janova O.N. Ustanovlenie advokatskoj monopolii kak odno iz uslovij uspeshnoj realizacii konstitucionnogo prava na poluchenie kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi (istoriko-pravovoj aspekt) // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. 2013. № 4. S. 41–46.
25. Solovyh S.Zh. Institut kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi kak garantija dostupnosti pravosudija // Evrazijskaja advokatura. 2015. № 5 (18).
26. Ciskarishvili A.V. Advokatskaja monopolija: opyt zarubezhnyh stran // Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2016. № 5. S. 138–146.
27. Shapran N.V., Panchenko V.Ju. Eshhjo raz ob advokatskoj monopolii // Problemy obespechenija, realizacii, zashhity konstitucionnyh prav i svobod cheloveka. 2015. № 4. S. 414–419.
28. Junusov A.S., Kaznaev A.O. Advokatura Turcii // Evrazijskaja advokatura. 2016. № 2. S. 16–22.
29. Janush E.V. O sootnoshenii ponjatij «juridicheskie uslugi» i «juridicheskaja pomoshh’» // Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel’skij zhurnal. 2016. № 11-1 (53). S. 89–92.

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Pastukhov M.I.
Advocacy in Republic of Belarus: legislation and practice
Purpose: Consideration of features of the organization and activity of advocacy profession in Republic of Belarus.
Methodology: The formal-legal and historical-legal method were used.
Results: In article questions of the organization and activity of legal (advocacy) profession in Republic of Belarus are considered. It is noted that this institute has considerably kept shape of the Soviet model of legal profession. To these in Belarus there is only one republican lawyer organization, and the legal profession is under strong influence of authorities.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific value as represents attempt of judgment of the significant legal phenomena.
Keywords: advocate, lawyer, lawyer activity, Bars, guarantees of lawyer activity.
References (transliterated)
1. Analiticheskij obzor G-3 (2011) «Polozhenie advokatov v Respublike Belarus’ posle prezidentskih vyborov 19 dekabrja 2010 goda» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.lawtrend.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/IOM_Analytical_Review_G-3_2011_RUS1.pdf.
2. Ragulin A.V., Reut I.M. Razvitie belorusskoj advokatury budet prodolzhat’sja! Interv’ju s Predsedatelem Belorusskoj respublikanskoj kollegii advokatov Viktorom Ivanovichem Chajchicem // Evrazijskaja advokatura. 2015. № 4.

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Barsukova L.I.
Charter of Bar as one of constituent documents of the non-profit corporate organization
Purpose: Research of contents of the charter of Bar as one of constituent documents of the non-profit corporate organization.
Methodology: Historical and legal and formally legal methods were used.
Results: In article are considered and the short characteristic is given to basic elements of the charter of Bar, such as subject and purposes of activity of Bar, sources of formation of property of Bar and direction of its use, order of management of Bar, data on branches of Bar, other provisions which are not contradicting the Law on lawyer activity and legal profession and other federal laws.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the scientific value as is one of the first attempts to consider contents of the charter of Bar. The formulated conclusions in the scientific article will promote development of the theory of legal profession, development of practical offers on optimization of lawyer activity.
Keywords: non-profit corporate organization, Bar, charter of Bar.
References (transliterated)
1. Barsukova L.I. Grazhdansko-pravovaja harakteristika uchreditel’nyh dokumentov: monografija / pod red. d-ra jurid. nauk, prof. V.V. Dolinskoj. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskij: KamGU imeni Vitusa Beringa, 2014.
2. Bojkov A.D. Status advokata: soderzhanie, kvalifikacionnye trebovanija i principy advokatskoj dejatel’nosti: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2010.
3. Paleev I.M. Organizacionnye i pravovye osnovy dejatel’nosti advokatskih bjuro i kabinetov v Rossijskoj Federacii: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2010.
4. Prosvirkin A.N. Organizacionnye osnovy advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokatury: sravnitel’no-pravovoj analiz istoricheskogo razvitija i formirovanija normativno-pravovoj bazy v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2007.
5. Fedotova T.A. Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i problemy sudebnogo predstavitel’stva: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2009.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Sukhova O.A.
The right of convicted person to appeal against a sentence, pronounced on the basis of the verdict of the jurors, and the role of the advocate in its realization
Purpose: Оn the basis of the existing criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation and practice of its application to analyze the implementation of rights of the convicted to appeal against a sentence, pronounced by the court with participation of jurors, and to determine the role of the lawyer in exercising such right.
Methodology: The dialectical, logical, systematic, formal-legal methods was used.
Results: The article concludes that the specificity of appeals against sentences of the court with participation of jurors predefined order of consideration of the criminal case that the composition of the court, special order of sentencing, and takes into account the mixed nature of the Institute of appeal, which contains features of the cassation. The author draws attention to the fact that the possibility of criminal proceedings in the part of the presiding judge and of the jury due to the will of the accused, therefore the defense should not only be best prepared for the procedure of consideration of criminal case by court with participation of jurors, but also to have a clear understanding of the consequences of making the court verdict, in particular, about the legislative prohibition of appellate review of the judgment on the merits. The article notes the significant role of the lawyer in the implementation of the right of the convicted to appeal the sentence, pronounced on the basis of the verdict, the jury shown the importance of drawing as a lawyer of high quality, deeply motivated and based on provisions of the appeal on the specified sentence, but also reveals typical examples of permissible from the defense attorneys for violations of limits appellate review of jury verdicts.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific value and practical significance, since in the context of the rights of the convicted on appeal of jury verdict focuses on the important role of the advocate in the exercise of this right, and also contains a generalization, which allowed us to formulate conclusions about the imperfection of the advocate and judicial practice.
Keywords: appeal, the right of appeal, sentence, jury court, verdict, convicted person, advocate.
References (transliterated)
1. Suhova O.A. Apelljacionnaja zhaloba advokata – sredstvo zashhity prav i zakonnyh interesov doveritelja ot narushenij zakona pri proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu // Advokatura v Respublike Mordovija. 2015. № 2. S. 24–34.
2. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 24 dekabrja 2013 g. po delu № 56-APU13-40SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
3. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 6 oktjabrja 2016 g. po delu № 46-APU16-14SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
4. O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii, regulirujushhih sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisjazhnyh zasedatelej: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 22 nojabrja 2005 g. № 23 (v red. ot 22.12.2015). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
5. Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/indexA.php.
6. Kalinkina L.D. Apelljacionnye osnovanija otmeny ili izmenenija prigovora, postanovlennogo na osnovanii verdikta prisjazhnyh zasedatelej // Evrazijskaja advokatura. 2017. № 2 (27). S. 39–43.
7. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 29 sentjabrja 2015 g. po delu № 5-APU15-72SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
8. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 30 maja 2013 g. po delu № 74-APU13-7SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
9. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 4 ijunja 2013 g. po delu № 41-APU13-13SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
10. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 29 sentjabrja 2015 g. po delu № 5-APU15-72SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
11. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 10 sentjabrja 2015 g. po delu № 20-APU15-20SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
12. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 21 nojabrja 2013 g. po delu № 46-APU13-33SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
13. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 6 oktjabrja 2016 g. po delu № 46-APU16-14SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
14. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 14 janvarja 2014 g. po delu № 41-APU13-54SP. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
15. Nasonov S.A. Modeli peresmotra ne vstupivshih v zakonnuju silu prigovorov, postanovlennyh na osnovanii verdikta prisjazhnyh zasedatelej, v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah // Lex russica. 2013. № 4. S. 379–390.
16. Suhova O.A. Sroki i sub#ekty apelljacionnogo obzhalovanija // Apelljacionnoe proizvodstvo v rossijskom ugolovnom processe: monografija / L.D. Kalinkina, E.I. Shigurova, O.A. Suhova [i dr.]; pod obshh. red. L.D. Kalinkinoj. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordovskogo un-ta, 2014. S. 54–74.
17. Sharapova D.V. Osnovanija apelljacionnogo obzhalovanija prigovora, postanovlennogo sudom s uchastiem prisjazhnyh zasedatelej // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2014. № 10. S. 2316–2319.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Dorzhieva S.V.
To the issue of the protection of child’s rights from parents’ abuses
Purpose: The improvement of legal regulation of a child’s rights and legitimate interests’ self-protection from parents’ abuses.
Methodology: There are used a method of system analysis and a method of legal modeling.
Results: This article includes the analysis of legal regulation of the child’s right to protect his / her own rights and legitimate interests from parents’ abuses in the Russian Federation. There are revealed some problems, connected with the realization of this right, and suggested the measures, aimed at the improvement of family, civil procedure and other legislation. There is suggested to enhance the role of a lawyer in protection of children’s rights from parents’ abuses through providing free legal assistance in the form of consulting, drafting of procedural and other documents, participation in court proceedings as a representative.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has considerable scientific value because it highlights the actual topic of the protection of children’s rights from parents’ abuses.
Keywords: Children, minors, abuse, rights and legitimate interests, Family Code, legal regulation.
References (transliterated)
1. Bespalov Ju.F. Semejno-pravovoe polozhenie rebenka v Rossijskoj Federacii. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2014.
2. Kommentarij k Semejnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii / otv. red. A.M. Nechaeva. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurajt, 2009.
3. Sem’ja G.V. Professional’nyj standart specialista organov opeki i popechitel’stva // Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie.2013. № 3. S. 19–28 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: www.psyedu.ru .
 
PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Kiselyov P.P.
Legal status of the data collected by the advocate and his ratio with a procedural form of proofs
Purpose: To investigate the legislative provisions causing legal status of the data collected by the lawyer.
Methodology: Analytical, formal and logical and comparative and legal methods of research were used.
Results: In article an attempt to prove equal validity of the proofs collected by subjects state and lawyer investigation that is in turn the basis for a conclusion that the data collected by the lawyer become proofs not at the time of representation in business.
Novelty/originality/value: The article possesses the high scientific and practical value as contains the new concept about the proofs collected by the lawyer.
Keywords: lawyer, proofs, status, investigation.
References (transliterated)
1. Ishhenko V.N. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Pravovaja i kriminologicheskaja ocenka novogo UPK RF» // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 10.
2. Kipnis N.M. Dopustimost’ dokazatel’stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1995.
3. Kipnis N.M. Ocenka asimmetrii pravil o dopustimosti dokazatel’stv // Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom processe. Tradicii i sovremennost’ / pod red. V.A. Vlasihina. M.: Jurist#, 2000.
4. Kiseljov P.P. Advokatskoe rassledovanie kak universal’noe sredstvo pravovoj zashhity. M.: Evrazijskij nauchno-issledovatel’skij institut problem prava, 2016. S. 117, 118.
5. Mihajlovskaja I.B. Nastol’naja kniga sud’i po dokazyvaniju v ugolovnom processe. M.: TK Velbi: Prospekt, 2008.
6. Ragulin A.V. Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika v Rossijskoj Federacii: voprosy teorii i praktiki: dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2015.
7. Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskij K.B. Ugolovnyj process: uchebnik / pod obshh. red. prof. A.V. Smirnova. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: KNORUS, 2007.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Ragulin A.V.
About need of expansion of powers of the prosecutor as participant of criminal legal proceedings in Russian Federation
Purpose: Research of a question of need of expansion of powers of the prosecutor as participant of criminal legal proceedings.
Methodology: The dialectic method of knowledge and also special methods was used: formal-legal, statistical, system.
Results: For increase in efficiency of activity of the prosecutor as the person authorized to carry out criminal prosecution on behalf of the state the conclusion about need of fixing for provisions of Art. 37 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation of the right of the prosecutor for initiation of legal proceedings and also investment of the prosecutor with the right of total legal assessment of actions of suspected (defendant) at all stages of pre-judicial production is drawn. Fixing in provisions of Art. 108, 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation of regulations on the obligatory direction to the prosecutor of the resolution of the investigator on excitement before court of the petition for election of a measure of restraint and extension of term of her action and also about granting to the prosecutor of copies of the documents proving need of election or extension of period of validity of a measure of restraint in the form of detention and introduction of the right of the prosecutor to withdraw the petition for election of a measure of restraint in the form of detention or about extension of term of detention before his judicial consideration and also establishment that in case the prosecutor by results of judicial review of the corresponding petition doesn’t support the election of a measure of restraint in the form of detention (extension of term of detention), the court stop production according to the petition is also offered. Also it is offered to establish in provisions of Art. 37 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation the rights of the prosecutor to allow the branches stated to the investigator and also the right to discharge the investigator of further production of investigation, at assumption of violation of requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation by him or other legislation at investigation of criminal case.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific and practical value as is attempt of a complex research of the modern and current problem important for practice of criminal legal proceedings.
Keywords: prosecutor, criminal legal proceedings, public prosecutor’s supervision.
References (transliterated)
1. http://www.newsru.com/russia/23Dec2014/sled.html.
2.https://zakon.ru/discussion/2012/1/25/konflikt_mezhdu_prokurorami_i_sledovatelyami_obostryaetsya.
3. Aleksandrov A.S. Voprosy vzaimodejstvija prokurora, rukovoditelja sledstvennogo organa i sledovatelja v hode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Vestnik MVD. 2009. № 1.
4. Aleksandrov A.S., Kuhta A.A., Marushin D.N. Sudebnaja instancija kak perspektivnoe mesto razreshenija sporov, voznikajushhih mezhdu organami predvaritel’nogo rassledovanija, prokuratu-roj, v hode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // «Chernye dyry» v rossijskom zako-nodatel’stve. 2008. № 1. S. 378–379.
5. Amirbekov K.I. Sledstvennyj sud’ja, sledovatel’, doznavatel’ i prokuror v dosudebnom pro-izvodstve sovremennogo ugolovnogo processa: status i polnomochija // Vestnik Akademii Gene-ral’noj prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii. 2015. № 4 (48).
6. Bagmet A.M. Ob ustranenii dvoevlastija v ugolovnom presledovanii // Rossijskaja justicija. 2013. № 12.
7. Balakshin V. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela prokurorom // Zakonnost’. 2008. № 8.
8. Bulanova N.V. Prokurorskij nadzor za sobljudeniem prav uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproiz-vodstva: sostojanie, problemy, perspektivy // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. № 2. S. 107–113.
9. Bykov V. Prava prokurora na stadii vozbuzhdenija ugolovnogo dela // Zakonnost’. 2013. № 4. S. 49–53.
10. Bykov V.M. Aktual’nye problemy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Kazan’: Poznanie, 2008.
11. Voronin S.Je., Kirienko N.A. Prokuror kak uchastnik ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Birobid-zhan, 2012.
12. Doklad General’nogo prokurora RF V.V. Ustinova na rasshirennom zasedanii kollegii Gene-ral’noj prokuratury RF. M., 2006. S. 12.
13. Drukalev I.L. Problemy nadzora prokurora v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym de-lam // Pravo. 2011. № 2.
14. Informacionnyj portal «RIA novosti» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://ria.ru/incidents/20150324/1054204020.html# ixzz3YgWxzrJc.
15. Islamova Je.R., Chubykin A.V. Motivirovannoe postanovlenie prokurora o napravlenii mate-rialov v organ predvaritel’nogo rassledovanija dlja reshenija voprosa ob ugolovnom presledova-nii (problemy primenenija) // Krymskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2016. № 3 (9).
16. Klimova Ja.A. Transformacija polnomochij prokurora na zavershajushhem jetape dosudebnogo proizvodstva, okanchivajushhemsja prekrashheniem ugolovnogo dela // Vestnik Volgogradskoj akade-mii MVD Rossii. 2016. Vyp. 2 (37).
17. Klimova Ja.A. Transformacija polnomochij prokurora na zavershajushhih jetapah dosudebnogo proizvodstva: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2017. S. 5.
18. Kolokolov N.A. «Velikoe protivostojanie»: sledovatel’ vs prokuror // Biblioteka krimi-nalista. 2014. № 5.
19. Kolokolov N.A. Balans obvinitel’noj vlasti // Ugolovnyj process. 2009. № 3.
20. Kolokolov N.A. Poslednie novelly UPK RF: balans obvinitel’noj vlasti stabiliziruet-sja // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2009. № 2.
21. Kruglikov A.P. Polnomochija prokurora po vozbuzhdeniju ugolovnogo dela i osushhestvleniju ugolovnogo presledovanija // Zakonnost’. 2012. № 1.
22. Krjukov V.F. Pravovoj status prokurora v ugolovnom presledovanii (dosudebnoe i sudebnoe proizvodstvo): avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2012.
23. Lazareva V.A. Dolgozhdannye izmenenija v statuse prokurora (zakon ot 28 dekabrja 2010 g. № 404-FZ) // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2011. № 3.
24. Magomedov A.Sh. Soglasie rukovoditelja sledstvennogo organa na vozbuzhdenie sledovatelem hodatajstva pered sudom: neobhodimost’ ili prepjatstvie // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, poli-ticheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul’turologija i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki: v 2 ch. 2013. № 7 (33). Ch. I. C. 139–141.
25. Martynjuk M.V. Realizacija prokurorom polnomochija po vozbuzhdeniju ugolovnogo dela // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul’turologija i iskusstvove-denie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki: v 3 ch. 2015. № 11 (61). Ch. I. C. 105–107.
26. Neganov D.A. Krizis stadii vozbuzhdenija ugolovnogo dela i vyhod iz nego // «Chernye dyry» v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve. 2013. № 1.
27. Ovsjannikov I.V. Prokurorskij nadzor v stadii vozbuzhdenija ugolovnogo dela // Vestnik Akademii General’noj prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii. 2012. № 4 (30).
28. Oficial’naja statistika. General’naja prokuratura Rossijskoj Federacii: oficial’nyj sajt [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.genproc.gov.ru/stat/data/1114179.
29. Pitirimov E.A. Aktual’nye problemy prakticheskoj realizacii pravovosstanovitel’noj sankcii ugolovno-processual’noj otvetstvennosti, predusmotrennoj st. 124 UPK RF // Pravo-vye problemy ukreplenija rossijskoj gosudarstvennosti: sb. st. Ch. 59. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 2013.
30. Prikaz General’noj prokuratury Rossii ot 02.06.2011 № 162 «Ob organizacii prokuror-skogo nadzora za processual’noj dejatel’nost’ju organov predvaritel’nogo sledstvija». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
31. Prokurorskij nadzor za sobljudeniem zakonnosti v dejatel’nosti organov doznanija i pred-varitel’nogo sledstvija / V.M. Savickij; pod red. M.S. Strogovicha, G.N. Aleksandrova. M.: Gos. izd-vo jurid. lit., 1959. S. 149–152.
32. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu o realizacii prava podsudimogo na rassmotrenie dela bespristrast-nym sudom v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. 2008. № 3 (5).
33. Ragulin A.V. Kreslo sud’i dlja advokata. Nekotorye problemy formirovanija sudejskogo korpusa v Rossii putem privlechenija advokatov i puti ih reshenija // Advokatskie vesti Rossii. 2012. № 3–4 (135–136). S. 20–22.
34. Ragulin A.V. Problemnye voprosy pravovoj reglamentacii i realizacii professional’-nogo prava advokata-zashhitnika na obzhalovanie dejstvij (bezdejstvija) dolzhnostnyh lic gosu-darstvennyh organov, osushhestvljajushhih proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2012. № 3 (31). Mart. S. 202–217.
35. Skabelin A.V. Vozvrashhenie prokuroru polnomochij po vozbuzhdeniju ugolovnyh del: za i protiv // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Jurisprudencija. 2016. № 2 (31).
36. Sokolovskaja N.S. K voprosu ob jeffektivnosti uchastija prokurora v sostjazanii storon // Pravovye problemy ukreplenija rossijskoj gosudarstvennosti: sb. st. Ch. 47. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom-skogo un-ta, 2010.
37. Spirin A.V. Spor mezhdu prokurorom i sledovatelem v sude nedopustim // Juridicheskaja nau-ka i pravoohranitel’naja praktika. 2013. № 4 (26).
38. Statisticheskie otchety «O rabote prokurora» po forme P za janvar’–dekabr’ 2008, 2009, 2010 godov // General’naja prokuratura Rossijskoj Federacii.
39. Statisticheskie otchety «Svedenija o rezul’tatah nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov na dosu-debnoj stadii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» po forme NSiD za janvar’–dekabr’ 2011, 2012 godov // General’naja prokuratura Rossijskoj Federacii.
40. Statisticheskie otchety «Nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov na dosudebnoj stadii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» po forme NSiD za janvar’–dekabr’ 2013, 2014 godov // General’naja prokura-tura Rossijskoj Federacii.
41. Stukonog I.V. Uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii sudom hodatajstv organov predvaritel’no-go rassledovanija o prodlenii sroka soderzhanija pod strazhej // Sovremennye tendencii razvi-tija nauki i tehnologij. 2016. № 10–8.
42. Suddep zaplatit 6,4 mln rub. za razrabotku nauchno obosnovannyh norm nagruzki sudej [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://pravo.ru/news/view/142715/.
43. Sychev D.A. Sootnoshenie funkcij ugolovnogo presledovanija i nadzora s drugimi naprav-lenijami dejatel’nosti prokurora na dosudebnyh stadijah proizvodstva // Sociologija i pravo. 2014. № 4 (26).
44. Sychev D.A. Prokuror: mesto v osushhestvlenii ugolovnogo presledovanija v hode dosudebnogo sudoproizvodstva // Sociologija i pravo. 2015. № 2 (28).
45. Sychev D.A. Ugolovno-processual’nye funkcii prokurora, osushhestvljaemye v hode dosudeb-nogo proizvodstva // Kriminalist##. 2013. № 1 (12).
46. Tabolina K.A. Nadzor prokurora za vozbuzhdeniem i rassledovaniem ugolovnyh del: avto-ref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2016.
47. Tuzova E.V. Nekotorye voprosy ugolovno-processual’nyh pravootnoshenij prokurora s ru-kovoditelem sledstvennogo organa i sledovatelem na stadii vozbuzhdenija ugolovnogo dela // Vestnik akademii jekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. 2015. № 5.
48. Ukazanie General’noj prokuratury RF ot 09.11.2011 № 392/49 «Ob usilenii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem trebovanij ugolovno-processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva o zaderzhanii, zakljuchenii pod strazhu i prodlenii sroka soderzhanija pod strazhej». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
49. Haliulin A.G. Pravovoe regulirovanie dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam nuzh-daetsja v ispravlenii sistemnyh oshibok // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2008. № 11.
50. Himicheva G.P. Utochnit’ proceduru dosledstvennoj proverki // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodst-vo. 2012. № 1.
51. Shadrin V.S. Covremennye osobennosti realizacii prokurorom funkcii ugolovnogo presle-dovanija v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Kriminalist#. 2015. № 1 (16).
52. Shhepilov O.O. Sootnoshenie prokurorskogo nadzora, sudebnogo i vedomstvennogo processu-al’nogo kontrolja po UPK RF // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2009. № 10.
53. Jagofarov S.M. Osushhestvlenie prokurorom ugolovnogo presledovanija v dosudebnom proiz-vodstve // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 3 (178).
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Martyshkin V.N.
Law enforcement collisions when ensuring interrogation of the «hidden» participants of criminal legal proceedings
Purpose: A research of the problems connected with implementation of the procedure of interrogation of the witnesses who were injured in the conditions excluding their visual observation by other participants at judicial stages of criminal trial.
Methodology: The formal-legal method and a method of the included observation were used.
Results: The procedural forms and organizational security measures, ways of protection of participants of criminal legal proceedings approved by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Mordovia are given in article. The attention to gaps in the right, and also the arising procedural, organizational collisions is paid during production of preliminary investigation and realization in federal courts of the general jurisdiction by production of interrogation of the witness who was injured in the conditions excluding their visual observation by other participants of judicial proceedings. The innovations given in article are applicable also by consideration of criminal cases with participation of jurors, taking into account some specifics of preparation for consideration of the case. Article represents the material developing the scientific and practical researches which are earlier conducted with participation of the author.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific and practical value as in her the urgent scientific and practical problem is considered.
Keywords: «hidden» witness, victim, security measures, state protection.
References (transliterated)
1. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-5/2010.
2. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Kassacionnoe opredelenie № 22-1036/07 ot 11.05.2007.
3. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-15/2015.
4. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Prigovor Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija ot 24.04.2015.
5. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-1/2001.
6. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-13/2010.
7. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Ugolovnoe delo № 21724 i № 2k-17/2010.
8. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-60/1993 i № 2-1/2001.
9. Arhiv Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Mordovija. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-89/1996.
10. Evropejskij sud po pravam cheloveka. Izbrannye reshenija. T. 2. M.: NORMA-M, 2000.
11. Korol’kov I. Kto zashhitit svidetelja // Moskovskie novosti. 2001. № 41.
12. Korol’kov I. Ohota na sudej prodolzhaetsja // Izvestija. 1994. № 14.
13. Korol’kov I. Ohota na sudej // Izvestija. 1994. № 12.
14. Lenin V.I. O gosudarstve i prave. M.: Juridicheskaja literatura, 1958. T. 2. S. 720.
15. Martyshkin V.N., Kuz’michev O.P., Martyshkin V.V. Voprosy obespechenija bezopasnosti doprosa «skrytyh» uchastnikov sudoproizvodstva // Pravo i bezopasnost’. 2010. T. 34. № 1. S. 98–102
16. Martyshkin V.N., Kuz’michev O.P. Problemy realizacii processual’nyh trebovanij o proizvodstve doprosa svidetelja v uslovijah, iskljuchajushhih ego vizual’noe nabljudenie drugimi uchastnikami sudebnogo razbiratel’stva // Rossijskoe pravosudie. 2009. № 8. S. 36–42
17. Presnjakova L, Tereshina T. Sud’ju umoem krov’ju // Sovetskaja Mordovija. 1993. № 4–5.
18. Razzakov F. Hronika rossijskoj prestupnosti. 1992–1995 gg. M.: Jeksmo, 1997.S. 304–305.
19. Sapozhnikova G. Granata dlja Dezdemony // Komsomol’skaja pravda. 2002. № 40.
20. Tereshina T. Volch’ja staja // Izvestija Mordovii. 2000. № 109.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Popov V.A.
Understanding the limits of discretion as an institution of criminal procedure
Purpose: Preparation of a comprehensive analysis of scientific approaches to the discretionary powers of the law enforcer and their limits, preparation of general conclusions.
Methodology: Analysis, synthesis and formal legal methods were used.
Results: The article defines the main positions of legal scientists on the institution of discretion in the modern criminal process and the limits of its application, a comprehensive analysis of these positions and ways to further improve the institution of discretion.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific value, because it is one of the first attempts at a comprehensive analysis of approaches to the little-studied and unregulated legislation of the institution of discretion and its limits, based on the results of the analysis, general conclusions have been prepared.
Keywords: discretion, discretion, process, powers, choice, concept, limits of discretion.
References (transliterated)
1. Antropov V.G. Pravoprimenitel’noe usmotrenie: ponjatie i formirovanie (logiko-semanticheskij aspekt): avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Volgograd, 1995.
2. Barak A. Sudejskoe usmotrenie: per. s angl. M.,1999.
3. Bonner A.T. Primenenie zakona i sudebnoe usmotrenie // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1979. № 6. S. 34–42.
4. Vas’kovskij E.V. Civilisticheskaja metodologija. Uchenie o tolkovanii i primenenii grazhdanskih zakonov. M., 2002.
5. Dubovickij V.N. Zakonnost’ i usmotrenie v sovetskom gosudarstvennom upravlenii. Minsk, 1984.
6. Zhdanov A.A. K voprosu o «svobodnom usmotrenii» v burzhuaznom administrativnom prave // Pravovedenie. 1968. № 5. S. 98–105.
7. Ignat’ev A.S. Predely usmotrenija kak obshheteoreticheskaja problema v kontekste praktiki Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii // Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2012. № 3. S. 111–118.
8. Komissarov K.I. Sudebnoe usmotrenie v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1969. № 4. S. 49–56.
9. Korenev A.P. Normy administrativnogo prava i ih primenenie. M., 1978.
10. Korkunov N.M. Lekcii po obshhej teorii prava. SPb., 2003.
11. Ljublinskij P.I. Osnovanija sudejskogo usmotrenija v ugolovnyh delah. SPb., 1904.
12. Papkova O.A. Sudejskoe usmotrenie v grazhdanskom processe: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 1997.
13. Podmoskovnyj V.D. Pravovaja osnova sudebnogo usmotrenija po rossijskomu zakonodatel’stvu (voprosy teorii i praktiki): avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2004.
14. Pokrovskij I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. 5-e izd., stereotip. M., 2009.
15. Sevast’janov A.P. Predely sudejskogo usmotrenija pri naznachenii nakazanija: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Krasnojarsk, 2004.
16. Stepin A.B. Sudebnoe usmotrenie v chastnom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2002.
17. Studenikina M.S. Soderzhanie i granicy usmotrenija v dejatel’nosti gosudarstvennyh organov i dolzhnostnyh lic, osushhestvljajushhih pravoprimenenie v sfere upravlenija // Pravoprimenenie v sovetskom gosudarstve. M., 1985. S. 39–51.
18. Chechot D.M. Administrativnaja justicija (teoreticheskie problemy). L., 1973.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Sharipova A.R.
Removal of the judge: interindustry distinctions are how justified?
Purpose: Carrying out the interindustry complex analysis of approaches to a question of removal of the judge.
Methodology: Author were used historical and legal and formal-legal methods.
Results: The interindustry procedural institute of removal of the judge is an instrument for ensuring of independence and impartiality of justice in general. Differences in a standard regulation of removals of judges and in practice of their permission in criminal, civil and arbitration legal proceedings aren’t caused by substantial differences between branches of justice. The author points to expediency of unification of legislative and law-enforcement approaches to institute of removal of judges in all procedural branches of the right.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific value as is one of the first attempts of the complex analysis of a current scientific problem.
Keywords: removal of the judge, interest, impartiality, interindustry loans, criminal trial.
References (transliterated)
1. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 30 janvarja 2017 g. po delu № 10-315\17. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
2. Gorskij M.V. Mehanizm pravovogo regulirovanija otvodov uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (processual’noe i kriminalisticheskoe issledovanie): avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Voronezh, 2009. S. 7–8.
3. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po realizacii kvalifikacionnymi kollegijami sudej norm zakonodatel’stva Rossijskoj Federacii o protivodejstvii korrupcii, utverzhdennye resheniem VKKS RF ot 26 janvarja 2017 g. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
4. Obzor sudebnoj praktiki kassacionnoj i apelljacionnoj instancij po ugolovnym delam Primorskogo kraevogo suda za pervoe polugodie 2016 goda. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
5. Ozhegov S.I. Slovar’ russkogo jazyka. M., 1989 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://slovarozhegova.ru/.
6. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 17 ijunja 2008 g. № 733-0-P. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
7. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 1 nojabrja 2007 g. № 800-0-0. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
8. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RA ot 2 ijulja 1998 g. № 20-P. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
9. Postanovlenie Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apelljacionnogo suda ot 24 janvarja 2013 g. po delu № A79-7483/2009. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
10. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 5 aprelja 2017 g. № 44u-34/2017.
11. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 15 marta 2017 g. po delu № 44-u17-28. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
12. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Jaroslavskogo oblastnogo suda ot 17 avgusta 2016 g. № 44u-67/2016. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
13. Postanovlenie Federal’nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vjatskogo okruga ot 15 dekabrja 2003 g. po delu № A28-5378/2003-113/13. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
14. Postanovlenie Federal’nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga v postanovlenii ot 25 oktjabrja 2013 g. po delu № A15-598/2013. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’tantPljus».
15. Taj Ju.V., Arabova T.F., Le Burdon V. Otvod sudej kak garantija nezavisimosti suda // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii. 2014. № 8.
16. Tarasov A.A. Sudebnaja reforma kak javlenie rossijskoj kul’tury vtoroj poloviny XIX stoletija // Istorija gosudarstva i prava. 2015. № 12. S. 32.
17. Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka: v 4 t. / Pod red. D.N. Ushakova. M., 1935–1940 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL:https://gufo.me/dict/ushakov.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Kostiuk M.F.
Legal bases of counteraction to extremism
Purpose: Research of a concept and features of legal regulation of counteraction to extremism.
Methodology: The dialectic method of knowledge and also special methods was used: legallistic, statistical, sociological, system.
Results: In article extremism is considered as the social and legal. The operating system of the domestic legislation in the sphere of counteraction to extremism is presented.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the scientific value as is one of the first attempts of a complex research of legal measures of counteraction to extremism.
Keywords: safety, extremism, extremist activity.
References (transliterated)
1. Kunashev A.A. Motivy nenavisti ili vrazhdy v ugolovnom prave Rossii: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2012. S. 10.
2. Reshenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 20.04.2017 № AKPI17-238 [Jelektronnyj resurs] URL: http://legalacts.ru/sud/reshenie-verkhovnogo-suda-rf-ot-20042017-n-akpi17-238/.
3. Universal’nyj jenciklopedicheskij slovar’. M.: Bol’-shaja Rossijskaja jenciklopedija, 1999. S. 1497.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Safaryanov I.F.
Topical issues of combating begging
Purpose: A study of begging as parasitic forms of life, manifested in undermining the social equilibrium and the violation of public order.
Methodology: Formal-legal method was used.
Results: In article the judgments which are contained in various sources concerning punishment for begging are in detail investigated. Introduction of article providing responsibility for this kind of activity in the Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offences is offered.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has a scientific value and novelty, because it offers the solution of a question on appointment of punishment for begging which is currently in most cases remains unpunished. In addition, the article presents arguments showing the need to fight the manifestation is not at the level of laws of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and with the use of the Russian code of administrative offences.
Keywords: Begging, harassing citizens, vagrancy and public order.
References (transliterated)
1. Kostjuk M.F., Rostokinskij A.V. Statistika ulichnoj prestupnosti v Moskve na fone massovyh protestov // Biznes v zakone. 2012. № 5. S. 65–67.
2. Kostjuk M.F. Ugolovnaja politika po pravovomu regulirovaniju i protivodejstviju organizacii nezakonnoj migracii // Problemy v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve. Mezhdunarodnyj juridicheskij zhurnal. 2013. № 2. S. 131–135.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Egorova D.V.
Mechanisms, directions and forms of cooperation of the states in the fight against transnational crimes
Purpose: Attempt of judgment of concepts of mechanisms, the directions and forms of cooperation of the states in fight against transnational crimes.
Methodology: Historical and legal, comparative and legal and formal-legal methods were used.
Results: The author investigated variety of mechanisms of the international cooperation for the solution of the questions connected with investigation and disclosure of transnational crime has carried out systematization of the directions and forms of cooperation of the states in fight against transnational crimes.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has scientific value, because it is one of the first works in which are contains distinction between these concepts in the sphere of international cooperation is clearly.
Keywords: international cooperation in criminal court proceedings, the concept of cooperation, goals and objectives of international cooperation in criminal matters.
References (transliterated)
1. Borodin S.V., Ljahov E.G. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v bor’be s ugolovnoj prestupnost’ju (problemy dejatel’nosti OON v oblasti preduprezhdenija prestupnosti i obrashhenija s pravonarushiteljami). M., 1983.
2. Bogatyrev A.G. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo gosudarstv po bor’be s prestupnost’ju. M., 1989.
3. Galenskaja L.N. Mezhdunarodnaja bor’ba s prestupnost’ju. M., 1972.
4. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo. M., 1999.
5. Moiseev E.G. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy sotrudnichestva stran SNG: ucheb. posob. M., 1997.
6. Nigmatullin R.V. Sotrudnichestvo gosudarstv v bor’be s prestuplenijami mezhdunarodnogo haraktera v XX – nachale XXI stoletija (istoriko-pravovoj aspekt): dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2007.
7. Osmaev I.B. Mezhdunarodnye i nacional’nye pravovye sredstva bor’by s otmyvaniem prestupnyh dohodov. M., 1999.
8. Soglashenie o sotrudnichestve ministerstv vnutrennih del stran – uchastnic SNG v sfere bor’by s organizovannoj prestupnost’ju ot 17 fevralja 1994 goda// Sbornik mezhdunarodnyh soglashenij MVD Rossii. M., 1996.
9. Cepelev V.F. Ugolovno-pravovye, kriminologicheskie i organizacionnye aspekty mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva v bor’be s prestupnost’ju: dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2001.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Musman K.A.
Criminalistic characteristics of crimes under Art. 330.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation
Purpose: To identify the specifics of the forensic characteristics of crimes under Art. 330.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation «Failure to comply with the obligation to file a notice of the presence of a citizen of the Russian Federation of the citizenship (nationality) of a foreign state or residence permit or other valid document confirming the right to permanently reside in a foreign country».
Methodology: We used a formal legal method, a method of comparative analysis.
Results: In this article, the specificity of the forensic characterization of crimes under Art. 330.2 of the Criminal Code. The author draws a conclusion about the importance of this article for ensuring the national security of the Russian state and refers to the characteristics of the criminalistic characteristics of this type of crime. In particular, the article reveals the main features of the crimes committed, the characteristics of the personality of the subjects of criminal activity are examined. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the motivation for committing this crime. Also, the author draws attention to the problematic aspects of the legislation, which may create obstacles for the qualification of crimes under Art. 330.2 of the Criminal Code.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has a scientific value, since it highlights the actual and poorly studied problem of investigating crimes under Art. 330.2 of the Criminal Code. This allows to develop and improve the work of investigation and operational bodies in the direction of investigating similar crimes.
Keywords: citizenship, foreign citizenship, inaction, notification, migration.
References (transliterated)
1. Golovakin A.V. Grazhdanstvo RF – novyj pravovoj status. M.: Laboratorija knigi, 2012.
2. Murav’ev K.V. Sposoby snizhenija processual’noj nagruzki, al’ternativnye dekriminalizacii // Vestnik Omskoj juridicheskoj akademii. 2016. № 1 (30). S. 61–67.
3. Ostapec O.G. Novelly zakonodatel’stva o grazhdanstve Rossijskoj Federacii: za i protiv // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2016. № 3 (64). S. 56–62.
4. Prigovor po delu № 1-16/15-87. Sudebnyj uchastok № 87 Adlerskogo rajona g. Sochi [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://msud87.krd.msudrf.ru/modules.php?name=info_pages&id=5334.
5. Smashnikova T.B. K probleme statusa lic, imejushhih vtoroe grazhdanstvo Rossijskoj Federacii // Simvol nauki. 2016. № 12–3. S. 123–125.
6. Stjazhkina S.A. Informacija kak ob#ekt ugolovno-pravovoj ohrany: ponjatie, priznaki, vidy // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Serija «Jekonomika i pravo». 2015. № 2. S. 157–160.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Zuy I.V.
Responsibility for deliberate bankruptcy in Russian law
Purpose: To study the specifics of the liability for intentional bankruptcy, provided for in the legislation of the Russian Federation.
Methodology: We used a formal legal method, a method of comparative analysis.
Results: This article discusses the specifics of the liability that exists in Russian law for intentional bankruptcy. The author turns to the identification of the main problems of bringing to criminal liability under art. 196 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation «Intentional bankruptcy». Key factors that prevent the wide application of this article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are singled out. The current situation in the sphere of responsibility for intentional bankruptcy is analyzed. The author clarified that Russian legislation needs to clarify the wording of the concept of «deliberate bankruptcy», a clear delineation of criminal and administrative responsibility for this act.
Novelty/originality/value: This article has a scientific value, since it highlights the actual for the Russian legal science problem - the peculiarities of criminal and administrative responsibility for deliberate bankruptcy and related problems.
Keywords: deliberate bankruptcy, evasion of debt obligations, criminal liability, transaction, major damage.
References (transliterated)
1. Zhadan V.N. Problemy dokazyvanija faktov prednamerennogo bankrotstva predprijatij // Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve. Juridicheskij zhurnal. 2013. № 1. S. 194–197.
2. Zinkovskij M.A. Prednamerennoe bankrotstvo v uslovijah nacional’nogo jekonomicheskogo krizisa // Sovremennoe pravo. 2015. № 6. S. 137–140.
3. Sverchkov V.V., Voronov S.S. Prednamerennoe bankrotstvo juridicheskogo lica ili individual’nogo predprinimatelja: mehanizm prestupnogo povedenija i osobennosti kvalifikacii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 21. S. 156–160.
4. Sereda I.M., Birjukova E.A. Nekotorye problemy kvalifikacii prednamerennogo bankrotstva po sub#ektu prestuplenija // Rossijskij sledovatel’. 2012. № 14. S. 12–17.
5. Ten A.N. Opredelenie momenta okonchanija nepravomernyh dejstvij pri bankrotstve i prednamerennyh bankrotstv // Biznes v zakone. Jekonomiko-juridicheskij zhurnal. 2016. № 5. S. 133–137.
6. Jashhenko A.S. Prednamerennoe bankrotstvo: problemy kvalifikacii i razgranichenija smezhnyh sostavov prestuplenij // Vestnik Brjanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 3. S. 178–181.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Dorzhieva S.V., Murzina E.A.
The actual problems of the restoration of parental rights
Purpose: Identifying and resolving the problems connected with the restoration of parental rights.
Methodology: There are used a method of system analysis and a technical method.
Results: The article focuses on the actual issues of the restoration of parental rights in the Russian Federation. There are revealed some difficulties connected with the proof of the right to restore parental rights. There are made suggestions on the improvement of family law and the federal law “About free legal assistance”. The article defines the need of a lawyer’s participation on the side of a claimant in this category of cases.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has considerable scientific value because it highlights the actual topic of the restoration of parental rights.
Keywords: children, child, family, deprivation of parental rights, restoration of parental rights, Family Code.
References (transliterated)
1. Min’kovskij G.M. Nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij k Konstitucii Rossijskoj Federacii / otv. red. V.V. Lazarev. 2-e izd., dop. i pererab. M.: Spark, 2001.
2. Rabec A.M. Tradicionnye i sovremennye pravovye formy semejnogo vospitanija detej, ostavshihsja bez popechenija roditelej: monografija. M.: Izd-vo RGSU, 2008.
 
EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCE
Nilov I.L.
Consumer extremism in the sphere of shared construction
Purpose: The aim of this study is the consideration of article 10 of the Law № 214-FZ «Liability for breach of obligations under the Treaty».
Methodology: This author used formal legal method.
Results: The author proposes to Supplement the current Law on share construction of a position to refuse to protect the rights of individuals abusing their rights.
Novelty/originality/value: The Relevance of the chosen topic stems from the fact that the problem of unfair behaviour of participants of shared construction is not only connected with the improper fulfillment of obligations by the parties of contractual relations, but also the facts of abuse of rights on the part of customers.
Keywords: shared construction, inequitable conduct, abuse of rights, denial of the protection of the law.
References (transliterated)
1. Bogdanova E.E. Dobrosovestnost’ uchastnikov dogovornyh otnoshenij i problemy zashhity ih sub#ektivnyh grazhdanskih prav: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2010.
2. Dvoreckij V.R. Ostorozhno, potrebillery! Ili kak zashhitit’ prodavca ot proiskov zlonamerennyh pokupatelej. M.: GrossMedia, ROSBUH, 2007.
3. Kartel’ V. Kak borot’sja s potrebitel’skim jekstremizmom? // Biznes-advokat. 1999. № 7.
4. Kostjuk N.V. Dobrosovestnost’ v rossijskom i zarubezhnom grazhdanskom prave // Hozjajstvo i pravo. 2008. № 12. S. 99–103.
5. Krylov A. Potrebitel’skij jekstremizm dol’shhikov // JeZh-Jurist. 2015. № 8. S. 1, 6.
6. Matancev D.A. Problema zloupotreblenija pravom v sfere zashhity prav potrebitelej // Tradicii i novacii v sisteme sovremennogo rossijskogo prava: sbornik tezisov uchastnikov VII Mezhdunarodnoj mezhvuzovskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii studentov i aspirantov. M., 2008. S. 181–183.
7. Ozhegova G.A. K ponjatiju «potrebitel’skij jekstremizm» // Jurist. 2014. № 14. S. 15–19.
8. Petuhova I.Je. Problemy primenenija zakonnoj neustojki za narushenie srokov peredachi ob#ektov nedvizhimosti // Jurist. 2016. № 13. S. 33–37.
9. Popikov O. Nadelennye pravom «jekstremisty» // JeZh-Jurist. 2013. № 14. S. 16.
10. Proekt Federal’nogo zakona № 81981-7 «O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal’nyj zakon «Ob uchastii v dolevom stroitel’stve mnogokvartirnyh domov i inyh ob#ektov nedvizhimosti i o vnesenii izmenenij v nekotorye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossijskoj Federacii» (red., vnesennaja v GD FS RF, tekst po sostojaniju na 20.01.2017). Rassmotren Sovetom GD FS RF 14.02.2017 (Protokol № 28, p. 54). Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz SPS «Konsul’tantPljus».
11. Sutjagin A.V. Konflikty s pokupateljami: problemy i reshenija / pod red. A.V. Sutjagina. M.: GrossMedia, ROSBUH, 2009.
 
EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCE
Uskova M.S.
Grounds for denying state support to agrarians:problems of legality and gaps in existing legislation
Purpose: To identify legal conflicts that cause enforcement problems when resolving the issue of providing state support to farmers under crop insurance contracts.
Methodology: The author use the methods of analysis and activities and synthesis, formal-logical, comparative law.
Results: The options for resolving some of the problems caused by the existence of conflicts of law in the field of agricultural insurance, carried out with state support, worked out with the help of scientific research and practical ways of research.
Novelty/originality/value: Scientific has a value in view of the fact that it is an independent individual author’s analysis of legal conflicts in the considered field of legal relations.
Keywords: crop insurance contract, state subsidy, insurance compensation, losses, state support.
References (transliterated)
1. Akimova Ju.A., Kochetkova S.A. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy gosudarstvennoj podderzhki agrarnoj sfery regiona v sovremennyh uslovijah // Fundamental’nye issledovanija. 2015. № 8–1. S. 168–172.
2. Kochetkova S.A., Akimova Ju.A. Mehanizmy gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v rossijskom APK // Fundamental’nye issledovanija. 2016. № 10–2. S. 398–402.
3. Mishherskaja E.A. Nekotorye problemy publichno-pravovogo regulirovanija publichno-chastnogo partnerstva v Rossijskoj Federacii // Reformy i pravo. 2017. № 1. S. 44–52.
4. Shherbakov V.V. Partnerstvo gosudarstva i biznesa v strahovanii sel’skohozjajstvennyh riskov: vyzovy novogo vremeni i perspektivy razvitija: monografija / pod red. I.P. Hominich. M.: Dashkov i K, 2011.

 

 

 

Сайт «Цифровая Академическая Библиотека “Автограф”»

НОВОСТИ

Наши партнеры

 

Лицензия Creative Commons
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.