Translator
Скачать
Вниманию авторов
Индексирование журнала
Содержание журнала
HISTORICAL EXPERIENCEDekhanov S.A.Right in rem in the roman law: property rights, ownership and holdingPurpose: The study of the history of the formation of property rights in Roman law.Methodology: The article uses historical, comparative legal and formal logical research methods.Results: The article deals with the formation of property rights in Roman law; analyzed the historical foundations and features of the formation of ownership, possession and holding in Roman law.Novelty/originality/value: The article is of high scientific value, since it is an original form of considering the evolution of property rights, ownership and holding in Roman law.Keywords: Roman law, limited property rights, ownership, possession, holding.References (transliterated)1.Dexanov S.A. Advokatura Drevnego Vostoka, Grecii, Rima: sravnitel`ny`j analiz // Advokat. 2005. № 8. S. 82–90.2.Dogma rimskogo prava. Osobennaya chast`. Lekcii professora Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta L.B. Dorna. SPb., 1891.3.Heusler A. Institutionen des Deutschen Privatrechts. Leipzig, 1885.4.Emel`kina I.A. Sistema ogranichenny`x veshhny`x prav na zemel`ny`e uchastki: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01004842369#?page=20.5.Noviczkij I.B. Rimskoe pravo. M., 1998. S. 74.6.Pokrovskij I.A. Istoriya rimskogo prava M., 2004. (Klassika rossijskoj civilistiki).7.http://www.allpravo.ru/library/doc2527p0/instrum3503/item3605.html.
HISTORICAL EXPERIENCEKirilova K.V.Historical stages of the creation of the German Federal patent courtЦель: Исследование истории становления института патентного права и развития Федерального патентного суда в Германии.Методология: Использовались историко-правовой и формально-юридический методы.Результаты: В статье в целях изучения института патентного права были выделены основные этапы его формирования: 1801–1871 гг., 1871–1949 гг., 1949–1961 гг. и с 1961 г. по настоящее время. Проанализирован и раскрыт каждый период становления Федерального патентного суда Германии.Новизна/оригинальность/ценность: Статья обладает научной ценностью, поскольку в ней исследуется становление и развитие Федерального патентного суда в Германии, которое ранее не рассматривалось ни одним автором в Российской Федерации.Ключевые слова: этапы развития, патентное право, Федеральный патентный суд Германии.References (transliterated)1.Androshhuk G.A. Zashhita intellektual`noj sobstvennosti v Germanii: e`konomiko-pravovoj aspekt // Nauka ta іnnovaczії. 2010. T. 6. № 3. S. 66–83.2.Artamonova E.M. Specializirovanny`j sud po intellektual`ny`m pravam v sisteme arbitrazhny`x sudov. M., 2015. S. 346–352.3.Gavrilova N.M. Sovremenny`j opy`t innovacionnogo razvitiya Germanii i vozmozhnosti ego ispol`zovaniya v Rossii // Finansy`: Teoriya i Praktika. 2011. № 6. S. 13–20.4.Predsedatel` Federal`nogo patentnogo suda. Otdel «Svyazi s obshhestvennost`yu i mezhdunarodny`e voprosy`, informacionnaya sluzhba» // Federal`ny`j patentny`j sud. 2012.5.Sy`shhikova T.V., Shabanov P.N. Federal`ny`j patentny`j sud Respubliki Germaniya: voprosy` organizacii i deyatel`nosti // Pravovaya nauka i reforma yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2014. № 4 (27). S. 53–57.6.Heggen Alfred. Die Bemuhungen des ‘Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure’ um die Reform des Erfindungsschutzes im Vorfeld des Reichspatentgesetzes von 1877. Technikgeschichte, 1973. R. 337–44.7.Heggen Alfred. Zur Vorgeschichte des Reichspatentgesetzer von 1877. G GRUR, 1977. R. 32.8.Dube Christian. Religiose Sprache in Reden Adolf Hitlers; Analysiert an Hand ausgewahlter Reden aus den Jahren 1933–1945. Dissertation Universitat Kiel, Germany, 2004. R. 238.9.Dr. Alfred Muller. Die Entwicklung des Erfindungsschutzes und seiner Gesetzgebung in Deutschland. 1898. R. 8–9.10.Manegold K.H. Der Wiener Patentschutzkongress von 1873. Technikgeschichte, 1971. P. 158.11.Toshiko Takenaka, Christoph Rademacher, Jan Krauss, Jochen Pagenberg, Tilman Mueller Stoy, Christof Karl. Patent Enforcement in the US, Germany and Japan. OXFORD university press, 2015. № 1.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEGabdrakhmanov R.L., Denisenko M.V., Kuzhikov V.N.To the question of administrative predition in criminal law on the example of the crime under Article 151.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian FederationPurpose: Study of the qualification of a crime with administrative prediment, infringing on physical and mental development, the health of minors and the sale of alcohol products to minors.Methodology: Analysis method and formal legal methods were used.Results: Examining the qualifications of the crime under Article 151.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the authors noted difficulties in determining the subject of the crime and distinguishing this crime from administrative offenses. Statistics on the problem under study are analyzed.Novelty/originality/value: The article has high scientific value, as the authors, using criminal, administrative and other legislation, materials of the practice of the judiciary, came to the conclusion that the law was improved.Keywords: crime qualifications, administrative predition, health of minors, alcohol products, retail trade, statistics.References (transliterated)1.Lyapunov Yu.I. Obshhestvennaya opasnost` deyaniya kak universal`naya kategoriya sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. M., 1989. S. 39.2.Mal`cev V.V. Kategoriya «obshhestvenno opasnoe povedenie». Volgograd, 1995. S. 62.3.Bavsun M.V., Bavsun I.G., Tixon I.L. Administrativnaya preyudiciya i perspektivy` eyo primeneniya na sovremennom e`tape // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2008 . № 6. S. 6–8.4.Gabdraxmanov R.L., Denisenko M.V., Kuzhikov V.N. Kvalifikaciya prestuplenij, posyagayushhix na zakonny`j oborot alkogol`noj produkcii // Rossijskij sledovatel`. 2019. № 11. S. 16–20.5.Kovalev M.I. Prestuplenie i prostupok // Problemy` sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel`stva po ukrepleniyu pravoporyadka i usileniya bor`by` s prestupleniyami: mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchny`x trudov. Sverdlovsk, 1982. S. 11–12.6.Koncepciya razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel`stva / otv. red.: T.Ya. Xabriev, Yu.A. Tixomirov. M., 2014. S. 58.7.Shemyakin D.V. Problemny`e voprosy` ispol`zova-niya administrativnoj preyudicii v ugolovnom prave // Rossijskij sledovatel`. 2015. № 15. S. 43–47.8.https://www.sudakt/ru/regular/dok/k0ughy9tnhzzr. ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEPakerman G.A.Legal Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment in the Grand Duchy of LuxembourgPurpose: Study of the legal regulation of foreign direct investment in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in order to determine the current investment regime favorable to foreign persons.Methodology: Comparative legal, historical legal and formal legal methods were used.Results: Today the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is one of the largest and most stable centers for managing international financial assets – there are about 4,000 registered funds with assets under management in the amount of more than 3.6 trillion euros.The geographical location of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, its political, social and reputation stability, developed infrastructure, favorable tax regime and investment climate, these and other factors are attractive for groups of companies that register their administrative centers and structural divisions (branches and representative offices) on its territory. Registration of a company and/or implementation of activities in Luxembourg gives them the opportunity to enter the common market of the European Union. The main idea of this article is focused on the analysis of recent changes in the national legislation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in particular in the corporate sphere, and includes the study of legislative acts that have also expired. The article concludes with an assessment that the current investment regime in Luxembourg may be different for different forms of investment. This diversity just attracts foreign investors, since, in particular, foreign direct investment, which by its nature is a means of strengthening the productive activity of the recipient state, is at the same time another tool for cross-border investment between groups of companies. In return, groups of companies with the goal of minimizing tax costs are interested in «financial engineering schemes» proposed by the legislation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.Novelty/originality/value: The scientific value of this article is an it is attempt to unveil the legal regulation of foreign direct investment in Luxembourg in a complex, rather than the individual areas that are studied, namely: taxation, registration of a company in the offshore zone. The article briefly reviews the changes in the corporate sphere, as well as the current currency and tax laws, and some acts of the European Union and the Model BIT 2019.Keywords: groups of companies, foreign investment, foreign direct investment, BIT model, national treatment, most favored nation treatment, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.References (transliterated)1.Zvonova E.A. Sovremenny`e trendy` e`volyucii mezhdunarodny`x finansovy`x centrov: regional`ny`j aspekt (na primere mezhdunarodnogo finansovogo centra v Lyuksemburge) // Dajdzhest-Finansy`. 2019. T. 24. № 3. S. 291.2.Putevoditel` dlya biznesa po Lyuksemburgu. Bryussel`. 2017 g. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://91.206.121.217/TpApi/Upload/c4b6dc42-4d28-4626-aa49-1eafb802c069/Businessguide_Luxembourg_2017.pdf.3.Kanashevskij V.A. Ofshorny`e kompanii i trasty`. Antiofshornoe regulirovanie. 2-e izd., dop. M.: Mezhdu-narodny`e otnosheniya, 2019.4.Pakerman G.A. Sovremenny`e modeli dvustoronnix investicionny`x soglashenij // Arbitrazh i regulirovanie mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo oborota: rossijskie, inostranny`e i transgranichny`e podxody`. Liber Amicorum v chest` 70-letiya A.S. Komarova / sost. i nauch. red.: N.G. Markalova i A.I. Muranov. M., 2019. S. 442–470.5.Xorosheva A.O. Velikie derzhavy` i sozdanie Velikogo Gerczogstva Lyuksemburg v XIX v. // Rossiya i mir v XIX veke. 2017. S. 86–101 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/velikie-derzhavy-i-sozdanie-velikogo-gertsogstva-lyuksemburg-v-xix-v/viewer.6.She`kson N. Lyudi, obokravshie mir. Pravda i vy`my`sel o sovremenny`x ofshorny`x zonax. M.: E`ksmo, 2011.7.Yuridicheskaya kompaniya Amond & Smith Ltd. Lyuksemburg kak instrument mezhdunarodnogo nalogovogo planirovaniya. Aktual`noe sostoyanie i perspektivy` // Rossijskaya Yusticiya. 2006. Iyun` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.amondsmith.ru/press/publication/13/.8.Tekst konsolidirovannoj versii Grazhdanskogo kodeksa 1803 g. s izmeneniyami ot 28.04.2019 [E`lektron-ny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.legilux.lu/eli/etat/leg/code/civil/20190428.9.http://www.legilux.lu/editorial/codes.10.The Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, adopted on: 17 Oct 1868 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/lu00000_.html.11.Konsolidirovannaya versiya Kommercheskogo kodeksa 1807 g. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.legilux.lu/eli/etat/leg/code/commerce/20160101.12.Arrêté grand-ducal du 30 août 1918 portant règlement sur le contrôle des sociétés coopératives [E`lektron-ny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/agd/1918/08/30/n4/jo.13.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1915/08/10/n1/jo.14.https://www.benelux.int/files/2313/9230/2800/BeneluxVerdrag_2008.pdf.15.https://eulaw.ru/treaties/tfeu/.16.https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/5854/download.17.Regulation (EU) № 1219/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 Establishing Transitional Arrangements for Bilateral Investment Agreements between Member States and Third Countries // Eur-lex.europa.eu; Eur-Lex Access to European Union law [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32012R1219.18.Procedure 2010/0197/COD. Bilateral Investment Agreements between Member States and Third Countries: Transitional Arrangements // Eur-lex.europa.eu; Eur-Lex Access to European Union law [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/procedure/EN/2010_197.19.Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing Transitional Arrangements for Bilateral Agreements between Member States and Third Countries // Eur-lex.europa.eu; Eur-Lex Access to European Union law [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010PC0344.20.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1993/04/05/n1/jo.21.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2019/12/04/a811/jo.22.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2004/11/12/n1/jo.23.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2018/05/30/a446/jo.24.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2018/05/30/a446/jo.25.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2016/07/23/n7/jo.26.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2008/10/24/n1/jo.27.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2010/12/17/n9/jo.28.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2013/07/12/n1/jo.29.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rbcl/2016/01/15/n1/jo.30.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2016/08/10/n1/jo.31.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1915/08/10/n1/jo.32.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2002/12/19/n1/jo.33.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2009/04/20/n1/jo.34.http://www.legilux.lu/eli/etat/leg/code/civil/20200101.35.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2011/05/24/n2/jo.36.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1929/07/31/n1/jo.37.Informacionno-pravovaya sistema «GARANT».38.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1929/07/31/n1/jo.39.Postanovlenie Velikogo Gerczoga ot 15 dekabrya 2016 g. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2016/12/15/n2/jo.40.Postanovlenie Velikogo Gerczoga ot 6 iyunya 2019 goda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2019/06/06/a391/jo.41.Postanovlenie Velikogo Gerczoga ot 1 avgusta 2018 goda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2018/08/01/a770/jo.42.https://www.cc.lu/accueil/.43.https://odl.lu/en/homepage.44.Zakon ot 4 dekabrya 2019 goda, kasayushhijsya Ofisa dyu Dyukruar [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2019/12/04/a839/jo.45.This version of the Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits replaces the January 2019 version [TAD/PG(2019)1]. This revision of the Arrangement includes all modifications agreed to the Arrangement, including its Annexes, and is effective as of 1 January 2020 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=tad/pg(2020)1.46.Zakon ot 12 dekabrya 2016 goda ob uchrezhdenii i izmenenii kompanij, vliyayushhix na obshhestvo:47.izmenenny`j zakon ot 19 dekabrya 2002 goda o registracii torgovli i kompanij, a takzhe schetov i godovy`x otchetov kompanij;48.izmenenny`j zakon ot 4 dekabrya 1967 goda o podoxodnom naloge;49.v) izmenenny`j zakon ot 1 dekabrya 1936 g. o muni-cipal`nom kommercheskom naloge;50.g) izmenenny`j zakon ot 16 oktyabrya 1934 goda o naloge na imushhestvo [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2016/12/12/n1/jo.51.Souncil Directive 2011/96/EU of 30 November 2011 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://niemands.ru/press-centr/faq/directive_201196eu.52.Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.nexus.ua/data/files/Legal_DB/International/EU_VAT_Directive.pdf.53.Zakon ot 12 iyulya 2013 g. ob upravlyayushhix fon-dami al`ternativny`x investicij [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2013/07/12/n1/jo.54.https://take-profit.org/statistics/gdp/luxembourg. ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEVetrova E.G.«Letter» and «silence» of the sports federation as jurisdictional decisionsPurpose: To identify the criteria for recognition of the status of a «decision» by the action or omission of jurisdictional and other bodies of International Sports Federations through a study of the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).Methodology: Methods of analysis and synthesis; formal-legal and comparative methods.Results: The article analyzed the criteria for recognizing the status of decisions for letters, messages and «silence» of bodies of International Sports Federations. Separately, an assessment is given of the fact of the lack of reaction («silence») of the jurisdictional body of the International Sports Federation, as well as letters received from the e-mail address of the Federation.Novelty/originality/value: The article is a comprehensive analysis of the practice of CAS regarding the recognition of the status of «decision» by the action, inaction of jurisdictional and other bodies of international sports federations. The author has formulated a number of conclusions of practical importance for legal science.Keywords: Sports Arbitration, CAS practice, decisions of judicial bodies, decisions of Sports Federations, denial of justice, form of decision of Sports Federation, dispute resolution.References (transliterated)1.Poluxina R.E`. Pravovy`e aspekty` problem sportivnogo arbitrazha // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry`. 2018. № 3. S. 149–152.2.Shaxraj S.M. Mezhdunarodny`j sportivny`j arbitrazh. M.: Voenizdat, 2011.3.Kirilyuk O.V. Lex sportiva – koncepciya transnaci-onal`nogo sportivnogo prava // Zakon i zhizn`. 2013. № 3 (8). S. 113–117.4.Nafziger J.A.R. The Future of International Sports Law // Lex Sportiva: What is Sports Law? / ed. C.R. iekmann, J. Soek. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press / Springer, 2012. P. 109–122.5.Arbitration CAS 2017/A/5058 Al-Ittihad FC v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 18 December 2017 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202017%2FA%2F5058.6.Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1633 FC Schalke 04 v. Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (CBF), award of 16 December 2008 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202008%2FA%2F1633%20FC).7.Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4193 Guyana Football Federation (GFF) v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) & St. Vincent and the Grenadines Football Federation (SVGFF), award of 5 January 2016 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202015%2FA%2F4193).8.Arbitration CAS 2016/A/4772 Diego Dominguez v. Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA), award of 12 January 2018 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202016%2FA%2F4772).9.Arbitration CAS 2005/A/899 FC Aris Thessaloniki v. FIFA & New Panionios N.F.C., award of 15 July 2005 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202005%2FA%2F899).10.Arbitration CAS 2010/A/2315 Netball New Zealand v. International Netball Federation Limited (IFNA), award of 27 May 2011 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202010%2FA%2F2315).11.Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2586 William Lanes de Lima v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) & Real Betis Balompié, award of 3 October 2012 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202011%2FA%2F2586).12.Arbitration CAS 2012/A/2754 U.C. Sampdoria v. Club San Lorenzo de Almagro & Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 8 February 2013 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202012%2FA%2F2754). ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEDudorov T.D.Problems of legislative regulation of grounds for recognizing a person as a suspectPurpose: The purpose of the study is to make generalized theoretical conclusions and reasonable recommendations on the basis of a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical and practical problems of the suspect’s institute, based on a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical and practical problems of the institution.Methodology: Analytical, formal, legal and systemic approaches were used.Results: An analysis of the legislative interpretation of the grounds for recognizing a person as a suspect makes it reasonable, in the author’s view, to argue that they need unification, both in terms of their list and in terms of the mechanism for involving the person involved in the criminal process. The author makes a proposal to improve the existing criminal law, in particular Art. 46 CPC of the Russian Federation.Novelty/originality/value: The article has a certain degree of novelty and scientific value, as it is devoted to the current problems of legal regulation of the criminal procedure status of the suspect. Its provisions can be used in further scientific research on the issues at hand, as well as taken into account in further reform of the domestic criminal procedure law.Keywords: criminal proceedings, procedural status, suspect, criminal case, procedural form, procedural act.References (transliterated)1.Bisharyan K.A. Podozrevaemy`j i zashhita ego prav v ugolovnom processe: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007. S. 11.2.Veretennikov I.A. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo kak kompleksny`j pravovoj institut: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.3.Dacieva X.G. Processual`no-pravovy`e i gumanitarny`e problemy` uchastiya podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom processe Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009.4.Efremova N.P., Kal`niczkij V.V. Privlechenie v ka-chestve obvinyaemogo: uchebno-praktich. posob. Omsk: Izd-vo Omsk. akad. MVD Rossii, 2007.5.Epaneshnikov A.S. Zashhita prav i zakonny`x interesov podozrevaemogo i obvinyaemogo v rossijskom dosudebnom proizvodstve. Orenburg, 2003. S. 36.6.Zajcev O.A., Smirnov P.A. Podozrevaemy`j v ugolovnom processe. M.: E`kzamen, 2005.7.Zelenina O.A. Processual`ny`j status uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i ego izmenenie v dosudebnom proizvodstve: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004. S. 123.8.Larin A.M. Ugolovny`j process Rossii: lekcii-ocherki / A.M. Larin, E`.B. Mel`nikova, V.M. Saviczkij; pod red. V.M. Saviczkogo. M.: BEK, 1997.9.Murav`ev K.V. Uvedomlenie o podozrenii v sovershenii prestupleniya // Ugolovny`j process. 2007. № 11. S. 16–21.10.Teregulova A.A. Pravovoe polozhenie podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom processe Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2008.11.Shadrin V.S. Obespechenie prav lichnosti pri rassledovanii prestuplenij. M.: Yurlitinform, 2000.12.Kachalova O.V. Oxrana konstitucionny`x prav podozrevaemogo i obvinyaemogo na predvaritel`nom sledstvii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1999. S. 8.13.Mel`nikov V.Yu. Processual`noe oformlenie zaderzhaniya zapodozrennogo licza i ego dopros // Rossijskij sledovatel`. 2003. № 9. S. 12.14.Konax E.I., Parfenova M.V. Processual`ny`j status i obespechenie prav podozrevaemogo. M., 2005. S. 9. PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATERagulin A.V.The court decision on the «secret claim» of the advocate A.R. Ramaldanov to the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation: «illegality» and «positive content»Purpose: To study the issues of illegality and the positive content of the decision of the Khamovnichesky District Court, issued in a claim about the recognition of Clarification No. 03/19 of Ethics and Standards Commission of the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation on the admissibility of advocates appeals to law enforcement agencies and the «Resolution on advocacy ethics» adopted by the IX All-Russian Congress of Advocates contradicting the foundations of law and order and morality.Methodology: The author used the methods of structural and functional analysis, the system method, the formal legal method, the comparative method, the retrospective method, the method of studying documents, the method of included observation.Results: An output is made that the decision of the claim of A.R. Ramaldanov to the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation does not meet the requirements of legality and validity. It has also been established that in accordance with the provisions of the court’s decision, the content of the signs of the objective side of the person being punished according to Clarification No. 03/19, the advocate`s behavior in comparison with the rules actually reflected in its text, the court actually expands, and the circumstances listed in the decision are added to them. Each of them should fall under the signs of «abuse of law» in accordance with Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: interference with the activities of law enforcement authorities; violation of the principle of independence and corporate of advocacy; neglect of moral traditions and the requirements of professional ethics; undermining the trust in the advocates community; other circumstances. The provisions of Clarification No. 03/19 and the Resolution are in fact supplemented by a mandatory feature of the subjective side of the act - the special purpose of interfering in the activities of the bodies of advocate self-government and damage the credibility of the advocacy, undermining trust in it. In this regard, it is concluded that the decision on the claim of A.R. Ramaldanov can be assessed as an attempt to consolidate a partial actual softening of the provisions of the Explanation of the Ethics and Standards Commission 03/19 and Resolution of the IX All-Russian Congress of Advocates «Resolution on advocacy ethics» and the practice of the possible further application of these acts.Novelty/originality/value: The article is of scientific value, since it is the first attempt to study the current situation in the Russian bar and regulate disciplinary liability of a lawyer in connection with the adoption by the Ethics and Standards Commission of the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation of Clarification No. 03/19 and adoption IX All-Russian Congress of Advocates «Resolution on advocacy ethics».Keywords: advocacy, advocate, disciplinary liability of an advocate, Ethics and Standards Commission, Federal Chamber of Advocates, All-Russian Congress of Advocates, Code of Professional Ethics of Advocates.References (transliterated)1.https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2019/06/13/80871-litso-osvobozhdennoy-professii.2.https://pasmi.ru/archive/234140/.3.https://mhg.ru/o-presledovaniyah-po-delu-32-h-v-svete-konvencii-o-zashchite-prav-cheloveka-6052019.4.https://legal.report/advokaty-prosjat-hamovnicheskij-sud-otmenit-reshenie-fpa-razreshiv-pisat-donosy-drug-na-druga/.5.https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2019/04/18/799592-advokatam-zapretili-zhalovatsya.6.https://freemedia-io.turbopages.org/s/freemedia.io/2019/05/apkk.7.https://proufu.ru/news/novosti/80938-32_advokata_prosyat_bastrykina_proverit_deyatelnost_advokatskoy_palaty_bashkirii/.8.https://rb.versia.ru/32-advokata-poprosili-proverit-deyatelnost-advokatskoj-palaty-bashkirii.9.https://mbk-news.appspot.com/suzhet/presleduyut-za-vyskazyvani/.10.https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3992875.11.https://www.svoboda.org/a/29904618.html.12.https://newizv.ru/news/politics/17-01-2020/chest-ili-mest-za-chto-advokatov-lishayut-professii.13.Ragulin A.V. Traktat ob Obrashhenii 32-x, principax, diskriminacii i demokratii v rossijskoj advokature: monografiya / predisl.: G.B. Mirzoev, poslesl.: A.V. Vorob`ev. M.: Rossijskaya akademiya advokatury` i notariata, Evrazijskij nauchno-issledovatel`skij institut problem prava, 2019. S. 67–84.14.https://fparf.ru/documents/fpa-rf/documents-commissions/interpretation-no-03-19.15.https://fparf.ru/documents/fpa-rf/documents-of-the-congress/resolution-on-the-observance-of-legal-ethics/.16.https://www.mos-gorsud.ru/rs/hamovnicheskij/services/cases/civil/details/30f9617c-54da-41c3-bcd5-98b898b49390?participants=Palata.17.https://fparf.ru/documents/fpa-rf/judicial-practice/lawsuit-up-the-udmurt-republic-to-the-federal-chamber-of-lawyers-of-the-russian-federation/.18.https://legal.report/mosgorsud-razreshil-fpa-nakazyvat-advokatov-za-donosy-na-kolleg/.19.https://www.mos-gorsud.ru/rs/hamovnicheskij/services/cases/civil/details/a550a937-b683-48ac-8433-d7ec37b505f9?participants=Ramaldanov.20.https://www.mos-gorsud.ru/mgs/services/cases/appeal-civil/details/b0ff614d-39d6-4fcb-90ec-68168ed4d891?participants=Ramaldanov.21.https://obhis.ru/opredeleniya-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rossiyskoy-federatsii-s-polozhitelnym-soderzhaniem.html.22.https://echo.msk.ru/blog/zoya_svetova/2410715-echo/. PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATE
Melnichenko R.G.
Digital shadow of the advocate
Purpose: To identify and problematize such phenomena as «digital shadow of the advocate» and «digital copy of the advocate».Methods: Statistical, hermeneutic and comparative legal method were used.Results: The problem of «smuggling» appearance in the digital world of digital shadows of the advocate and advocate’s self-government bodies was identified.Novelty/originality/value: Lack of research on digital shadows and digital copies as applied to social life. The author’s use of statistical data in the field of online life of members of the advocates community testifies to originality. The scientific value nature of the study is evidenced by the recommendations that the author puts forward, based on the idea of a «digital shadow of the advocate».Keywords: advocacy, digital world, digital shadow, digital twin, assemblage point, personality core, digital footprint.References (transliterated)1.Bern E`. Igry`, v kotory`e igrayut lyudi: Psixologiya chelovecheskix vzaimootnoshenij; Lyudi, kotory`e igrayut v igry`: Psixologiya chelovecheskoj sud`by`: perev. s angl. / obshh. red. M.S. Maczkovskogo. SPb.: Lenizdat, 1992.2.Kokorev D.S., Yurin A.A. Cifrovy`e dvojniki: ponyatie, tipy` i preimushhestva dlya biznesa // Colloquium-journal. 2019. № 10 (34).3.Mel`nichenko R.G. Otzy`vy` drugix licz o rabote advokata: interpretaciya e`ticheskogo ogranicheniya // Advokatskaya praktika. 2017. № 4. S. 12–17.4.Mel`nichenko R.G. E`lektronnaya advokatura // Evrazijskaya advokatura. 2017. № 3 (28). S. 38–41.5.Michael W. Grieves Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication - LLC, 2014. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EURASIAN SPACEShevchenko V.E.Referendum as an institute of direct will of citizens:effectiveness of implementation in national and international practicePurpose: Analysis of the institution of the referendum as a form of direct expression of the will of citizens, identifying the effectiveness of the implementation of the referendum in national and international practice.Methodology: General scientific (systemic, structural-functional, historical), private scientific (synthesis, analysis, comparison, analogy).Results: For a number of reasons, the referendum institution was not widely spread in Russia. The reasons for the low popularity of the referendum as a form of direct expression of the will of the people are the complexity of the procedure for organizing it, conducting it, the vagueness of the requirements for the issues put forward for voting, the vagueness of the wordings established by the legislator, the high financial costs, the lack of interest of the authorities in resolving fundamentally important issues directly by the population, and the low legal literacy of the citizens themselves, passivity, their distrust of the institution in question.Novelty/originality/value: At this stage in the development of mankind, a referendum with its rich history is undoubtedly one of the most significant institutions in a democratic state, the most important criterion for building a civil society. Its improvement is legislative, the most frequent application in practice can lead to the very so-called Rousseau sovereign nation, which not only knows its rights, but can also protect them, use them legally to improve not only their own, but also everyone around him. Only the reform of the institute, not in part, but in its totality, in all its problematic aspects, can lead the state to that reality in which «its bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people».Keywords: referendum, features, direct expression of will, plebiscite, vote, implementation efficiency, Problems, reforming.References (transliterated)1.Bol`shaya sovetskaya e`nciklopediya: slovar` / pod red. A.M. Proxorova. M.: Sovetskaya e`nciklopediya, 1972.2.Avak`yan S.A., Ivanchenko A.V., Vedeneev Yu.A., Ly`senko V.I. Izbiratel`noe pravo i izbiratel`ny`j process v Rossijskoj Federacii: uchebnik. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 1998.3.Petrov A.Yu. Grazhdansko-pravovoe znachenie voli i voleiz``yavleniya v sdelke // Kiberleninka: Nauchnaya e`lektronnaya biblioteka. 2007. № 45 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/grazhdansko-pravovoe-znachenie-voli-i-voleizyavleniya-v-sdelke.4.Statisticheskie danny`e, razmeshhenny`e na oficial`-nom sajte Central`noj izbiratel`noj komissii Rossijskoj Federacii // CIKRF [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.vybory.izbirkom.ru.5.Filippov M.M. Ponyatie voli v sovetskoj psixologii: Opy`t opredeleniya voli: monografiya. Tomsk: Izdatel`stvo Tomskogo universiteta, 1968.6.Chirkin V.E. Konstitucionnoe pravo zarubezhny`x stran: uchebnik. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012.7.Yuridicheskij e`nciklopedicheskij slovar`: slovar` / pod red. A.Ya. Suxareva. M.: Sovetskaya e`nciklopediya, 1987.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACEMinyazeva T.F.Special categories of criminal law in RussiaPurpose: Study of a number of special categories of criminal law in Russia.Methodology: The analysis method and formal legal methods were used.Results: The article substantiates the importance of maintaining in criminal law of Russia, as a special branch of law, traditionally inherent categories and principles: «crime», «punishment», «complicity in a crime», principle, personal responsibility, and others. Attention is drawn to the fact that «breaking is not building», and changing the essence of specific categories of this branch of law does not contribute to the effectiveness of the fight against crime, on the contrary, it complicates law enforcement.Novelty/originality/value: The article is distinguished by scientific novelty and has significant scientific value.Keywords: criminal law, crime, punishment, principle of personal responsibility, complicity in a crime, legal entity.References (transliterated)1.Naumov A.V. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaya chast`: kurs lekcij. 6-e izd. M.: PROSPEKT, 2019.2.Dal` V. Tolkovy`j slovar` zhivogo velikorusskogo yazy`ka. T. 4. M., 1991. S. 467.3.Kolokolov N.A. Ugolovny`j prostupok: chastnoe, zaby`vaem obshhee i osobennoe. Vse novoe – xorosho zaby`toe staroe // Mirovoj sud`ya. 2017. № 5.4.Ragimov I.M., Baburin S.N., Golik Yu.V., Duk Yu.I., Korobeev A.I. Sovremennoe gosudarstvo v e`poxu global`-ny`x transformacij. SPb.: Yuridicheskij centr – Akademiya, 2019. S. 184, 1915.Babaev M.M., Pudovochkin Yu.E. Problemy` rossijskoj ugolovnoj politiki: monografiya. M.: PROSPEKT, 2018. S. 182–1846.Koreczkij D.A. Fenomen «novoj normal`nosti» v yurisprudencii // IV Saratovskie ugolovno-pravovy`e chteniya: cbornik statej po materialam IV Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Saratov, 2019.7.Ershov S.A. Problemy` reglamentacii posobnichestva v UK RF // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy` XII mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (29–30 yanvarya 2015 g.). MGYuA. M., 2015. S. 236.8.Rarog A.I. Prioritety` rossijskoj ugolovno-pravovoj politiki. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy` XII mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (29–30 yanvarya 2015 g.). MGYuA. M., 2015. S. 15.9.Alauxanov E`. Pravovoj genezis organizovannoj prestupnosti v Respublike Kazaxstan. SPb.: Yuridicheskij centr, 2018. S. 110.10.Ermolovich Ya.N. Neostorozhnoe soprichinenie vreda v prestupleniyax, sopryazhenny`x s narusheniem spe-cial`ny`x pravil // Pravo v Vooruzhenny`x silax. 2019. № 2. JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE Sapronova T.P.Legal statistics as an independent direction of Prosecutor’s supervisionPurpose: The purpose of the article is to consider legal statistics as an independent section of Prosecutor’s supervision. For this purpose, the main functions of the Prosecutor’s office are described, and the forms of reporting on various types of Prosecutor’s activities are described.Methodology: The article uses analytical, theoretical and formal legal methods.Results: Statistical data are collected in all areas of prosecutorial activity that are stipulated by law. The system of Prosecutor’s legal statistics also includes state (Federal) interdepartmental statistical reporting. Data from Federal statistical observation forms are formed taking into account the control and Supervisory powers of the Prosecutor to verify the accuracy and completeness of the subjects ‘ recording of crimes. It is concluded that the Prosecutor is the only procedural figure who is not interested in distorting statistical data on the results of the investigation. It is the lack of any interest in the distortion of statistical data on the results of the investigation, and therefore data on crime, contributes to securing the effective implementation of prosecutorial oversight in the area of legal statistics, the adoption of effective management solutions aimed at combating crime. That is why statistics act as an independent direction of Prosecutor’s supervision.Novelty/originality/value: the Study reveals the essence of the statistical aspect of the Prosecutor’s supervision, which is usually not considered as an independent direction of the Prosecutor’s activity. It is proposed to fix in article 1 of the Federal law «on the Prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation» the Prosecutor’s conduct of legal statistics as an independent direction of Supervisory activity. The originality of the work is emphasized by the studied normative acts, which the author refers to during the analysis. The value of the work consists in a detailed analysis of the issues raised in the article and a detailed answer to them.Keywords: Prosecutor’s supervision, legal statistics, statistical data, normative acts, fighting crime.References (transliterated)1.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 22-02-1 (red. ot 06.02.2020) «O prokurature Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lek-tronny`j resurs]. URL: www/consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_262/9612db5d2407ba1a131cc074e3c50f01fb2ddf972.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 20.06.2018 № 368 «Ob utverzhdenii i o vvedenii v dejstvie statisticheskogo otcheta «Nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov, soblyudeniem prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina» po forme ON i Instrukcii po ego formirovaniyu [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https//gkrfkod.ru/zakonodatelstvo/prikaz-genprokuratury-rossii-ot 20062018-n-368.3.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 24.01.2017 № 20 «Ob utverzhdenii i o vvedenii v dejstvie statisticheskogo otcheta «Nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov na dosudebnoj stadii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» po forme NSiD i Instrukcii po ego formirovaniyu [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: docs.cntd.ru/document/553941975.4.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 09.07.20159 № 364 «O vnesenii izmenenij v prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 15.02.2011 № 33 «Ob organizacii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov pri osushhestvlenii operativno-rozy`sknoj deyatel`nosti» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: URL: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_183856/.5.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 02.11.2010 № 391 «Ob utverzhdenii o vvedenii v dejstvie statisticheskogo otcheta «O rezul`tatax nadzora za zakonnost`yu ispolneniya ugolovny`x nakazanij» po forme UIS i Instrukcii po ego sostavleniyu» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: docs.cntd.ru/document/552097494.6.Statisticheskaya otchetnost` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://poznayra.org/s43112t1.html7.Formy` federal`nogo statisticheskogo nablyudeniya № 1-EGS «Ediny`j otchet o prestupnosti», № 2-EGS «Svedeniya o liczax, sovershivshix prestupleniya», № 3-EGS «Svedeniya o zaregistrirovanny`x, raskry`ty`x i neraskry`ty`x prestupleniyax», № 4-EGS «Svedeniya o sostoyanii prestupnosti i rezul`tatax rassledovaniya prestuplenij», № 2-E «O rassmotrenii soobshhenij o prestuplenii», № 1-E «Svedeniya o sledstvennoj rabote i doznanii», № 2-E «Svedeniya o rassmotrenii soobshhenij», № 1-EM «Svedeniya ob osnovny`x pokazatelyax sledstvennoj raboty` i doznaniya».8.Instrukciya o poryadke zapolneniya i predstavleniya uchetny`x dokumentov. Prilozhenie № 3 k prikazu General`noj prokuratury` Rossijskoj Federacii, MVD Rossii, MChS Rossii, Minyusta Rossii, FSB Rossii, Mine`konomrazvitiya Rossii, FSKN Rossii ot 29.12.2005 № 39/1070/1021/253/780/353/399 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://base.garan.ru/12144358.9.Sbornik General`noj prokuratury` Rossijskoj Federacii «Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossii» za yanvar`–maj 2020 goda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https//genproc.gov.ru/upload/iblock/0e2/sbornik_5_2020pdf.10.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 22-02-1 (red. ot 06.02.2020) «O prokurature Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lek-tronny`j resurs]. URL: www/consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_262/9612db5d2407ba1a131cc074e3c50f01fb2ddf97.11.Statisticheskij otchet po forme 11-Stat «O rezul`tatax raboty` prokurora v sfere ugolovno-pravovoj statistiki» za yanvar`–dekabr` 2019 g. Sm. Delo № 11-13-2019 prokuratury` Tverskoj oblasti.12.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18.01.2016 № 18 «O provedenii opy`tnoj e`kspluatacii gosudarstvennoj avtomatizirovannoj sistemy` pravovoj statistiki» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: docs.cntd.ru/document/456047579.13.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18.06.2013 № 295 «Ob utverzhdenii i vvedenii v dejstvie Vremennoj instrukcii po uchetu raboty` prokurorov v organax prokuratury` Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70359754.14.Mel`nikov N.V. Prokurorskij nadzor – samostoya-tel`naya forma osushhestvleniya prokurorskoj vlasti v Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2016. № 5. S. 34.15.Voronin O.V. O sushhnosti sovremennogo prokurorskogo nadzora // Ugolovnaya yusticiya. 2018. № 11. S. 188.16.Zakon Respubliki Kazaxstan ot 22.12.2003 № 510 «O gosudarstvennoj pravovoj statistike i special`ny`x uchetax» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z030000510. JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE Magnitsky N.D.Improving the system of public financial control over the formation of state and municipal revenuesPurpose: To consider the system of financial control within the framework of the formation of incomes of public law education and to identify an effective calculation of the income forecast.Methodology: The study used a comparative analysis of the presentation of the forecast of federal budget revenues by the chief administrators of federal budget revenues.Results: It seems expedient to forecast federal budget revenues based on revenue sources. However, in view of such a wide range of information subject to financial control, as well as a wide range of different sources of income, it seems appropriate to use programming languages.Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific value, since it contains conclusions and proposals important for science and practice.Keywords: income forecast, list of income sources, chief income administrators.References (transliterated)1.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 23.06.2016 № 574 «Ob obshhix trebovaniyax k metodike prognozirovaniya postuplenij doxodov v byudzhety` byudzhetnoj sistemy` Rossijskoj Federacii». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».2.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 31.08.2016 № 868 «O poryadke formirovaniya i vedeniya perechnya istochnikov doxodov Rossijskoj Federacii». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».3.Ispolnenie federal`nogo byudzheta i byudzhetov byudzhetnoj sistemy` Rossijskoj Federacii za 2019 god [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.minfin.ru/.4.Nalogovy`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (NK RF) ot 31.07.1998 № 146-FZ. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».5.Byudzhetny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 31.07.1998 № 145-FZ. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus». JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE Neznamova I.A.Responsibility for intra-family crimes in the Russian Federation and foreign countriesPurpose: To address issues related to the problem of domestic violence itself. The article will consider what domestic violence is, whether it is worth keeping a family between the victim and the «rapist» or whether such marriages should be dissolved, what is the purpose of the Federal Law No. 1183390-6 «On the prevention of domestic violence», which is going to be adopted in the Russian Federation , and what experience do other countries have in this matter, in particular, the USA, France, GermanyMethodology: The study used a comparative analysis of the crimes of the Russian Federation on the example of other countries.Results: On the basis of this study, the author concluded that the law must approve the law on domestic violence, especially for those people who actually faced this problem.Novelty/originality/value: In every family there are different kinds of disagreements, but not in every family these disagreements escalate to physical, mental or sexual abuse. From time immemorial, this topic has been relevant, and this problem is constantly raised. People from different countries constantly talk about the urgency of this problem and demand protection from this situation.Keywords: family violence, Federal Law No. 1183390-6 «On the prevention of family and domestic violence», family and domestic violence, preventive measures.References (transliterated)1.Model`noe zakonodatel`stvo o nasilii v sem`e. Rekomendacii OON [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.gender.cawater-info.net/publications/pdf/mod_un.pdf.2.Pasport proekta Federal`nogo zakona № 1183390-6 «O profilaktike semejno-by`tovogo nasiliya» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&ts=23366322605788430712579857&cacheid=D1DD5EAF22610B230E2250F7F52B1BDA&mode=splus&base=PRJ&n=151045&rnd=0.0020780954442429778#523q2kicwb.3.Xarlamov V.S. Institut oxrannogo ordera v zarubezhnom zakonodatel`stve kak instrument zashhity` lichnosti ot vnutrisemejnogo nasiliya // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2014. № 1 (32). S. 34–40.4.Lotova I.P., Orexova E.Ya. Bor`ba s nasiliem i zhestokost`yu v otnoshenii zhenshhin: opy`t Francii // Ucheny`e zapisi Zabajkal`skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 5 (64). S. 110–115.5.https://tass.ru/obschestvo/8438335.6.Zona prava: pravozashhitny`j proekt [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://zona.media/news/2020/03/30/linija.7.RFI: novosti [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.rfi.fr/ru/frantsiya/20190903-srochnye-mery-frantsiya-usilivaet-borbu-s-domashnim-nasiliem.8.Rossijskaya gazeta. 1990. 27 oktyabrya [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://rg.ru/2016/10/27/korrespondenty-rg-o-tom-kak-za-rubezhom-boriutsia-s-semejnym-nasiliem.html.9.Informaciya o yuridicheskix pravax, kotory`mi obladayut v SShA immigranty` – zhertvy` by`tovogo nasiliya, i svedeniya ob immigracii po brachnoj vize [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://meet-usa.com/uploads/files/IMBRA_Russian.pdf.10.Krasnaya vesna: informacionnoe agentstvo, Moskva, 2016 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://rossaprimavera.ru/article/4e79e7fd. JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE Tadjiboev M.M.Judicial enforcement issues: problems and suggestionsPurpose: Filling the gaps in legislation of about enforcement of civil judicial decisions of the Republic of UzbekistanMethodology: Аnalysis and synthesis, study of judicial decisions concerning their enforcementResults: Giving proposals for improving civil procedure and executive procedure of the Republic of UzbekistanNovelty/originality/value: Тhe article discusses the theoretical and practical features of the regulation of relations, relating to the enforcement of civil judicial decisionsKeywords: civil case, judicial acts, court’s decision, enforce the court’s decision, enforcement documents, an execution order.References (transliterated) 1.Mamasidiov M. Grazhdanskij process. Posobie dlya kandidatov rezerva v sudy` po grazhdanskim delam. Tashkent, 2014. S. 318.2.Zakon Respubliki Uzbekistan «Ob ispolnenii sudebny`x aktov i aktov iny`x organov» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://lex.uz/.3.Grazhdanskij processual`ny`j kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://lex.uz/docs/3517337?otherlang=1.4.Perechen` dejstvuyushhix postanovlenij Plenuma Verxovnogo Suda Respubliki Uzbekistan [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://nrm.uz/products?folder=2147483647_zakonodatelstvo_ruz&products=1_vse_zakonodatelstvo_uzbekistana»RUz / Sudebny`e akty` / Postanovleniya Plenuma Verxovnogo suda / Informaciya o postanovleniyax Plenuma VS HYPERLINK «https://nrm.uz/products?folder=396896_informaciya_o_postanovleniyah_plenuma_vs_ruz&products=1_vse_zakonodatelstvo_uzbekistana»RUz /.5.Konstituciya Respubliki Uzbekistan, stat`ya 114 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://lex.uz/docs/35869.6.Federal`ny`j zakon Rossijskoj Federacii ot 02.10.2007 № 229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel`nom proizvodstve» (v redakcii ot 02.12.2019) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://fssprus.ru/2032946/.7.Grazhdanskij processual`ny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 14.11.2002 №138-FZ (red. ot 24.04.2020) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570/.8.Zakon Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 2 sentyabrya 1993 goda «O sudax» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.lex.uz/acts/68521.9.Yodgorov X., Saidmurodov B. Poryadok obrashheniya v sud po grazhdanskim delam: praktich. posob. 2-e izd. Tashkent, 2017. S. 36. LITERARY LOUNGEKuznetsov B.A.H2S as a Mean of the Defense (Katja P.`s Case)
HISTORICAL EXPERIENCEKirilova K.V.Historical stages of the creation of the German Federal patent courtЦель: Исследование истории становления института патентного права и развития Федерального патентного суда в Германии.Методология: Использовались историко-правовой и формально-юридический методы.Результаты: В статье в целях изучения института патентного права были выделены основные этапы его формирования: 1801–1871 гг., 1871–1949 гг., 1949–1961 гг. и с 1961 г. по настоящее время. Проанализирован и раскрыт каждый период становления Федерального патентного суда Германии.Новизна/оригинальность/ценность: Статья обладает научной ценностью, поскольку в ней исследуется становление и развитие Федерального патентного суда в Германии, которое ранее не рассматривалось ни одним автором в Российской Федерации.Ключевые слова: этапы развития, патентное право, Федеральный патентный суд Германии.References (transliterated)1.Androshhuk G.A. Zashhita intellektual`noj sobstvennosti v Germanii: e`konomiko-pravovoj aspekt // Nauka ta іnnovaczії. 2010. T. 6. № 3. S. 66–83.2.Artamonova E.M. Specializirovanny`j sud po intellektual`ny`m pravam v sisteme arbitrazhny`x sudov. M., 2015. S. 346–352.3.Gavrilova N.M. Sovremenny`j opy`t innovacionnogo razvitiya Germanii i vozmozhnosti ego ispol`zovaniya v Rossii // Finansy`: Teoriya i Praktika. 2011. № 6. S. 13–20.4.Predsedatel` Federal`nogo patentnogo suda. Otdel «Svyazi s obshhestvennost`yu i mezhdunarodny`e voprosy`, informacionnaya sluzhba» // Federal`ny`j patentny`j sud. 2012.5.Sy`shhikova T.V., Shabanov P.N. Federal`ny`j patentny`j sud Respubliki Germaniya: voprosy` organizacii i deyatel`nosti // Pravovaya nauka i reforma yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2014. № 4 (27). S. 53–57.6.Heggen Alfred. Die Bemuhungen des ‘Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure’ um die Reform des Erfindungsschutzes im Vorfeld des Reichspatentgesetzes von 1877. Technikgeschichte, 1973. R. 337–44.7.Heggen Alfred. Zur Vorgeschichte des Reichspatentgesetzer von 1877. G GRUR, 1977. R. 32.8.Dube Christian. Religiose Sprache in Reden Adolf Hitlers; Analysiert an Hand ausgewahlter Reden aus den Jahren 1933–1945. Dissertation Universitat Kiel, Germany, 2004. R. 238.9.Dr. Alfred Muller. Die Entwicklung des Erfindungsschutzes und seiner Gesetzgebung in Deutschland. 1898. R. 8–9.10.Manegold K.H. Der Wiener Patentschutzkongress von 1873. Technikgeschichte, 1971. P. 158.11.Toshiko Takenaka, Christoph Rademacher, Jan Krauss, Jochen Pagenberg, Tilman Mueller Stoy, Christof Karl. Patent Enforcement in the US, Germany and Japan. OXFORD university press, 2015. № 1.
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEGabdrakhmanov R.L., Denisenko M.V., Kuzhikov V.N.To the question of administrative predition in criminal law on the example of the crime under Article 151.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian FederationPurpose: Study of the qualification of a crime with administrative prediment, infringing on physical and mental development, the health of minors and the sale of alcohol products to minors.Methodology: Analysis method and formal legal methods were used.Results: Examining the qualifications of the crime under Article 151.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the authors noted difficulties in determining the subject of the crime and distinguishing this crime from administrative offenses. Statistics on the problem under study are analyzed.Novelty/originality/value: The article has high scientific value, as the authors, using criminal, administrative and other legislation, materials of the practice of the judiciary, came to the conclusion that the law was improved.Keywords: crime qualifications, administrative predition, health of minors, alcohol products, retail trade, statistics.References (transliterated)1.Lyapunov Yu.I. Obshhestvennaya opasnost` deyaniya kak universal`naya kategoriya sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. M., 1989. S. 39.2.Mal`cev V.V. Kategoriya «obshhestvenno opasnoe povedenie». Volgograd, 1995. S. 62.3.Bavsun M.V., Bavsun I.G., Tixon I.L. Administrativnaya preyudiciya i perspektivy` eyo primeneniya na sovremennom e`tape // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2008 . № 6. S. 6–8.4.Gabdraxmanov R.L., Denisenko M.V., Kuzhikov V.N. Kvalifikaciya prestuplenij, posyagayushhix na zakonny`j oborot alkogol`noj produkcii // Rossijskij sledovatel`. 2019. № 11. S. 16–20.5.Kovalev M.I. Prestuplenie i prostupok // Problemy` sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel`stva po ukrepleniyu pravoporyadka i usileniya bor`by` s prestupleniyami: mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchny`x trudov. Sverdlovsk, 1982. S. 11–12.6.Koncepciya razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel`stva / otv. red.: T.Ya. Xabriev, Yu.A. Tixomirov. M., 2014. S. 58.7.Shemyakin D.V. Problemny`e voprosy` ispol`zova-niya administrativnoj preyudicii v ugolovnom prave // Rossijskij sledovatel`. 2015. № 15. S. 43–47.8.https://www.sudakt/ru/regular/dok/k0ughy9tnhzzr. ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEPakerman G.A.Legal Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment in the Grand Duchy of LuxembourgPurpose: Study of the legal regulation of foreign direct investment in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in order to determine the current investment regime favorable to foreign persons.Methodology: Comparative legal, historical legal and formal legal methods were used.Results: Today the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is one of the largest and most stable centers for managing international financial assets – there are about 4,000 registered funds with assets under management in the amount of more than 3.6 trillion euros.The geographical location of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, its political, social and reputation stability, developed infrastructure, favorable tax regime and investment climate, these and other factors are attractive for groups of companies that register their administrative centers and structural divisions (branches and representative offices) on its territory. Registration of a company and/or implementation of activities in Luxembourg gives them the opportunity to enter the common market of the European Union. The main idea of this article is focused on the analysis of recent changes in the national legislation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in particular in the corporate sphere, and includes the study of legislative acts that have also expired. The article concludes with an assessment that the current investment regime in Luxembourg may be different for different forms of investment. This diversity just attracts foreign investors, since, in particular, foreign direct investment, which by its nature is a means of strengthening the productive activity of the recipient state, is at the same time another tool for cross-border investment between groups of companies. In return, groups of companies with the goal of minimizing tax costs are interested in «financial engineering schemes» proposed by the legislation of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.Novelty/originality/value: The scientific value of this article is an it is attempt to unveil the legal regulation of foreign direct investment in Luxembourg in a complex, rather than the individual areas that are studied, namely: taxation, registration of a company in the offshore zone. The article briefly reviews the changes in the corporate sphere, as well as the current currency and tax laws, and some acts of the European Union and the Model BIT 2019.Keywords: groups of companies, foreign investment, foreign direct investment, BIT model, national treatment, most favored nation treatment, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.References (transliterated)1.Zvonova E.A. Sovremenny`e trendy` e`volyucii mezhdunarodny`x finansovy`x centrov: regional`ny`j aspekt (na primere mezhdunarodnogo finansovogo centra v Lyuksemburge) // Dajdzhest-Finansy`. 2019. T. 24. № 3. S. 291.2.Putevoditel` dlya biznesa po Lyuksemburgu. Bryussel`. 2017 g. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://91.206.121.217/TpApi/Upload/c4b6dc42-4d28-4626-aa49-1eafb802c069/Businessguide_Luxembourg_2017.pdf.3.Kanashevskij V.A. Ofshorny`e kompanii i trasty`. Antiofshornoe regulirovanie. 2-e izd., dop. M.: Mezhdu-narodny`e otnosheniya, 2019.4.Pakerman G.A. Sovremenny`e modeli dvustoronnix investicionny`x soglashenij // Arbitrazh i regulirovanie mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo oborota: rossijskie, inostranny`e i transgranichny`e podxody`. Liber Amicorum v chest` 70-letiya A.S. Komarova / sost. i nauch. red.: N.G. Markalova i A.I. Muranov. M., 2019. S. 442–470.5.Xorosheva A.O. Velikie derzhavy` i sozdanie Velikogo Gerczogstva Lyuksemburg v XIX v. // Rossiya i mir v XIX veke. 2017. S. 86–101 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/velikie-derzhavy-i-sozdanie-velikogo-gertsogstva-lyuksemburg-v-xix-v/viewer.6.She`kson N. Lyudi, obokravshie mir. Pravda i vy`my`sel o sovremenny`x ofshorny`x zonax. M.: E`ksmo, 2011.7.Yuridicheskaya kompaniya Amond & Smith Ltd. Lyuksemburg kak instrument mezhdunarodnogo nalogovogo planirovaniya. Aktual`noe sostoyanie i perspektivy` // Rossijskaya Yusticiya. 2006. Iyun` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.amondsmith.ru/press/publication/13/.8.Tekst konsolidirovannoj versii Grazhdanskogo kodeksa 1803 g. s izmeneniyami ot 28.04.2019 [E`lektron-ny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.legilux.lu/eli/etat/leg/code/civil/20190428.9.http://www.legilux.lu/editorial/codes.10.The Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, adopted on: 17 Oct 1868 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/lu00000_.html.11.Konsolidirovannaya versiya Kommercheskogo kodeksa 1807 g. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.legilux.lu/eli/etat/leg/code/commerce/20160101.12.Arrêté grand-ducal du 30 août 1918 portant règlement sur le contrôle des sociétés coopératives [E`lektron-ny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/agd/1918/08/30/n4/jo.13.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1915/08/10/n1/jo.14.https://www.benelux.int/files/2313/9230/2800/BeneluxVerdrag_2008.pdf.15.https://eulaw.ru/treaties/tfeu/.16.https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/5854/download.17.Regulation (EU) № 1219/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 Establishing Transitional Arrangements for Bilateral Investment Agreements between Member States and Third Countries // Eur-lex.europa.eu; Eur-Lex Access to European Union law [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32012R1219.18.Procedure 2010/0197/COD. Bilateral Investment Agreements between Member States and Third Countries: Transitional Arrangements // Eur-lex.europa.eu; Eur-Lex Access to European Union law [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/procedure/EN/2010_197.19.Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing Transitional Arrangements for Bilateral Agreements between Member States and Third Countries // Eur-lex.europa.eu; Eur-Lex Access to European Union law [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010PC0344.20.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1993/04/05/n1/jo.21.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2019/12/04/a811/jo.22.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2004/11/12/n1/jo.23.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2018/05/30/a446/jo.24.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2018/05/30/a446/jo.25.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2016/07/23/n7/jo.26.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2008/10/24/n1/jo.27.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2010/12/17/n9/jo.28.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2013/07/12/n1/jo.29.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rbcl/2016/01/15/n1/jo.30.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2016/08/10/n1/jo.31.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1915/08/10/n1/jo.32.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2002/12/19/n1/jo.33.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2009/04/20/n1/jo.34.http://www.legilux.lu/eli/etat/leg/code/civil/20200101.35.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2011/05/24/n2/jo.36.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1929/07/31/n1/jo.37.Informacionno-pravovaya sistema «GARANT».38.http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1929/07/31/n1/jo.39.Postanovlenie Velikogo Gerczoga ot 15 dekabrya 2016 g. [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2016/12/15/n2/jo.40.Postanovlenie Velikogo Gerczoga ot 6 iyunya 2019 goda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2019/06/06/a391/jo.41.Postanovlenie Velikogo Gerczoga ot 1 avgusta 2018 goda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2018/08/01/a770/jo.42.https://www.cc.lu/accueil/.43.https://odl.lu/en/homepage.44.Zakon ot 4 dekabrya 2019 goda, kasayushhijsya Ofisa dyu Dyukruar [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2019/12/04/a839/jo.45.This version of the Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits replaces the January 2019 version [TAD/PG(2019)1]. This revision of the Arrangement includes all modifications agreed to the Arrangement, including its Annexes, and is effective as of 1 January 2020 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=tad/pg(2020)1.46.Zakon ot 12 dekabrya 2016 goda ob uchrezhdenii i izmenenii kompanij, vliyayushhix na obshhestvo:47.izmenenny`j zakon ot 19 dekabrya 2002 goda o registracii torgovli i kompanij, a takzhe schetov i godovy`x otchetov kompanij;48.izmenenny`j zakon ot 4 dekabrya 1967 goda o podoxodnom naloge;49.v) izmenenny`j zakon ot 1 dekabrya 1936 g. o muni-cipal`nom kommercheskom naloge;50.g) izmenenny`j zakon ot 16 oktyabrya 1934 goda o naloge na imushhestvo [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2016/12/12/n1/jo.51.Souncil Directive 2011/96/EU of 30 November 2011 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://niemands.ru/press-centr/faq/directive_201196eu.52.Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.nexus.ua/data/files/Legal_DB/International/EU_VAT_Directive.pdf.53.Zakon ot 12 iyulya 2013 g. ob upravlyayushhix fon-dami al`ternativny`x investicij [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2013/07/12/n1/jo.54.https://take-profit.org/statistics/gdp/luxembourg. ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEVetrova E.G.«Letter» and «silence» of the sports federation as jurisdictional decisionsPurpose: To identify the criteria for recognition of the status of a «decision» by the action or omission of jurisdictional and other bodies of International Sports Federations through a study of the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).Methodology: Methods of analysis and synthesis; formal-legal and comparative methods.Results: The article analyzed the criteria for recognizing the status of decisions for letters, messages and «silence» of bodies of International Sports Federations. Separately, an assessment is given of the fact of the lack of reaction («silence») of the jurisdictional body of the International Sports Federation, as well as letters received from the e-mail address of the Federation.Novelty/originality/value: The article is a comprehensive analysis of the practice of CAS regarding the recognition of the status of «decision» by the action, inaction of jurisdictional and other bodies of international sports federations. The author has formulated a number of conclusions of practical importance for legal science.Keywords: Sports Arbitration, CAS practice, decisions of judicial bodies, decisions of Sports Federations, denial of justice, form of decision of Sports Federation, dispute resolution.References (transliterated)1.Poluxina R.E`. Pravovy`e aspekty` problem sportivnogo arbitrazha // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry`. 2018. № 3. S. 149–152.2.Shaxraj S.M. Mezhdunarodny`j sportivny`j arbitrazh. M.: Voenizdat, 2011.3.Kirilyuk O.V. Lex sportiva – koncepciya transnaci-onal`nogo sportivnogo prava // Zakon i zhizn`. 2013. № 3 (8). S. 113–117.4.Nafziger J.A.R. The Future of International Sports Law // Lex Sportiva: What is Sports Law? / ed. C.R. iekmann, J. Soek. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press / Springer, 2012. P. 109–122.5.Arbitration CAS 2017/A/5058 Al-Ittihad FC v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 18 December 2017 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202017%2FA%2F5058.6.Arbitration CAS 2008/A/1633 FC Schalke 04 v. Confederação Brasileira de Futebol (CBF), award of 16 December 2008 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202008%2FA%2F1633%20FC).7.Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4193 Guyana Football Federation (GFF) v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) & St. Vincent and the Grenadines Football Federation (SVGFF), award of 5 January 2016 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202015%2FA%2F4193).8.Arbitration CAS 2016/A/4772 Diego Dominguez v. Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA), award of 12 January 2018 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202016%2FA%2F4772).9.Arbitration CAS 2005/A/899 FC Aris Thessaloniki v. FIFA & New Panionios N.F.C., award of 15 July 2005 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202005%2FA%2F899).10.Arbitration CAS 2010/A/2315 Netball New Zealand v. International Netball Federation Limited (IFNA), award of 27 May 2011 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202010%2FA%2F2315).11.Arbitration CAS 2011/A/2586 William Lanes de Lima v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) & Real Betis Balompié, award of 3 October 2012 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202011%2FA%2F2586).12.Arbitration CAS 2012/A/2754 U.C. Sampdoria v. Club San Lorenzo de Almagro & Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), award of 8 February 2013 // Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Case Law Documents [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Search/results.aspx#k=(CAS%202012%2FA%2F2754). ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICEDudorov T.D.Problems of legislative regulation of grounds for recognizing a person as a suspectPurpose: The purpose of the study is to make generalized theoretical conclusions and reasonable recommendations on the basis of a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical and practical problems of the suspect’s institute, based on a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical and practical problems of the institution.Methodology: Analytical, formal, legal and systemic approaches were used.Results: An analysis of the legislative interpretation of the grounds for recognizing a person as a suspect makes it reasonable, in the author’s view, to argue that they need unification, both in terms of their list and in terms of the mechanism for involving the person involved in the criminal process. The author makes a proposal to improve the existing criminal law, in particular Art. 46 CPC of the Russian Federation.Novelty/originality/value: The article has a certain degree of novelty and scientific value, as it is devoted to the current problems of legal regulation of the criminal procedure status of the suspect. Its provisions can be used in further scientific research on the issues at hand, as well as taken into account in further reform of the domestic criminal procedure law.Keywords: criminal proceedings, procedural status, suspect, criminal case, procedural form, procedural act.References (transliterated)1.Bisharyan K.A. Podozrevaemy`j i zashhita ego prav v ugolovnom processe: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007. S. 11.2.Veretennikov I.A. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo kak kompleksny`j pravovoj institut: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.3.Dacieva X.G. Processual`no-pravovy`e i gumanitarny`e problemy` uchastiya podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom processe Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009.4.Efremova N.P., Kal`niczkij V.V. Privlechenie v ka-chestve obvinyaemogo: uchebno-praktich. posob. Omsk: Izd-vo Omsk. akad. MVD Rossii, 2007.5.Epaneshnikov A.S. Zashhita prav i zakonny`x interesov podozrevaemogo i obvinyaemogo v rossijskom dosudebnom proizvodstve. Orenburg, 2003. S. 36.6.Zajcev O.A., Smirnov P.A. Podozrevaemy`j v ugolovnom processe. M.: E`kzamen, 2005.7.Zelenina O.A. Processual`ny`j status uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i ego izmenenie v dosudebnom proizvodstve: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004. S. 123.8.Larin A.M. Ugolovny`j process Rossii: lekcii-ocherki / A.M. Larin, E`.B. Mel`nikova, V.M. Saviczkij; pod red. V.M. Saviczkogo. M.: BEK, 1997.9.Murav`ev K.V. Uvedomlenie o podozrenii v sovershenii prestupleniya // Ugolovny`j process. 2007. № 11. S. 16–21.10.Teregulova A.A. Pravovoe polozhenie podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom processe Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2008.11.Shadrin V.S. Obespechenie prav lichnosti pri rassledovanii prestuplenij. M.: Yurlitinform, 2000.12.Kachalova O.V. Oxrana konstitucionny`x prav podozrevaemogo i obvinyaemogo na predvaritel`nom sledstvii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1999. S. 8.13.Mel`nikov V.Yu. Processual`noe oformlenie zaderzhaniya zapodozrennogo licza i ego dopros // Rossijskij sledovatel`. 2003. № 9. S. 12.14.Konax E.I., Parfenova M.V. Processual`ny`j status i obespechenie prav podozrevaemogo. M., 2005. S. 9. PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATERagulin A.V.The court decision on the «secret claim» of the advocate A.R. Ramaldanov to the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation: «illegality» and «positive content»Purpose: To study the issues of illegality and the positive content of the decision of the Khamovnichesky District Court, issued in a claim about the recognition of Clarification No. 03/19 of Ethics and Standards Commission of the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation on the admissibility of advocates appeals to law enforcement agencies and the «Resolution on advocacy ethics» adopted by the IX All-Russian Congress of Advocates contradicting the foundations of law and order and morality.Methodology: The author used the methods of structural and functional analysis, the system method, the formal legal method, the comparative method, the retrospective method, the method of studying documents, the method of included observation.Results: An output is made that the decision of the claim of A.R. Ramaldanov to the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation does not meet the requirements of legality and validity. It has also been established that in accordance with the provisions of the court’s decision, the content of the signs of the objective side of the person being punished according to Clarification No. 03/19, the advocate`s behavior in comparison with the rules actually reflected in its text, the court actually expands, and the circumstances listed in the decision are added to them. Each of them should fall under the signs of «abuse of law» in accordance with Art. 10 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: interference with the activities of law enforcement authorities; violation of the principle of independence and corporate of advocacy; neglect of moral traditions and the requirements of professional ethics; undermining the trust in the advocates community; other circumstances. The provisions of Clarification No. 03/19 and the Resolution are in fact supplemented by a mandatory feature of the subjective side of the act - the special purpose of interfering in the activities of the bodies of advocate self-government and damage the credibility of the advocacy, undermining trust in it. In this regard, it is concluded that the decision on the claim of A.R. Ramaldanov can be assessed as an attempt to consolidate a partial actual softening of the provisions of the Explanation of the Ethics and Standards Commission 03/19 and Resolution of the IX All-Russian Congress of Advocates «Resolution on advocacy ethics» and the practice of the possible further application of these acts.Novelty/originality/value: The article is of scientific value, since it is the first attempt to study the current situation in the Russian bar and regulate disciplinary liability of a lawyer in connection with the adoption by the Ethics and Standards Commission of the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation of Clarification No. 03/19 and adoption IX All-Russian Congress of Advocates «Resolution on advocacy ethics».Keywords: advocacy, advocate, disciplinary liability of an advocate, Ethics and Standards Commission, Federal Chamber of Advocates, All-Russian Congress of Advocates, Code of Professional Ethics of Advocates.References (transliterated)1.https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2019/06/13/80871-litso-osvobozhdennoy-professii.2.https://pasmi.ru/archive/234140/.3.https://mhg.ru/o-presledovaniyah-po-delu-32-h-v-svete-konvencii-o-zashchite-prav-cheloveka-6052019.4.https://legal.report/advokaty-prosjat-hamovnicheskij-sud-otmenit-reshenie-fpa-razreshiv-pisat-donosy-drug-na-druga/.5.https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2019/04/18/799592-advokatam-zapretili-zhalovatsya.6.https://freemedia-io.turbopages.org/s/freemedia.io/2019/05/apkk.7.https://proufu.ru/news/novosti/80938-32_advokata_prosyat_bastrykina_proverit_deyatelnost_advokatskoy_palaty_bashkirii/.8.https://rb.versia.ru/32-advokata-poprosili-proverit-deyatelnost-advokatskoj-palaty-bashkirii.9.https://mbk-news.appspot.com/suzhet/presleduyut-za-vyskazyvani/.10.https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3992875.11.https://www.svoboda.org/a/29904618.html.12.https://newizv.ru/news/politics/17-01-2020/chest-ili-mest-za-chto-advokatov-lishayut-professii.13.Ragulin A.V. Traktat ob Obrashhenii 32-x, principax, diskriminacii i demokratii v rossijskoj advokature: monografiya / predisl.: G.B. Mirzoev, poslesl.: A.V. Vorob`ev. M.: Rossijskaya akademiya advokatury` i notariata, Evrazijskij nauchno-issledovatel`skij institut problem prava, 2019. S. 67–84.14.https://fparf.ru/documents/fpa-rf/documents-commissions/interpretation-no-03-19.15.https://fparf.ru/documents/fpa-rf/documents-of-the-congress/resolution-on-the-observance-of-legal-ethics/.16.https://www.mos-gorsud.ru/rs/hamovnicheskij/services/cases/civil/details/30f9617c-54da-41c3-bcd5-98b898b49390?participants=Palata.17.https://fparf.ru/documents/fpa-rf/judicial-practice/lawsuit-up-the-udmurt-republic-to-the-federal-chamber-of-lawyers-of-the-russian-federation/.18.https://legal.report/mosgorsud-razreshil-fpa-nakazyvat-advokatov-za-donosy-na-kolleg/.19.https://www.mos-gorsud.ru/rs/hamovnicheskij/services/cases/civil/details/a550a937-b683-48ac-8433-d7ec37b505f9?participants=Ramaldanov.20.https://www.mos-gorsud.ru/mgs/services/cases/appeal-civil/details/b0ff614d-39d6-4fcb-90ec-68168ed4d891?participants=Ramaldanov.21.https://obhis.ru/opredeleniya-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rossiyskoy-federatsii-s-polozhitelnym-soderzhaniem.html.22.https://echo.msk.ru/blog/zoya_svetova/2410715-echo/. PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATE
Melnichenko R.G.
Digital shadow of the advocate
Purpose: To identify and problematize such phenomena as «digital shadow of the advocate» and «digital copy of the advocate».Methods: Statistical, hermeneutic and comparative legal method were used.Results: The problem of «smuggling» appearance in the digital world of digital shadows of the advocate and advocate’s self-government bodies was identified.Novelty/originality/value: Lack of research on digital shadows and digital copies as applied to social life. The author’s use of statistical data in the field of online life of members of the advocates community testifies to originality. The scientific value nature of the study is evidenced by the recommendations that the author puts forward, based on the idea of a «digital shadow of the advocate».Keywords: advocacy, digital world, digital shadow, digital twin, assemblage point, personality core, digital footprint.References (transliterated)1.Bern E`. Igry`, v kotory`e igrayut lyudi: Psixologiya chelovecheskix vzaimootnoshenij; Lyudi, kotory`e igrayut v igry`: Psixologiya chelovecheskoj sud`by`: perev. s angl. / obshh. red. M.S. Maczkovskogo. SPb.: Lenizdat, 1992.2.Kokorev D.S., Yurin A.A. Cifrovy`e dvojniki: ponyatie, tipy` i preimushhestva dlya biznesa // Colloquium-journal. 2019. № 10 (34).3.Mel`nichenko R.G. Otzy`vy` drugix licz o rabote advokata: interpretaciya e`ticheskogo ogranicheniya // Advokatskaya praktika. 2017. № 4. S. 12–17.4.Mel`nichenko R.G. E`lektronnaya advokatura // Evrazijskaya advokatura. 2017. № 3 (28). S. 38–41.5.Michael W. Grieves Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication - LLC, 2014. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EURASIAN SPACEShevchenko V.E.Referendum as an institute of direct will of citizens:effectiveness of implementation in national and international practicePurpose: Analysis of the institution of the referendum as a form of direct expression of the will of citizens, identifying the effectiveness of the implementation of the referendum in national and international practice.Methodology: General scientific (systemic, structural-functional, historical), private scientific (synthesis, analysis, comparison, analogy).Results: For a number of reasons, the referendum institution was not widely spread in Russia. The reasons for the low popularity of the referendum as a form of direct expression of the will of the people are the complexity of the procedure for organizing it, conducting it, the vagueness of the requirements for the issues put forward for voting, the vagueness of the wordings established by the legislator, the high financial costs, the lack of interest of the authorities in resolving fundamentally important issues directly by the population, and the low legal literacy of the citizens themselves, passivity, their distrust of the institution in question.Novelty/originality/value: At this stage in the development of mankind, a referendum with its rich history is undoubtedly one of the most significant institutions in a democratic state, the most important criterion for building a civil society. Its improvement is legislative, the most frequent application in practice can lead to the very so-called Rousseau sovereign nation, which not only knows its rights, but can also protect them, use them legally to improve not only their own, but also everyone around him. Only the reform of the institute, not in part, but in its totality, in all its problematic aspects, can lead the state to that reality in which «its bearer of sovereignty and the only source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people».Keywords: referendum, features, direct expression of will, plebiscite, vote, implementation efficiency, Problems, reforming.References (transliterated)1.Bol`shaya sovetskaya e`nciklopediya: slovar` / pod red. A.M. Proxorova. M.: Sovetskaya e`nciklopediya, 1972.2.Avak`yan S.A., Ivanchenko A.V., Vedeneev Yu.A., Ly`senko V.I. Izbiratel`noe pravo i izbiratel`ny`j process v Rossijskoj Federacii: uchebnik. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 1998.3.Petrov A.Yu. Grazhdansko-pravovoe znachenie voli i voleiz``yavleniya v sdelke // Kiberleninka: Nauchnaya e`lektronnaya biblioteka. 2007. № 45 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/grazhdansko-pravovoe-znachenie-voli-i-voleizyavleniya-v-sdelke.4.Statisticheskie danny`e, razmeshhenny`e na oficial`-nom sajte Central`noj izbiratel`noj komissii Rossijskoj Federacii // CIKRF [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.vybory.izbirkom.ru.5.Filippov M.M. Ponyatie voli v sovetskoj psixologii: Opy`t opredeleniya voli: monografiya. Tomsk: Izdatel`stvo Tomskogo universiteta, 1968.6.Chirkin V.E. Konstitucionnoe pravo zarubezhny`x stran: uchebnik. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2012.7.Yuridicheskij e`nciklopedicheskij slovar`: slovar` / pod red. A.Ya. Suxareva. M.: Sovetskaya e`nciklopediya, 1987.
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACEMinyazeva T.F.Special categories of criminal law in RussiaPurpose: Study of a number of special categories of criminal law in Russia.Methodology: The analysis method and formal legal methods were used.Results: The article substantiates the importance of maintaining in criminal law of Russia, as a special branch of law, traditionally inherent categories and principles: «crime», «punishment», «complicity in a crime», principle, personal responsibility, and others. Attention is drawn to the fact that «breaking is not building», and changing the essence of specific categories of this branch of law does not contribute to the effectiveness of the fight against crime, on the contrary, it complicates law enforcement.Novelty/originality/value: The article is distinguished by scientific novelty and has significant scientific value.Keywords: criminal law, crime, punishment, principle of personal responsibility, complicity in a crime, legal entity.References (transliterated)1.Naumov A.V. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaya chast`: kurs lekcij. 6-e izd. M.: PROSPEKT, 2019.2.Dal` V. Tolkovy`j slovar` zhivogo velikorusskogo yazy`ka. T. 4. M., 1991. S. 467.3.Kolokolov N.A. Ugolovny`j prostupok: chastnoe, zaby`vaem obshhee i osobennoe. Vse novoe – xorosho zaby`toe staroe // Mirovoj sud`ya. 2017. № 5.4.Ragimov I.M., Baburin S.N., Golik Yu.V., Duk Yu.I., Korobeev A.I. Sovremennoe gosudarstvo v e`poxu global`-ny`x transformacij. SPb.: Yuridicheskij centr – Akademiya, 2019. S. 184, 1915.Babaev M.M., Pudovochkin Yu.E. Problemy` rossijskoj ugolovnoj politiki: monografiya. M.: PROSPEKT, 2018. S. 182–1846.Koreczkij D.A. Fenomen «novoj normal`nosti» v yurisprudencii // IV Saratovskie ugolovno-pravovy`e chteniya: cbornik statej po materialam IV Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Saratov, 2019.7.Ershov S.A. Problemy` reglamentacii posobnichestva v UK RF // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy` XII mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (29–30 yanvarya 2015 g.). MGYuA. M., 2015. S. 236.8.Rarog A.I. Prioritety` rossijskoj ugolovno-pravovoj politiki. Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy` XII mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (29–30 yanvarya 2015 g.). MGYuA. M., 2015. S. 15.9.Alauxanov E`. Pravovoj genezis organizovannoj prestupnosti v Respublike Kazaxstan. SPb.: Yuridicheskij centr, 2018. S. 110.10.Ermolovich Ya.N. Neostorozhnoe soprichinenie vreda v prestupleniyax, sopryazhenny`x s narusheniem spe-cial`ny`x pravil // Pravo v Vooruzhenny`x silax. 2019. № 2. JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE Sapronova T.P.Legal statistics as an independent direction of Prosecutor’s supervisionPurpose: The purpose of the article is to consider legal statistics as an independent section of Prosecutor’s supervision. For this purpose, the main functions of the Prosecutor’s office are described, and the forms of reporting on various types of Prosecutor’s activities are described.Methodology: The article uses analytical, theoretical and formal legal methods.Results: Statistical data are collected in all areas of prosecutorial activity that are stipulated by law. The system of Prosecutor’s legal statistics also includes state (Federal) interdepartmental statistical reporting. Data from Federal statistical observation forms are formed taking into account the control and Supervisory powers of the Prosecutor to verify the accuracy and completeness of the subjects ‘ recording of crimes. It is concluded that the Prosecutor is the only procedural figure who is not interested in distorting statistical data on the results of the investigation. It is the lack of any interest in the distortion of statistical data on the results of the investigation, and therefore data on crime, contributes to securing the effective implementation of prosecutorial oversight in the area of legal statistics, the adoption of effective management solutions aimed at combating crime. That is why statistics act as an independent direction of Prosecutor’s supervision.Novelty/originality/value: the Study reveals the essence of the statistical aspect of the Prosecutor’s supervision, which is usually not considered as an independent direction of the Prosecutor’s activity. It is proposed to fix in article 1 of the Federal law «on the Prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation» the Prosecutor’s conduct of legal statistics as an independent direction of Supervisory activity. The originality of the work is emphasized by the studied normative acts, which the author refers to during the analysis. The value of the work consists in a detailed analysis of the issues raised in the article and a detailed answer to them.Keywords: Prosecutor’s supervision, legal statistics, statistical data, normative acts, fighting crime.References (transliterated)1.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 22-02-1 (red. ot 06.02.2020) «O prokurature Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lek-tronny`j resurs]. URL: www/consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_262/9612db5d2407ba1a131cc074e3c50f01fb2ddf972.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 20.06.2018 № 368 «Ob utverzhdenii i o vvedenii v dejstvie statisticheskogo otcheta «Nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov, soblyudeniem prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina» po forme ON i Instrukcii po ego formirovaniyu [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https//gkrfkod.ru/zakonodatelstvo/prikaz-genprokuratury-rossii-ot 20062018-n-368.3.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 24.01.2017 № 20 «Ob utverzhdenii i o vvedenii v dejstvie statisticheskogo otcheta «Nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov na dosudebnoj stadii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» po forme NSiD i Instrukcii po ego formirovaniyu [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: docs.cntd.ru/document/553941975.4.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 09.07.20159 № 364 «O vnesenii izmenenij v prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 15.02.2011 № 33 «Ob organizacii prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov pri osushhestvlenii operativno-rozy`sknoj deyatel`nosti» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: URL: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_183856/.5.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 02.11.2010 № 391 «Ob utverzhdenii o vvedenii v dejstvie statisticheskogo otcheta «O rezul`tatax nadzora za zakonnost`yu ispolneniya ugolovny`x nakazanij» po forme UIS i Instrukcii po ego sostavleniyu» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: docs.cntd.ru/document/552097494.6.Statisticheskaya otchetnost` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://poznayra.org/s43112t1.html7.Formy` federal`nogo statisticheskogo nablyudeniya № 1-EGS «Ediny`j otchet o prestupnosti», № 2-EGS «Svedeniya o liczax, sovershivshix prestupleniya», № 3-EGS «Svedeniya o zaregistrirovanny`x, raskry`ty`x i neraskry`ty`x prestupleniyax», № 4-EGS «Svedeniya o sostoyanii prestupnosti i rezul`tatax rassledovaniya prestuplenij», № 2-E «O rassmotrenii soobshhenij o prestuplenii», № 1-E «Svedeniya o sledstvennoj rabote i doznanii», № 2-E «Svedeniya o rassmotrenii soobshhenij», № 1-EM «Svedeniya ob osnovny`x pokazatelyax sledstvennoj raboty` i doznaniya».8.Instrukciya o poryadke zapolneniya i predstavleniya uchetny`x dokumentov. Prilozhenie № 3 k prikazu General`noj prokuratury` Rossijskoj Federacii, MVD Rossii, MChS Rossii, Minyusta Rossii, FSB Rossii, Mine`konomrazvitiya Rossii, FSKN Rossii ot 29.12.2005 № 39/1070/1021/253/780/353/399 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://base.garan.ru/12144358.9.Sbornik General`noj prokuratury` Rossijskoj Federacii «Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossii» za yanvar`–maj 2020 goda [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https//genproc.gov.ru/upload/iblock/0e2/sbornik_5_2020pdf.10.Federal`ny`j zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 22-02-1 (red. ot 06.02.2020) «O prokurature Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lek-tronny`j resurs]. URL: www/consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_262/9612db5d2407ba1a131cc074e3c50f01fb2ddf97.11.Statisticheskij otchet po forme 11-Stat «O rezul`tatax raboty` prokurora v sfere ugolovno-pravovoj statistiki» za yanvar`–dekabr` 2019 g. Sm. Delo № 11-13-2019 prokuratury` Tverskoj oblasti.12.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18.01.2016 № 18 «O provedenii opy`tnoj e`kspluatacii gosudarstvennoj avtomatizirovannoj sistemy` pravovoj statistiki» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: docs.cntd.ru/document/456047579.13.Prikaz General`nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18.06.2013 № 295 «Ob utverzhdenii i vvedenii v dejstvie Vremennoj instrukcii po uchetu raboty` prokurorov v organax prokuratury` Rossijskoj Federacii» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70359754.14.Mel`nikov N.V. Prokurorskij nadzor – samostoya-tel`naya forma osushhestvleniya prokurorskoj vlasti v Rossii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2016. № 5. S. 34.15.Voronin O.V. O sushhnosti sovremennogo prokurorskogo nadzora // Ugolovnaya yusticiya. 2018. № 11. S. 188.16.Zakon Respubliki Kazaxstan ot 22.12.2003 № 510 «O gosudarstvennoj pravovoj statistike i special`ny`x uchetax» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z030000510. JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE Magnitsky N.D.Improving the system of public financial control over the formation of state and municipal revenuesPurpose: To consider the system of financial control within the framework of the formation of incomes of public law education and to identify an effective calculation of the income forecast.Methodology: The study used a comparative analysis of the presentation of the forecast of federal budget revenues by the chief administrators of federal budget revenues.Results: It seems expedient to forecast federal budget revenues based on revenue sources. However, in view of such a wide range of information subject to financial control, as well as a wide range of different sources of income, it seems appropriate to use programming languages.Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific value, since it contains conclusions and proposals important for science and practice.Keywords: income forecast, list of income sources, chief income administrators.References (transliterated)1.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 23.06.2016 № 574 «Ob obshhix trebovaniyax k metodike prognozirovaniya postuplenij doxodov v byudzhety` byudzhetnoj sistemy` Rossijskoj Federacii». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».2.Postanovlenie Pravitel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 31.08.2016 № 868 «O poryadke formirovaniya i vedeniya perechnya istochnikov doxodov Rossijskoj Federacii». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».3.Ispolnenie federal`nogo byudzheta i byudzhetov byudzhetnoj sistemy` Rossijskoj Federacii za 2019 god [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.minfin.ru/.4.Nalogovy`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (NK RF) ot 31.07.1998 № 146-FZ. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus».5.Byudzhetny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 31.07.1998 № 145-FZ. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy` «Konsul`tantPlyus». JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE Neznamova I.A.Responsibility for intra-family crimes in the Russian Federation and foreign countriesPurpose: To address issues related to the problem of domestic violence itself. The article will consider what domestic violence is, whether it is worth keeping a family between the victim and the «rapist» or whether such marriages should be dissolved, what is the purpose of the Federal Law No. 1183390-6 «On the prevention of domestic violence», which is going to be adopted in the Russian Federation , and what experience do other countries have in this matter, in particular, the USA, France, GermanyMethodology: The study used a comparative analysis of the crimes of the Russian Federation on the example of other countries.Results: On the basis of this study, the author concluded that the law must approve the law on domestic violence, especially for those people who actually faced this problem.Novelty/originality/value: In every family there are different kinds of disagreements, but not in every family these disagreements escalate to physical, mental or sexual abuse. From time immemorial, this topic has been relevant, and this problem is constantly raised. People from different countries constantly talk about the urgency of this problem and demand protection from this situation.Keywords: family violence, Federal Law No. 1183390-6 «On the prevention of family and domestic violence», family and domestic violence, preventive measures.References (transliterated)1.Model`noe zakonodatel`stvo o nasilii v sem`e. Rekomendacii OON [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.gender.cawater-info.net/publications/pdf/mod_un.pdf.2.Pasport proekta Federal`nogo zakona № 1183390-6 «O profilaktike semejno-by`tovogo nasiliya» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&ts=23366322605788430712579857&cacheid=D1DD5EAF22610B230E2250F7F52B1BDA&mode=splus&base=PRJ&n=151045&rnd=0.0020780954442429778#523q2kicwb.3.Xarlamov V.S. Institut oxrannogo ordera v zarubezhnom zakonodatel`stve kak instrument zashhity` lichnosti ot vnutrisemejnogo nasiliya // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2014. № 1 (32). S. 34–40.4.Lotova I.P., Orexova E.Ya. Bor`ba s nasiliem i zhestokost`yu v otnoshenii zhenshhin: opy`t Francii // Ucheny`e zapisi Zabajkal`skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 5 (64). S. 110–115.5.https://tass.ru/obschestvo/8438335.6.Zona prava: pravozashhitny`j proekt [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://zona.media/news/2020/03/30/linija.7.RFI: novosti [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.rfi.fr/ru/frantsiya/20190903-srochnye-mery-frantsiya-usilivaet-borbu-s-domashnim-nasiliem.8.Rossijskaya gazeta. 1990. 27 oktyabrya [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://rg.ru/2016/10/27/korrespondenty-rg-o-tom-kak-za-rubezhom-boriutsia-s-semejnym-nasiliem.html.9.Informaciya o yuridicheskix pravax, kotory`mi obladayut v SShA immigranty` – zhertvy` by`tovogo nasiliya, i svedeniya ob immigracii po brachnoj vize [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://meet-usa.com/uploads/files/IMBRA_Russian.pdf.10.Krasnaya vesna: informacionnoe agentstvo, Moskva, 2016 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://rossaprimavera.ru/article/4e79e7fd. JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE Tadjiboev M.M.Judicial enforcement issues: problems and suggestionsPurpose: Filling the gaps in legislation of about enforcement of civil judicial decisions of the Republic of UzbekistanMethodology: Аnalysis and synthesis, study of judicial decisions concerning their enforcementResults: Giving proposals for improving civil procedure and executive procedure of the Republic of UzbekistanNovelty/originality/value: Тhe article discusses the theoretical and practical features of the regulation of relations, relating to the enforcement of civil judicial decisionsKeywords: civil case, judicial acts, court’s decision, enforce the court’s decision, enforcement documents, an execution order.References (transliterated) 1.Mamasidiov M. Grazhdanskij process. Posobie dlya kandidatov rezerva v sudy` po grazhdanskim delam. Tashkent, 2014. S. 318.2.Zakon Respubliki Uzbekistan «Ob ispolnenii sudebny`x aktov i aktov iny`x organov» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://lex.uz/.3.Grazhdanskij processual`ny`j kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://lex.uz/docs/3517337?otherlang=1.4.Perechen` dejstvuyushhix postanovlenij Plenuma Verxovnogo Suda Respubliki Uzbekistan [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://nrm.uz/products?folder=2147483647_zakonodatelstvo_ruz&products=1_vse_zakonodatelstvo_uzbekistana»RUz / Sudebny`e akty` / Postanovleniya Plenuma Verxovnogo suda / Informaciya o postanovleniyax Plenuma VS HYPERLINK «https://nrm.uz/products?folder=396896_informaciya_o_postanovleniyah_plenuma_vs_ruz&products=1_vse_zakonodatelstvo_uzbekistana»RUz /.5.Konstituciya Respubliki Uzbekistan, stat`ya 114 [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://lex.uz/docs/35869.6.Federal`ny`j zakon Rossijskoj Federacii ot 02.10.2007 № 229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel`nom proizvodstve» (v redakcii ot 02.12.2019) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://fssprus.ru/2032946/.7.Grazhdanskij processual`ny`j kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 14.11.2002 №138-FZ (red. ot 24.04.2020) [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570/.8.Zakon Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 2 sentyabrya 1993 goda «O sudax» [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://www.lex.uz/acts/68521.9.Yodgorov X., Saidmurodov B. Poryadok obrashheniya v sud po grazhdanskim delam: praktich. posob. 2-e izd. Tashkent, 2017. S. 36. LITERARY LOUNGEKuznetsov B.A.H2S as a Mean of the Defense (Katja P.`s Case)
НОВОСТИ
- "Назад к ничтожеству: контрреформа закона об адвокатуре" стрим Андрея Рагулина и Романа Мельниченко
- Заявление Специального докладчика ООН по вопросу о положении в области прав человека в Российской Федерации
- Первый Всероссийский съезд адвокатов: рождение «монстра» стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Новый закон об адвокатуре: в ожидании золотого века: стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Международная научно-практическая конференция «Российская адвокатура: независимость, самоуправляемость, защищенность» (9 декабря 2023 г., 10-00 Мск.).
- Беседа с Адвокатом Андреем Рагулиным
- Принятие антиадвокатских поправок в закон об адвокатуре
- Independent expert assessment on the Draft Law to amend the Federal Law “On legal practice and legal profession in the Russian Federation”, no. 301952-8
- Антиадвокатская сущность адвокатских палат: стрим Романа Мельниченко и Андрея Рагулина
- Обращение Правления Межрегиональной общественной организации "Инициатива 2018" в органы Организации Объединенных Наций, к международным ассоциациям адвокатов и правозащитным организациям
- Круглый стол «Российская адвокатура: защита для защитников» (28 октября 2023 г., 10-00 Мск).
- Круглый стол «Законодательство об адвокатуре в России: прогрессивное развитие или деградация?» (25 ноября 2023 г., 10-00 Мск).
- Научно-практическая Конференция Союза "Негосударственный Экспертный Научно-Исследовательский Центр Судебных Экспертов и Специалистов"
- Мнение Комиссии по продвижению законодательных инициатив в сфере социальных и профессиональных прав адвокатов Адвокатской палаты Санкт-Петербурга / о проекте Федерального закона №301952-8 /
- Защитим российскую адвокатуру - 2023!
- Обращение Совета АП Новосибирской области о содержании Законопроекта о внесении изменений в законодательство об адвокатуре
- Независимое экспертное заключение на проект Федерального Закона «О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон «Об адвокатской деятельности и адвокатуре в Российской Федерации» № 301952-8
- Обращение в защиту российских адвокатов, подвергающихся преследованию
- 9-й форум по криптовалютам и майнингу Blockchain Life 2022
- 14-15 сентября в Москве состоится 9-й международный форум по криптовалютам и майнингу Blockchain Life 2022.
