RUS ENG

Translator

AzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (S)Chinese (T)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish

Читайте в следующем номере

Импакт-фактор российских научных журналов

Группа ВКонтакте

Группа в FB

International scientific and practical law journal Eurasian Journal of International Law

SUMMARIES OF ARTICLES № 2 (9) 2014

PROBLEMS OF OR GANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Zadneprovsky A.P.
New advocacy of Ukraine or some thoughts of the power in advocacy profession and the rights of the advocate
Purpose: Research of negative consequences of the reform of the legislation carried out in the Republic of Ukraine about lawyer activity and advocacy profession.
Methodology: Historical and legal and formal – legal methods, method of theoretical modeling, comparative and legal method were used.
Results: To the main negative consequences of the reform of the legislation carried out in the Republic of Ukraine about lawyer activity and advocacy profession the author carried that the head of legal profession of Ukraine elected the acting government official, in a number of regions bodies of advocacy self-government are created not by a democratic way, function was withdrawn from legal profession on management of free legal aid, the idea contradicting bases of the organization and legal profession activity about creation in advocacy profession department of own safety is stated, the rights of the advocate in criminal trial were essentially reduced. These negative consequences are in details criticized in work.
Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first attempts from a position of critical approach to consider the reform of the legislation carried out in Ukraine about lawyer activity and advocacy profession.
Keywords: advocacy profession, legislation, rights of the lawyer.
References (transliterated)
1. Zaborovskij V.V. Pravovoj analiz nekotoryh aspektov Zakona Ukrainy «Ob advokature i advokatskoj dejatel’nosti» // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 4 (5). – S. 46–49.
2. Zaborovskij V.V. Osobennosti pravovogo statusa advokata v Ukraine // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 5 (6). – S. 58–60.
3. Ljulich V.A. Zakreplenie prava zashhitnika na sobiranie dokazatel’stv v Ugolovno-processual’nom kodekse Ukrainy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 65–66.
4. Ragulin A.V. Institucionalizacija professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika v sovetskom zakonodatel’stve // Novyj juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 101–110.
5. Ragulin A.V. Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika v Respublike Ukraina // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2010. – № 12 (31). – S. 117–119.
6. Popeljushko V.A. Shtrihi k «portretu» novogo ugolovnogo processa Ukrainy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2012. – № 1 (1). – S. 89–97.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Zorin R.G., Klimenko A.G., Shatlikova A.А.
Tendencies and prospects of improvement of the mechanism of legal regulation of procedure of mediation in criminal trial of Republic of Belarus and Russian Federation
Purpose: The analysis of legal bases of regulation of mediation in criminal trial.
Methodology: Authors used a comparative and legal method and an analysis method.
Results: In article on the basis of studying and synthesis of experience of the foreign states in mediation application for permission of the criminal and legal conflicts, and also on the basis of studying of procedure of mediation as one of alternative ways of settlement of disputes it is possible to define mediation in criminal legal proceedings as procedure within which the independent and impartial third party – the intermediary (mediator) – participates in permission of the criminal and legal conflict between the parties. Mediation as an alternative way of permission of legal disputes, will help to accelerate implementation of judgments in criminal legal proceedings. Authors came to a conclusion that for effective realization of this mechanism it is necessary to define a circle of participants, the bases and conditions of an admissibility of use of mediation, competence of a mediator. Adoption of law «About mediation» becomes important incentive in development of Republic of Belarus to mediation as complex phenomenon, will allow to expand possibilities of citizens in a choice of means of settlement of the arising conflicts. With adoption of law conditions for integration of mediation in national legal culture will be created. In Russia the foundation to mediation formation as lawful form of settlement of disputes and social institute is laid. It was promoted by acceptance of a number of regulations. It is obviously necessary to add the current legislation of Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation with introduction of legal institute of mediation in criminal trial.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high practical importance as contains author’s generalizations possessing novelty and conclusions which can be put into practice. Scientific novelty of research is predetermined by that in many countries mediation didn’t receive so far the legislative regulation in the sphere of criminal legal proceedings.
Keywords: criminal trial, mediation, participants, mediator, decisions, problems of legal regulation.
References (transliterated)
1. Soyer J-Cl. Droit penal et procedure penale. – Paris, 1992. – R. 246.
2. Arutjunjan A.A. Mediacija v ugolovnom processe: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – M., 2012.
3. Bessonova V.V. Mediacija kak sposob provedenija peregovorov v konstruktivnom duhe // Predprinimatel’stvo i pravo: informacionno-politicheskij portal: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http: www.lexandbusiness.ru/view-article.php.id=903.
4. Blashhenko M.P. Mediacija v Kazahstane – pervyj opyt vnedrenija i primenenija // Specializirovannyj mezhrajonnyj jekonomicheskij sud Karagandinskoj oblasti: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://karsmes.kz/?page_id=501&lang=ru.
5. Vladimirova O.V. Perspektivy razvitija mediacii v Rossii i Ukraine // Belgorodskij universitet kooperacii, jekonomiki i prava: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.sworld.com.ua/konfer27/451.pdf.
6. Golovko L.V. Institut ugolovno-pravovoj mediacii i ego perspektivy v Rossijskoj Federacii // Zakon. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 127.
7. Eremenko G. Mediacija v Ukraine: «za» i «protiv» // Jurist & Zakon: informacionno-politicheskij portal: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/EA002546.html.
8. Zagajnova S.K. Sovremennye problemy i perspektivy razvitija prakticheskoj mediacii v Rossii // Razvitie mediacii v Rossii: teorija, praktika, obrazovanie: Sb. statej / Pod red. E.I. Nosyrevoj, D.G. Fil’chenko. – M.: Berlin, 2012.
9. Zajceva L. Primirenie s poterpevshim – al’ternativnyj sposob uregulirovanija ugolovno-pravovyh konfliktov // Sudovy vesnіk. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 71–78.
10. Zajceva L.L. Institut primirenija v ugolovnom processe Respubliki Belarus’ // [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/
12572/1/16.pdf.
11. Zer H. Vosstanovitel’noe pravosudie: novyj vzgljad na prestuplenie i nakazanie: Per. s angl. / Obshh. red. L.M. Karnozovoj; komment. L.M. Karnozovoj i S.A. Pashina. – M.: MOO Centr «Sudebno-pravovaja reforma», 2002.
12. Kamenkov V.S. Osnovnye polozhenija proekta zakona «O mediacii» // Vestnik Vysshego Hozjajstvennogo Suda Respubliki Belarus’. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 82–85.
13. Karjagina O.V. Perspektivy mediacii v rossijskom ugolovnom processe: zarubezhnyj opyt primiritel’nyh procedur // Rossijskaja justicija. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 66–68.
14. Kovalenko E.I. Pravovye aspekty mediacii kak vnesudebnoj (al’ternativnoj) procedury razreshenija sporov // Justycyja Belarusі. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 49–53.
15. Krasheninnikov P.V. Pochemu posredniku nuzhna svoja bukva zakona? // Mediacija i pravo. – 2007. – № 2 (4). – S. 13–20.
16. Luk’janovskaja O.V., Mel’nichenko R.G. Osnovy juridicheskoj konfliktologii i mediacii. – Volgograd: FGOU VPO «Volgogradskaja akademija gosudarstvennoj sluzhby», 2011. – S. 76 –78.
17. Maksudov R.R. Vosstanovitel’naja mediacija: ideja i tehnologija: Metod. rek. – M.: In-t prava i publichnoj politiki, 2009. – (Metody raboty s nesovershennoletnimi pravonarushiteljami).
18. O mediacii: Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan, 28 janv. 2011 g., № 401-IV // Kazahstanskaja pravda: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.pavlodar.com/zakon/?dok=04918&all=all.
19. Proekt Zakona Respubliki Belarus’ «O mediacii» / Proekty zakonov // Nacional’nyj pravovoj internet-portal Respubliki Belarus’: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http: // www.pravo.by/main.aspx?guid=3941&p0=2012058001.
20. Sesar K. Karatel’noe otnoshenie obshhestva: Real’-nost’ i mif // Pravovedenie. – 1998. – № 4. – S. 162–171.
21. Smirnova I.G. Mediacija: ternistyj put’ v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravo: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.lib.tsu.ru/mminfo/000063105/350/image/350-132.pdf.
22. Shamlikashvili C.A. Otvetstvennost’ mediatora: za chto otvechaet mediator v processe uregulirovanija spora i za chto on otvechat’ ne dolzhen // Centr mediacii i prava: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.mediacia.com/wp/70-mlaw_ev_b-406.html.
23. Shamlikashvili C.A. Juridicheskoe soprovozhdenie procedury mediacii // Korporativnyj jurist. – 2009. – № 2. – S. 25.
24. Perspektivy razvitija mediacii v Respublike Bashkortostan: Obzor kruglogo stola // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 9–11.

PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Ragulin A.V.
Contradictions between the legislation on legal profession and the criminal procedure legislation of Russia regarding a regulation of professional privileges of the advocate-defender and their overcoming
Purpose: Identification of collisions between the legislation on legal profession and the criminal procedure legislation of Russia on the questions connected with a regulation of professional privileges of the advocate-defender and their overcoming.
Methodology: Formal-legal method and method of theoretical modeling were used.
Results: The author formulated offers on permission of collisions between the legislation on legal profession and the criminal procedure legislation of Russia in relation to such professional privileges of the advocate-defender as the right for direct participation in proof process, the right for involvement of the expert, the right for free meetings with the principal, the right to fix information containing in materials of criminal case, the right to make other actions which are not contradicting the legislation, etc. The basic rule of overcoming of collisions between the legislation on legal profession and the criminal procedure legislation of Russia according to which it need to be guided by the provision on a priority of standards of the legislation on legal profession is formulated.
Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first attempts to consider a question of overcoming of collisions between the legislation on legal profession and the criminal procedure legislation of Russia.
Keywords: legal profession, criminal procedure, legislation, collisions, overcoming of collisions, professional privileges of the advocate-defender.
References (transliterated)
1. http://pressa.irk.ru/sm/2008/17/020002.html.
2. http://www.fparf.ru/news/smi/54.htm.
3. http://www.ng.ru/ideas/2011-05-23/9_femida.html.
4. Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i advokatura: Sbornik normativnyh aktov i dokumentov / Pod obshh. red. E.V. Semenjako, Ju.S. Pilipenko. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2010. – S. 358–365.
5. Advokatskoe dos’e: Praktich. posob. / A.V. Ches-nokov, E.S. Shugrina. – M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2011. – S. 11.
6. Andreeva N., Lipcer E., Stavickaja A. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po vedeniju zashhity lica, v otnoshenii kotorogo est’ osnovanija predpolagat’, chto ono javljaetsja zhertvoj narushenija prav cheloveka / Pod obshh. red. K. Moskalenko. – M., 2004. – S. 20.
7. Anisimov S. Otstranen ot dela nezakonno // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta. – 2012. – № 18 (131).
8. Baev M.O., Baeva N.A. Taktiko-jeticheskie nachala dejatel’nosti advokata-zashhitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2009. – S. 251.
9. Balakshin V.S. Inye processual’nye dejstvija kak sredstva ugolovno-processual’nogo dokazyvanija // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2006. – № 3. – S. 25–30.
10. Bozh’ev V. Pjatiletie ugolovno-processual’nogo ko-deksa // Zakonnost’. – 2007. – № 1. – S. 10.
11. Burobin V., Pletnev V. Pravovoj rezhim advokatskoj tajny. Ponjatie pravovogo rezhima advokatskoj tajny i ego soderzhanie // Zakon i pravo. – 2006. – № 5. – S. 28.
12. Burov Ju.V., Nasonova I.A. Processual’nye dejstvija na jetape okonchanija predvaritel’nogo sledstvija // Obshhestvo i pravo: Nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal. – 2008. – № 3 (21). – C. 216–219.
13. Bjulleten’ VS RF . – 1990. – № 2. – S. 10.
14. Bjulleten’ VS RF. – 1992. – № 4. – S. 8–9.
15. Vestnik Konstitucionnogo Suda RF. – 2000. – № 5. – S. 46–52.
16. Volkolup (Gladysheva) O.V. Sistema ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i problema ee sovershenstvovanija. – SPb., 2003. –S. 49–50.
17. Garmaev Ju.P. Nezakonnaja dejatel’nost’ advokatov v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Uchebnik. – M.: Jekzamen, 2005. – S. 30, 48, 52.
18. Garmaev Ju.P. Protivodejstvie nezakonnym sposobam zashhity na predvaritel’nom sledstvii // Rossijskij sledovatel’. – 2002. – № 8. – S. 16–19.
19. Dikusar V.M. Kommentarij k stat’e 8 // Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii» / Pod obshh. red. I.L. Trunova. – M.: Jeksmo, 2005. – S. 49.
20. Dikusar V.M. Advokatskaja tajna – neobhodimoe uslovie sushhestvovanija advokatury i odnovremenno processual’naja garantija polnoty, ob#ektivnosti i sostjazatel’nosti sudoproizvodstva // Advokatura. Gosudarstvo. Obshhestvo: Sb. materialov 6 ezhegodnoj nauch.-prakt. konferencii, 2009 g. / Feder. Palata advokatov. Ros. Federacii. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2009. – C. 45.
21. Eliseev N.G. Processual’nye dejstvija // Zakon. – 2007. – № 3. – S. 112–117.
22. Zakljuchenie Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossijskoj Federacii o praktike sledstvennyh organov g. Moskvy, narushajushhej prava advokatov // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii. – 2010. – № 3 (29). – S. 53.
23. Zashhitnik nuzhdaetsja v zashhite // Vestnik Federal’-noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii. – 2010. – № 3 (29). – S. 160.
24. Informacionnaja spravka o sostojanii advokatury i advokatskoj dejatel’nosti v 2009 g. // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii. – 2010. – № 2 (28). – C. 41.
25. Kolosovskij S. Vas eshhe ne obyskali? Bud’te gotovy! // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta. – 2009. – № 20 (61).
26. Kommentarij k Ugolovno-processual’nomu kodek-su Rossijskoj Federacii. – M.: Jeksmo. – 2003. – S. 107.
27. Kommentarij k. Ugolovno-processual’nomu kodek-su Rossijskoj Federacii / Pod red. V.V. Mozjakova. – M., 2002. – S. 151.
28. Kuznecov A.N. Sledstvennye i inye processual’nye dejstvija kak sposoby sobiranija dokazatel’stv v ugolovnom processe: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Voronezh, 2005.
29. Lisicin R. Chto delat’ sledovatelju, esli zashhitnik ne javilsja na dopros // Rossijskaja justicija. – 2000. – № 6. – S. 40–42.
30. Mal’ko A.V. Teorija gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik. – M.: Jurist’, 2001. – S. 230.
31. Neznamova Z.A. Kollizii v ugolovnom prave: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 1995. – S. 8.
32. Opasnaja professija // AG. – 2009. – № 3 (44).
33. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 06.07.2000 № 128-O «Po zhalobe grazhdanina Parshutkina Viktora Vasil’evicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav i svobod punktom 1 chasti vtoroj stat’i 72 UPK RSFSR i stat’jami 15 i 16 Polozhenija ob advokature RSFSR» // Vestnik Konstitucionnogo Suda RF. – 2001. – № 1.
34. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 08.11.2005 № 439-O «Po zhalobe grazhdan S.V. Borodina, V.N. Burobina, A.V. Bykovskogo i drugih na narushenie ih konstitucionnyh prav stat’jami 7, 29, 182 i 183 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // Vestnik Konstitucionnogo Suda RF. – 2006. – № 2.
35. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 14 ijulja 1998 g. № 86-O «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel’nyh polozhenij Federal’nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoj dejatel’nosti» po zhalobe grazhdanki I.G. Chernovoj» // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 1998. – № 152 (11 avgusta).
36. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 16 ijulja 2009 g. № 970-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Gavrilova Aleksandra Mihajlovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav punktom 3 chasti tret’ej stat’i 56 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» (Tekst Opredelenija oficial’no opublikovan ne byl) .Jelektronnyj resurs. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.
37. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 23.09.2010 № 1146-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan Jeshonkulova Azamata Hatambaevicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav polozhenijami statej 49, 51 i 377 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.ksrf.ru/Decision/Pages/default.aspx.
38. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 6 marta 2003 g. № 108-O po zhalobe grazhdanina Cickishvili Givi Vazhevicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav punktom 2 chasti tret’ej stat’i 56 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: // SZ RF. – 2003. – № 21. – St. 2060.
39. Petruhin I.L. Opravdatel’nyj prigovor i pravo na reabilitaciju: Monografija. – M.: Prospekt, 2009. – S. 83.
40. Pilipenko Ju.S. Advokatskaja tajna: Zakonodatel’nyj, jeticheskij, pravoprimenitel’nyj aspekty. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2009. – S. 243–245.
41. Poljanskij N.N. Pravda i lozh’ v ugolovnoj zashhite. – M.: Pravovaja zashhita, 1927. – S. 30.
42. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 20 fevralja 1996 g. № 5-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel’nyh polozhenij FZ ot 8 maja 1994 g. «O statuse deputata Soveta Federacii i statuse deputata Gosudarstvennoj Dumy Federal’nogo Sobranija Rossijskoj Federacii»» // SZ RF. – 1996. – № 9. – St. 828
43. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 27 ijunja 2000 g. № 11-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij chasti pervoj stat’i 47 i chasti vtoroj stat’i 51 Ugolovno-processual’nogo kodeksa RSFSR v svjazi s zhaloboj grazhdanina V.I. Maslova» // Vestnik Konstitucionnogo suda RF. – 2000. – № 5.
44. Pristanskov D. Processual’nye garantii // JeZh-Jurist. – 2005. – № 19.
45. Ragulin A.V. Nekotorye aspekty priznanija dokaza-tel’stv, sobrannyh po ugolovnomu delu, nedopustimymi // Obespechenie zakonnosti v rossijskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (Saransk, 7–8 dekabrja 2006 g.) / Redkoll.: L.D. Kalinkina (otv. red.), N.R. Muhudinova, O.A. Suhova. – Saransk: Mordovskoe kn. izd-vo, 2006. – S. 334–339.
46. Ragulin A.V. Obshhie polozhenija uchenija o pro-fessional’noj zashhite po ugolovnym delam. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2008. – S. 210–256.
47. Ragulin A.V. Pravovoj status professional’nogo zashhitnika kak uchastnika ugolovnogo processa: Ucheb. posob. – Ufa: Akademija VJeGU: Vostochnyj universitet, – 2009. – S. 67–68.
48. Ragulin A.V. «Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika»: formulirovanie opredelenija ponjatija // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2012. –№ 4. – S. 21–25.
49. Ragulin A.V. K voprosu ob opredelenii ponjatija «professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika // Pravovaja iniciativa. –2011. – № 2. – S. 16.
50. Ragulin A.V. O sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel’stva v napravlenii ohrany professional’nyh prav advokatov // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj Akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2009. – № 4. – S. 14 – 19.
51. Rekomendacii po obespecheniju advokatskoj tajny i garantij nezavisimosti advokata pri osushhestvlenii advokatami professional’noj dejatel’nosti. Utverzhdeny resheniem Soveta FPA RF ot 30 nojabrja 2009 g. // Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i advokatura: Sbornik normativnyh aktov i dokumentov / Pod obshh. red. E.V. Semenjako, Ju.S. Pilipenko. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2010. – S. 602.
52. Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2003. – № 135 (3249) (10 ijulja).
53. Rudnev V.I. Provedenie operativno-rozysknyh i sledstvennyh dejstvij v otnoshenii advokatov vozmozhno na osnovanii sudebnogo reshenija // Advokat. – 2004. – № 9.
54. Ryzhakov A.P. Zashhitnik v ugolovnom processe: Nauch.-praktich. rukovodstvo. – M.: Jekzamen, 2007. – S. 260–261.
55. Tihomirov M.Ju. Kollizionnoe pravo. – M., 2000.
56. Carev V.M. Jeffektivnost’ uchastija zashhitnika v dokazyvanii na predvaritel’nom sledstvii. – Krasnodar, 1990. – S. 97.
57. Churkin A.V. O pravomernosti provedenija operativno-rozysknyh meroprijatij v otnoshenii advokata vo vremja konfidencial’nogo svidanija s podzashhitnym v uslovijah sledstvennogo izoljatora libo IVS // Advokat. – 2006. – № 2.
58. Shajhullin M.S. Princip zakonnosti vo vzaimootnoshenijah advokatury i organov gosudarstvennoj vlasti // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2012. – № 1 (1). – S. 20-23.
59. Shejfer S.A. Sledstvennye dejstvija. Osnovanija, processual’nyj porjadok i dokazatel’stvennoe znachenie. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2004.

PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Zaborovsky V.V.
Legal analysis of certain aspects of the right to counsel lawyer request
Purpose: Conduct an analysis of the legal nature of a lawyer request to investigate the practical aspects concerning the implementation of this law, in particular with respect to the procedure of its filing and timing of the response to the inquiry counsel, as well as to analyze the conditions that impede the realization of their right to counsel.
Methodology: The authors used legalistic method based on the consistency and comprehensiveness of its holding.
Results: In article the concludes that the right to request a lawyer is one of its most important rights, without which it becomes more difficult or even impossible to provide a lawyer ceases to qualified legal assistance. The author notes that, unfortunately, the new Law of Ukraine «On Advocacy Activities» does not solve all problems associated with full implementation of the right to counsel of his inquiry. Platoon is also that such a state of things pulls the inability to perform at a high level lawyers of their functions to represent and protect the interests of their clients.
Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses the some important scientific value and practical significance, because it contains a comprehensive study of the legal nature of lawyers’ request as necessary for the implementation of the rights of a lawyer of their professional activities, and explores the practical aspects of the implementation of this law.
Keywords: lawyer, legal aid, lawyer request a warrant lawyer, attorney secrets.
References (transliterated)
1. Habibulin V. Predmet advokatskoj tajny // Predprini-matel’stvo, hozjajstvo i pravo. – 2006. – № 5. – S. 163–165.
2. Podosinnikov L.A. Advokatskij zapros kak osnovnaja forma istrebovaniem advokatom dokazatel’stv pri okazanii kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Pravo i zhizn’. – 2009. – № 5 (131). [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.law–n–life.ru/arch/131/131–18.doc.
3. Tokarev G.V. Problemy realizacii prava advokata na zapros informacii (st. 6 dejstvujushhego Zakona Ukrainy «Ob advokature») // Advokat. – 2005. – № 11. – S. 40–45.
4. Gvozdij V. Pjat’ pljusov i minusov zakona ob advokature // Pravovaja nedelja. – 2012. – № 24 . Jelektronnyj resurs. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://smi.liga.net/articles/2012–08–01/6434558.htm.
5. Chebanenko A.M. Zapros po delu – vazhnaja sostavnaja chast’ dejatel’nosti advokata // Advokat. – 2003. – № 3. – S. 24–25.
6. Ragulin A.V. Nekotorye problemy reglamentacii i prakticheskoj realizacii prava advokata-zashhitnika na poluchenie otveta na zaprosy // Juridicheskij mir. – 2012. – № 8 (188). – S. 14–18.
7. Ragulin A.V. Problemy reglamentacii i prakticheskoj realizacii prava advokata-zashhitnika na zapros svedenij, neobhodimyh dlja okazanija juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2012. – № 9 (37). – S. 187–202.

Human rights IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Tillabayev M.A., Hamdamova F.U.
Extraterritorial obligations of states under international human rights law in the context of international development cooperation
Purpose: Research of the extraterritorial obligations of states under international human rights law, their characteristic and the main tendencies of their development.
Methodology: Formally legal and comparative analysis of the relevant international human rights documents and legal doctrine.
Results: The article provides detailed analysis of nature and scope of extraterritorial human rights obligations of states. To this end, it refers to the relevant provisions of the International Covenant on Economical, social and cultural rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Convention on the rights of person with disabilities as well as soft law sources such as Maastricht Principles and Limburg Principles. International human rights law implies that states shall provide implementation of human rights not only within their own territory but also outside their territory. It is emphasized that without international assistance «the full realization of human rights will remain unfulfilled aspiration in many countries. It means states have extraterritorial obligations under human rights law. To be more precise, the obligation of international cooperation, in particular, development cooperation, implies, on the one hand, the obligation of developed states to provide assistance to developing states, on the other hand, the obligation of developing states to seek and to accept assistance suggested. To conclude, International development cooperation is a part of international cooperation and extraterritorial obligations are a part of obligations within international development cooperation. Analysis of different views with regard to the issue and provides that extraterritorial human rights obligations are not only implied by human rights documents but directly derived from legally binding international documents such as UN Charter and the Declaration on principles of friendly relations and cooperation among states.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific value as contains author’s generalizations and conclusions, important systems for understanding and the content of the extraterritorial obligations of states under international human rights law.
Keywords: extraterritorial obligations, international cooperation and assistance, obligation to respect, protect and fulfill human rights, lack of resources, Maastricht Principles, Limburg principles, the obligation of developed states to provide assistance to developing states.
References
1. Courtis Ch., Sepulveda M., Are extraterritorial obligations reviewable under the Optional protocol to the ICESCR, 2009.
2. Engstrom V. Who is responsible for corporate human rights violations? Abo Academy University, Institute for human rights. 2002.
3. Gostin L., Archer R. The duty of states to assist other states in need: ethics, human rights and international law, Georgetown university law centre, 2008.
4. Hausmann U. and RolfKünnemann R. Germany’s extraterritorial obligations. – 2006.
5. Luopajarvi K. Is there an obligation on states to accept international humanitarian assistance to internally displaced persons under international law? – Oxford university press, 2003.
6. Principles and Guidelines for a Human Rights Approach to Poverty Reduction strategies. – OHCHR, 2006.
7. Scogly S. Extra-national obligation towards economic and social rights. International Council on Human Rights Policy, 2002.
8. UNDP. International cooperation at a crossroads; aid, trade and security in an unequal world. – Human Development Report, 2005.
9. Vandenhole W. Is there a legal obligation to cooperate internationally for development. International journal on Children’s rights, 2007.
10. Maastricht principles on extraterritorial obligations of states in the area of economic, social and cultural rights.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Martyshkin V.N.
Christian idea about court and justice
Purpose: Research of history of emergence and development of moral views about judges and justice, and also about interrelation of Christianity and the law.
Methodology: Author used a historical legal and formal-legal methods.
Results: In work existence of the Christian beginnings in such phenomena of modern justice as the principle of justice, a faultless image of the judge, increased requirements to professional ethics of the judge, an assessment of proofs from the point of view of their relevancy, an admissibility, reliability and sufficiency, independence of court, legality, the principle of publicity and availability of the law, legal proceedings and the judicial act, impartiality of the judge, competitiveness of the parties, establishment of effective mechanisms of controls and counterbalances in legal proceedings locates and described. Also the special attention that the Christian beginnings are found out in a postulate that the miscarriage of justice and bribery of judges involve special responsibility is paid.
Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses the high scientific value as represents one of the first scientific works in whom, taking into account conclusions of earlier conducted researches author’s conclusions and generalizations concerning history of emergence and development of moral views about judges and justice, and also about interrelation of Christianity and the law are formulated.
Keywords: Christian bases, court, justice.
References (transliterated)
1. Aristotel’. Politika: Soch.: V 4 t. – M., 1983.
2. Bal’zak O. Marany // Bal’zak O. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 10 t. – M., 1995. – T. 10. – S. 387.
3. Biblija. Kniga Svjashhennogo Pisanija Vethogo i Novogo zaveta. – M.: Rossijskoe biblejskoe obshhestvo, 1993.
4. Bazhanov A.T. Kurs lekcij dlja studentov jurfaka KGU im. V.I. Ul’janova-Lenina. Speckurs «Sud i pravosudie». Lekcija «Nravstvennye osnovy sudebnoj dejatel’nosti i ejo pravovye aspekty». – Kazan’, 1975.
5. Vedernikov V. Gost’ 13-j stranicy // Nedelja. – 1990. – № 2 (1554).
6. Gercen A.I. Byloe i dumy. – M., 1987. – T. 1 – S. 529.
7. Dal’ V.I. Tolkovyj slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo jazyka. – SPb., 1997. – S. 355.
8. Derzhavin G.R. Vlastiteljam i sud’jam. – L., 1987.
9. Karamzin N.M. Istorija gosudarstva Rossijskogo: Kollekcionnoe izd. – M.: ROOSSA. – S. 1224.
10. Kirpichnikov A.I. Rossijskaja korrupcija. – SPb., 2004. – S. 414.
11. Koni A.F., Sudebnye rechi. – SPb., 1905. – S. 355.
12. Majskij I.M. Vospominanija sovetskogo posla v Anglii. – M., 1960. – S. 144.
13. Martyshkin V.N. Vasil’ev Timofej Vasil’evich – patriot, pravoved (o pervom juriste-mezhdunarodnike v Velikobritanii) // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 1 (2). – S. 13–20.
14. Lenin V.I. O gosudarstve i prave // Sb. proizvedenij i dokumentov: V 2 t. – M., 1958. – T. 2. – S. 720.
15. Martyshkin V.N. Iz dnevnika vospominanij // Saransk–Kazan’: Uzy druzhby.(1000-letiju Kazani posvjashhaetsja) / Sost. T.S. Bargova. – Saransk, 2005. – S. 109.
16. Martyshkin V.N. O protivodejstvii korrupcii: organizacionnye i pravovye problemy // Pravosudie v Respublike Mordovija. – 2011. – № 5. – S. 16.
17. Martyshkin V.N. Pravovaja kompetentnost’ sud’i – garantija jeffektivnoj zashhity lichnosti ot neobosnovannogo zakljuchenija pod strazhu // Materialy Vserossijskoj mezhvedomstvennoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. – N. Novgorod, 2010. – S. 189.
18. Miloserdova L.F. Sudebnaja reforma 1864 g. kak jetap v razvitii vzaimodejstvija gosudarstva i obshhestva v Rossijskoj imperii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 9 (49). – S. 157–162.
19. Medvedev D.A. Iz vystuplenija na vstreche s chlenami Obshhestvennoj palaty RF. Moskva, 20.01.2011 // Pravo i bezopasnost’. – 2011. – № 1 (38). – S. 86.
20. Medvedev D.A. Rossija: stanovlenie pravovogo gosudarstva: V 3 t. – M., 2010. – T. 1. – S. 587.
21. Musskij S.A. Sto velikih ljudej. – M., 2008. – S. 25.
22. Muhortov A.A. Sootnoshenie pravovyh i nravstvennyh nachal pri realizacii prava na sudejskoe usmotrenie // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2012. – № 1 (29). – S. 157–164.
23. Patriarh Moskovskij i Vseja Rusi Aleksij II // Pravo i Bezopasnost’. – 2005. – № 3. – S. 4.
24. Poslanie Prezidenta Vladimira Putina Federal’nomu Sobraniju RF // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2012. – 13 dekabrja (№ 287).
25. Putin V.V. Demokratija i kachestvo gosudarstva // Kommersant. – 2012. – 6 fevralja.
26. Sangadzhiev B.V. Reforma pravosudija v Rossii (na primere sudov obshhej jurisdikcii) // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 5 (45). – S. 143–154.
27. Samyj velikij chelovek, kotoryj kogda-libo zhil. – Izd. v Germanii, 1991 / WACHTTURM BIBEL-UMD TRAKTAT-CESELLSCHAFT Deutscher Zweig, e V., Selters / Taunus (Perevod Novogo Mira Svjashhennyh Pisanij).
28. Skoblikov P.A. Protivodejstvie neobosnovannym i nezakonnym otkazam v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnyh del ugolovno-processual’nymi sredstvami // Sud’ja. – 2013. – № 9. – S. 43–44.
29. Taranov A.S. Filosofskaja aforistika. – M., 1996. – S. 195.
30. Tolkachenko A.A., Harabet K.V. Hristianskoe uchenie o prestuplenii i nakazanii. – M.: Norma, 2009.
31. Jakovlev N.V. Sudy i sud’i Chuvashii 1917–2012 gg. – Cheboksary: Novoe vremja, 2013. – S. 9.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFOR CEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Skitovich V.V., Sedelnik V.V.
The question of implementation by a judicial precedent in the legal system of the Republic of Belarus
Р
urpose: Analysis of the theoretical and enforcement aspects of the use of judicial precedent as a source of law in the Republic of Belarus.
Methodology: Authors applied a systematic and formal-legal methods, as well as the method of comparative law.
Results: Based on the analysis of historical, structural and substantial aspects and principles on the use of judicial precedent, the authors ground conclusion about the necessity of thoughtful approach to borrowing institutions of foreign law. The authors believe that all the existing problems of judicial enforcement can be successfully resolved through the realization of those opportunities that the current Belarusian legislation. The article substantiates the increase of the role of judicial interpretation given to the law enforcement practice and prospects of creation of specialized jurisdictions.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has a certain scientific novelty and practical significance as it allows to specify the doctrinal and practical aspects of the implementation of judicial precedent in modern Belarusian law.
Keywords: legal system, a normative legal act, judicial precedent, the source of law.
References (transliterated)
1. Berzhel’ Zh-L. Obshhaja teorija prava. – M.: Nota bene, 2000.
2. Bibilo V.N. Formy sudebnoj praktiki kak istochnika prava // Vesnik Grodzenskaga dzjarzhaunaga universitjeta imja Janki Kupaly. – 2008. – № 2. – (Seryja 4. Pravaznaustva).
3. Vasilevich G.A. Sudebnyj precedent kak istochnik prava // Justicija Belarusi. – 2004. – № 7.
4. Ivanova T.V. Ponjatija «sudebnyj precedent» i «sudebnaja praktika»: ih traktovka i opredelenija // Vesnik Belarus. dzjarzh. un-ta. – 2010. – № 1. – (Seryja 3).
5. Isaeva T.V. Znachenie sudebnoj praktiki v sisteme istochnikov grazhdanskogo prava Rossijskoj Federacii // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 85–86.
6. Lejst O.Je. Sushhnost’ prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava. – M.: Zercalo, 2002.
7. Krasina E.N. Mezhdunarodnyj sudebnyj precedent kak jelement modernizacii pravovoj sistemy Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notari-ata. – 2011. – № 1. – S. 25–27.
8. Mazurenko A.P. Zakonodatel’naja politika: obshheteoreticheskij aspekt // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 121–-123.
9. Marchenko M.N. Pravovye sistemy sovremennogo mira. – M.: Zercalo-M, 2001.
10. Ospanov E.A. Rol’ sudebnoj praktiki v ocenke pravovoj sistemy obshhestva // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 83–84.
11. Podgrusha V. Contra legem: pro et contra // Justicija Belarusi. – 2003. – № 4.
12. Sudebnaja praktika v sovetskoj pravovoj sisteme. – M.: Jurid. lit., 1975.
13. Fridmjen L. Vvedenie v amerikanskoe pravo. – M.: Progress, 1993.
14. Cvajgert K., Ketc H. Vvedenie v sravnitel’noe pra-vovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava. – T. 1. – M.: Mezhdunar. otnoshenija, 1998.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFOR CEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Hasanov F.Z.
To the question of counteraction of corruption in the health care sphere
Purpose: Consideration of the main aspects of corruption manifestations in the health care sphere.
Methodology: The author applied a formal-legal method and a method of studying of materials of criminal cases.
Results: In article it is noted that corruption in the sphere of health care constitutes the increased public danger, in this regard the state needs to concentrate the main efforts in corruption counteraction. The conclusion that corruption negatively affects development of economy and a social infrastructure is drawn. Concrete examples of corruption manifestations are reviewed.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific value as contains author’s conclusions and generalizations concerning definition of corruption crimes in the health care sphere.
Keywords: corruption, health care, fight, state, counteraction, law, responsibility.
References (transliterated)
1. Doklad General’nogo prokurora Rossijskoj Federacii Ju.Ja. Chajki v Sovete Federacii Federal’nogo Sobranija Rossijskoj Federacii // Prokuror. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 4–21.
2. Krasnopol’skaja I. V Rossii uvelichilis’ rashody na zdravoohranenie // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2012. – 18 marta.
3. Polukarov A.V., Kurakin A.V. O neobhodimosti vvedenija ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti juridicheskih lic za korrupciju v sfere zdravoohranenija // Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 24–29.
4. Tihomirov A.V. Korrupcija v zdravoohranenii // Glavnyj vrach: hozjajstvo i pravo. – 2009. – № 6.
5. Interv’ju V.M. Lebedeva teleprogramme «Vesti v subbotu». 23 fevralja 2013 g.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFOR CEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Tsarenko V.I., Khoma V.A.
Concept of property rights of intellectual protection by bodies of income and charges of Ukraine: the essence and definition
Purpose: To investigate the novels of Ukrainian legislation defining steps on Protection of Intellectual Property Rights (hereinafter – IPR) by bodies of income and charges of Ukraine; to research the legal nature of these activities and to develop proposals to clarify the law.
Methodology: The methods of legal analysis, synthesis, comparison, specification, and similar others were used by authors.
Results: To introduce a system of automatic formation of the customs register of IPR without additional application owner in the central body of executive power, providing the implementation of state policy in the sphere of state customs is proposed in the article. According to the authors, it would help to establishing more effective system of the protection and enforcement of IPR in Ukraine. Also, according to results of analysis of scientific views and novels of the legislation, the authors came to the conclusion that there is a narrow and a broad understanding of «the protection of IPR». Researching of the content of activities that are used by bodies of income and charges of Ukraine to the protection and enforcement of IPR, are defined in the Customs Code of Ukraine (hereinafter – CCU ) as «promotion to the protection of IPR», led to the conclusion that they are by far the protection measures IPR. On this basis is proposed to amend the title of section XIV CCU and formulate it as «Measures to protect intellectual property rights during the movement of goods across the customs border of Ukraine» in accordance with the content .
Novelty/originality/value: The narrow and a broad understanding of «the protection of IPR» are suggested by authors in the article. Firstly is proposed to implement the automatic formation system of the customs register of IPR without additional application of rights-owner. Also firstly is proposed to amend the title of the section XIV CCU.
Keywords: security, measures to protect intellectual property rights, promote the protection of intellectual property rights bodies income and fees.
References (transliterated)
1. Borot’ba z kontrafaktom: fahіvcі SShA dіljat’sja dosvіdom z ukraїns’kimi kollegami: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.apteka.ua/article/83498.
2. Kolesnіchenko V.V. Naprjamki vdoskonalennja pravovogo reguljuvannja zahodіv і procedur admіnіstrativno-pravovogo zahistu prava іntelektual’noї vlasnostі // Mitna sprava. – 2012. – № 5 (84). – S. 73–77.
3. Kouri Ch. Kontrafaktnye lekarstva ugrozhajut zhiteljam desjatkov stran: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.kontinent.org/article_rus_4cbca5bd26445.html.
4. Obushhak O.O., Obushhak S.A. Admіnіstrativne reguljuvannja u sferі ohoroni prav na ob’єkti prav іntelektual’noї vlasnostі // Gumanіtarnij vіsnik Zaporіz’koї derzhavnoї іnzhenernoї akademії: Zbіrnik naukovih prac’. – 2009. – № 36. – S. 75–86.
5. Strizhak І.V. Problemi sprijannja zahistu prav іntelektual’noї vlasnostі mitnimi organami Ukraїni // Mitna sprava. – 2013. –№ 3 (87). – S. 54–59.
6. Harchenko V.B. Ugolovno-pravovaja ohrana prav na rezul’taty intellektual’noj dejatel’nosti: problemy zakonodatel’nogo opredelenija i pravoprimenitel’noj praktiki // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 1 (2). – S. 74–82.
7. Chernjak T.N. Ohrana intellektual’noj sobstvennosti v Ukraine v uslovijah VTO: [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://accl.ru/publikacii/ohrana_intellektualnoy_sobstvennosti_v_ukraine_v_usloviyah_vto.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Ershov O.G., Karpov K.V.
To discussion on the delimitation of the employment contract and an agreement
Purpose: Allocation in terms of a comparative study of the historical development and labor legislation signs are in place to for enforcement of labor and differentiation of civil law contracts.
Methodology: The authors used the historical-legal, comparative legal, legalistic methods.
Results: In work approaches to definition of the legal nature of the employment contract in foreign and Russian law are shown, difficulties of differentiation of labor and civil contracts in the course of right application are considered and it is formulated a new criterion for its consideration.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has some scientific value, since it was the first in the Russian legal literature for enforcement purposes in the classification of such relationships is proposed criterion as the time of the ownership of the result.
Keywords: employment contract, work contract, foreign law.
References (transliterated)
1. Astrahankin A.A. Dorevoljucionnyj i sovetskij jeta-py genezisa dogovora kontraktacii v Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2010. – № 2 (17). – S. 98–102.
2. Braginskij M.I., Vitrjanskij V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. – Kniga tret’ja. Dogovory o vypolnenii rabot i okazanii uslug. – M.: Statut, 2002.
3. Braginskij M.I., Vitrjanskij V.V. Dogovornoe pravo: obshhie polozhenija. – M.: Statut, 2001.
4. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, Ju.K. Tolstogo. – M.: TK Velbi: Prospekt, 2004. – S. 360.
5. Grazhdanskoe Ulozhenie Germanii: Per. s nem. / Nauch. red. A.L. Makovskij. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2006.
6. Dzhioev V.G. Kriterii razgranichenija trudovogo dogovora i dogovora podrjada v celjah regulirovanija trudovyh pravootnoshenij // Pravo i jekonomika. – 2012. – № 12. – S. 70–73.
7. Ershov O.G. O prave podrjadchika na rezul’tat raboty pri ispolnenii objazatel’stva stroitel’nogo podrjada // Jurist. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 33–39.
8. Kiselev I.Ja. Trudovoj dogovor pri kapitalizme: problemy najma i uvol’nenija / Otv. red. S.A. Ivanov. – M.: Nauka, 1989.
9. Kodifikacija rossijskogo grazhdanskogo prava: Svod zakonov grazhdanskih Rossijskoj Imperii, Proekt Grazhdanskogo ulozhenija Rossijskoj Imperii, Grazhdanskij kodeks RSFSR 1922 g., Grazhdanskij kodeks RSFSR 1964 g. – Ekaterinburg: Institut chastnogo prava, 2003.
10. Koncepcija razvitija grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’st-va Rossijskoj Federacii (odobrena resheniem Soveta pri Prezidente RF po kodifikacii i sovershenstvovaniju grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva ot 07.10.2009 // VVAS RF. – 2009. – № 11.
11. Tal’ L.S. Trudovoj dogovor. Civilisticheskoe issledovanie. – Ch. 1. Obshhee uchenie. – Jaroslavl’, 1913.
12. Trudovoe pravo Francii: Sbornik normativnyh aktov / Otv. red. N.A. Mucinova. – M.: UDN, 1985.

JURISPRU DENCE AND EDUCATION
Treskov V.I.
At sources of the Russian Constitution. In memory of the academician Oleg Emelyanovich Kutafin politics and Economics of Eurasia
Purpose: Consideration of the main aspects of scientific heritage of the academician O.E. Kutafin in the field of research of the constitutional construction in Russia.
Methodology: The author used a historical and legal method and analysys of O.E. Ktuafin’s main scientific works in the constitutionalism sphere.
Results: In work the main ideas and the concepts formulated in scientific works of the Academician O.E. Kutafin in the sphere of a constitutional law and realization of constitutionalism in Russia are analysed.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific value as in it the analysis of a number of aspects of the constitutional construction in Russia including practical realization of the constitutionalism, representing relevance for modern legal science and political life of the country is given.
Keywords: constitutionalism, constitutional law, creative heritage, federalism, civil society.
References (transliterated)
1. Aktual’nye problemy konstitucionnogo i munici-pal’nogo prava RF. – M.: MGJuA, 2012.
2. Bogdanova N.A. Avtonomija: idei i praktika (razmyshlenija po povodu knigi O.E. Kutafina «Rossijskaja avtonomija») // Konstitucionnoe i municipal’noe pravo. – 2006. – № 9.
3. Gabitov M.R. Koncepcija juridicheskogo obrazo-vanija budushhego // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 4 (5).
4. Beseda s dejstvitel’nym chlenom rossijskoj akademii nauk, rektorom moskovskoj gosudarstvennoj juridicheskoj akademii O.E. Kutafinym // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2003. – № 10.
5. Kutafin O.E. Konstitucija i problemy ee realizacii // Rossijskij konstitucionalizm: problemy i reshenija: Materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii. – M.: Jurist, 1997.
6. Kutafin O.E. Rossijskij konstitucionalizm. – M., 2008.
7. Kutafin O.E., Fadeev V.I. Municipal’noe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii. – M., 1997.
8. Pervyj po pravu. – M., 2011.
9. Treskov V.I. Chem otlichaetsja rossijskoe obrazovanie ot oksfordskogo? // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 1 (2).
10. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii ot 3 oktjabrja 2002 g. № 1114 «O prisuzhdenii premij Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii v oblasti obrazovanija za 2001 god».

JURISPRU DENCE AND EDUCATION
Ayupova Z.
К., Кussainov D.U.
The legal system of the Republic of Kazakhstan as the legal basis of the modernization of the economy of the state
Purpose: Developement of theoretical propositions for the category «legal system» and its relevant aspects, to identify and analyze current processes of legal integration.
Methodology: is based on a set of applicable methods of scientific knowledge, which provide the most effective solution of the problems in the study.
Results: The authors developed a theoretical position for the category «legal system» and its relevant aspects, analyzed the current processes of legal integration, trends and directions of its development. The basis of the research methodology adopted set of applicable methods of scientific knowledge, which allow most effectively solve the research problem. Integration processes today cause a situation where all the legal system, including the right of Kazakhstan, are under constant pressure from the integration and development of the law that is actively changing the content and structure of the system. Integration requires to ensure its effectiveness the elaboration of common legal rules, procedures, standards. Today all the legal systems of the world for the first time appeared related (albeit inefficiently) certain formal legal obligations, which resulted in a chain reaction of interaction between them.
Novelty / originality / value: The paper has a high scientific value, since it is one of the first attempts to consider the history of the legal system of the state through the prism of the evolution of civil society, as well as issues related to the process of legal integration in the functional, structural and categorical aspects.
Keywords: integration, legal integration, development of the law, globalization, international law, legal system, standardization, regulation, public relations.
References (transliterated)
1. Mel’nikov V.V. Konstitucionnye osnovy regulirovanija jekonomicheskih otnoshenij v Rossii // Novyj juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 104–111.
2. Muhtasarova T.R. Teorija i pravovaja priroda pravootnoshenij sobstvennosti v Rossii // Novyj juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 17–22.
3. Suleimenov M. K. The development of the institute of property law in the legislation of Kazakhstan // Scientific works of Adilet. – 2007. – № 1. – P. 10–22.
4. Shajhullin M.S. K voprosu o transformacii tradicij mestnogo samoupravlenija i pravovyh osnovah ih nejtralizacii v sovetskoj Rossii // Istorija gosudarstva i prava. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 41–43.
5. Shajhullin M.S. K voprosu o protivodejstvii negativnym tradicijam v sisteme mestnogo samoupravlenija pravovymi sredstvami // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 45–48.

 

 

 

 

НОВОСТИ

Наши партнеры

 

Лицензия Creative Commons
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.