RUS ENG

Translator

AzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (S)Chinese (T)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish
  • Скачать журнал

Индексирование журнала





Импакт-фактор российских научных журналов

Содержание журнала

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Zaborovskу V.V.
The lawyer’s complaint as an excuse to initiate discipleinary proceedings against lawyers for legislation in Ukraine and Russian Federation
Purpose: Analyzis of the reason for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against a lawyer as an application (complaint) another lawyer.
Methodology: The authors used formal legal method based on the consistency and comprehensiveness of its holding.
Results: We concluded that both Ukrainian and Russian legislation the right to initiate the issue of disciplinary liability attorney granted to any other lawyer, regardless of whether a direct relationship between them. The conclusion about the feasibility of the existence of rules that provide an opportunity to resolve the contradictions between lawyers peacefully and within the internal system of self-government organization advocates, as it will be the key to avoid undermining the authority of public advocacy.
Novelty/originality/value: The paper has a certain scientific value and important practical significance, because it contains a comprehensive study of the legal nature of the drive to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the lawyer as an application (complaint) another lawyer.
Keywords: lawyer disciplinary liability, the drive to initiate disciplinary proceedings, the applicant’s lawyer.
References (transliterated)
1. Busurina E.O. Povody dlja vozbuzhdenija discipli-narnogo proizvodstva v otnoshenii advokata // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – №  2 (3). – S. 60–64.
2. Dmitriev Ju.A. Advokatskie palaty – real’nyj organ zashhity prav chlenov soobshhestva ili simvol formal’nogo predstavitel’stva? // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2012. – № 3 (31). – S. 196–201.
3. Zaborovskij V.V. Povody dlja vozbuzhdenija disci-
plinarnogo proizvodstva v otnoshenii advokata v zako-nodatel’stvе Ukrainy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 6 (13). – S. 45–50.
4. Mel’nichenko R.G. Pravovoe regulirovanie instituta professional’noj otvetstvennosti advokatov v Rossijskoj Federacii: Мonografija. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2010.
5. Obshhij kodeks pravil dlja advokatov stran Evropej-skogo Soobshhestva, prinjatyj delegaciej dvenadcati stran-uchastnic na plenarnom zasedanii v Strasburge v oktjabre 1988 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. –Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_343.
6. Petrosjan N.S. K voprosu o strategii i taktikе v advokatskoj dejatel’nosti // Pravozashhitnik. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 18.
7. Potashnik I.M. K voprosu o nezavisimosti advokatov i advokatskih ob#edinenij v Rossijskoj Federacii na sovremennom jetape // Pravozashhitnik. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 3.
8. Postanovlenie Kievskogo apelljacionnogo administrativnogo suda ot 6 ijunja 2013 goda (delo № 2a-13503/12/2670) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/31889213.
9. Pravila advokatskoj jetiki, utverzhdennye Uchreditel’nym S#ezdom advokatov Ukrainy ot 17 nojabrja 2012 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://vkdka.org/pravil-advokatskoji-etiki.
10. Reshenie Vysshej kvalifikacionno-disciplinarnoj komissii advokatury № ІІ-009/2014 ot 23 janvarja 2014 goda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – URL: Rezhim dostupa: http://vkdka.org/rishennya-i-0092014.

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Kantyukova I.T.
Legal status of the advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee by the legislation of the Ukraine
Purpose: Research of a legal status of advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee and on the legislation of the Ukraine.
Methodology: Formal-legal and comparative and legal methods were used.
Results: In article the place and a role of the advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee in system of rendering the qualified legal aid to citizens and the organizations in Ukraine are analyzed, the detailed analysis of a legal status of these persons, a functional purpose of its activity and other requirements imposed to them is carried out. By results of the conducted research by the author the conclusions directed on improvement of a legal regulation of the status of advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee in Ukraine are formulated.
Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first works devoted to the analysis of a legal status of advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee by the legislation of the Ukraine.
Keywords: legal profession, advocacy, advocate’s assistant, advocate’s trainee.
References (transliterated)
1. Zaborovskij V.V. Nekotorye problemnye aspekty oformlenija polnomochij advokata v grazhdanskom processe Ukrainy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 3 (10). – S. 47–52.
2. Zaborovskij V.V. Povody dlja vozbuzhdenija disciplinarnogo proizvodstva v otnoshenii advokata po zakonodatel’stvu Ukrainy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 6 (13). – S. 45–50.
3. Makushkina E.Je. Nekotorye problemy professio-nal’noj podgotovki advokatov i sdachi kvalifikacionnogo jekzamena v svete reformy rynka juridicheskih uslug // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 5 (12). – S. 21–28.
4. Ragulin A.V., Shajhullin M.S. Sovremennye prob-lemy i tendencii professional’nogo razvitija advokata // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 5 (6). – S. 42–57.
5. Ragulin A.V. Pravo advokata-zashhitnika trebovat’ zapreta na vmeshatel’stvo v advokatskuju dejatel’nost’ libo prepjatstvovanie ej kakim by to ni bylo obrazom: problemy zakonodatel’noj reglamentacii i prakticheskoj realizacii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2012. – № 4 (47). – S. 136–143.
6. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija professional’nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika i ih obespechenija po zakonodatel’-stvu Ukrainskoj Respubliki // Pravovoe gosudarstvo: Teorija i praktika. – 2010. – № 22. – S. 94–98.
7. Skrjabin A.N. Jetapy dejstvij zashhitnika pri reshenii voprosa ob izbranii mery presechenija podozrevaemomu (obvinjaemomu) v ugolovnom proizvodstve Ukrainy // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2014. – № 4 (11). – S. 36–42.

ACTUAL PROLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Tarasov A.A.
To a question of the procedural status of the person concerning which criminal prosecution is carried out
Purpose: Consideration of the contents of the procedural status of the person concerning which criminal prosecution is carried out.
Methodology: The author applied a historical and legal method, a comparative and legal method, a formal legal method.
Results: In article the scientific discussions which are conducted in recent years about optimization of the procedural status of the person which is exposed to criminal prosecution are analyzed. The convention of the use in the law of any terms and need of a priority of substantial, human rights sense of standard instructions in comparison with their formal expression is emphasized.
Novelty/originality/value: Work is of the high scientific value as is attempt of complex reconsideration of questions of the maintenance of legal status of the person concerning which criminal prosecution is carried out.
Keywords: suspect, accused, the right for protection, human rights, a presumption of innocence, purpose of criminal legal proceedings, brining a charge, the notice of suspicion, attraction as the accused.
References (transliterated)
1. Vedernikov A.N. Aktual’nye problemy uchastija zashhitnika na stadii predvaritel’nogo rassledovanija v period nachala sovremennoj sudebno-pravovoj reformy. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 2008.
2. Gavrilov B.Ja. Institut pred#javlenija obvinenija: pravovye realii i mify // Aktual’nye problemy sovremennogo ugolovnogo processa Rossii: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. trudov / Pod red. prof. V.A. Lazarevoj. – Samara: Samarskij universitet, 2010. – Vyp. 5.
3. Gavrilov B.Ja. Perspektivy sovershenstvovanija ugolovno-processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva v XXI veke // Aktual’nye problemy prava i gosudarstva v XXI veke: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. g. Ufa, 17–18 aprelja 2014 g. / Pod obshh. red. F.B. Muhametshina. – Ufa: UJuI MVD RF, 2014.
4. Golovenkov P., Spica N. Ugolovno-processual’nyj kodeks Federativnoj Respubliki Germanija – Strafprozessordnung (StPO): Nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij i perevod teksta zakona so vstupitel’noj stat’joj professora Uve Hell’manna «Vvedenie v ugolovno-processual’noe pravo FRG». – Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam, 2012.
5. Kruglikov A.P. Obvinjaemyj: nuzhen li takoj uchastnik v ugolovnom processe sovremennoj Rossii? // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2014. – № 11/2 (122).
6. Lazareva V.A., Ivanov V.V., Utarbaev A.K. Zashhita prav lichnosti v ugolovnom processe Rossii: Ucheb. posob. dlja magistrov. – M.: Jurajt, 2011.
7. Makarov L.V., Portnov Ju.A. Podozrevaemyj v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve – nasledie proshlogo ili osoznannaja neobhodimost’? // Aktual’nye problemy sovremennogo ugolovnogo processa Rossii: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. trudov / Pod red. prof. V.A. Lazarevoj. – Samara: Samarskij universitet, 2010. – Vyp. 5.
8. Semencov V.A. Obespechenie prava na zashhitu licu, v otnoshenii kotorogo vozbuzhdaetsja ugolovnoe delo // Semencov V.A. Izbrannye stat’i po ugolovnomu processu. – Krasnodar: Prosveshhenie–Jug, 2013.
9. Ugolovno-processual’noe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii / Otv. red. Ju.K. Jakimovich. – SPb.: Izdatel’stvo R.Arslanova «Juridicheskij centr Press», 2007.
10. Shejfer S.A. Privlechenie v kachestve obvinjaemogo. Pred#javlenie obvinenija // Ugolovnyj process: Uchebnik / Kollektiv avtorov; pod red. V.A. Lazarevoj. – M.: Justicija, 2015.
 
HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EUR ASIAN SPACE
Ivanova S.A.
Phenomenon of development of ideas about justice in Russia (beginning)
Purpose: Consideration of a phenomenon of development of ideas about justice in Russia.
Methodology: The author applied a historical and legal and philosophical and legal method.
Results: Justice, acting as a difficult phenomenon or we weed interactions of economy, the right, policy and morals, reflects all complexity of socioeconomic communications and the relations of people and in the wide plan is social and philosophical category. V. S. Solovyov, S. N. Bulgakov and N. A. Berdyaev’s concepts resist to hedonistic and utilitarian prospects of justice and a personal freedom as justice in their treatment represents both result, and means of internal freedom. The combination of socio-political realism and philosophical idealism in works of these philosophers presented original option of permission of the major problem of the theory of justice – a ratio universal and individual, pluralistic.
Novelty/originality/value: Work is of the high scientific value as is attempt of complex reconsideration of questions of development of ideas about justice in Russia.
Keywords: justice, ethics, moral, rationality, integrity, principle of civil law, theory of social justice, middle class, civil law, law.
References (transliterated)
1. Berdyaev N.A. Istoki i smysl russkogo kommunizma. – M., 1990. – S. 108.
2. Berdyaev N.A. Sud’ba Rossii. – M., 1990. – S. 83.
3. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya neravenstva. – M., 1992.
4. Bulgakov S.N. Ot maksizma k idealizmu: Sbornik statei. – SPb., 1903.
5. Grudtsina L.Yu. Instituty grazhdanskogo obschestva v sisteme chastnopravovyh i publichno-pravovyh otnosheniy // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2014. – № 3(55)–4(56).
6. Grudtsyna L.Yu. Problemy klassifikatsii institutov grazhdanskogo obschestva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Mezhdunarodnyj akademicheskiy zhurnal RAEN. – 2014. – № 3.
7. Grudtsina L.Yu. Soderzhanie i klassifikatsiya insti-tutov grazhdanskogo obschestva v Rossii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2014. – № 1(53)–2(54).
8. Grudtsina L.Yu. Sredniy klass i grazhdanskoe obschestvo: ekonomiko-pravovoy aspect // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2015. – № 1–2 (65–66). – S. 121–122.
9. Ivanova S.A. Dogovor ob obrazovanii: ponyatie, soderzhanie, pravovoe regulirovanie // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2014. – № 9(61)–10(62).
10. Ivanova S.A. Innovatsionnye protsessy v sovremennom rossiyskom obrazovanii // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2013. – № 5(45)–6(46).
11. Kazakov A.P. Teoriya progressa v russkoy sotsiologii XIX veka. – L., 1969. – S. 32.
12. Kistyakovskiy B. Kategorii neobhodimosti i spravedlivosti pri issledovanii sotsial’nyh yavleniy // Zhizn’. – 1900. – № 9.
13. Kistyakovskiy B.A. Kategorii neobhodimosti i spravedlivosti. – M., 1903.
14. Kistyakovskiy B.A. Russkaya sotsiologicheskaya shkola i kategoriya vozmozhnosti pri reshenii sotsial’no-eticheskih problem // Problemy idealizma. – M., 1903.
15. Korovyakovskiy D.G. Pravovye osnovy, sposoby i metody obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti bankovskoy deyatel’nosti v sovremennyh usloviyah // Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’. – 2009. – № 3. – S. 43–52.
16. Lavrov P.L. Filosofiya i sotsiologiya // Izbr. proizv.: V 2 t. – T. 2. – M., 1992. – S. 54.
17. Lagutkin A.V. Velikaya illyuziya demokratii. – M.: Yurkompani, 2014.
18. Lagutkin A.V., Trubnikov V.I., Grudtsina L.Yu. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo v sovremennoy Rossii. – M.: Yurkompani, 2013.
19. Losskiy N.O. Istoriya russkoy filosofii. – M., 1991.
20. Matveeva M.A., Shagieva R.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie i pravotvorchestvo v pravovoy sisteme obschestva: teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy sootnosheniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2014. – № 12. – S. 5–13.
21. Mihaylovskiy N.K. Predislovie k tret’emu izdaniyu // Poln. sobr. soch. – 4-е izd. – T. 1. – SPb., 1906.
22. Mihaylovskiy N.K. Chto takoe progress? // Poln. sobr. soch. – 4-е izd. – T. 1. – SPb., 1906.
23. Rachkov P.A. Pravda-spravedlivost’ // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. – 1996. – № 1. – S. 28.
24. Solov’ev B. S. Soch.: V 2 t. – M.: Mysl’, 1988.
25. Solov’ev V.S. Opravdanie dobra // Soch.: V 2 t. – M., 1988. – S. 127.
26. Solov’ev V.S. Smysl lyubvi // Chteniya o bogochelovechestve: Stat’i. – SPb., 1994. – S. 311.
27. Frank S.L. Duhovnye osnovy obschestva. – M., 1992. – S. 490.
28. Chernikov M.V. Kontsepty pravda i istina v russkoy kul’ture: problema korrelyatsii // Polis. – 1999. – № 5.
29. Yuzhakov S.N. Sotsiologicheskie etyudy. – SPb., 1891.
30. Yanov A.L. Rossiya protiv Rossii. Ocherki istorii russkogo natsionalizma. 1825–1921. – Novosibirsk, 1999. – S. 122.

HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EUR ASIAN SPACE
Lagutkin A.V., Grudtsyna L.Yu.
System development of civil society and fluctuation
Purpose: Consideration of philosophical and legal problems of development of civil society.
Methodology: Authors applied a formal legal method and a philosophical legal method.
Results: In article an attempt to define a place and a role of information in a difficult legal mechanism of formation and development of institutes of civil society taking into account application to this problem of cybernetic approach is made. The dual social and legal nature of a phenomenon of civil society in Russia consists that, on the one hand, it doesn’t grow «from below», and is formed «from above», at will of the state having opportunity to operate development of civil society by means of information perceived by its institutes; on the other hand, civil society represents difficult open social system which development qualitatively depends on development of the elements making it.
Novelty/originality/value: Work possesses the high scientific value as represents attempt of definition of a place and role of information in the mechanism of formation and development of institutes of civil society.
Keywords: civil society, information, social system, cybernetics, management, state, fluctuation, human rights, social environment, self-organization, ideology, energy, safety.
References (transliterated)
1. Alekseev S.S. Liniya prava. – M.: Statut, 2006. – S. 114.
2. Andrianov N.V. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo kak sreda institutsionalizatsii advokatury. – M.: LIBROKOM, 2011. – S. 35–36.
3. Afanas’ev V.G. Mir zhivogo. Sistemnost’, evolyutsiya i upravlenie. – 2-e izd. – M.: 2010. – S. 158.
4. Afanas’ev V.G. Obschestvo: sistemnost’, poznanie i upravlenie. – M.: Politizdat, 1981. – S. 23.
5. Afanas’ev V.G. Sotsial’naya informatsiya i upravlenie obschestvom. – M.: Politizdat, 1975. – S. 12.
6. Gramshi A. Iskusstvo i politika. Pis’ma. – T. 1. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. – S. 542.
7. Klaus G. Kibernetika i obschestvo: Per. s nem. – M.: Progress, 1967. – S. 128.
8. Korshunov N.M. Konvergentsiya chastnogo i publichnogo prava: problemy teorii i praktiki. – M.: Infra-M, 2011. – S. 24.
9. Lagutkin A.V. Velikaya illyuziya demokratii. – M.: Yurkompani, 2014.
10. Lagutkin A.V. Rossiya na rasput’e: kuda poydem? – M.: Yurkompani, 2014. – S. 3.
11. Pokrovskiy I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. – M., 2001. – S. 37.
12. Setrov M.I. Organizatsiya biosistem. – L.: Nauka, 1971.
13. Sokolova L.V. A.A. Uhtomskiy i kompleksnaya nauka o cheloveke. – SPb., 2010. – S. 146.
14. Tihomirov Yu.A. Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo // Obschaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskiy kurs. – M., 2009. – S. 255.
15. Harkevich A.A. O tsennosti informatsii // Problemy kibernetiki. – M., 1960. – Vyp. 4. – S. 54.
16. Elias N. O protsesse tsivilizatsii: V 2 t. – T. 1. – S. 38.
17. Engel’gardt V.A. Integratizm – put’ ot prostogo k slozhnomu v poznanii yavleniy zhizni // Voprosy filosofii. – 1970. – № 11. – S. 108.

JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFOR CEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Martyshkin V.N.
Jury in Russia: reforming prospects
Purpose: Consideration of topical issues of reforming of a jury in Russia.
Methodology: The author applied a historical and legal method, statistical methods, a formal legal method, a method of the included supervision.
Results: In article «The prospects of reforming of a jury in the Russian Federation» designated on a round table, carried out on February 19, 2015 by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation together with the Russian state university of justice, problems of expansion of application of institute of jurors are critically analyzed.
Novelty/originality/value: Work is of the high scientific value as is attempt of the modern analysis of views of reforming of a jury in Russia.
Keywords: judicial system, jury, jurors, jurymen.
References (transliterated)
1. Vedomosti SND i VS RF. – 1993. – № 33. – St. 1313.
2. Vol’ter F.M. Izbrannye proizvedenija po ugolovnomu pravu i processu. – M., 1956. – S. 185.
3. Koni A.F. Otcy i deti sudebnoj reformy. – Kn. 1. – M., 2003. – S. 341.
4. Medvedev D.A. Vystuplenie na VII Vserossijskom s#ezde sudej // Sud’ja. – 2008. – № 12. – S. 8.
5. Perspektivy reformirovanija suda prisjazhnyh v Rossijskoj Federacii: Programma kruglogo stola // Rossijskij gosuniversitet pravosudija. – 2015. – 19 fevralja.
6. Samyj velikij chelovek, kotoryj kogda-libo zhil. – M., 1991. – S. 119.
7. Speranskij M.M. O korennyh zakonah gosudarstva. – M., 2015. – S. 166, 195.
8. Ugolovnyj process: Uchebnik / Pod red. V.S. Balak-shina, Ju.V. Kozubenko, A.D. Proshljakova. – M., 2011. – S. 790.
9. Shheglovitov I.G. K sorokaletiju sudebnyh Ustavov 20 nojabrja 1864 g. // Vestnik prava. – 1904. – № 9. – S. 2–3.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFOR CEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Shakirov T.R.
The international standards concerning selection and appointment of judges
Purpose: Consideration of the content of the international legal norms establishing the standards concerning selection and appointment of judges.
Methodology: The author applied a comparative and legal method, a formal legal method, a method of the included supervision.
Results: In article on the basis of studying of a wide range of international legal acts the main contents of the international standards, concerning selection and appointment of judges are opened. The conclusion that the way of appointment of judges, their advances on service and transfer to other court is the main characteristic of judicial system and an indicator of its independence and ability to serve as the effective instrument of fair administration of justice is drawn. It is noted that a number of bodies for protection of human rights expressed concern in connection with unjustified participation executive or legislature in the course of appointment of judges. The attention that the Human Rights Committee and other bodies recommended to all states to create independent body which will provide appointment and advance of judges and management of judicial system is paid.
Novelty/originality/value: Work is of the scientific value as contains generalizations, important for a legal regulation of judicial activity, and conclusions.
Keywords: court, standards of appointment of judges to a position, independence of judges, International Commission of Jurists.
References (transliterated)
1. AHPChN, Principy i rukovodjashhie polozhenija, Razdel A.
2. Venecianskaja komissija, Doklad o nezavisimosti sudebnoj sistemy, chast’ I: Nezavisimost’ sudej. Prinjat Venecianskoj komissiej na 82-j Plenarnoj sessii (Venecija, 12–13 marta 2010 g.), CDL-AD(2010)004, 16 marta 2010 g.
3. Venecianskaja komissija, Zakljuchenie o poslednih izmenenijah v Zakon «Ob osnovnyh polozhenijah Konstitucii» Respubliki Albanija, CDL-INF(1998)009.
4. Doklad Special’nogo dokladchika po voprosu o nezavisimosti sudej i advokatov, Dokument OON № A/HRC/11/41 (2009).
5. Evropejskaja hartija o statuse sudej, DAJ/DOC (98) 23.
6. ESPCh, Campbell i Fell protiv Velikobritanii (zhaloby № 7819/77; 7878/77): Postanovlenie, 28 ijunja 1984 g., p. 78.
7. Zakljuchitel’nye zamechanija Komiteta po pravam cheloveka po Azerbajdzhanu, Dokument OON № CCPR/CO/73/AZE, p. 14.
8. Zakljuchitel’nye zamechanija Komiteta po pravam cheloveka po Bolivii, Dokument OON № CCPR/C/79/add.74, p. 34.
9. Zakljuchitel’nye zamechanija Komiteta po pravam cheloveka po Gondurasu, Dokument OON № CCPR/C/HND/CO/1, p. 16.
10. Zakljuchitel’nye zamechanija Komiteta po pravam cheloveka po Livanu, Dokument OON № CCPR/C/79/Add.78, p. 15.
11. Zakljuchitel’nye zamechanija Komiteta po pravam cheloveka po Rumynii, Dokument OON № CCPR/C/79/Add.111, p. 10.
12. Zakljuchitel’nye zamechanija Komiteta po pravam cheloveka po Tadzhikistanu, Dokument OON № CCPR/CO/84/TJK, p. 17.
13. Zashhita pravosudija: disciplinarnoe proizvodstvo v otnoshenii sudej v Rossijskoj Federacii, Doklad missii MKJu, 2012 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://icj.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/MISSION-RUSSIA-REPORT_rus.pdf.
14. Komitet po pravam cheloveka, Zamechanie obshhego porjadka № 32, stat’ja 14: Pravo na ravenstvo pered sudami i tribunalami i pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo, Dokument OON № CCPR/C/GC/32 (2007), p. 19.
15. MASPCh, delo «Reverón Trujillo protiv Venesujely», postanovlenie ot 30 ijunja 2009 g. (Predvaritel’nye vozrazhenija, Po sushhestvu, Kompensacija i Sudebnye rashody), p. 74.
16. Mezhamerikanskaja komissija po pravam cheloveka, Garantii nezavisimosti rabotnikov sudebnoj sistemy, OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 44, 5 dekabrja 2013 g., str. 25.
17. Mezhdunarodnaja associacija advokatov, Minimal’nye standarty nezavisimosti sudej, prinjaty v 1982 g.
18. Naznachenie sudej, doklad, prinjatyj Venecianskoj komissiej na 70-j Plenarnoj sessii (Venecija, 16–17 marta 2007 g.).
19. Naznachenie sudej: procedura otbora na sudejskuju dolzhnost’ v Rossijskoj Federacii: Doklad Missii MKJu 2014 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://icj.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/RUSSIA-Selecting-the-judges-Publications-Reports-2014-Rus.pdf, str. 3.
20. Osnovnye principy OON, kasajushhiesja nezavisimosti sudebnyh organov, prinjaty sed’mym Kongressom OON po preduprezhdeniju prestupnosti i obrashheniju s pravonarushiteljami, sostojavshimsja v Milane s 26 avgusta po 6 sentjabrja 1985 g., i odobreny rezoljuciej General’noj Assamblei OON 40/32 ot 29 nojabrja 1985 g.
21. Pekinskoe zajavlenie o principah nezavisimosti sudebnyh organov v regione LAWASIA, prinjato predsedatel’stvujushhimi sud’jami regiona LAWASIA i drugimi sud’jami iz stran Azii i Tihogo okeana v Pekine v 1995 g., prinjato Sovetom LAWASIA v 2001 g., princip 13.
22. Pojasnitel’nyj memorandum k Evropejskoj hartii o statuse sudej, princip 1.3.
23. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo MKJu № 1: Principy nezavisimosti i podotchjotnosti sudej, advokatov i prokurorov [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.icj.org/no-1-international-principles-on-the-independence-and-accountability-of-judges-lawyers-and-prosecutors/.
24. Proekt Vseobshhej deklaracii o nezavisimosti pravosudija (Deklaracija Singvi).
25. Rekomendacija № CM/Rec(2010)12 Komiteta ministrov gosudarstvam-chlenam o sud’jah: nezavisimost’, jeffektivnost’ i objazannosti.
26. Sostojanie sudebnoj sistemy v Rossii, Doklad issledovatel’skoj missii po sudebnoj reforme v Rossijskuju Federaciju, 2010 god [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://icj.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Russia-indepjudiciary-report-2010-rus.pdf.

JURISPRUDENCE AND EDUCATION
Korovyakovsky D.G.
Features of emergence of ideas about the higher legal education in the course of formation of the state and the right in Ancient Greece
Purpose: Consideration of features of emergence of ideas about the higher legal education in the course of formation of the state and the right in Ancient Greece.
Methodology: The author applied a historical and legal method.
Results: In article the author’s analysis of formation of bases of legal education in the context of formation of the state and the right finds the reflection in Ancient Greece. The general regularities and features of approaches to types and forms of education in various states policies of Ancient Greece are revealed.
Novelty/originality/value: Work possesses a certain scientific value as contains author’s vision of historical and legal bases of emergence of legal education.
Keywords: Ancient Greece, legal education, education forms.
References (transliterated)
1. Grote G. A History of Greece. – Vol. 4. – Cambridge University Press, 2010.
2. Johnson William A. (Editor), Parker Holt N. (Editor) Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. – Oxford University Press, USA; Reprint edition (June 8, 2011).
3. Hunt N.B. Living in Ancient Greece. – Chelsea House Publications, 2008. – (Living in the Ancient World).
4. Andreev Ju.V., Koshelenko G.A., Kuzishhin V.I., Marinovich L.P. Istorija Drevnej Grecii. – M.: Vysshaja shkola, 2005.
5. Bol’shoj Jenciklopedicheskij slovar’. – M.: Jeksmo, 2000.
6. Vach’janc A.M. Drevnjaja Grecija. Drevnij Rim: Ucheb. posob. – 2-e izd., ispr. – M.: Ajris-press, 2004.
7. Gorelov A. A. Politologija v voprosah i otvetah: Ucheb. posob. – M.: Jeksmo, 2009.
8. Dzhurinskij A.N. Istorija zarubezhnoj pedagogiki: Ucheb. posob. dlja vuzov. – M.: FORUM – INFRA-M, 1998.
9. Dorzhiev Zh.B. i dr. Istorija politicheskih i pravovyh uchenij: Ucheb.-metod. posob. – Ulan-Udje: Izdatel’stvo VSGTU, 2004.
10. Zelenkov M.Ju. Politologija (bazovyj kurs). – M.: Jurid. in-t MIITa, 2009.
11. Ivanov E.V. Istorija obrazovanija i pedagogicheskoj mysli: Ucheb.-metod. rek. k seminarskim zanjatijam. – Velikij Novgorod: NovGU im. Jaroslava Mudrogo, 2002.
12. Istorija politicheskih i pravovyh uchenij: Kratkij uchebnyj kurs / Pod obshh. red. akad. RAN, d. ju.n., prof. V.S. Nersesjanca. – M.: NORMA, 2000.
13. Ksenofont. Kiropedija. – M., 1965.
14. Novyj slovar’ metodicheskih terminov i ponjatij (teorija i praktika obuchenija jazykam). — M., 2009.
15. Ocherki istorii shkoly i pedagogiki za rubezhom. – Ch. 1. – Gl. 3. – M., 1988.
16. Perfilova T.B. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rimskoj imperii (Kul’turologicheskij aspekt): Diss. ... d-ra ist. nauk. – Jaroslavl’, 2004.
17. Politologija. Praktikum: Ucheb. posob. dlja studentov uchrezhdenij, obespechivajushhih poluchenie vyssh. obrazovanija / N.P. Denisjuk i dr.; pod obshh. red. S.V. Reshetnikova. – Minsk: TetraSistems, 2008.
18. Politologija. Uchebnik / Pod red. d.p.n., prof. V.I. Burenko, d.f.n. V.V. Zhuravleva. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2004.
19. Politologija: Ucheb. posob. / Sost.: S.V. Birjukov, S.V. Ivlev, T.V. Baturina, E.V. Mel’nichenko. – Tomsk, 2004.
20. Slastenin V.A. i dr. Pedagogika: Ucheb. posob. dlja stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zaved. / V.A. Slastenin, I.F. Isaev, E.N. Shijanov; pod red. V.A. Slastenina. – M.: Akademija, 2002.
21. Rossijskaja pedagogicheskaja jenciklopedija / Pod red. V.G. Panova. – M., 1993.
22. Tolkovyj slovar’ / Sost.: S.I. Ozhegov, N.Ju. Shvedova. – M., 1949–1992.
23. Filosofskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar’. – M., 2010.
24. Cybul’skaja M.V. Istorija politicheskih i pravovyh uchenij. – M.: Moskovskij mezhdunarodnyj institut jekonometriki, informatiki, finansov i prava, 2003.
25. Jenciklopedija sociologii. – M., 2009.
 
EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCE
Amasyants A.E.
About the legal value of the opinions of the victim upon the individualization of punishment (on the example of a specific case)
Purpose: to Consider the example of a particular case problematic issues of law enforcement related to the consideration of the opinion of the victim upon the individualization of punishment.
Methodology: the Author used a formal legal method, study of documents, the method of participant observation.
Results: In the article on the example of a specific criminal case discusses some practical problems of the application of the institution of reconciliation with the victim in the framework of mitigating circumstances, upon appointment by the court of criminal punishment.
Novelty/originality/value: the Article has practical value, because based on the analysis of specific case by the author revealed some problematic aspects in the application of court Institute application with the victim when the individualization of punishment.
Keywords: mitigating circumstances, the reconciliation with the victim, to change the sentence, reduction of punishment, General principles of punishment, the justice of the punishment, the lawyer-defender.
References (transliterated)
1. Amas’janc A.Je. Princip spravedlivosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (filosofsko-pravovoj analiz) // Zakony Rossii. Opyt. Analiz. Praktika. – 2013. – № 11. – S. 107.
2. Voronin V.N. Individualizacija nakazanija posredstvom smjagchajushhih obstojatel’stv: voprosy sudebnoj praktiki // Advokat. – 2014. – № 5.
3. Postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 11 dekabrja 2013 goda № 10-12458\13.

НОВОСТИ

Группа ВКонтакте

 

Лицензия Creative Commons
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.