RUS ENG

Translator

AzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (S)Chinese (T)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish

Читайте в следующем номере

Импакт-фактор российских научных журналов

Группа ВКонтакте

Группа в FB

International scientific and practical law journal Eurasian Journal of International Law
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Airapetyan Y.V.
Free legal aid as a factor of accessibility of justice in civil procedure of Armenian Republic
Purpose: The comparative analysis of the legislation of Armenian Republic and foreign countries regarding the institution of legal aid in civil proceedure.
Methodology: Author used comparative legal and formal-legal methods.
Results: This work discusses the concept of institution of free legal aid in civil procedure of Republic of Armenia, conducted a survey of public defenders on the provision of free legal aid, and identified the necessary directions for improvement of legislation in this area.
Novelty/originality/value: Article carries a high scientific and practical value, since it is one of the first attempts to propose the creation of a separate legal instrument regulating the provision of free legal aid in civil proceedure of RA, based on the opinions of people directly providing it.
Keywords: free legal aid, access to justice, office of public defender.
References (transliterated)
1. http://advocates.am: Oficial’nyj sajt Palaty advoka-tov Respubliki Armenija.
2. Besplatnaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ i obespechenie dostupa k pravosudiju v Rossii / Institut prava i publichnoj politiki. – M.: LigalStadis.RU: konsalting i kommunikacii, 2010. – (Dostup k pravosudiju).
3. Besplatnaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’: model’ vzai-modejstvija gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshhestva (zarubezhnyj i rossijskij opyt): Sbornik dokladov. – M: Akvarel’, 2011.
4. Gumashjan K. Dosjagaemost’ i dostupnost’ juridicheskoj pomoshhi: Na armjan. jaz. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.pastaban.am.
5. Zakon Respubliki Kazahstan ot 3 ijulja 2013 goda № 122-V 3RK «O garantirovannoj gosudarstvom juridicheskoj pomoshhi» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://online.zakon.kz.
6. Kazinjan G.S. Garantii dostupnosti pravosudija v Respublike Armenija: Na armjan. jaz. – Erevan, 2007.
7. Mazaev V.D. Obshhaja harakteristika zakonoda-tel’nogo obespechenija besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossii: Analiticheskij doklad / Institut prava i publichnoj politiki. – M.: Akvarel’, 2011.
8. Mezhdunarodnyj opyt v sfere okazanija besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi / Institut «Pravo obshhestvennyh interesov» (PILI) po zakazu proekta «Dostup k pravosudiju», osushhestvljaemogo kompaniej Atos Origin (Bel’gija) pri finansovoj podderzhke Evropejskogo Sojuza cherez Delegaciju Evropejskoj Komissii [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.pilnet.ru.
9. Melikjan R., Kocharjan V. Dostupnost’ pravosudija: evropejskij opyt i armjanskie osnovnye voprosy: Na armjan. jaz. – Erevan, 2005.
10. Ocenka i obespechenie kachestva programm besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://igzakon.ru/magazine295.
11. Pleten’ A.S. Konstitucionnoe pravo na besplatnuju juridicheskuju pomoshh’ i mehanizm ego realizacii v sovremennoj Rossii: Avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. – Habarovsk, 2008. – S. 11.
12. Predlozhenija po povysheniju dostupnosti pravosudija dlja maloimushhih i social’no nezashhishhennyh grazhdan – uchastnikov grazhdanskogo processa (po rezul’tatam monitoringa dejatel’nosti mirovyh sudej v Leningradskoj oblasti i Permskom krae) / Pod red. L.O. Ivanova. – M.: Informpoligraf, 2011.
13. «Reshenie predsedatelja palaty advokatov Respubliki Armenija ob opredelenii specializacii i raspredelenii obshhestvennyh zashhitnikov v administrativno-territorial’nyh rajonah», 28 fevralja 2014 goda, թիվ 62-Լ.
14. Ter-Vardanjan G. Juridicheskaja pomoshh’, predos-tavljaemaja za schet sredstv gosudarstvennogo bjudzheta, kak finansovyj jelement prava na dostup k pravosudiju: Na armjan. jaz. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.court.am.
15. Federal’nyj zakon ot 21.11.2011 № 324-FZ (red. ot 28.12.2013) «O besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v Rossijskoj Federacii».

PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Ryabtseva E.V.
«Pro bono» as legal profession activity: Russian experience
Purpose: The analysis of forms of a free legal aid in relation to activity of advocates in Russia.
Methodology: Comparative and legal, historical and legal and formal-legal methods were applied.
Results: In article the Russian experience of development of «pro bono» as one of legal profession activities is analyzed, historical stages of development of this institute are investigated and modern activities of lawyer educations within «pro bono» are shown.
Novelty/originality/value: Article is of a certain scientific and practical value as contains the author’s generalizations characterizing experience of development of institute of a free legal aid in Russia.
Keywords: advcoacy profession, «pro bono», public organizations, help to citizens, public debt.
References (transliterated)
1. Bal’dinkinova Z.D., Galushkin A.A. K voprosu o povyshenii jeffektivnosti ispolnenija sudebnyh reshenij i obespechenija ustanovlennogo porjadka dejatel’nosti sudov v Rossijskoj Federacii na sovremennom jetape // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 3.
2. Bugarenko A.I. K voprosu ob istorii prava na besplatnuju juridicheskuju pomoshh’ v Rossii // Advokatskaja praktika. – 2011. – № 1.
3. Vlasov A.A. Pravo na poluchenie v Rossii kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi i problemy ee realizacii // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2014. – № 1 (32). – S. 9–12.
4. Grudcyna L.Ju. Perspektivy formirovanija institutov grazhdanskogo obshhestva v aspekte konvergencii chastnogo i publichnogo prava // Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2014. – № 1–2 (53–54). – S. 46–59.
5. Doncova Ju. Juridicheskaja pomoshh’ darom. Voz-mozhno li jeto? // JeZh-Jurist. – 2011. – № 36. – S. 2.
6. Dorskaja A.A. K voprosu o periodizacii pravovoj reformy v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravovaja iniciativa. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 2.
7. Ivanov A.A., Shagieva R.V. Stanovlenie advokatury v Drevnem Rime // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2014. – № 1 (32). – S. 13–18.
8. Ivanova V.V. Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’: usluga ili juridicheskaja pomoshh’? // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. – 2014. – № 2 (33). – S. 26–31.
9. Kirillovyh A.A.Besplatnaja juridicheskaja pomoshh’ i pravovye osnovy ee okazanija // Advokat. – 2012. – № 8.
10. Mel’nichenko R. Kormushka dlja naznachencev. Razmyshlenija po povodu zakonoproekta o besplatnoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi // JeZh-Jurist. –2011. – № 38. – S. 7.
11. Os’kina I., Lupu A. Pomoshh’ bespomoshhnym! // JeZh-Jurist. – 2013. – № 47.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Kantyukova I.T.
Legal status of the advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Purpose: Research of a legal status of advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee and on the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Methodology: Formal-legal and comparative and legal methods were used.
Results: In article the place and a role of the advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee in system of rendering the qualified legal aid to citizens and the organizations in the Republic of Kazakhstan are analyzed, the detailed analysis of a legal status of these persons, a functional purpose of its activity and other requirements imposed to them is carried out. By results of the conducted research by the author the conclusions directed on improvement of a legal regulation of the status of advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee in the Republic of Kazakhstan are formulated.
Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first works devoted to the analysis of a legal status of advocate’s assistant and advocate’s trainee by the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Keywords: legal profession, advocacy, advocate’s assistant, advocate’s trainee.
References (transliterated)
1. http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1300008454.
2. Kantjukova I.T. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii polozhenij rossij-skogo zakonodatel’stva o pravovom statuse pomoshhnika i stazhera advokata // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 6 (7). – S. 33–40.
3. Mihanova O.V. Advokatom – tol’ko cherez stazhirovku! // Vestnik advo-katskoj palaty Respubliki Bashkortostan. – 2013. – № 2 (31). – S. 41–43.
4. Ragulin A.V., Shajhullin M.S. Sovremennye problemy i tendencii professional’nogo razvitija advokata // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 5 (6). – S. 43.

ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Grishin A.V.
Interrogations experts in court
Purpose: Analysis of the provisions of the legislation and the jurisprudence governing the interrogation and an expert in criminal proceedings before a court, in order to identify the existing problems of law enforcement and developing ways to resolve them.
Methodology: Were dialectic-materialistic method and formal legal methods.
Results: The article examines various aspects of interrogation expert at trial; identified issues raised by stakeholders regarding the application of the law governing interrogation expert in court. Proposed methods of interrogation expert optimization tactics to facilitate a uniform approach to the content of the part of the judicial investigation.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific value, because it contains a comprehensive analysis of the changes of law and judicial practices relating to the questioning of an expert in criminal proceedings; of interest to defence counsel in developing the optimum tactics of interrogation expert.
Keywords: criminal proceedings, the opinion of the expert, the interrogation experts, additional expertise.
References (transliterated)
1. Demidova E.E. Predmet doprosa sudebnogo jeksper-ta // Problemy zakonnosti. – 2012. – № 120. – S. 361–371.
2. Kljushnik A.S. Sushhnost’ pokazanij jeksperta i specialista v ugolovnom processe Rossii // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2009. – № 12. – S. 104–106.
3. Fedotov I.C. Iniciativa suda ili sudejskaja iniciativa v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 119–127.
4. Hrustaleva Ju.A. Trudnosti ustanovlenija prichinno-sledstvennyh svjazej v sudebno-medicinskoj praktike // Sudebnaja jekspertiza. – Saratov, 2007. – № 1. – S. 20–25.

PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Ragulin A.V.
Right of advocate-defender for free meetings with the principal: questions of the theory and practice
Purpose: Analysis of theoretical and practical aspects of realization of the right of the advocate-defender for free meetings with the principal.
Methodology: The formal-legal method, a statistical method and a method of theoretical modeling were used.
Results: In work the offer on replacement of the term «appointment» used in the text of normative legal acts with the term «meetings for rendering a legal aid» is proved, and also suggestions for improvement of the precepts of law regulating the right of the advocate-defender for free meetings with the principal containing in conditions of compulsory isolation are formulated.
Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses high scientific value and has the practical importance as is one of the first works devoted to the complex analysis of theoretical and practical questions of realization of the right of the advocate-defender for free meetings with the principal be the legislation of Russian Federation.
Keywords: legal profession, advocate-defender, rights of the lawyer, appointment to the principal.
References (transliterated)
1. Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i advokatura: Sbornik nor-
mativnyh aktov i dokumentov / Pod obshh. red. E.V. Seme-njako, Ju.S. Pilipenko. – M.: Inform-Pravo, 2010. – S. 600–601.
2. Barenbojm P., Reznik G., Mozolin V. Pravovaja reforma XXI veka i advokatura. – M.: Justicinform, 2007. – S. 16.
3. Brusnicyn L.V. Ogranichenie prava na svidanie zashhitnika s podzashhitnym v nacional’nom i mezhdunarodnom prave // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2002. – № 11. – S. 108.
4. Vlasov A.A. Advokatura v konstitucionno-pravovom pole // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2014. – № 4 (71). – S. 123–124.
5. Vorob’ev A.V., Poljakov A.V., Tihonravov Ju.V. Teorija advokatury. – M.: Grant, 2002. – S. 336.
6. Garmaev Ju.P. Nezakonnaja dejatel’nost’ advokatov v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Uchebnik. – M.: Jekzamen, 2005. – S. 30, 48, 52.
7. Garmaev Ju.P. Protivodejstvie nezakonnym sposobam zashhity na predvaritel’nom sledstvii // Rossijskij sledovatel’. – 2002. – № 8. – S. 16–19.
8. Dikov G. Advokatskaja tajna v svete praktiki ESPCh // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii. – 2010. – № 2 (28). – C. 171.
9. Karimova G.Ju. Osobennosti primenenija k nesovershennoletnim mery presechenija v vide zakljuchenija pod strazhu (po materialam Respubliki Bashkortostan) // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. – 2014. – № 5 (72). – S. 161–163.
10. Koldaev D.E. K voprosu o pravovom polozhenii zashhitnika v rossijskom sude // Pravozashhitnik. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 22.
11. Koldaev D.E. K voprosu o pravovom regulirovanii advokatskoj dejatel’nosti v Rossijskoj Federacii // Pravozashhitnik. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 8.
12. Kolosovskij S. Naruchniki kak oruzhie advokata. Izobreten novyj sposob zashhity ot prevyshenija vlasti // Novaja advokatskaja gazeta. – 2009. – № 13.
13. Krasnov V.E. Obespechenie sorazmernosti cenzury perepiski s advokatom lic, v otnoshenii kotoryh izbrana mera presechenija v vide zakljuchenija pod strazhu // Konstitucionno-pravovye problemy ugolovnogo prava i processa: Sb. materialov mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Sankt-Peterburg, 30–31 oktjabrja 2009 g. / Severo-Zapadnyj filial Rossijskoj akademii pravosudija; sost. K.B. Kalinovskij. – SPb.: Petropolis, 2010. –S. 192–195.
14. Minjazeva T.F. Problemy pravovogo statusa lichnosti osuzhdennyh v Rossijskoj Federacii: Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra jurid. nauk. – M., 2001.
15. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 14 ijulja 1998 g. № 86-O «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel’nyh polozhenij Federal’nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoj dejatel’nosti» po zhalobe grazhdanki I.G. Chernovoj» // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 1998. – 11 avgusta (№ 152).
16. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 6 ijulja 2000 g. № 128-O «Po zhalobe grazhdanina Parshutkina Viktora Vasil’evicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav i svobod punktom 1 chasti vtoroj stat’I 72 UPK RSFSR i stat’jami 15 i 16 Polozhenija ob advokature RSFSR» // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2000. – 3 avgusta (№ 149).
17. Poljanskij N.N. Pravda i lozh’ v ugolovnoj zashhite. – M.: Pravovaja zashhita, 1927. – S. 30.
18. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 29 nojabrja 2010 g. № 20-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij statej 20 i 21 Federal’nogo zakona «O soderzhanii pod strazhej podozrevaemyh i obvinjaemyh v sovershenii prestuplenij» v svjazi s zhalobami grazhdan D.R. Baranovskogo, Ju.N. Volohonskogo i I.V. Plotnikova» // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 2010. – 17 dekabrja (№ 5365).
19. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 2 ijulja 1997 g. № 11-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti punkta «b» chasti pervoj stat’I 1 Zakona Respubliki Mordovija ot 20 janvarja 1996 goda «O vremennyh chrezvychajnyh merah po bor’be s prestupnost’ju» v svjazi s zhaloboj grazhdanina R.K. Hajrova» // Rossijskaja gazeta. – 1997. – 16 ijulja (№ 135).
20. Potokina O. Sohranjat’ tajnu perepiski // Advokatskie vesti. – 2007. – № 11.
21. Rezoljucija Tret’ego Vserossijskogo s#ezda advokatov № 2 «O narushenijah prav advokatov i avtoritete advokatury» // Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. – 2007. – № 2 (16). – S. 81.
22. Reshenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 7 fevralja 2012 g. № GKPI11-2095 // SPS «Konsul’tant pljus».
23. Rudnev V.I. Sudebnaja zashhita prav lic, soderzhashhihsja pod strazhej. – M., 2005. – S. 194–195.
24. Ryzhakov A.P. Zashhitnik v ugolovnom processe: Nauch.-praktich. ruk. – M.: Jekzamen, 2007. – S. 258.
25. Ryzhakov A.P. Kommentarij k Ugolovno-processu-al’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii. – M.: Jeksmo, 2003. – S. 107.
26. Semencov V.A., Burger B.M. Ugolovno-processu-al’nye formy uchastija advokata v dosudebnom proizvodstve. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2010. – S. 78–79.
27. Smolenskij M.B. Advokatskaja dejatel’nost’ i advokatura v Rossijskom Federacii: Uchebnik. – Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2005. – S. 134.
28. Fomin M.A. Pravo na zashhitu v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Ucheb.-praktich. posob. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2008. – S. 99.
29. Churkin A.V. O pravomernosti provedenija operativno-rozysknyh meroprijatij v otnoshenii advokata vo vremja konfidencial’nogo svidanija s podzashhitnym v uslovijah sledstvennogo izoljatora libo IVS // Advokat. – 2006. – № 2.
30. Shherba S.P. Teoreticheskie osnovy i osobennosti ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva po delam lic, stradajushhih fizicheskimi i psihicheskimi nedostatkami: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. – M., 1990. – S. 15–16, 36–38, 53.

PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Skryabin A.N.
Features investigative actions and measures of criminal proceedings against lawyers in the legislation of Ukraine
Purpose: Scientific and practical study of the peculiarities of the investigation and measures to ensure the criminal proceedings against a lawyer under the laws of Ukraine, development and submission of proposals for the improvement of the criminal - procedural legislation of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine «On the Bar and Advocacy».
Methodology: Use formal legal method, comparative law and the method of analysis.
Results: In the scientific article features of investigative actions and measures to ensure the criminal proceedings against a lawyer in accordance with the Law of Ukraine «On Advocacy and Legal Practice» from 05.07.2012 and the Criminal Code of Ukraine protsesualnom from 13.04.2012. The author in his scientific article concludes that the existing procedural order of the investigative actions and measures to ensure the criminal proceedings against the lawyer does not ensure its complete protection against arbitrariness on the part of law enforcement agencies. In the scientific article states that guarantees the independence of lawyers, embodied in the Law of Ukraine «On the Legal Profession and Legal Practice» is not fully reflected in the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with which the author comes to the conclusion that the investigative actions and measures to ensure that criminal proceedings against a lawyer should be more clearly regulated in the Code of Criminal Procedure by making changes and additions to the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has high academic value and practical significance, since it contains the author of the novel generalizations, conclusions and suggestions for improvement of the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine «On the Bar and Advocacy».
Keywords: investigations, measures to ensure, criminal procedure, criminal procedure, procedural safeguards, advocacy, conducting searches, advice lawyers.
References (transliterated)
1. Afanasієv R.V. Garantії Advokats’koї dіjal’nostі: sutnіst’ ta problemi realіzacії // Vіsnik Nacіonal’noї asocіa-cії advokatіv Ukraїni. – 2014. – № 2 (3) kvіten’. – S. 33–36.
2. Glovac’kij І.Ju. Dіjal’nіst’ advokata-zahisnika u krimіnal’nomu procesі: Navch. posіb. – K.: Atіka, 2003.
3. Golovko L.V. Doznanie i predvaritel’noe sledstvie v ugolovnom processe Francii. – M.: SPARK, 1995 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.twirpx.com/file/132907.
4. Moldovan V.V., Moldovan A.V. Porіvnjal’ne krimі-nal’no-procesual’ne pravo: Ukraїna, FRN, Francіja, Anglіja, SShA: Navch. posіb. / Kiїv. nac. un-t іm. T. Shevchenka. – K.: Jurіnkom іnter, 1999.
5. Udalova JI.D., Savic’ka S.L. Krimіnal’no-procesual’nі garantії dіjal’nostі advokata. – K.: KNT, 2014.

HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EUR ASIAN SPACE
Tillabaev M.A., Khamdamova F.U.
Evaluation of the international legal basis on elimination of child labour
Objective: To analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of international standards on the elimination of child labor, defining the reasons for their ineffective implementation.
Methodology: The formal-legal and comparative legal analysis of the relevant international instruments and legal doctrine.
Results: This article is devoted to the analysis of international standards on elimination of child labor. The authors are trying to determine how these standards are effective and realizable in practice. The paper gives an overview of the relevant documents and the obligations imposed upon the states in this direction. According to the authors, the current legal framework does not provide effective mechanisms for monitoring.
Novelty/originality/value: The authors emphasize that the ineffectiveness of measures to eradicate child labor is due to not only the weakness of the monitoring system, but the unreality of achieving the objectives of the relevant documents under the conditions of modernity. The paper has a high scientific value, because it contains the author’s generalizations and conclusions that are important for understanding the ineffectiveness of measures taken to eliminate child labor.
Keywords: сhild labor, the ILO Convention, the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).
References
1. Gallinetti J.S. An Assessment of the Significance of the International Labour Organisation’s Convention 182 in South Africa with specific reference to the Instrumental Use of Children in the Commission of Offences as a Worst Form of Child Labour. Thesis (PhD). University of the Western Cape, 2007. – P. 152.
2. ILO Global report, 2010. UP:30/04/2012-09:07:59 WM:30/04/2012-09:08:19 M:LW998-7-FY A:11a1 R:1100579 C:58F8445A01C5F76F2F1AE64D17AD7D24563C9CF6.
3. Scott C. The interdependence and permeability of human right norms: towards a partial fusion of the international covenants on human rights. 27 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 769. 1989. – P. 780.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFOR CEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EUR ASIAN SPACE
Kazantseva O.L.
An independent anti-corruption expertise: whether justified expectations?
Objective: The study of the subject, the importance and role of an independent anti-corruption expertise of legal acts and their projects in the fight against corruption in order to identify its effectiveness.
Methodology: use formal legal and synergetic methods.
Results: The article deals with the concept, significance and role of an independent anti-corruption expertise of legal acts and their projects in the fight against corruption. Based on personal experience of independent anti-corruption expert author reveals the problems associated with deficiencies in the legal regulation of the order of the anti-corruption expertise, the legal status of an independent expert and procedures for dispute resolution independent experts and law-making bodies. The author makes suggestions for improving anti-corruption legislation, allowing it to fill with gaps and weaknesses.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has high scientific value and practical importance because it provides an analysis of anti-corruption legislation, the conclusion about the need to continue to improve it in order to fight corruption, given appropriate suggestions.
Keywords: normative legal act, an independent anti-corruption expertise, legal regulation, the fight against corruption.
References (transliterated)
1. Antikorrupcionnaja jekspertiza normativno-pravo-vyh aktov i ih proektov / Azarov M.S., Astanin V.V., Barzilova I.S. i dr.; sost. Rossinskaja E.R. – M.: Prospekt, 2010.
2. Kazanceva O.L. Antikorrupcionnaja jekspertiza normativnyh pravovyh aktov i ih proektov: pravovaja osnova i sub#ekty // Aktual’nye voprosy protivodejstvija korrupcionnym pravonarushenijam: teorija i praktika: Materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. – Karaganda: Izd-vo KarGU, 2014.
3. Kazanceva O.L. Jekspertiza normativnyh pravovyh aktov: sootnoshenie pravovoj i antikorrupcionnoj jekspertiz // Aktual’nye problemy sovershenstvovanija zakonodatel’stva i pravoprimenenija: Materialy IV mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii / Evrazijskij nauchno-issledovatel’skij institut problem prava. – Ufa, 2014.
4. Korobkin A.N. Problemy osushhestvlenija nezavisimoj antikorrupcionnoj jekspertizy // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. – 2012. – № 9.

JURISPRUDENCE AND EDUCATION
Pospelov O.V.
Theses on advocacy profession in Russia and foreign states: summary list
Purpose: Drawing up the summary list of the theses devoted to advocacy activity and legal profession.
Methodology: The statistical method and a method of studying of documents were applied.
Results: The author made the exhaustive list of the Russian theses devoted to problems of lawyer activity and legal profession, and also the list, considerable on volume, of the dissertations defended in the foreign states approximate quantitative indices of scientific activity in the corresponding area are defined, systematization of theses depending on a type of the thesis, branches of science, object and a subject of dissertation research is carried out.
Novelty/originality/value: Material is of the considerable scientific value as allows to track development of domestic science about lawyer activity and legal profession, to receive information on research achievements of scientists dealing issues and problems of legal profession and lawyer activity, to plan ways of independent scientific search in the corresponding field of knowledge.
Keywords: legal profession, science about legal profession, the thesis.
References (transliterated)
1. Bojkov A.D. Advokatura i advokaty: Sbornik statej. – M.: Jurlitinform, 2010. – S. 103–104.
2. Krichevskij G.G. Magisterskie i doktorskie disserta-
cii, zashhishhennye na juridicheskih fakul’tetah universite-tov Rossijskoj imperii (1755–1918): Bibliograficheskij ukazatel’ / Sost., predisl. i nauch. red. A.N. Jakusheva. – Stavropol’: San-San, 1998. – 201 s.
3. Ragulin A.V. Formirovanie nauki ob advokature v Rossii // Evrazijskaja advokatura. – 2013. – № 2 (3). – S. 128–140.
4. Rahlevskij V.A., Borisov K.G. Bibliograficheskij spravochnik dissertacij na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata i doktora juridicheskih nauk / Pod obshh. red. chlen.-korr. AN SSSR, d-ra jurid. nauk V.M. Chhikvadze. – Dushanbe: IRFON, 1965. – 543 s.

НОВОСТИ

Наши партнеры

 

Лицензия Creative Commons
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.