RUS ENG

Translator

AzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (S)Chinese (T)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish

Индексирование журнала





Импакт-фактор российских научных журналов

Historical experience
Kolesnikov Y.A., Reznichenko D.R.
Judicial reform of 2014: results and consequences for economic justice, current risks and threats, measures to minimize them
Purpose: The major purpose of the article – research the broad view of expert community, with which includes scientific lawyer, judges, analytics; research their opinion about success of the reform in the system of arbitration courts.
Methodology: We used the methods of analysis and activities and synthesis, formal-logical, comparative law.
Results: The article compares the application of the judicial practice of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, carries out the author’s classification of actual risks and major threats to the system of economic justice, explores possible ways to prevent and / or overcome them.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has a high scientific and practical value, as it is a modern attempt to address the current problem.
Keywords: Judicial reform, economic justice, judicial practice, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.
References (transliterated)
1. Jakovlev V.F. Predislovie // Vestnik VAS RF. Spe-cial’noe prilozhenie. 2001. № 1. S. 7.
2. Baryshnikov P.S., Vorozhevich A.S., Zagorul’ko L.P., Zaharova M.V. i dr. Posle VAS. Rossijskoe jekonomicheskoe pravosudie segodnja i zavtra. M: Nacional’nyj issledovatel’skij universitet Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki, 2016.
3. Seregina O.L. Perspektivy razvitija arbitrazhnoj vetvi sudebnoj vlasti posle uprazdnenija Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gosudarstvo i pravo. Juridicheskie nauki. 2015. № 1.
4. Ivanov A.A. Principy pravovoj opredelennosti i ravnogo pravoprimenenija. Kakova rol’ sudov // Arbitrazhnaja praktika. 2015. № 12. S. 101.
5. Budylin S.L. Precedent na rasput’e. Kratkaja istorija sudebnogo pravotvorchestva v Rossii // Vestnik jekonomicheskogo pravosudija Rossijskoj Federacii. 2015. № 11.
6. Seregina O.L. Perspektivy razvitija arbitrazhnoj vetvi sudebnoj vlasti posle uprazdnenija Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda RF // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gosudarstvo i pravo. Juridicheskie nauki. 2015. № 12. S. 101.
7. Solov’eva T.V. Znachenie postanovlenij vysshih sudebnyh organov v grazhdanskom processual’nom zakonodatel’stve // Rossijskaja justicija. 2015. № 1. S. 5.
8. Kommentarij Antonovoj S. Za kulisami Verhovnogo Suda: ob inkognito Predsedatelja, majatnike Sviridenko i nezavidnoj uchasti trojki sudej [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://zakon.ru/blog/2015/08/13/za_kulisami_verxovnogo_suda_ob_inkognito_predsedatelya_ mayatnike_sviridenko_i_nezavidnoj_uchasti_tro.
 
Historical experience
Zenov V.E.
Value of the Nuremberg process for a legal regulation of ensuring the right for protection within criminal cases production
Purpose: A research of a role of the Nuremberg process in a legal regulation of ensuring the right for protection.
Methodology: Historical and legal and formally legal methods were used.
Results: It is established that the Nuremberg process exerted considerable impact on formation and development of the legal acts and norms regulating ensuring the right for protection in criminal legal proceedings adopted after its carrying out.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific value as in it the urgent legal problem is considered.
Keywords: Nuremberg process, right for protection, criminal legal proceedings.
References (transliterated)
1. http://www.law.edu.ru/norm/norm.asp?normID=1244713
2. Vestnik Federal’noj palaty advokatov RF. 2009. № 3 (25). S. 69–75.
3. Ragulin A.V., Shakirov T.R. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy instituta professional’-nyh prav advokata-zashhitnika // Aktual’nye problemy sovershenstvovanija zakonodatel’-stva i pravoprimenenija. Ufa, 2015. S. 202–207.
 
Historical experience
Klyachin V.M.
The beginning of the Great Patriotic war: disaster or blander
Purpose: To Study the nature of the events of the great Patriotic war with the goal of establishing the reasons for such a rapid and unexpected defeat created by the summer of 1941 the Soviet military system.
Methodology: Author use historical and legal methed, and the method of theoretical modeling.
Results: As a result of the retrospective analysis of events of the great Patriotic war highlighted the signs of disaster. This allowed the author with a fundamentally new positions to interpret some historical facts that characterize this period. Dedicated ground for the rehabilitation of perpetrators of criminal acts under the influence of objective conditions of uncertainty, as a special form innocent of harm.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific value and important practical value as it contains author’s generalizations and conclusions, allowing on the basis of the provisions of catastrophe theory to systematically investigate the causes that led to catastrophic consequences in the period of June–July 1941 on the Soviet-German theater of hostilities, which allows to determine the peculiarities of the system of social relations, and also to outline concrete steps to develop recommendations for organizing activities in conditions of uncertainty of disasters.
Keywords: the great Patriotic war, disaster, uncertainty, organization, defense, rehabilitation, infliction of damage.
References (transliterated)
1. Arnol’d V.I. Teorija katastrof. 5-e izd. M.: Editorial URSS, 2009.
2. Bagramjan I.H. Tak nachinalas’ vojna. (Voennye memuary.). M.: Voenizdat, 1971.
3. Velikaja Otechestvennaja vojna 1941–1945 godov: v 12 t. T. 2. Proishozhdenie i nachalo vojny. M.: Kuchkovo pole, 2012.
4. Gal’der F. Russkaja kompanija. Hronika boevyh dejstvij na Vostochnom fronte. 1941–1942 g. M.: Centrpoligraf, 2007.
5. Zhukov G.K. Vospominanija i razmyshlenija: v 2 t. T. 1. M.: OLMA Media Grupp, 2015.
6. Istorija voennoj strategii Rossii / red. V.A. Zolotarev. M.: Kuchkovo pole; Poligrafresursy, 2000.
7. Istorija Velikoj Otechestvennoj vojny 1941–1945: v 2 t. / avtor. vstup. sl. V.E. Frolov; avt. predisl. V.A. Zolotarev. 2-e izd. T. 1. M.: INES, RUBIN, 2015.
8. Kljachin V.M. Neopredelennost’ katastrofy kak teoreticheskoe osnovanie rasshirenija instituta nevinovnogo prichinenija vreda // Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve. 2016. № 6. S. 262–266.
9. Mirovye vojny HH veka: v 4 kn. / Institut vseobshhej istorii RAN. Kn. 3. Vtoraja mirovaja vojna: ist. ocherk. 2-e izd. M.: Nauka, 2005.
10. Prikaz № 0250 ot 28 ijulja 1941 goda. CA MO RF, f. 4, op. 11, d. 65, l. 192–193.
11. Rubcov Ju.V. General’skaja pravda. 1941–1945. M.: Veche, 2014. S. 11.
12. Hano J. Japonskaja katastrofa. Avarija na Fukusime i ee posledstvija: per. s nem. SPb.: BHV-Peterburg, 2013.
13. Hrushhev N.S. Vospominanija. Vremja. Ljudi. Vlast’: v 2 kn. Kn. 1. M.: Veche, 2016.
14. Chuev F.I. Sto sorok besed s Molotovym: Iz dnevnika F. Chueva / posleslov. S. Kuleshova. M.: Terra, 1991. S. 50.
 
Historical experience
Strizhakov I.V.
About use of prohibitive orders of Office in the conflict of jurisdictions of Court of the Chancellor and Courts of general law in England of the 15-17th centuries
Purpose: A research of a problem of use of prohibitive orders of Office in the conflict of jurisdictions of Court of the Chancellor and Courts of general law in England of the 15-17th centuries.
Methodology: Historical and legal and formally legal methods were used.
Results: It is established that in England the 15–17th century of century jurisdiction of courts hasn’t been rather accurately defined. Besides, this period of time is also characterized by existence of extensive judicial system (more than 60 types of courts) in this connection, because of indistinct division of their competence there was a set of the disputes connected both with jurisdiction of affairs and with priority of jurisdiction. In particular, these contradictions have mentioned courts of General law and Court of the Chancellor. The first were guided by general law, the second – the right of justice.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific value as in her the urgent historical and legal problem is considered.
Keywords: right of justice, Court of the Chancellor, prohibitive order, court of general law.
References (transliterated)
1. Baildon W.P. Introduction to select cases in Chancery A.D. 1364 to 1471 / ed. by W.P. Baildon. London: Selden Society, 1896.
2. Baker J. An introduction to English legal history. London: Butterworths Law, 1990.
3. Campbell J. Lives of the Lord Chancellors and Keepers of the Great Seal of England, from the Earliest Times Till the Reign of King George IV. London: John Murray, 1868.
4. Holdsworth W. A history of English law. v. 5. Boston: Little, Brown, and company, 1924.
5. Kerly D.M. An historical sketch of the equitable jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1890.
6. Maitland F.W. Equity also, The forms of action at common law: two courses of lectures / ed. by A.H. Chaytor and W.J. Whittaker. Cambridge, 1910.
7. Marsh A.H. History of the Court of Chancery and of the rise and development of the doctrines of equity. Toronto: Carswell & Co., 1890.
8. Plucknett T. A concise history of The Common law. 5th ed. Indianapolis: Liberty fund, 1956.
9. The practice of the Court of Chancery. London: Stevens and Haynes, 1870.
10. Mihajlov A.M. Ocherki po teorii i istorii anglijskogo prava. M.: Jurlitinform, 2015.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Shamba T.M.
Legal profession as element of system of the constitutional state: Russian realities and problems of the beginning of the XXI century
Purpose: To prove need of every possible increase in a role of legal profession as important element of system of the constitutional state in modern Russia, strengthenings of its interaction with civil society and the government, increases in efficiency of human rights activity of the lawyer case, use new, appropriate time of forms and methods of work with citizens, the organizations and business.
Methodology: Legallistic and historical and legal methods were used.
Results: In article the conclusion is drawn that the modern Russian legal profession, relying on rich domestic and international experience in the sphere of human rights activity, following the best traditions of the Russian pre-revolutionary and Soviet legal profession, at the beginning of the XXI century becomes an important element of system of the constitutional state in our country. It occurs thanks to constantly increasing, in the conditions of market economy and pluralistic democracy, the need for the qualified legal aid to natural and legal entities, and also in view of the closest communication of legal profession with civil society. At the same time efficiency of human rights activity of legal profession in a decisive measure depends on in what degree it will keep the independence in relation to the state and will strengthen the positions in the course of implementation of justice, strengthening of legality and law and order.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the sufficient scientific value as represents attempt of the general scientific judgment of the place, rare for domestic practice, a role and value of legal profession in system only still of the formed constitutional state in Russia.
Keywords: constitutional state, civil society, lawyer, lawyer activity, legal assistance, justice, Russia.
References (transliterated)
1. Gil’dija rossijskih advokatov: istorija, tradicii, perspektivy: sbornik dokumentov, vystuplenij, dokladov, publikacij / pod obshh. red. G.B. Mirzoeva. M.: Gil’dija rossijskih advokatov, 2009.
2. Koni A.F. Nravstvennye nachala v ugolovnom processe (obshhie cherty sudebnoj jetiki) // Jurisprudencija. 2011. № 1. T. 21.
3. Krasheninnikov P. Novyj zakonoproekt garantiruet nezavisimost’ i svobodu dejstvij advokatov // Rossijskaja gazeta. 2017. 15 marta.
4. Makarova Z.V. Professional’naja zashhita podozrevaemyh, obvinjaemyh. M.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova «Juridicheskij centr Press», 2008.
5. Stecovskij Ju.I. Advokatura i gosudarstvo. M.: Jurist#, 2007.
6. Troickij N.A. Advokatura v Rossii i politicheskie processy 1866–1904 gg. Tula: Avtograf, 2000.
7. Shamba T.M., Kokin V.N. Advokatura v Rossijskoj Federacii: uchebnik. 3-e izd., pererab. M.: Norma: Infra-M, 2012.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Melnichenko R.G.
Electronic advocacy
Purpose: To Identify the degree of influence of the fourth technological revolution to practice law.
Methodology: We Used statistical and hermeneutic and comparative-historical method and interview method.
Results: It was found not reflexionando the introduction of new technologies in the legal sphere. The forecast of the further development of the legal profession in the new environment.
Novelty/originality/value: The lack of such scientific publications on the topic, testifies to its originality. The synthesis of Informatics and law – of its originality. Proposed ways of development of the legal profession – its values.
Keywords: the legal profession, the fourth technological revolution, law technology.
References (transliterated)
1. Anatolij Alizar. Bot-jurist vyigral del na $3 mln // Geektimes 20.02.2016 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://geektimes.ru/post/271396/
2. Mel’nichenko R.G. Vlijanie sovremennyh juridicheskih tehnologij na reformirovanie sfery juridicheskoj pomoshhi // Obespechenie prav i svobod cheloveka v sovremennom mire: v 4 ch. Ch. 2. M.: Prospekt, 2017. S. 39–43.
3. Shackaja A.V. Audioprotokolirovanie kak obespe-chitel’nyj jelement sobljudenija razumnyh srokov v rajonnyh sudah // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. 2016. № 2. T. 22. S. 255.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Zakharenkov D.N.
Problems of realization of the principle of independence in the relationship between advocacy and the state
Purpose: Correlate the competence of state bodies in the field of advocacy with the independence of the legal profession.
Methodology: The authors applied formal legal method and systemic method.
Results: The author analyzes the scope and nature of the powers of state bodies with respect to the legal profession, the article examines the extent to which the state may influence such questions of the organization and activities of the bar as the formation of a lawyer corps, lawmaking in the field of advocacy, etc.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific and practical value.
Keywords: principles, independence, advocacy, qualification commission.
References (transliterated)
1. Avdeeva M.A. Sovremennye problemy advokatury Rossii: dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2008. S. 69.
2. Barshhevskij M.Ju. Advokatura ne dolzhna zaviset’ ot gosudarstva // Pravozashhitnik. 1999. № 3. S. 38.
3. Bojkov A.D. Advokatura i advokaty: sbornik statej. M.: Jurlitinform, 2010. S. 43.
4. Vajpan V.A. Nastol’naja kniga advokata: postatejnyj kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature, normativno-metodicheskie materialy. M.: ZAO Justicinform, 2006.
5. Galoganov A.P. Dialog mezhdu gosudarstvom i advokaturoj: sovremennye rossijskie realii // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2012. № 4. S. 44.
6. Galoganov A.P. Organizacija i principy dejatel’nosti rossijskoj advokatury v uslovijah formirovanija pravovogo gosudarstva: dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2000. S. 125.
7. Korotkova P.E. K voprosu o nezavisimosti advokatskoj dejatel’nosti // Advokatskaja praktika. 2013. № 6. S. 9.
8. Kucherena A.G. Rol’ advokatury v stanovlenii grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Rossii. M.: PENATES – Penaty, 2002. S. 58.
9. Mirzoev G.B. Predislovie k knige V.I. Sergeeva «Advokat i advokatura». M.: Juniti, 2003. S. 3.
10. Nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob advokatskoj dejatel’nosti i advokature v Rossijskoj Federacii» / pod red. D.N. Kozaka. M.: Statut, 2003.
11. Pombo F., Sadovnikova E.V. Prezident Mezhdunarodnoj associacii juristov Fernando Pombo o novyh vyzovah juridicheskomu soobshhestvu // Advokat. 2008. № 1. S. 3.
12. Reznik G.M. Zakon ob advokature kak zhertva konflikta interesov // Ros. justicija. 1998. № 3. S. 24.
13. Stecovskij Ju.I. Ogosudarstvlenie advokatury nesovmestimo s pravom. Juridicheskaja priroda advokatury // Advokat. 2007. № 7.
14. Sharov G.K. Stat’i proshlyh let (ob advokature i ne tol’ko): sbornik / Federal’naja palata advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii; Advokat. gruppa SANCTALEX. M.: Justicija, 2011. S. 665.
15. http://www.eurasian-advocacy.ru/PDF/Russia-Towards-a-Stronger-Legal-Profession-Publication-2015-RUS.pdf.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Marchenkov I.G.
Urgency as indispensable condition of the lawyer employment contract
Purpose: Detection of features of legal regulation of the lawyer employment contract.
Methodology: Formally legal methods were used.
Results: In article need of legislative fixing of a condition about urgency of the lawyer employment contract is proved in case the lawyer is given an opportunity to carry out lawyer activity on the basis of the employment contract signed with other lawyer or lawyer education.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific value as is one of the first attempts to reveal features which have to be inherent in the lawyer employment contract.
Keywords: lawyer, lawyer activity, lawyer employment contract, special type of the employment contract, urgency of the employment contract.
References (transliterated)
1. Batusova E.S. Pravovoe regulirovanie srochnyh trudovyh dogovorov v Rossii i nekotoryh zarubezhnyh stranah. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy GARANT, 2015.
2. Bernam U. Pravovaja sistema Soedinennyh Shtatov Ameriki. M.: Novaja justicija, 2006. S. 264–265.
3. Kokova L.R. Sroki v trudovom prave: monografija. M.: TK Velbi, 2008. S. 32.
4. Kosul’nikova M. Srochnyj trudovoj dogovor: ot A do Ja // Kadrovaja sluzhba i upravlenie personalom predprijatija. 2010. № 11–12.
5. Plastinina N. Problemy srochnyh trudovyh dogovorov // Kadrovaja sluzhba i upravlenie personalom predprijatija. 2012. № 7.
6. Rastorzhenie srochnogo trudovogo dogovora [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://vse-temu.org/new-rastorzhenie-srochnogo-trudovogo-dogovora.html.
7. Trudovoj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii. Razdel III. Trudovoj dogovor. Postatejnyj nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij E.G. Sitnikovoj, N.V. Senatorovoj. M.: Bibliotechka RG, 2013.
 
PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATION AND Advocacy PROFESSION FUNCTIONING
Soloviova J.I.
The influence of the processes of commercialization of the legal profession on the identity of each advocate and the advocacy as a whole
Purpose: Research of the role of the process of commercialization of the legal profession in shaping the identity of each advocate and the advocacy as a whole.
Methodology: The authors used the historical and legal method and of the methods and systematic scientific analysis and synthesis.
Results: By the author studies the issues of identity of advocates. On the basis of the conducted analysis of scientific literature identified the main conceptual approaches concerning the role of the processes of commercialization of the legal profession in the choice of profession and further formation of the personality of an advocate in the modern period.
Novelty/originality/value: Article possesses the high scientific value as in it of the first analyzed peculiarity of the process of commercialization of the legal profession in the aspect of self-determination individual and group entity – of each advocate and the advocacy as a whole.
Keywords: legal status of an advocate, commercialization of the legal profession, self-determination individual and group entity, the identity of each advocate and the advocacy as a whole.
References (transliterated)
1. Bajramova A.N. Pravovoj analiz advokatskoj dejatel’nosti kak biznesa ili uslug, okazyvaemyh za opredelennyj gonorar // Sovremennoe pravo. 2014. № 9. S. 87.
2. Barenbojm P.D., Burobin V.N. O putjah razvitija rossijskoj advokatury // Advokat. 2009. № 3. S. 3–13.
3. Barshhevskij M.Ju. Biznes-advokatura v SShA i Germanii: ucheb. posob. M.: Belye al’vy, 1995.
4. Botnev V.K. O kommercializacii advokatury // Problemy v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve. 2011. № 1. S. 208.
5. Vas’kovskij E.V. Organizacija advokatury. Ch. 1. Ocherk vseobshhej istorii advokatury. SPb., 1893.
6. Vinaver M. Ocherki ob advokature. SPb.: Tipografija M.M. Stasjulevicha, 1902.
7. Vorob’ev A.V., Poljakov A.V., Tihonravov Ju.V. Teorija advokatury. M.: Grant#, 2002.
8. Grudcyna L.Ju. Istorija rossijskoj advokatury: kratkij obzor // Advokat. 2006. № 9. S. 13.
9. Zhuravleva A.L., Kuprejchenko A.B. Struktura i determinacija jekonomicheskogo samoopredelenija lichnosti // Chelovek – nauka – gumanizm: k 80-letiju so dnja rozhdenija akademika I.T. Frolova. M.: Nauka, 2009.
10. Zvezdkina Je.F. Social’naja priroda samosoznanija. Krasnojarsk: Krasnojar, 1986.
11. Kon I.S. V poiskah sebja: lichnost’ i ee samosoznanie. M.: Politizdat, 1984.
12. Kucherena A.G. Rol’ advokatury v stanovlenii grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Rossii: dis. ... d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2002.
13. Markov A.N. Pravila advokatskoj professii v Rossii. Opyt sistematizacii postanovlenij sovetov prisjazhnyh poverennyh po voprosam professional’noj jetiki. M.: Tipografija O.L. Somovoj, 1913.
14. Mihajlov F.T. Obshhestvennoe soznanie i samosoznanie individa. M.: Nauka, 1990.
15. Pikar Je. Ob advokate (paradoks). M.: Gorodec: Dobrosvet, 2000.
16. Pospelov O.V. Formy advokatskih obrazovanij: dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2008.
17. Ragulin A.V. Professional’nye prava advokata-zashhitnika v Rossijskoj Federacii. Voprosy teorii i praktiki: dis. ... d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2014.
18. Smoljarchuk V.I. Giganty i charodei slova (russkie sudebnye oratory vtoroj poloviny XIX – nachala XX veka). M.: Jurid. lit, 1984.
19. Spirkin A.G. Soznanie i samosoznanie. M.: Politizdat, 1972.
20. Uroki istorii: 150 let rossijskoj advokature / Federal’naja palata advokatov Rossijskoj Federacii. M: Inform-Pravo, 2014.
21. Uchrezhdenie sudebnyh ustanovlenij. SPb.: Izdanie juridicheskogo knizhnogo sklada «Pravo», 1913.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Bukalerova L.A., Utorova T.N.
To a question of the moment of the end of fictitious registration of the foreign citizen or the person without citizenship in the place of stay in premises in the Russian Federation
Purpose: Definition of the moment of the termination of such crime as fictitious registration of the foreign citizen or person without citizenship in the place of stay in premises in the Russian Federation.
Methodology: The formal-legal method was used.
Results: In article approaches to definition of the moment of the end of fictitious registration of the foreign citizen or the person without citizenship in the place of stay in premises in the Russian Federation are considered. On the basis of the analysis of jurisprudence and provisions of the theory of criminal law the solution of the designated problem is proposed.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the sufficient scientific value as represents attempt of judgment of the significant legal phenomena.
Keywords: the ended crime, fictitious registration, migration registration, the citizen, the foreign citizen, the person without citizenship, corpus delicti.
References (transliterated)
1. Borisov S.V. Ugolovnaja otvetstvennost’ za fiktivnuju registraciju (postanovku na uchet) po mestu prebyvanija ili po mestu zhitel’stva v zhilom pomeshhenii v Rossijskoj Federacii // Juridicheskaja nauka. 2015. № 2. S. 68–69.
2. Eliseev M.A. Ugolovno-pravovaja harakteristika fiktivnoj registracii (postanovki na uchet) po mestu prebyvanija ili po mestu zhitel’stva v zhilom pomeshhenii v Rossijskoj Federacii // Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo. 2016. № 10. S. 874–879.
3. Lejba A. Analiz izmenenij zakonodatel’stva RF, napravlennogo na bor’bu s «rezinovymi» kvartirami // Zhilishhnoe pravo. 2014. № 3. S. 7–18.
4. MVD dolzhno zhestko presekat’ nelegal’nuju migraciju [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://ru.sputniknews-uz.com/migration/20170309/4944883/putin-o-nelegalnoi-migracii.html.
5. Otchet o chisle osuzhdennyh po vsem sostavam prestuplenij Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii № 10-a za 2014 g., 2016 g. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=3834.
6. Postanovlenie mirovogo suda Vologodskoj oblasti po sudebnomu uchastku № 35 ot 14.12.2016 po delu № 1-112/2016 v otnoshenii Osovskoj S.N. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-cudebnyj-uchastok-35-s/act-233692881.
7. Prigovor mirovogo sud’i sudebnogo uchastka № 5 sudebnogo rajona goroda okruzhnogo znachenija Nojabr’sk JaNAO ot 05.05.2015 po delu № 1-33/2015 v otnoshenii Shajgardanova A.R. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-sudebnyj-uchastok-5-g-noyabrsk-s/act-223198938.
8. Prigovor Mirovogo suda Vologodskoj oblasti po sudebnomu uchastku № 44 ot 15.06.2016 po ugolovnomu delu № 1-57/2016 v otnoshenii R.R. Jegamberdieva [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-cudebnyj-uchastok-44-s/act-232201749.
9. Prigovor ot 1 marta 2017 g. po delu № 1-43/2017. Sudebnyj uchastok № 1 g. Myski (Kemerovskaja oblast’) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://rospravosudie.com.
10. Prigovor ot 1 fevralja 2017 g. po delu № 1-3/2017 Sudebnogo uchastka № 64 mirovogo sud’i Istrinskogo sudebnogo rajona (Moskovskaja oblast’) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://rospravosudie.com.
11. Prigovor ot 1 fevralja 2017 g. po delu № 1-6/2017 sudebnogo uchastka № 290 mirovogo sud’i Jelektrostal’skogo sudebnogo rajona (Moskovskaja oblast’) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://sudact.ru.
12. Reshenie po delu 1-70/2015 ot 05.11.2015 Sudebnogo uchastka № 3, g. Novyj Urengoj Jamalo-Neneckij avtonomnyj okrug [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-sudebnyj-uchastok-3-g-novyj-urengoj-s/act-224547609/.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Ragulin A.V.
To a question of the maintenance of the concepts «gross violation of public order» and «obvious disrespect for society» as elements of the objective part of hooliganism
Purpose: Establishment of maintenance of the concepts «gross violation of public order» and «obvious disrespect for society» as elements of the objective party of hooliganism.
Methodology: Formal-legal and historical and legal methods were used.
Results: In article the conclusion is drawn that it is necessary to understand an essential negative deviation from the standard rules of conduct which interferes with normal functioning of the system of the public relations providing tranquility, normal working conditions, rest and life of citizens and also work of institutions, enterprises and organizations as gross violation of public order. It is necessary to understand openly expressed disrespectful attitude towards not personified number of people as obvious disrespect for society.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the sufficient scientific value as represents attempt of judgment of the significant legal phenomena.
Keywords: hooliganism, criminal liability, crime, criminal law of the Russian Federation, gross violation of public order, obvious disrespect for society.
References (transliterated)
1. Aistova L.S. Kvalifikacija huliganstva: ucheb.-prakt. posob. SPb., 1998. S. 5.
2. Andrusenko E.A. K voprosu ob ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za huliganstvo // Uchenye zapiski Tadzhikskogo universiteta. 1959. T. XX. Vyp. 9.
3. Bjulleten’ Verhovnogo suda RSFSR. 1965. № 10.
4. Bjulleten’ Verhovnogo suda RSFSR. 1966. № 11.
5. Bjulleten’ Verhovnogo suda RF. 2003. № 5.
6. Veklenko V., Bavsun M. Problemy tolkovanija ocenochnyh kategorij ugolovnogo zakona // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2003. № 3. S. 15–17.
7. Dushin A.V., Egoryshev S.V. Filosofsko-pravovye problemy cheloveka: kurs lekcij. Ufa: Vostochnyj universitet, 2000. S. 131.
8. Egorov V.S. Ugolovnaja otvetstvennost’ za prestuplenija protiv obshhestvennoj bezopasnosti i obshhestvennogo porjadka. M., 2000. S. 27.
9. Zhogin N.V. Bor’ba s huliganstvom – delo vseh i kazhdogo. M.: Juridicheskaja literatura, 1967. S. 28.
10. Kobzeva E.V. Ocenochnye priznaki v ugolovnom zakone: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Saratov, 2002. S. 4.
11. Kozachenko I.Ja. Publichnost’ kak objazatel’nyj priznak huliganstva // Problemy sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii. Sverdlovsk, 1973. S. 116–125.
12. Kudrjavcev V.N. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologija. M., 1982. S. 15–16.
13. Kuznecov A.V. Huliganstvo i bor’ba s nim. M.: Gosjurizdat, 1962. S. 27.
14. Kuznecova N.F. Ugolovnaja otvetstvennost’ za narushenie obshhestvennogo porjadka. M., 1963. S. 9.
15. Luneev V.V. Prestupnost’ XX veka. Mirovye, regional’nye i rossijskie tendencii. M.: Norma, 1999. S. 213.
16. Matyshevskij P.S. Otvetstvennost’ za prestuplenija protiv obshhestvennoj bezopasnosti, obshhestvennogo porjadka i zdorov’ja naselenija. M.: Juridicheskaja literatura, 1964. S. 79.
17. Ragulin A.V. Huliganstvo: ugolovno-pravovye aspekty: dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Cheljabinsk, 2005.
18. Slovar’ russkogo jazyka / sost. S.I.Ozhegov. M.: Gos. izd-vo inostr. i nac. slovarej, 1953. S. 124.
19. Solov’eva T.A. Ocenochnye ponjatija i suzhdenija v ugolovno-processual’nom prave // Pravovedenie. 1986. № 3. S. 69–73.
20. Trufanov V.V. Nekotorye voprosy ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za huliganstvo // Uchenye zapiski VJuZI. 1959. Vyp. VII. S. 131.
21. Ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaja chast’: uchebnik / pod red. I.Ja. Kozachenko, Z.A. Neznamovoj, G.P. Novoselova. M.: Norma, 1998. S. 389.
22. Filosofskij slovar’ / pod red. I.T. Frolova. 4-e izd. M.: Politizdat, 1981. S. 225.
23. Haldeev L. Otvetstvennost’ za huliganstvo // Rossijskaja justicija. 1997. № 5. S. 38.
24. Shubin V.V. Rassmotrenie ugolovnyh del o huliganstve. M., 1980. S. 45.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Melkonyan D.A.
Invalidity of transactions in Russian civil law
Purpose: To study the legal nature and peculiarities of invalid transactions in Russian civil law.
Methodology: We used a formal legal method, normative and dogmatic analysis.
Results: This article analyzes the institution of invalidity of transactions in Russian civil law. The importance of this institution in protecting the legitimate property rights of citizens is substantiated. The main attention is paid to the issues of classification of invalid transactions and the differences between void and disputable transactions in the Russian legislation. The author draws attention to the problem of feigned transactions, which are formally actual transactions, but in practice cover the violation of the rights of individuals and legal entities. In the opinion of the author, a large number of invalid transactions in modern Russia is associated with a low level of legal culture of citizens and inadequate elaboration of the regulatory legal acts governing the conclusion of transactions.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has considerable scientific value, since it highlights the topic of analysis of invalid transactions, which is very popular and important for Russian civil law, which is of great importance for further improvement of civil-law relations in modern Russia.
Keywords: transaction, civil law, legality, invalidity of transaction, void transaction, disputable transaction.
References (transliterated)
1. Demidjuk V.A. Analiz pravovoj prirody nedej-stvitel’nyh sdelok // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. 2016. № 1. T. 22. S. 203–205.
2. Iljushina M.N. Reforma instituta nedejstvitel’nosti sdelok: sovremennoe sostojanie i nereshennye problemy // Monitoring pravoprimenenija. 2014. № 2. S. 4–10.
3. Kagal’nickova N.V. Teoretiko-pravovye problemy razgranichenija nichtozhnyh i osporimyh sdelok v grazhdanskom prave // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 5: Jurisprudencija. 2015. № 1. S. 104–107.
4. Majmeskul M.N. Problemy nedejstvitel’nosti sdelok // Science Time. 2015. № 1 (13). S. 316–319.
5. Paraskevova D.V. Posledstvija nedejstvitel’nosti chasti sdelki // Biznes v zakone. Jekonomiko-juridicheskij zhurnal. 2016. № 2. S. 238–241.
6. Savchenko E.Ja. Problemy pravovogo regulirovanija nedejstvitel’nyh sdelok // Pravoporjadok: istorija, teorija, praktika. 2016. № 2(9). S. 12–16.
7. Teljukina M.V. Ponjatie sdelki: teoreticheskij i prakticheskij aspekty // Advokat. 2002. № 8. S. 21–35.
8. Hvostickij M.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie nedejstvi-tel’nyh sdelok, sovershennyh s cel’ju, protivnoj osnovam pravoporjadka ili nravstvennosti: juridicheskie oshibki i sposoby ih reshenija // Juridicheskie issledovanija. 2017. № 2. S. 60–67.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Sotnikova A.B.
Legal characteristics of the land plot provided for the integrated urban development
Purpose: To determine the legal characteristics of the land plot provided for integrated urban development.
Methodology: The article uses the following methods: formal legal and systematical, synthesis.
Results: The article contains key legal characteristics of the land plot provided for integrated urban development.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has a scientific value, because this is one of the first attempts at a comprehensive study of the legal issues of land plots provided for integrated urban development.
Keywords: integrated urban development, land plot, town planning code, permitted use of land plot, lands of settlements.
References (transliterated)
1. Golichenkov A.K. Jekologicheskoe pravo Rossii: slovar’ juridicheskih terminov: ucheb. posob. dlja vuzov. M.: Gorodec, 2008.
2. Zheleznov D.S. Novelly pravovogo regulirovanija predostavlenija zemel’nyh uchastkov dlja stroitel’stva v svete kljuchevyh polozhenij Federal’nogo zakona ot 23 ijunja 2014 g. № 171-FZ // Agrarnoe i zemel’noe pravo. 2014. № 11. S. 43–51.
3. Kommentarij k Zemel’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejnyj) / pod red. S.A. Bogoljubova. M.: Prospekt, 2015.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ADVOCACY PRACTICE
Musman K.A.
Basic aspects of regulation of adoption practice in Russia and in the countries of the European Union
Purpose: A comparative analysis of the aspects of regulation of adoption practices in Russia and in the countries of the European Union.
Methodology: We used a method of comparative analysis, a formal legal method.
Results: This article analyzes the main features of the legal regulation of adoption practices in the Russian Federation and in the countries of the European Union. The existing differences in the legal regulation of adoption are revealed, the main obstacles that arise on the way of possible adoption and adoption of children  – citizens of the Russian Federation by foreign citizens – are identified. It is emphasized that in the Russian Federation there is a tendency to further tighten the practice of adoption by foreign citizens, this position is shared by many lawyers, public and political figures. At the same time, attention is drawn to the similarity of many aspects of the legal regulation of the adoption of children in Russia and in the countries of the European Union.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has considerable scientific value, as it highlights the actual topic of comparative analysis of the practice of adoption of children in Russia and in the countries of the European Union.
Keywords: adoption, adoption, children, adolescents, Russian Federation, European Union, Family Code, Civil Code, legal regulation.
References (transliterated)
1. Bessarab N.S., Murzin R.L. Teoretiko-pravovye i pro-
cedurnye voprosy mezhdunarodnogo usynovlenija // Ak-tual’nye problemy sovremennoj nauki. 2005. № 5. S. 61–72.
2. Bujanova E.V. Procedura usynovlenija po zakonodatel’stvu zarubezhnyh stran. Orenburg, 2013.
3. Vorob’eva L.V. Usynovlenie i udocherenie. M., 2015.
4. Germanskoe pravo. Ch. 1. M., 1996.
5. Kuznecova O.V. Problemy usynovlenija rossijskih detej inostrannymi grazhdanami // Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 23 (378). S. 120–124.
6. Makeeva A.A. Dvustoronnie mezhdunarodnye dogovory kak faktor obespechenija prav rebenka // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2013. № 1. S. 122–147.
7. Trinchenko K.O. Transgranichnoe usynovlenie: problemy priznanija // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2016. № 1 (62). S. 213–220.
8. Shalajkin R.N., Arhipenko D.A. Sovremennye for-my ustrojstva detej v sem’ju // Vestnik Belgorodskogo juridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2011. № 1. S. 129–138.
9. Francuzskij grazhdanskij kodeks 1804 g. S pozdnejshimi izmenenijami na 1939 g. / perev. I.S. Pereterskogo. M., 1941.
10. Private international law. Edinburg, 1990. P. 496.
11. https://pravo.hse.ru/intprilaw/doc/040601.
 
PROTECTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS OF ADVOCATe
Kolesnik K.R.
Carrying out a lawyer’s investigation: existing obstacles and possible ways to overcome them
Purpose: Identification of obstacles to conducting an attorney’s investigation in Russian legal practice and possible ways to overcome them
Methodology: We used a formal legal method, a method of comparative analysis.
Results: In this article, the specifics of the introduction in the Russian legal practice of the institute of advocacy investigation are analyzed. The author’s recommendations on the improvement of the regulatory and legal framework for ensuring the conduct of an advocacy investigation are proposed. It is clarified that the introduction of the institute of advocate investigation in modern Russia requires the correction of the existing criminal procedural legislation in the direction of expanding the advocacy powers and ensuring the assistance of the investigative bodies in the legal investigation.
Novelty/originality/value: This article has a significant scientific value, as it highlights the actual and controversial for the Russian legal science problem.
Keywords: lawyer investigation, preliminary investigation, criminal case, defense, collection of evidence, investigative actions.
References (transliterated)
1. Kudrjavcev V.L. Nekotorye problemy sovershenstvovanija processual’noj formy predvaritel’nogo rassledovanija v kontekste sostjazatel’nyh nachal ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Sankt-Peterburg. 6–8 oktjabrja 2010 g. SPb., 2011.
2. Martynchik E.G. Pravovye osnovy advokatskogo rassledovanija: sostojanie i perspektivy formirovanija novogo instituta i modeli // Advokatskaja praktika. 2012. № 1. S. 21–29.
3. Mel’nikov V.Ju. Uchastie zashhitnika v hode dosudebnogo proizvodstva // Evrazijskaja advokatura. 2013. № 2. S. 35–41.
4. Mel’nikov V.Ju. Neobhodimo li vozvrashhat’sja k voprosu advokatskogo rassledovanija? // Advokatskaja praktika. 2015. № 4. S. 3–8.
5. Ragulin A.V. Reglamentacija prav advokata-zashhitnika na opros lic s ih soglasija i predstavlenie predmetov i dokumentov // Evrazijskaja advokatura. 2013. № 1 (2).
6. Ragulin A.V. O proekte Federal’nogo zakona «O vnesenii izmenenij v Ugolovno-processual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (o dopolnitel’nyh garantijah nezavisimosti advokatov pri okazanii imi kvalificirovannoj juridicheskoj pomoshhi v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve)» // Evrazijskaja advokatura. 2017. № 1 (26). S. 61–67.
7. Salakko A.S. Perspektivy sovershenstvovanija instituta advokatskogo rassledovanija // Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve. № 2. S. 158–162.
8. Sibircev G.I. Institut advokatskogo rassledovanija kak neobhodimyj jelement nezavisimosti advokata // Sudebnaja vlast’ i ugolovnyj process. 2014. № 3. S. 263–269.
9. Urgalkin A.S. Zashhitnik v dokazyvanii po ugolovnomu delu na stadii predvaritel’nogo sledstvija // Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel’stve. 2011. № 2. S. 199–202.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Grebennikov V.V., Grudtsyna L.Yu.
Methodology of the judicial right and basis of classification of modern judicial systems
Purpose: Research of methodology of the judicial right and justification of the author’s concept of classification of judicial systems of the present.
Methodology: Historical and legal, system and formally legal methods were used.
Results: In article author’s definition of methodology of the theory of the judicial right which is understood as set of the theoretical principles, receptions, ways and means of a research of structure and system of judicial authority, legal mechanisms of legal proceedings, judicial system forms, and also interactions of judicial authority with other branches of the government and influence of activity of judicial authority on the public relations is given. If the right source (the law or a judicial precedent), then bases of a tipologization of judicial systems of the present by the nature and methodology, according to authors of article, is the basis for the become classical tipologization of legal systems of René David more difficult. It is represented to authors that the fullest classification of judicial systems of the present can be carried out taking into account the following characteristics of judicial systems and features of sudoproizvodstvo of the modern countries of the world: a) the place and a role of judicial system in system of division of the authorities, structure of public administration; b) legal mechanisms and features of interaction of links (elements) of judicial system with each other; c) existence (centralization) or absence (dissociation) of uniform superauthorized judicial authority (highest judicial authority); d) complexity and plurality of judicial instances and justices, their interaction with other public authorities; e) the place and a role of institute of prosecutor’s office in activity of links of judicial system (in particular, belonging of prosecutor’s office to executive power, investment of prosecutors with big powers and so forth); e) the place and a role of legal profession and lawyers in legal proceedings (in particular, institute of rendering free legal aid).
Proceeding from pyramidal creation of judicial system, the place and a role of judicial authority in system of division of the authorities and values of a judicial precedent in national legal system in the world are distinguished four types of judicial systems («judicial families»): 1) romano-German (continental) judicial right; 2) Anglo-Saxon (case) judicial right; 3) dualistic judicial right; 4) the religious and moral judicial right.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has the high scientific value as is one of the first attempts to consider classification of judicial systems («judicial families») of the present and to give definition to methodology of the theory of the judicial right.
Keywords: judicial right, judicial system, judicial precedent, legal proceedings, division of the authorities, judge.
References (transliterated)
1. Alpatov Ju.M. Ponjatie i priroda sudebnoj vlasti: processual’nye osobennosti istoricheskogo razvitija sudebnoj sistemy gosudarstva // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2016. № 6. S. 158–159.
2. Alpatov Ju.M. Processual’nye garantii nezavisimosti sudej v Rossii // Pravo i obshhestvo. 2017. № 1.
3. Vlasenko N.A., Vlasenko A.N. Sudebnaja vlast’ i sudebnaja dejatel’nost’ v RF: kratkij kurs lekcij. M.: RAP, 2005.
4. Pravovye sistemy stran mira: Jenciklopedicheskij spravochnik. 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. / otv. red. d-r jurid. nauk, prof. A.Ja. Suharev. M: NORMA, 2009. S. 97.
5. Rulan N. Juridicheskaja antropologija: uchebnik dlja vuzov: per. s franc. M.: NORMA, 1999.
6. Sudebnye sistemy evropejskih stran: spravochnik / per. s franc. D.I. Vasil’eva i s angl. O.Ju. Kobjakova. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 2002.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Marchuk N.N., Vinogradova E.V.,
Primashev N., Sangadzhiev B.V.
Formation of police in the Argentine Republic
Purpose: To analyze process of formation of police and a legal regulation of position of the person which is carrying out police functions in Argentina.
Methodology: Universal methods of scientific knowledge historical, logical, comparative are used.
Results: In article formation of police and development of legal status of the person which is carrying out functions of the authority that is represented urgent in connection with the interest in the countries of Latin America undertaking reforms of internal legal regulation of public authorities which has increased in recent years has undergone a research.
Novelty/originality/value: This work is the Russia’s first research based only on the basis of the Argentina sources that predetermines its scientific novelty and the importance.
Keywords: reform of police, function of police in Argentina, the status of the police officer, the Police Agreement of Argentina.
References (transliterated)
1. Barreneche O.R., Galeano R.D. Notas sobre las reformas policiales en la Argentina, siglos XIX y XX. P. 73–112 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.minseg.gob.ar/sites/default/files/cuadernos/08_barreneche_g.pdf.
2. García Ferrari M. «El Único Hilo para guiarse en el Laberinto del bajo Fondo Social». Fotografía de Identificación en la Década de 1880. Buenos Aires, 28 y 29 de agosto del 2008 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.crimenysociedad.com.ar/files/submenu7-item2.html.
3. Las diez claves de la reforma de la Policía Bonaerense // La Nación. Buenos Aires, 18 de Marzo de 2016 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1881128-las-diez-claves-de-la-reforma-de-la-policia-bonaerense.
4. República Argentina. Convenio Policial Argentino [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://escuelasuperior.com.ar/instituto/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/reglamento-convenio-policial-argentino.pdf.
5. Romay F.L. Los serenos de Buenos Aires (policía nocturna). Buenos Aires: Editorial Policial, 1947.
6. Ternavasio M. Las reformas rivadavianas en Buenos Aires y el Congreso General Constituyente // Goldman N. (dir.). Revolución, República, Confederación (1806–1852). Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 2005.
7. Vaccaroni A. Prácticas policiales en la Revolución de Mayo. Una aproximación a las relaciones entre vigilantes y vigilados en Buenos Aires (1812–1821) // Revista de historia del derecho. Buenos Aires, dic. 2016. No. 52 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1853-17842016000200006.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Shvets V.M.
Prospects for improving the legal status of the judiciary in the Russian Federation
Purpose: Examine the right of legislative initiative of the judiciary through the prism of the system of checks and balances, identify problematic aspects, and attempt their resolution.
Methodology: We used the methods of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, legal modeling and forecasting legal and formally-legal method.
Results: The article examines one of the elements of the system of checks and balances associated with the right of legislative initiative of the judiciary. The analysis is through the lens of the legal tradition of Russia. The author substantiates the necessity of improving the legislation in accordance with the existing mechanism of checks and balances.
Novelty/originality/value: The scientific novelty is to identify limitations in the activities of the judiciary regarding legislative initiatives. Originality due to the specific approach to the subject of the research through the prism of the system of checks and balances. The value of the article lies in an attempt to determine the prospects of development of the judiciary as part of the system of checks and balances.
Keywords: judicial power, the right of legislative initiative, the system of «checks and balances», the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.
References (transliterated)
1. Kucherjavcev D.A. Sovershenstvovanie konstitucionnogo regulirovanija osushhestvlenija prava zakonoda-tel’noj iniciativy v Rossijskoj Federacii // Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 2. S. 212–218.
2. Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://vsrf.ru/.
3. Shagieva R.V. Stadii zakonotvorcheskogo processa v Rossii: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Uchenye trudy Rossijskoj akademii advokatury i notariata. 2015. № 4. S. 40–46.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Yusufov
а D.B.
Criminal liability for crimes in the sphere of legalization of money and property obtained by criminal means in Сhina: comparative legal research
Purpose: The analysis of norms about the criminal liability for legalization of cash and of property obtained by criminal means, the PRC.
Methodology: Methodological basis of research was made a universal dialectical method of cognition of the phenomena of objective reality. In addition, they used other methods of cognition: comparative, analysis, induction and deduction, analogy, description.
Results: Offers ideas for the improvement of the Russian legislation.
Novelty/originality/value: comparative analysis of international norms on criminal liability of legal persons, the identification of the relationship of such phenomena as money laundering and shadow banking.
Keywords: criminal liability, corpus delicti, legalization of criminal incomes, sanction, shadow banking, criminal liability of legal entities.
References (transliterated)
1. Brazhnikov V.V. Otjagchajushhie obstojatel’stva, otnosjashhiesja k sub#ektivnoj storone sostava prestuplenija v zarubezhnom ugolovnom zakonodatel’stve // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. № 314
2. Bukarev V.B., Truncevskij Ju.V., Shulepov N.A. Zarubezhnyj opyt v sfere pravovogo regulirovanija protivodejstvija legalizacii (otmyvaniju) dohodov, priobretennyh prestupnym putem // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2007. № 4.
3. V 2014 godu MVF otmechaet rost perehoda denezhnyh sredstv v tenevuju zonu. V Kitae tenevoj sektor sostavljaet okolo chetverti ot denezhnogo oborota [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.utro.ru/articles/2014/10/03/1215219.shtml.
4. Danilov N.V. Ugolovnaja otvetstvennost’ juridicheskih lic za sovershenie nalogovyh prestuplenij // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2006. № 9. S. 86–88.
5. Dvoreckaja A.E. Tenevoj banking: institucional’noe i funkcional’noe regulirovanie // Den’gi i kredit. 2013. № 4.
6. Dvoreckaja A.E. Finansovoe posrednichestvo i problemy tenevogo bankinga v Rossijskoj Federacii // Bankovskoe delo. 2013. № 3.
7. Kondrat E.N. Osnovnye sposoby legalizacii (otmyvanija) prestupnyh dohodov v rezul’tate sovershenija korrupcionnyh prestuplenij // Pravo i jekonomika. 2011. № 10.
8. Korotkov Ju.V. Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty bor’by s legalizaciej (otmyvaniem) nezakonnyh dohodov: dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M.: VNII MVD RF, 1998. S. 105–122.
9. Kruglikov L.L., Solov’ev O.G., Gribov A.S. Voprosy sovershenstvovanija norm st. 174 i 174.1 UK RF // Juridicheskaja nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. 2009. № 1. S. 136–139.
10. Meleshko N.P., Karibov S.I. Korporativnaja prestupnost’ i ugolovnaja otvetstvennost’ juridicheskih lic po UK KNR kak primer jevoljucionnogo razvitija sistemy socialisticheskogo ugolovnogo prava // Jurist#-Pravoved#. 2005. № 2. S. 19.
11. Minin R.V. Institut ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti juridicheskih lic v Rossii: problemy obuslovlennosti i reglamentacii: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Tjumen’, 2008. S. 26.
12. Kitaj priznal glavnoj problemoj nacional’noj jekonomiki tenevoj bankovskij sektor // Novostnoj portal Gazeta.ru [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.gazeta.ru/business/news/2014/11/15/n_6652513.shtml.
13. Oficial’nyj kommentarij k Osoboj chasti Ugolovnogo Kodeksa KNR [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.asia-business.ru/law/law1/criminalcode/remark/.
14. Oficial’nyj novostnoj portal «Vesti Jekonomika» [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.vestifinance.ru/articles/47732.
15. Doklad MVF o mirovoj finansovoj stabil’nosti ot 8 oktjabrja 2014 goda // Oficial’nyj sajt Mezhdunarodnogo Valjutnogo Fonda [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2014/02/index.htm.
16. Prokof’eva T.V., Smagina A.V. Nekotorye aspekty protivodejstvija legalizacii (otmyvaniju) dohodov, polu-chennyh prestupnym putem // Rossijskij sud’ja. 2007. № 1.
17. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Kurs lekcij. T. 1. Prestuplenie / pod red. A.I. Korobeeva. Vladivostok, 1999. S. 106.
18. Stat’ja 3 Polozhenija o valjutnom kontrole, obnarodovano Ukazom № 193 Gossoveta KNR ot 29 janvarja 1996 g.; povtorno obnarodovano Ukazom №  211 Gossoveta KNR ot 14 janvarja 1997 g.
19. Ugolovnyj Kodeks Kitajskoj Narodnoj Respubliki / pod red. A.I. Korobeeva. SPb., 2001. S. 33.
20. Troshhinskij P.V. Juridicheskaja otvetstvennost’ v prave Kitajskoj Narodnoj Respubliki. M.: IVD RAN, 2011. S. 114.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Dobryakov D.A.
Labour of convicts and various types of deprivation of liberty in the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea
Purpose: Comparative analysis of penal and penitentiary provisions about labour of convicts and various types of deprivation of liberty in legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea.
Methodology: Method of analysis, comparative-legal and formal-legal methods were used in the article.
Results: Some general features of the variations of deprivation of liberty (penal detention, imprisonment for a limited term and imprisonment for life) and forced labour in the criminal and penitentiary legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea are analyzed, ideas for development of Russian legislation on the basis of analysis are suggested.
Novelty/originality/value: The article has a certain scientific value, as it provides a comparative-legal analysis of the regulation of deprivation of liberty and laubour of convicts in the criminal and penitentiary legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea.
Keywords: punishment, labour of convicts, deprivation of liberty, system of punishments, criminal legislation, penitentiary legislation.
References (transliterated)
1. Kim, Soo-Am. The North Korean Penal Code, Criminal Procedures, and their Actual Applications. Korea Institute for National Unification, 2006.
2. Barhatova E.Ju. Kommentarij k Konstitucii Rossijskoj Federacii. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2015.
3. Kommentarij k Ugolovno-ispolnitel’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejnyj) / A.V. Brilliantov, S.I. Kurganov; pod red. A.V. Brilliantova. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2015.
4. Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejnyj) / K.A. Barysheva, Ju.V. Gracheva, G.A. Esakov i dr. 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2015.
5. Mazurina Ju.E. Ugolovnoe nakazanie v vide pozhiznennogo lishenija svobody i ego ob#ekt: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Rjazan’, 2010.
6. Minjazeva T.F. Trud, kak osnovnoe sredstvo ispravlenija osuzhdjonnyh v svete Koncepcii razvitija ugolovno-ispolnitel’noj sistemy Rossijskoj Federacii do 2020 g. // Rossijskaja justicija. 2013. № 3 S. 31.
7. Polnyj kurs ugolovnogo prava: v 5 t. / pod red. d-ra jurid. nauk, prof., zasluzhennogo dejatelja nauki RF A.I. Korobeeva. T. 1: Prestuplenie i nakazanie. SPb.: Izdatel’stvo R. Aslanova «Juridicheskij centr Press», 2008.
8. Radchenko E.P. Social’no-jekonomicheskie predposylki formirovanija gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v rossijskoj penitenciarnoj sisteme // Izvestija IGJeA. 2013. № 3. S. 110–112.
9. Cundurov F.R., Talan M.V. Nakazanie v ugolovnom prave: ucheb. posob. M.: Statut, 2015.
 
JUSTICE AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN THE EURASIAN SPACE
Gareeva E.V., Gabdullin T.R.
The use of special knowledge in investigation of crimes related to violation of traffic rules and operation of vehicles, committed by drivers in a state of intoxication
Objective: To uncover issues use of expertise (knowledge) in the investigation of road traffic offences.
Methodology: Formal-legal and comparative methods, analysis, synthesis were used.
Results: The article reveals the relevance of the use of special knowledge (cognition) in the investigation of road traffic offences, the distinction between the concepts of expertise and special knowledge in criminal procedure legislation and legal literature, application of special knowledge in investigation of crimes on violation of traffic rules and operation of vehicles, committed by drivers in a state of intoxication.
Novelty/Originality/Value: Based on the scientific doctrine, analysis, investigative practice of investigation of crimes related to violation of traffic rules and operation of vehicles, committed by drivers in a state of intoxication, the features of special knowledge are definied.
Keywords: special knowledge (cognition), violation of traffic rules and operation of vehicles, committed by drivers in a state of intoxication, traffic accident.
References (transliterated)
1. Sostojanie prestupnosti v Rossii za janvar’–dekabr’ 2016 goda. M.: FKU «GIAC» MVD Rossii, 2017.
2. Arsen’ev V.D., Zablockij V.G. Ispol’zovanie speci-al’nyh znanij pri ustanovlenii fakticheskih obstojatel’stv ugolovnogo dela. Krasnojarsk, 1986.
3. Baranov P.P., Kurbatov V.I. Juridicheskaja psiholo-gija / pod obshh. red. A.N. Erygina. M., 2006. S. 158.
4. Burceva E.V. O sposobnosti sotrudnikov OVD k ispol’zovaniju special’nyh poznanij v processe predvari-tel’nogo issledovanija sledov na meste DTP // Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija. 2011. № 7.
5. Vlasova S.V. Sposoby sobiranija dokazatel’stv po ugolovnym delam o prestuplenijah, svjazannyh s narusheniem pravil dorozhnogo dvizhenija i jekspluatacii transportnyh sredstv: dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2009.
6. Gajnel’zjanova V.R. Ispol’zovanie special’nyh znanij pri rassledovanii prestuplenij, svjazannyh s narusheniem pravil dorozhnogo dvizhenija i jekspluatacii transportnyh sredstv: dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Cheljabinsk, 2012.
7. Golovchanskij A.V. Ispol’zovanie dannyh jelektronnyh sistem bezopasnosti i upravlenija transportnogo sredstva pri rassledovanii dorozhno-transportnyh prestuplenij // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2014. Vyp. 3.
8. Gorodokin V.A. Ispol’zovanie special’nyh avtotehnicheskih znanij pri rassledovanii prestuplenij, svjazannyh s narusheniem pravil dorozhnogo dvizhenija i jekspluatacii transportnyh sredstv: dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2009.
9. Igbaeva G.R. Aktual’nye problemy zashhity prav strahovatelej i tret’ih lic po dogovoram strahovanija. Ufa, 2014.
10. Igbaeva G.R. Moshennichestvo v sfere objazatel’nogo strahovanija grazhdanskoj otvetstvennosti vladel’cev transportnyh sredstv // Evrazijskij juridicheskij zhurnal. 2015. № 12 (91). S. 187–189.
11. Zhulev V.I., Stepanishhev A.V. Rassledovanie dorozhno-transportnyh prestuplenij. M., 2004.
12. Kondakov N.I. Logicheskij slovar’-spravochnik. M.: Nauka, 1975.
13. Nagornyj G.M. Gnoseologicheskie aspekty ponjatija «special’nye znanija» // Kriminalistika i sudebnaja jekspertiza. Kiev, 1980. Vyp. 21.
14. Orlov Ju.K. Sudebnaja jekspertiza kak sredstvo dokazyvanija v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: IPK RFCSJe, 2005.
15. Rossinskaja E.R., Usov A.M. Sudebnaja komp’ju-terno-tehnicheskaja jekspertiza. M.: Pravo i zakon, 2001.
16. Shumatov Ju.T. Ispol’zovanie special’nyh poznanij na predvaritel’nom sledstvii: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 1996.
17. Hrustalev V.N., Trubicyn R.Ju. Uchastie specialista – kriminalista v sledstvennyh dejstvijah. SPb.: Piter, 2003.
18. http://www.alcotest.ru/article. Html?id=32536.
 
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF LAW SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Velibekov M.S.
Сonstitutional and juridical aspects of the institutionalization of constitutional referendum
Purpose: The goal is to disclose the сonstitutional and juridical features of decisions made in a constitutional referendum and their impact on.
Methodology: Historical legal and formal legal methods.
Results: In this article theoretical problems of development of such form of constitutional lawmaking as a referendum are considered; A distinction was drawn between ordinary and constitutional types of referendums; The tendency of replacement by referendum of decisions of representative institutions in the process of сonstitutional and juridical reform of the state structure is shown; The evaluation of the role of direct democracy in the dynamics of the system of state institutions of the developed countries of Western Europe is given.
Novelty/originality/value: The novelty of the research consists in raising the question of the scope of the competence of direct democracy in the sphere of сonstitutional and juridical reform of modern democratic systems; Originality consists in a differentiated approach to assessing the сonstitutional and juridical significance of different types of referendums.
Keywords: constitutional law, Вasic Law, the referendum, the direct democracy.
References (transliterated)
1. Budge I. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.
2. Direct Democracy: the Eastern and Central European Experience / A. Auer and M. Bützer (eds). Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.
3. Eisenberg A. When (if Ever) Are Referendums on Minority Rights Fair? / Representation and Democratic Theory / D. Laycock (ed). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2004.
4. Hart H.L.A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.
5. Haskell J. Direct Democracy or Representative Government? Dispelling the Populist Myth. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001.
6. Kelsen H. Allgemeine Theorie der Normen / K. Ringhofer and R. Walter (eds). Vienna: Manz, 1979.
7. Mendelsohn M., Parkin A. Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
8. Qvortrup M. A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.
9. Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy / D. Butler, A. Ranney (eds). Hampshire: Macmillan, 1994.
10. Setälä M. Referendums and Democratic Government. N.Y.: St Martin’s, 1999.
11. The Referendum Experience in Europe / M. Gallagher, P. Uleri (eds). L.: Palgrave/MacMillan, 1996.
12. Elinek G. Obshhee uchenie o gosudarstve. SPb.: Jurid. centr Press, 2004.
13. Chambers S. Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy // Constellations. 2004. Vol. 11. № 2.
14. Mironov M.A. Suverenen li suveren? // Pravovaja kul’tura. 2014. № 3 (18).
15. Cherepanov V.A. O narodovlastii v Rossii: prodolzhenie diskussii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2014. № 1.
16. Rudenko V.N. Konstitucionno-pravovye problemy prjamoj demokratii v sovremennom obshhestve: dis. ... d-ra jurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2003.
17. Shmelev A.V. Referendum kak ob#ekt teoretiko-pravovogo issledovanija: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Saratov, 2006.
 
EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCE
Romanov A.N., Slukin S.V.
Features of application of procedures of bankruptcy to the insolvent individual entrepreneur
Purpose: A research of features of application of procedures of bankruptcy to the insolvent individual entrepreneur.
Methodology: Authors used formall-legal method.
Results: In article separate features of application of procedures of a bankrostvo to the insolvent individual entrepreneur in compliance with the Russian legislation are considered.
Novelty/originality/value: Article has a certain scientific value, and high practical value as in her the urgent legal problem is considered and significant practical recommendations are formulated.
Keywords: insolvency, bankruptcy, the individual entrepreneur, payments in the budget, solvency of the debtor.
References (transliterated)
1. Vitrjanskij V.V. Nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij (postatejnyj) k Federal’nomu Zakonu «O nesostojatel’nosti (bankrotstve)». M.: Statut, 2013.
2. Gubin E.P. Predprinimatel’skoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii. M.: Norma-M-Infra, 2003. S. 68.
3. Nikitin E. Pravovoj status grazhdanina-predprinimatelja bez obrazovanija juridicheskogo lica // Rossijskaja justicija. 2003. № 12. S. 16–21.
4. Sadikova O.N. Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii, chasti pervoj (postatejnyj). 3-e izd., isprav., dop. i pererab. M.: INFRA-M, 2012.
5. Suhanov E.A. Grazhdanskoe pravo: v 2 t. M.: Volters Kluver, 2007.
6. Himichev V.A. Osushhestvlenie i zashhita grazhdanskih prav pri nesostojatel’nosti (bankrotstve). M.: Statut, 2006. S. 117–118.
 
EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCE
Rakhimov E.Kh.
Some features of implementation public procurement through call for quotes
Purpose: To solve some applied problems arising in the course of purchases in the manner of requesting quotations.
Methodology: Formal-legal and comparative methods, analysis, synthesis were used.
Results: The analysis of the problematic issues arising in the course of purchases by the method of requesting quotations, suggested recommendations for minimizing the risks of prosecution associated with the application of this method of procurement.
Novelty/originality/value: The most topical issues encountered in the implementation of a request for quotations have been identified, their systematization has been carried out depending on the stage of procurement, which facilitates the use of relevant recommendations.
Keywords: Contract system, request for quotations, procurement, state needs, competition.
References (transliterated)
1. Kosheleva V.V. Osnovnye narushenija pri provedenii zaprosa kotirovok [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://roszakupki.ru/upload/iblock/648/Kosheleva.pdf.
2. Lobanova O.L. Zapros kotirovok: javnye dostoinstva ili skrytye nedostatki? // Sovetnik buhgaltera gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo uchrezhdenija. 2015. № 12 (132). S. 18–26.
3. Pis’mo Minjekonomrazvitija Rossii ot 19.08.2014 № D28i-1616. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’-tantPljus».
4. Pis’mo Minjekonomrazvitija Rossii ot 25.06.2015 № D28i-1916. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul’-tantPljus».

НОВОСТИ

Группа ВКонтакте

 

Лицензия Creative Commons
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.